Nicotine Dependence
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to measure the individual and combined influence of electronic cigarette (ECIG) heating element resistance and liquid nicotine concentration on ECIG acute effects. Thirty-two experienced ECIG users will complete four independent laboratory sessions that will differ by heater resistance (0.5 ohm or 1.5 ohm) and liquid nicotine concentration (3 or 8 mg/ml). Other factors such as voltage, liquid solvent ratio, and liquid flavor will be held constant. Plasma nicotine concentration, subjective effects, and puffing behavior will be recorded for each condition.
Detailed description
Electronic cigarettes (ECIGs) are a popular and rapidly evolving class of products. ECIG users can manipulate several device features including liquid nicotine concentration (mg/ml) and heating element resistance (ohms). An emerging class of ECIG models includes sub-Ohm devices that employ low resistance heaters that are often used to achieve high device power. Some clinical laboratory data suggest that high power devices deliver nicotine to the user effectively, even when paired with a low liquid nicotine concentration. However, given that ECIG heater resistance and liquid nicotine concentration have not been manipulated in clinical laboratory studies, the influence of these factors on ECIG acute effects remain unclear. The purpose of this clinical laboratory study is to measure the influence of heater resistance and liquid nicotine concentration on ECIG acute effects. Participants will attend the lab for four experimental sessions where they use an ECIG. For each session, the participants will be randomly assigned (like the flip of a coin) to receive an ECIG with one of two different levels of heating coil resistance (which will determine overall device power) and one of two different liquid nicotine concentrations. The four sessions will begin at approximately the same time each day, will be separated by at least 48 hours, and will not occur more than two times per week. The primary hypotheses are that the low resistance heater paired with the 8 mg/ml liquid nicotine concentration, will result in greater nicotine delivery and subjective effect profiles, suggestive of higher abuse potential. Results from this study will further our understanding of the factors that influence the dependence potential of ECIGs and could inform future regulation of these devices.
Interventions
OTHERECIG Session
Participants will complete four sessions using an e-cigarette, including a 10-puff product use bout followed by a 60-minute ad lib bout over an approximately 4-hour period. The study conditions for each session (i.e., heater resistance and nicotine combinations) will be Latin-square ordered.
Sponsors
Virginia Commonwealth University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Willing to provide informed consent, attend the lab and abstain from nicotine/tobacco as required, and use designated products according to study protocol * Experienced ECIG users (use ≥1 ml of ECIG solution daily, use ECIG solution with a nicotine concentration ≥3 mg/ml, and have used their ECIG for ≥3 months) * Urine cotinine test result ≥ 3
Exclusion criteria
* History of organ-related diseases or current psychiatric condition * Regular use of prescription medication other than vitamins or birth control * Past month use of cocaine, opioids, benzodiazepines, or methamphetamine * Using marijuana greater than 10 days in the past 30 and/or alcohol greater than 25 days in the past 30 days * Pregnant or breastfeeding women * Weight less than 110 pounds * Daily use of \>5 cigarettes or use of other tobacco products (i.e., hookah, cigars) \>3 times a week
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Cmax: Plasma nicotine concentration (ng/ml) | Six blood samples are collected at each of the 4 visits. During each session, blood samples are collected 90,100,160,185,205,225 minutes into the session which lasts approximately 4 hours. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Withdrawal suppression: Direct effects of nicotine scale | Collected six times at each of the 4 visits. During each session, questions are collected 90,100,160,185,205,225 minutes into the session which lasts approximately 4 hours. | Contains 9-items. Administered on a computerized visual analogue scale that consists of a phrase centered on a horizontal line with not at all on the left and extremely on the right.. Responses range from 0-100. |
| Withdrawal suppression: Tiffany Drobes Questionnaire of Smoking Urges | Collected six times at each of the 4 visits. During each session, questions are collected 90,100,160,185,205,225 minutes into the session which lasts approximately 4 hours. | Contains 10 items. Participants will be asked to rate each phrase on a 7-point scale ranging from 0 (Strongly disagree) to 7 (Strongly agree). The items from this scale will form two factors: Factor 1 (intention to smoke) and Factor 2 (anticipation of relief from abstinence symptoms). |
| Withdrawal suppression: Direct effects of ECIG use scale | Collected six times at each of the 4 visits. During each session, questions are collected 90,100,160,185,205,225 minutes into the session which lasts approximately 4 hours. | Contains 14-items. Administered on a computerized visual analogue scale that consists of a phrase centered on a horizontal line with not at all on the left and extremely on the right. Responses range from 0-100. |
| Other subjective effects: General Labeled Magnitude Scale | Collected six times at each of the 4 visits. During each session, questions are collected 90,100,160,185,205,225 minutes into the session which lasts approximately 4 hours. | Contains 4-items. This category-ratio scale contains seven semantic labels that increase in sensitivity including: no sensation, barely detectable, weak, moderate, strong, very strong, and strongest imaginable sensation of any kind. Responses will be coded on a 0-100 scale. |
| Withdrawal suppression: Hughes-Hatsukami Withdrawal Scale | Collected six times at each of the 4 visits. During each session, questions are collected 90,100,160,185,205,225 minutes into the session which lasts approximately 4 hours. | Contains 11 items. Administered on a computerized visual analogue scale that consists of a phrase centered on a horizontal line with not at all on the left and extremely on the right.. Responses range from 0-100. |
| Puff Topography: puff duration | Collected twice at each of the 4 visits. During each session, puff duration is measured at 95 and 225 minutes. | Puff duration is the measurement of the length of participant puffs in seconds during a 10-puff directed puffing bout (lasting 5-minutes) and during the 60-minute ad libitum bout where participants are instructed to puff as much or as little as they like on the ECIG. |
| Puff Topography: puff volume | Collected twice at each of the 4 visits. During each session, puff duration is measured at 95 and 225 minutes. | Puff volume is the measurement of the size of participant puffs in milliliters during a 10-puff directed puffing bout (lasting 5-minutes) and during the 60-minute ad libitum bout where participants are instructed to puff as much or as little as they like on the ECIG. |
| Puff Topography: puff velocity | Collected twice at each of the 4 visits. During each session, puff duration is measured at 95 and 225 minutes. | Puff velocity is the measurement of the speed of participant puffs in milliliters per second during a 10-puff directed puffing bout (lasting 5-minutes) and during the 60-minute ad libitum bout where participants are instructed to puff as much or as little as they like on the ECIG. |
| Other subjective effects: Labeled Hedonic Scale | Collected six times at each of the 4 visits. During each session, questions are collected 90,100,160,185,205,225 minutes into the session which lasts approximately 4 hours. | Contains 4-items. This category-ratio scale contains ten semantic labels, intended to assess participant liking or disliking of sensations experienced in the general labeled magnitude scale.. Semantic labels include: most liked sensation imaginable, like extremely, like very much, like moderately, like slightly, dislike slightly, dislike moderately, dislike very much, dislike extremely and most disliked sensation imaginable. Responses will be coded on a 0-100 scale. |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed