Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of BIIB111 for the Treatment of Choroideremia

A Randomised, Open Label, Outcomes-Assessor Masked, Prospective, Parallel Controlled Group, Phase 3 Clinical Trial of Retinal Gene Therapy for Choroideremia Using an Adeno-Associated Viral Vector (AAV2) Encoding Rab Escort Protein 1 (REP1)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03496012
Acronym
STAR
Enrollment
169
Registered
2018-04-12
Start date
2017-12-11
Completion date
2020-12-01
Last updated
2023-12-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Choroideremia

Keywords

NightstaRx, NSR-REP1, Gene Therapy, AAV, REP1, Timrepigene Emparvovec

Brief summary

The objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single sub-retinal injection of BIIB111 in participants with choroideremia (CHM).

Detailed description

This study was previously posted by NightstaRx Ltd. In October 2020, sponsorship of the trial was transferred to Biogen.

Interventions

GENETICBIIB111

Administered as specified in the treatment arm.

Sponsors

Biogen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Are willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study. * Have a documented genetically-confirmed diagnosis of CHM. * Have active disease clinically visible within the macular region in the study eye. * Have a BCVA of 34-73 ETDRS letters (equivalent to worse than or equal to 6/12 or 20/40 Snellen acuity, but better than or equal to 6/60 or 20/200 Snellen acuity) in the study eye. Key

Exclusion criteria

* Have a history of amblyopia in the eligible eye. * Have had previous intraocular surgery performed in the study eye within 3 months of Visit 1. * Have any other significant ocular or non-ocular disease/disorder which, in the opinion of the investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the study, or may influence the results of the study, or the participant's ability to participate in the study. * Have participated in another research study involving an investigational product in the past 12 weeks or received a gene/cell-based therapy at any time previously. * Are unwilling to use barrier contraception methods, or abstain from sexual intercourse, for a period of 3 months, if treated with AAV2-REP1. NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With a ≥15 -Letter Improvement From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Month 12 as Measured by the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) ChartMonth 12BCVA was assessed for both eyes using the ETDRS visual acuity (VA) chart. BCVA test should be performed prior to pupil dilation, and distance refraction should be carried out before BCVA is measured. Initially, letters are read at a distance of 4 meters from the chart. If \<20 letters are read at 4 meters, testing at 1 meter should be performed. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or VA). Percentage of participants with a ≥15 -letter improvement from baseline in BCVA at Month 12 was reported for both eyes.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in BCVA at Month 12 Reported as Letters Measured by the ETDRS Chart in Study EyeBaseline, Month 12BCVA was assessed for study eye using the ETDRS VA chart. BCVA test should be performed prior to pupil dilation, and distance refraction should be carried out before BCVA is measured. Initially, letters are read at a distance of 4 meters from the chart. If \<20 letters are read at 4 meters, testing at 1 meter should be performed. BCVA was reported as number of letters read correctly by the participant using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or VA). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. Here negative values indicate decline in BCVA.
Percentage of Participants With a ≥10 -Letter Improvement From Baseline in BCVA at Month 12 Measured by the ETDRS ChartMonth 12BCVA was assessed for both eyes using the ETDRS VA chart. BCVA test should be performed prior to pupil dilation, and distance refraction should be carried out before BCVA is measured. Initially, letters are read at a distance of 4 meters from the chart. If \<20 letters are read at 4 meters, testing at 1 meter should be performed. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or VA). Percentage of participants with a ≥10 -letter improvement from baseline in BCVA at Month 12 was reported for both eyes.
Percentage of Participants With No Decrease From Baseline in BCVA or a Decrease From Baseline in BCVA of <5 ETDRS Letters at Month 12 Measured by the EDRS ChartMonth 12BCVA was assessed for both eyes using the ETDRS VA chart. BCVA test should be performed prior to pupil dilation, and distance refraction should be carried out before BCVA is measured. Initially, letters are read at a distance of 4 meters from the chart. If \<20 letters are read at 4 meters, testing at 1 meter should be performed. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or VA). Percentage of participants with no decrease or a decrease of \<5 letters from baseline in BCVA at Month 12 was reported for both eyes.
Change From Baseline in BCVA at Months 4 and 8 Reported as Letters Measured by the ETDRS ChartBaseline, Months 4 and 8BCVA was assessed for both eyes using the ETDRS VA chart. BCVA test should be performed prior to pupil dilation, and distance refraction should be carried out before BCVA is measured. Initially, letters are read at a distance of 4 meters from the chart. If \<20 letters are read at 4 meters, testing at 1 meter should be performed. BCVA was reported as number of letters read correctly by the participant using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in both the study and fellow eyes. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or VA). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. Here negative values indicate decline in BCVA.
Change From Baseline in Total Area of Preserved Autofluorescence (AF) at Month 12 in Study EyeBaseline, Month 12Fundus AF was used to assess change in total area of preserved AF. Areas of preserved AF were identified as well-demarcated regions of relative hyper AF compared with the background areas of surrounding atrophy. A negative change from baseline indicate decline in total area of preserved AF.
Change From Baseline in Distance From Foveal Center to Nearest Border of Preserved AF at Month 12 in Study EyeBaseline, Month 12Fundus AF was used to assess change in distance from foveal center (FC) to nearest border of preserved AF. A negative change from baseline indicate decline in distance from FC to nearest border of AF.
Change From Baseline in the Foveal Subfield Thickness Using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) at Month 12 in Study EyeBaseline, Month 12SD-OCT was used to assess change in foveal subfield thickness. The measurements were taken after dilation of the participant's pupil. A negative change from baseline indicates decline in foveal subfield thickness.
Change From Baseline in the Total Macular Volume Using SD-OCT at Month 12 in Study EyeBaseline, Month 12SD-OCT was used to assess change in total macular volume. The measurements were taken after dilation of the participant's pupil. A negative change from baseline indicates decline in total macular volume.
Change From Baseline in the Central Horizontal Ellipsoid Width Using SD-OCT at Month 12 in Study EyeBaseline, Month 12SD-OCT was used to assess change in central horizontal ellipsoid width. The measurements were taken after dilation of the participant's pupil. A negative change from baseline indicates decline in central horizontal ellipsoid width.
Change From Baseline in the Central Ellipsoid Area Using SD-OCT at Month 12 in Study EyeBaseline, Month 12SD-OCT was used to assess change in central ellipsoid area. The measurements were taken after dilation of the participant's pupil. A negative change from baseline indicates decline in central ellipsoid area.
Change From Baseline in the Choroidal Thickness Using SD-OCT at Month 12 in Study EyeBaseline, Month 12SD-OCT was used to assess change in choroidal thickness. The measurements were taken after dilation of the participant's pupil. A negative change from baseline indicates decline in choroidal thickness.
Change From Baseline in the Mean Retinal Sensitivity Using Microperimetry at Month 12 in Study EyeBaseline, Month 12Microperimetry was conducted to assess change in mean retinal sensitivity within the macula. Retinal mean sensitivity to light was measured in decibels (dBs) in multiple spots across the central and peripheral retina (entire visual field). Higher numbers (dBs) indicate higher retinal sensitivity. A negative change from baseline indicates decline in retinal sensitivity.
Change From Baseline in the Bivariate Contour Ellipse Area 63% Using Microperimetry at Month 12 in Study EyeBaseline, Month 12Microperimetry was conducted to assess change in bivariate contour ellipse area 63%. A negative change from baseline indicates decline in bivariate contour ellipse area 63%.
Change From Baseline in the Bivariate Contour Ellipse Area 95% Using Microperimetry at Month 12 in Study EyeBaseline, Month 12Microperimetry was conducted to assess change in bivariate contour ellipse area 95%. A negative change from baseline indicates decline in bivariate contour ellipse area 95%.
Change From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity Score at Month 12 in Study EyeBaseline, Month 12Change in contrast sensitivity was assessed by Pelli-Robson chart which uses a single large letter size (20/60 optotype), with contrast varying across groups of letters (6 per line), whose contrast varies from high to low. Participants read letters, starting with highest contrast, until they are unable to read 2 or 3 letters in a single group. Each group had three letters of the same contrast level, so there were three trials per contrast level. Score is assigned based on contrast of last group in which 2 or 3 letters were correctly read. Score is a measure of participant's log contrast sensitivity ranging from 0 (no letters read) to 2.25 (all letters read). Total CS score=\[(total letters correct-3) x 0.05\]. A negative change from baseline indicates worsening in contrast sensitivity score.
Change From Baseline in Colour Vision Total Error Score at Month 12 in Study EyeBaseline, Month 12Colour vision total error scores were assessed by the Farnsworth Munsell 100 Hue Sort Test. Farnsworth Munsell 100 Hue Test requires placing 100 colour palettes in the correct order based upon colour hue. Scores are determined by the frequency and severity of any displacement in the correct order. One error equates to one misplaced hue, by one step or position. An error score of 0 indicates no errors in ordering the hues while error score greater than 500 indicates virtually no color discrimination. A Total Error Score of 0 to 128 could be seen in a normal population.
Change From Baseline in Reading Speed Test at Month 12 in Study EyeBaseline, Month 12The reading speed (words per minute) was calculated using the following formula: \[number of words in the text - number of misread words\] / reading time x 60. The number of misread words and reading time is collected. A negative change from baseline indicates decline in reading speed.
Change From Baseline in the 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25) Composite Scores at Month 12 in Study EyeBaseline, Month 12VFQ-25 consists of a base set of 25 vision-targeted questions representing 11 vision-related constructs, plus an additional single-item general health rating question. All items are scored so that a high score represents better functioning. Each item is then converted to a 0 to 100 scale so that the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. A score of 0 represents the worst outcome and 100 represents the best outcome. A negative change from baseline indicates decline in VFQ-25 score.

Countries

Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Netherlands, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled at the investigative sites in the United States, Germany, Finland, France, the United Kingdom, Canada, Netherlands, and Denmark from 11 December 2017 to 01 December 2020.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 169 unique male participants with Choroideremia were randomized in the study (66 participants in Untreated Control Group; 34 participants in BIIB111 Low Dose group and 69 participants in BIIB111 High Dose group). Of which, 161 participants completed the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Untreated Control Group
Participants received no sham surgery or study medication to allow for a controlled comparison.
65
BIIB111 Low Dose
Followed by vitrectomy and retinal detachment in the study eye, participants received a single administration of low dose (1 × 10\^10 gp) BIIB111 (timrepigene emparvovec) as a sub-retinal injection on Day 0 (surgery day).
34
BIIB111 High Dose
Followed by vitrectomy and retinal detachment in the study eye, participants received a single administration of high dose (1 × 10\^11 gp) BIIB111 (timrepigene emparvovec) as a sub-retinal injection on Day 0 (surgery day).
65
Total164

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event001
Overall StudyReason Not Specified201
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject202

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicUntreated Control GroupBIIB111 Low DoseBIIB111 High DoseTotal
Age, Continuous49.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.73
49.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.62
47.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.91
48.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.15
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
51 Participants26 Participants54 Participants131 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
11 Participants7 Participants7 Participants25 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Black or African American
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Not Reported
7 Participants4 Participants5 Participants16 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Other
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
55 Participants30 Participants59 Participants144 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
65 Participants34 Participants65 Participants164 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 650 / 340 / 65
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 6530 / 3454 / 65
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 659 / 3411 / 65

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With a ≥15 -Letter Improvement From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Month 12 as Measured by the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Chart

BCVA was assessed for both eyes using the ETDRS visual acuity (VA) chart. BCVA test should be performed prior to pupil dilation, and distance refraction should be carried out before BCVA is measured. Initially, letters are read at a distance of 4 meters from the chart. If \<20 letters are read at 4 meters, testing at 1 meter should be performed. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or VA). Percentage of participants with a ≥15 -letter improvement from baseline in BCVA at Month 12 was reported for both eyes.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants who received the study treatment (or the phone call for those in the untreated control group) and had at least one post-treatment BCVA measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Untreated Control GroupPercentage of Participants With a ≥15 -Letter Improvement From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Month 12 as Measured by the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) ChartStudy Eye0 percentage of participants
Untreated Control GroupPercentage of Participants With a ≥15 -Letter Improvement From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Month 12 as Measured by the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) ChartFellow Eye0 percentage of participants
BIIB111 Low DosePercentage of Participants With a ≥15 -Letter Improvement From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Month 12 as Measured by the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) ChartStudy Eye2.9 percentage of participants
BIIB111 Low DosePercentage of Participants With a ≥15 -Letter Improvement From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Month 12 as Measured by the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) ChartFellow Eye0 percentage of participants
BIIB111 High DosePercentage of Participants With a ≥15 -Letter Improvement From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Month 12 as Measured by the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) ChartStudy Eye4.6 percentage of participants
BIIB111 High DosePercentage of Participants With a ≥15 -Letter Improvement From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Month 12 as Measured by the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) ChartFellow Eye3.1 percentage of participants
p-value: =0.35495% CI: [-3.1, 15]Fisher's Exact
p-value: =0.24595% CI: [-1.4, 12.8]Fisher's Exact
Secondary

