Skip to content

A Phase II Study of Bermekimab (MABp1) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

A Phase II, Open Label, Dose Escalation Study of Bermekimab (MABp1) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03496974
Enrollment
38
Registered
2018-04-12
Start date
2018-05-21
Completion date
2018-12-11
Last updated
2021-03-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atopic Dermatitis

Brief summary

A Phase 2 study of Bermekimab (MABp1) in patients with atopic dermatitis.

Detailed description

A Phase 2, Open Label, Dose Escalation Study of Bermekimab (MABp1) in Patients with Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis. The study is multi center and will consist of two dose levels: Group A (n=9): patients will receive a total of 4 x 200mg subcutaneous injections of bermekimab. Dosing will occur weekly from visit 1 to visit 4, inclusive. Group B (n=20): patients will receive a total of 8 x 400 mg subcutaneous injections of bermedimkb. Dosing will occur weekly from visit 1 to visit 8, inclusive.

Interventions

DRUGBermekimab Monoclonal Antibody 200 mg

200 mg subcutaneous injection

400 mg subcutaneous injection

Sponsors

Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Written informed consent provided by the patient * Age 18 years or greater * Chronic Atopic Dermatitis present for at least 3 years * Disease is not responsive to topical medications, or for whom topical treatments are not indicated or desired. * Willing and able to comply with all clinic visits and study-related procedures * EASI score ≥16 at screening and baseline visits * IGA score ≥3 at screening and baseline visits * ≥10% body surface area (BSA) of AD involvement at screening and baseline visits * Documented recent history (within 6 months before the screening visit) of inadequate response to treatment with topical medications or for whom topical treatments are otherwise medically inadvisable or undesired.

Exclusion criteria

* Treatment with an investigational drug within 8 weeks of baseline visit * Having received the following treatments within 4 weeks before the baseline visit, or any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to require such treatment(s) during the first 4 weeks of study treatment: 1. Immunosuppressive/immunomodulating drugs (eg, systemic corticosteroids, cyclosporine, mycophenolate-mofetil, IFN-γ, Janus kinase inhibitors, azathioprine, methotrexate, etc.) 2. Phototherapy for AD * Treatment with topical corticosteroids (TCS) or topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI) within 1 week before the baseline visit * Initiation of treatment during the screening period with prescription moisturizers or moisturizers containing additives such as ceramide, hyaluronic acid, urea, or filaggrin degradation products during the screening period (patients may continue using stable doses of such moisturizers if initiated before the screening visit) * Regular use (more than 2 visits per week) of a tanning booth/parlor within 4 weeks of the screening visit. * History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions to monoclonal antibodies. * Administration of any live (attenuated) vaccine within 4 weeks prior to the baseline. * Any history of dysplasia or history of malignancy (including lymphoma and leukemia) other than a successfully treated non-metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma or localized carcinoma in situ of the cervix * Active chronic or acute infection requiring treatment with systemic antibiotics, antivirals, antiparasitics, antiprotozoals, or antifungals within 2 weeks before the baseline visit, or superficial skin infections within 1 week before the baseline visit. NOTE: patients may be rescreened after infection resolves * Known or suspected history of immunosuppression, including history of invasive opportunistic infections (eg, tuberculosis \[TB\], histoplasmosis, listeriosis, coccidioidomycosis, pneumocystosis, aspergillosis) despite infection resolution: or unusually frequent, recurrent, or prolonged infections, per investigator judgment * History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or positive HIV serology at screening * Positive with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or hepatitis C antibody at the screening visit * Presence of skin comorbidities that may interfere with study assessments * Severe concomitant illness(es) that, in the investigator's judgment, would adversely affect the patient's participation in the study. Examples include, but are not limited to, patients with short life expectancy, patients with uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c ≥ 9%), patients with cardiovascular conditions (eg, stage III or IV cardiac failure according to the New York Heart Association classification), severe renal conditions (eg, patients on dialysis), hepato-biliary conditions (eg, Child-Pugh class B or C), neurological conditions (eg, demyelinating diseases), active major autoimmune diseases (eg, lupus, inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatoid arthritis, etc.), other severe endocrinological, gastrointestinal, metabolic, pulmonary or lymphatic diseases. The specific justification for patients excluded under this criterion will be noted in study documents (chart notes, case report forms \[CRFs\], etc.) * Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or women planning to become pregnant or breastfeed during the study * Where relevant, women unwilling to use adequate birth control

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)From Visit 1 (Post-injection) until 7 days after the last administration of the study drug.Safety and tolerability endpoints were evaluated by monitoring all the adverse events from clinical and laboratory reporting, vital signs, physical examinations, ECG and urinalysis. All the Adverse Events that the subjects experienced from Visit 1 Day 1 (Post-injection) until 7 days after the last administration of the study drug were captured in the clinical database. AEs are coded using medical dictionary - MedDRA Version 21.0 and the severity was assigned using CTCAE version 4.03.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pharmacokinetics (PK) Assessment at Week 7Group A: Week 4; Group B: Week 7An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has been developed to specifically measure bermekimab levels in human plasma. Blood will be drawn into a single 6 ml Na-Heparin collection tube at each PK collection time point. These samples will be collected per the study lab manual and immediately shipped to the Sponsor for PK analysis. The PK samples will also be used to test for the presence of antibodies against bermekimab. PK sample collection time points are as follows: Group A: Pre-dose at visits 1-5; visit 5 is reported Group B: Pre-dose at visit 1, visit 3, visit 5 and visit 8; visit 8 is reported
Number of Patients Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Response (0 or 1) at Week 7Group A: Week 4; Group B: Week 7IGA assesses disease severity and clinical response using a 5-point scale: 0 = clear, 1= almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe. The score is determined by ranking the extent of erythema and population/infiltration. A clinical response to therapy will be an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Patients receiving more than one treatment with additional medication for AD exacerbation during the study or who are missing IGA scores at visit 8 (week 7) will be treated as non-responders. For the 200 mg group, IGA was recorded at visits 1,3, and 5; visit 5 is reported. For the 400 mg group, IGA was recorded at visits 1-8, visit 8 was reported.
Number of Patients Achieving ≥2 IGA Score Reduction at Week 7Group A: Week 4; Group B: Week 7IGA assesses disease severity and clinical response using a 5-point scale: 0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe. The score is determined by ranking the extent of erythema and papulation/infiltration. A clinical response to therapy will be an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear).
Change in Peak Weekly Averaged Pruritus Numerical Rating Scores (Overall Itch) From Baseline to Week 7Group A: Baseline to Week 4; Group B: Baseline to Week 7The NRS rating system captures the intensity of patient's itch, both maximum and average intensity over a 24-hour period. The following question was presented to patients: How would you rate your itch at the worst moment and on average during the previous 24 hours a scale of 0-10 (0=no itch and 10=worst possible itch)?
Change in Peak Weekly Averaged Pruritus Numerical Rating Scores (Worst Moment Itch) From Baseline to Week 7Group A: Baseline to Week 4; Group B: Baseline to Week 7The NRS rating system captures the intensity of patient's itch, both maximum and average intensity over a 24-hour period. The following question was presented to patients: How would you rate your itch at the worst moment and on average during the previous 24 hours a scale of 0-10 (0=no itch and 10=worst possible itch)?
Change in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score From Baseline to Week 7Group A: Baseline to Week 4; Group B: Baseline to Week 7SCORAD was developed by the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis. (Severity scoring of Atopic Dermatitis: the SCORAD index), as a measure of disease severity in AD. It includes assessment of the eczema in addition to patient-reported symptoms. Total score ranges from 0 to 103 (no disease to most severe disease, respectively).
Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score, From Baseline to Week 7 (or Last Visit)Group A: Baseline to Week 4; Group B: Baseline to Week 7EASI score will assess severity and extent of AD with respect to erythema, excoriation, infiltration and lichenification at 4 anatomic sites of the body: lower and upper extremities, trunk and head. The total EASI score shall be in a range of 0 to 72 points (from no disease to maximum disease severity, respectively). Group A: Change= (Baseline - Week 4 score); Group B: Change= (Baseline - Week 7 score)
Number of Patients Achieving 50% or Greater Reduction in SCORAD Score at Week 7Group A: Week 4; Group B: Week 7Calculated as per description in Outcome 8.
Change in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Scores From Baseline to Week 7.Group A: Baseline to Week 4; Group B: Baseline to Week 7POEM is a 7-item patient-reported quality of life outcome measure based on a questionnaire to determine disease symptoms, including bleeding, cracking, dryness, flaking, itching, sleep loss and weeping. The scoring range is from 0 to 28 (no disease to most severe disease, respectively).
Change in Global Individual Signs Score (GISS) From Baseline to Week 7Group A: Baseline to Week 4; Group B: Baseline to Week 7GISS assesses AD lesions for erythema, excoriations, lichenification and edema/papulation. Each component will be rated on a global basis (over the entire body surface rather than region) using a 4-point scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate and 3=severe) according to the EASI grading severity. Total score will range from 0 to 12 (no disease to most severe disease, respectively).
Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) From Baseline to Week 7Group A: Baseline to Week 4; Group B: Baseline to Week 7The DLQI is a 10-item, validated questionnaire used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on QOL. The format is a simple response (0 to 3 where 0 is not at all and 3 is very much) to 10 questions, which assess QOL over the past week, with an overall scoring system of 0 to 30; a high score is indicative of a poor QOL.
Change in HADS (Anxiety) Score From Baseline to Week 7Group A: Baseline to Week 4; Group B: Baseline to Week 7The HADS is a set of fourteen questions to be rated by a patient on a four point (0-3) response category so the possible scores range from 0 to 21 for anxiety and 0 to 21 for depression. Scoring is as follows: (0-7)= Normal (8-10)= Borderline Abnormal (11-21)= Abnormal
Change in HADS (Depression) Score From Baseline to Week 7Group A: Baseline to Week 4; Group B: Baseline to Week 7The HADS is a set of fourteen questions to be rated by a patient on a four point (0-3) response category so the possible scores range from 0 to 21 for anxiety and 0 to 21 for depression. Scoring is as follows: (0-7)= Normal (8-10)= Borderline Abnormal (11-21)= Abnormal
Number of Patients Achieving 50% or Greater Reduction in EASI Score at Week 7Group A: Week 4; Group B: Week 7EASI score will assess severity and extent of AD with respect to erythema, excoriation, infiltration and lichenification at 4 anatomic sites of the body: lower and upper extremities, trunk and head. The total EASI score shall be in a range of 0 to 72 points (from no disease to maximum disease severity, respectively).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group A: 200 mg Cohort
Bermekimab Monoclonal Antibody 200 mg: 200 mg subcutaneous injection
10
Group B: 400 mg Cohort
Bermekimab Monoclonal Antibody 400 mg: 400 mg subcutaneous injection
28
Total38

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup B: 400 mg CohortTotalGroup A: 200 mg Cohort
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
6 Participants8 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
22 Participants30 Participants8 Participants
Age, Continuous48.54 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.14
47.92 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.35
46.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.78
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants6 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
26 Participants31 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants25 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants13 Participants3 Participants
Weight74.76 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.4
75.66 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.2
78.2 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.34

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 100 / 28
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 106 / 28
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 28

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Safety and tolerability endpoints were evaluated by monitoring all the adverse events from clinical and laboratory reporting, vital signs, physical examinations, ECG and urinalysis. All the Adverse Events that the subjects experienced from Visit 1 Day 1 (Post-injection) until 7 days after the last administration of the study drug were captured in the clinical database. AEs are coded using medical dictionary - MedDRA Version 21.0 and the severity was assigned using CTCAE version 4.03.

Time frame: From Visit 1 (Post-injection) until 7 days after the last administration of the study drug.

Population: All subjects who have received at least one dose of bermekimab were included in the safety analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group A: 200 mg CohortNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)3 Participants
Group B: 400 mg CohortNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)6 Participants
Secondary

Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) From Baseline to Week 7

The DLQI is a 10-item, validated questionnaire used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on QOL. The format is a simple response (0 to 3 where 0 is not at all and 3 is very much) to 10 questions, which assess QOL over the past week, with an overall scoring system of 0 to 30; a high score is indicative of a poor QOL.

Time frame: Group A: Baseline to Week 4; Group B: Baseline to Week 7

Population: Number of participants analyzed = participants with DLQI score assessment at specified time-points. Missing values imputed by LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Group A: 200 mg CohortChange in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) From Baseline to Week 7Baseline11.8 score on a scale
Group A: 200 mg CohortChange in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) From Baseline to Week 7Week 4/ Week 76.1 score on a scale
Group A: 200 mg CohortChange in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) From Baseline to Week 7Change5.70 score on a scale
Group B: 400 mg CohortChange in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) From Baseline to Week 7Baseline12.93 score on a scale
Group B: 400 mg CohortChange in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) From Baseline to Week 7Week 4/ Week 74.00 score on a scale
Group B: 400 mg CohortChange in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) From Baseline to Week 7Change8.93 score on a scale
Secondary

Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score, From Baseline to Week 7 (or Last Visit)

EASI score will assess severity and extent of AD with respect to erythema, excoriation, infiltration and lichenification at 4 anatomic sites of the body: lower and upper extremities, trunk and head. The total EASI score shall be in a range of 0 to 72 points (from no disease to maximum disease severity, respectively). Group A: Change= (Baseline - Week 4 score); Group B: Change= (Baseline - Week 7 score)

Time frame: Group A: Baseline to Week 4; Group B: Baseline to Week 7

Population: Number of participants analyzed = participants with EASI score assessment at specified time-points. Missing values imputed by last observation carried forward (LOCF).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Group A: 200 mg CohortChange in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score, From Baseline to Week 7 (or Last Visit)Baseline28.18 score on a scale
Group A: 200 mg CohortChange in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score, From Baseline to Week 7 (or Last Visit)Week 4/ Week 722.73 score on a scale
Group A: 200 mg CohortChange in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score, From Baseline to Week 7 (or Last Visit)Change5.45 score on a scale
Group B: 400 mg CohortChange in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score, From Baseline to Week 7 (or Last Visit)Baseline29.79 score on a scale
Group B: 400 mg CohortChange in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score, From Baseline to Week 7 (or Last Visit)Week 4/ Week 77.35 score on a scale
Group B: 400 mg CohortChange in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score, From Baseline to Week 7 (or Last Visit)Change22.44 score on a scale
Secondary

Change in Global Individual Signs Score (GISS) From Baseline to Week 7

GISS assesses AD lesions for erythema, excoriations, lichenification and edema/papulation. Each component will be rated on a global basis (over the entire body surface rather than region) using a 4-point scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate and 3=severe) according to the EASI grading severity. Total score will range from 0 to 12 (no disease to most severe disease, respectively).

Time frame: Group A: Baseline to Week 4; Group B: Baseline to Week 7

Population: Number of participants analyzed = participants with GISS score assessment at specified time-points. Missing values imputed by LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Group A: 200 mg CohortChange in Global Individual Signs Score (GISS) From Baseline to Week 7Baseline8.4 score on a scale
Group A: 200 mg CohortChange in Global Individual Signs Score (GISS) From Baseline to Week 7Week 4/ Week 77.5 score on a scale
Group A: 200 mg CohortChange in Global Individual Signs Score (GISS) From Baseline to Week 7Change0.9 score on a scale
Group B: 400 mg CohortChange in Global Individual Signs Score (GISS) From Baseline to Week 7Baseline9.64 score on a scale
Group B: 400 mg CohortChange in Global Individual Signs Score (GISS) From Baseline to Week 7Week 4/ Week 74.36 score on a scale
Group B: 400 mg CohortChange in Global Individual Signs Score (GISS) From Baseline to Week 7Change5.28 score on a scale
Secondary

Change in HADS (Anxiety) Score From Baseline to Week 7

The HADS is a set of fourteen questions to be rated by a patient on a four point (0-3) response category so the possible scores range from 0 to 21 for anxiety and 0 to 21 for depression. Scoring is as follows: (0-7)= Normal (8-10)= Borderline Abnormal (11-21)= Abnormal

Time frame: Group A: Baseline to Week 4; Group B: Baseline to Week 7

Population: Number of participants analyzed = participants with HADS score assessment at specified time-points. Missing values imputed by LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Group A: 200 mg CohortChange in HADS (Anxiety) Score From Baseline to Week 7Baseline4.6 score on a scale
Group A: 200 mg CohortChange in HADS (Anxiety) Score From Baseline to Week 7Week 4/ Week 73.2 score on a scale
Group A: 200 mg CohortChange in HADS (Anxiety) Score From Baseline to Week 7Change1.40 score on a scale
Group B: 400 mg CohortChange in HADS (Anxiety) Score From Baseline to Week 7Baseline7.29 score on a scale
Group B: 400 mg CohortChange in HADS (Anxiety) Score From Baseline to Week 7Week 4/ Week 72.64 score on a scale
Group B: 400 mg CohortChange in HADS (Anxiety) Score From Baseline to Week 7Change4.65 score on a scale
Secondary

Change in HADS (Depression) Score From Baseline to Week 7

The HADS is a set of fourteen questions to be rated by a patient on a four point (0-3) response category so the possible scores range from 0 to 21 for anxiety and 0 to 21 for depression. Scoring is as follows: (0-7)= Normal (8-10)= Borderline Abnormal (11-21)= Abnormal

Time frame: Group A: Baseline to Week 4; Group B: Baseline to Week 7

Population: Number of participants analyzed = participants with HADS score assessment at specified time-points. Missing values imputed by LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Group A: 200 mg CohortChange in HADS (Depression) Score From Baseline to Week 7Baseline5.6 score on a scale
Group A: 200 mg CohortChange in HADS (Depression) Score From Baseline to Week 7Week 4/ Week 74.2 score on a scale
Group A: 200 mg CohortChange in HADS (Depression) Score From Baseline to Week 7Change1.40 score on a scale
Group B: 400 mg CohortChange in HADS (Depression) Score From Baseline to Week 7Baseline7.11 score on a scale
Group B: 400 mg CohortChange in HADS (Depression) Score From Baseline to Week 7Week 4/ Week 73.18 score on a scale
Group B: 400 mg CohortChange in HADS (Depression) Score From Baseline to Week 7Change3.93 score on a scale
Secondary

Change in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Scores From Baseline to Week 7.

POEM is a 7-item patient-reported quality of life outcome measure based on a questionnaire to determine disease symptoms, including bleeding, cracking, dryness, flaking, itching, sleep loss and weeping. The scoring range is from 0 to 28 (no disease to most severe disease, respectively).

Time frame: Group A: Baseline to Week 4; Group B: Baseline to Week 7

Population: Number of participants analyzed = participants with POEM score assessment at specified time-points. Missing values imputed by LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Group A: 200 mg CohortChange in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Scores From Baseline to Week 7.Baseline17.3 score on a scale
Group A: 200 mg CohortChange in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Scores From Baseline to Week 7.Week 4/ Week 711.8 score on a scale
Group A: 200 mg CohortChange in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Scores From Baseline to Week 7.Change5.50 score on a scale
Group B: 400 mg CohortChange in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Scores From Baseline to Week 7.Baseline16.82 score on a scale
Group B: 400 mg CohortChange in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Scores From Baseline to Week 7.Week 4/ Week 75.93 score on a scale
Group B: 400 mg CohortChange in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Scores From Baseline to Week 7.Change10.89 score on a scale
Secondary

Change in Peak Weekly Averaged Pruritus Numerical Rating Scores (Overall Itch) From Baseline to Week 7

The NRS rating system captures the intensity of patient's itch, both maximum and average intensity over a 24-hour period. The following question was presented to patients: How would you rate your itch at the worst moment and on average during the previous 24 hours a scale of 0-10 (0=no itch and 10=worst possible itch)?

Time frame: Group A: Baseline to Week 4; Group B: Baseline to Week 7

Population: Number of participants analyzed = participants with pruritus NRS score assessment at specified time-points. Missing values imputed by LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Group A: 200 mg CohortChange in Peak Weekly Averaged Pruritus Numerical Rating Scores (Overall Itch) From Baseline to Week 7Baseline6.50 score on a scale
Group A: 200 mg CohortChange in Peak Weekly Averaged Pruritus Numerical Rating Scores (Overall Itch) From Baseline to Week 7Week 4/ Week 73.66 score on a scale
Group A: 200 mg CohortChange in Peak Weekly Averaged Pruritus Numerical Rating Scores (Overall Itch) From Baseline to Week 7Change2.84 score on a scale
Group B: 400 mg CohortChange in Peak Weekly Averaged Pruritus Numerical Rating Scores (Overall Itch) From Baseline to Week 7Baseline7.91 score on a scale
Group B: 400 mg CohortChange in Peak Weekly Averaged Pruritus Numerical Rating Scores (Overall Itch) From Baseline to Week 7Week 4/ Week 72.51 score on a scale
Group B: 400 mg CohortChange in Peak Weekly Averaged Pruritus Numerical Rating Scores (Overall Itch) From Baseline to Week 7Change5.4 score on a scale
Secondary

Change in Peak Weekly Averaged Pruritus Numerical Rating Scores (Worst Moment Itch) From Baseline to Week 7

The NRS rating system captures the intensity of patient's itch, both maximum and average intensity over a 24-hour period. The following question was presented to patients: How would you rate your itch at the worst moment and on average during the previous 24 hours a scale of 0-10 (0=no itch and 10=worst possible itch)?

Time frame: Group A: Baseline to Week 4; Group B: Baseline to Week 7

Population: Number of participants analyzed = participants with pruritus NRS score assessment at specified time-points. Missing values imputed by LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Group A: 200 mg CohortChange in Peak Weekly Averaged Pruritus Numerical Rating Scores (Worst Moment Itch) From Baseline to Week 7Baseline6.8 score on a scale
Group A: 200 mg CohortChange in Peak Weekly Averaged Pruritus Numerical Rating Scores (Worst Moment Itch) From Baseline to Week 7Week 4/ Week 73.71 score on a scale
Group A: 200 mg CohortChange in Peak Weekly Averaged Pruritus Numerical Rating Scores (Worst Moment Itch) From Baseline to Week 7Change3.09 score on a scale
Group B: 400 mg CohortChange in Peak Weekly Averaged Pruritus Numerical Rating Scores (Worst Moment Itch) From Baseline to Week 7Baseline7.96 score on a scale
Group B: 400 mg CohortChange in Peak Weekly Averaged Pruritus Numerical Rating Scores (Worst Moment Itch) From Baseline to Week 7Week 4/ Week 72.34 score on a scale
Group B: 400 mg CohortChange in Peak Weekly Averaged Pruritus Numerical Rating Scores (Worst Moment Itch) From Baseline to Week 7Change5.62 score on a scale
Secondary

Change in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score From Baseline to Week 7

SCORAD was developed by the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis. (Severity scoring of Atopic Dermatitis: the SCORAD index), as a measure of disease severity in AD. It includes assessment of the eczema in addition to patient-reported symptoms. Total score ranges from 0 to 103 (no disease to most severe disease, respectively).

Time frame: Group A: Baseline to Week 4; Group B: Baseline to Week 7

Population: Number of participants analyzed = participants with SCORAD score assessment at specified time-points. Missing values imputed by LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Group A: 200 mg CohortChange in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score From Baseline to Week 7Baseline59.44 score on a scale
Group A: 200 mg CohortChange in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score From Baseline to Week 7Week 4/ Week 748.4 score on a scale
Group A: 200 mg CohortChange in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score From Baseline to Week 7Change11.04 score on a scale
Group B: 400 mg CohortChange in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score From Baseline to Week 7Baseline70.80 score on a scale
Group B: 400 mg CohortChange in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score From Baseline to Week 7Week 4/ Week 726.10 score on a scale
Group B: 400 mg CohortChange in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score From Baseline to Week 7Change44.70 score on a scale
Secondary

Number of Patients Achieving ≥2 IGA Score Reduction at Week 7

IGA assesses disease severity and clinical response using a 5-point scale: 0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe. The score is determined by ranking the extent of erythema and papulation/infiltration. A clinical response to therapy will be an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear).

Time frame: Group A: Week 4; Group B: Week 7

Population: Number of participants analyzed = participants with IGA score assessment at specified time-points. Missing values imputed by LOCF.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group A: 200 mg CohortNumber of Patients Achieving ≥2 IGA Score Reduction at Week 71 Participants
Group B: 400 mg CohortNumber of Patients Achieving ≥2 IGA Score Reduction at Week 711 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients Achieving 50% or Greater Reduction in EASI Score at Week 7

EASI score will assess severity and extent of AD with respect to erythema, excoriation, infiltration and lichenification at 4 anatomic sites of the body: lower and upper extremities, trunk and head. The total EASI score shall be in a range of 0 to 72 points (from no disease to maximum disease severity, respectively).

Time frame: Group A: Week 4; Group B: Week 7

Population: Number of participants analyzed = participants with EASI score assessment at specified time-points. Missing values imputed by LOCF.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group A: 200 mg CohortNumber of Patients Achieving 50% or Greater Reduction in EASI Score at Week 72 Participants
Group B: 400 mg CohortNumber of Patients Achieving 50% or Greater Reduction in EASI Score at Week 723 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients Achieving 50% or Greater Reduction in SCORAD Score at Week 7

Calculated as per description in Outcome 8.

Time frame: Group A: Week 4; Group B: Week 7

Population: Number of participants analyzed = participants with SCORAD score assessment at specified time-points. Missing values imputed by LOCF.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group A: 200 mg CohortNumber of Patients Achieving 50% or Greater Reduction in SCORAD Score at Week 71 Participants
Group B: 400 mg CohortNumber of Patients Achieving 50% or Greater Reduction in SCORAD Score at Week 721 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Response (0 or 1) at Week 7

IGA assesses disease severity and clinical response using a 5-point scale: 0 = clear, 1= almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe. The score is determined by ranking the extent of erythema and population/infiltration. A clinical response to therapy will be an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Patients receiving more than one treatment with additional medication for AD exacerbation during the study or who are missing IGA scores at visit 8 (week 7) will be treated as non-responders. For the 200 mg group, IGA was recorded at visits 1,3, and 5; visit 5 is reported. For the 400 mg group, IGA was recorded at visits 1-8, visit 8 was reported.

Time frame: Group A: Week 4; Group B: Week 7

Population: All subjects who have received at least one dose of bermekimab were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group A: 200 mg CohortNumber of Patients Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Response (0 or 1) at Week 70 Participants
Group B: 400 mg CohortNumber of Patients Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Response (0 or 1) at Week 77 Participants
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics (PK) Assessment at Week 7

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has been developed to specifically measure bermekimab levels in human plasma. Blood will be drawn into a single 6 ml Na-Heparin collection tube at each PK collection time point. These samples will be collected per the study lab manual and immediately shipped to the Sponsor for PK analysis. The PK samples will also be used to test for the presence of antibodies against bermekimab. PK sample collection time points are as follows: Group A: Pre-dose at visits 1-5; visit 5 is reported Group B: Pre-dose at visit 1, visit 3, visit 5 and visit 8; visit 8 is reported

Time frame: Group A: Week 4; Group B: Week 7

Population: Number of participants analyzed = participants with pk analysis data at specified time-point. Missing values were not included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Group A: 200 mg CohortPharmacokinetics (PK) Assessment at Week 712.6 (μg/mL)
Group B: 400 mg CohortPharmacokinetics (PK) Assessment at Week 747.1 (μg/mL)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026