Change From Baseline in BCVA at Month 12 Reported as Letters Measured by the ETDRS Chart in Study Eye

BCVA was assessed for study eye using the ETDRS VA chart. BCVA test should be performed prior to pupil dilation, and distance refraction should be carried out before BCVA is measured. Initially, letters are read at a distance of 4 meters from the chart. If \<20 letters are read at 4 meters, testing at 1 meter should be performed. BCVA was reported as number of letters read correctly by the participant using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or VA). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. Here negative values indicate decline in BCVA.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received the study treatment (or the phone call for those in the untreated control group) and had at least one post-treatment BCVA measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Untreated Control GroupChange From Baseline in BCVA at Month 12 Reported as Letters Measured by the ETDRS Chart in Study Eye-2.3 letters
BIIB111 Low DoseChange From Baseline in BCVA at Month 12 Reported as Letters Measured by the ETDRS Chart in Study Eye-1.5 letters
BIIB111 High DoseChange From Baseline in BCVA at Month 12 Reported as Letters Measured by the ETDRS Chart in Study Eye-0.3 letters
Secondary

Change From Baseline in BCVA at Months 4 and 8 Reported as Letters Measured by the ETDRS Chart

BCVA was assessed for both eyes using the ETDRS VA chart. BCVA test should be performed prior to pupil dilation, and distance refraction should be carried out before BCVA is measured. Initially, letters are read at a distance of 4 meters from the chart. If \<20 letters are read at 4 meters, testing at 1 meter should be performed. BCVA was reported as number of letters read correctly by the participant using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in both the study and fellow eyes. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or VA). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. Here negative values indicate decline in BCVA.

Time frame: Baseline, Months 4 and 8

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received the study treatment (or the phone call for those in the untreated control group) and had at least one post-treatment BCVA measurement. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis. 'Number analyzed' indicates the number of participants with data available for analysis at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Untreated Control GroupChange From Baseline in BCVA at Months 4 and 8 Reported as Letters Measured by the ETDRS ChartChange From Baseline at Month 4: Study Eye0.2 lettersStandard Deviation 4.34
Untreated Control GroupChange From Baseline in BCVA at Months 4 and 8 Reported as Letters Measured by the ETDRS ChartChange From Baseline at Month 4: Fellow Eye-1.1 lettersStandard Deviation 8.45
Untreated Control GroupChange From Baseline in BCVA at Months 4 and 8 Reported as Letters Measured by the ETDRS ChartChange From Baseline at Month 8: Fellow Eye-0.4 lettersStandard Deviation 8.31
Untreated Control GroupChange From Baseline in BCVA at Months 4 and 8 Reported as Letters Measured by the ETDRS ChartChange From Baseline at Month 8: Study Eye-0.8 lettersStandard Deviation 4.93
BIIB111 Low DoseChange From Baseline in BCVA at Months 4 and 8 Reported as Letters Measured by the ETDRS ChartChange From Baseline at Month 8: Fellow Eye1.9 lettersStandard Deviation 7.06
BIIB111 Low DoseChange From Baseline in BCVA at Months 4 and 8 Reported as Letters Measured by the ETDRS ChartChange From Baseline at Month 4: Study Eye-0.4 lettersStandard Deviation 14.16
BIIB111 Low DoseChange From Baseline in BCVA at Months 4 and 8 Reported as Letters Measured by the ETDRS ChartChange From Baseline at Month 4: Fellow Eye0.9 lettersStandard Deviation 6.67
BIIB111 Low DoseChange From Baseline in BCVA at Months 4 and 8 Reported as Letters Measured by the ETDRS ChartChange From Baseline at Month 8: Study Eye-1.1 lettersStandard Deviation 13.13
BIIB111 High DoseChange From Baseline in BCVA at Months 4 and 8 Reported as Letters Measured by the ETDRS ChartChange From Baseline at Month 4: Study Eye0.6 lettersStandard Deviation 11.11
BIIB111 High DoseChange From Baseline in BCVA at Months 4 and 8 Reported as Letters Measured by the ETDRS ChartChange From Baseline at Month 8: Study Eye0.1 lettersStandard Deviation 11.71
BIIB111 High DoseChange From Baseline in BCVA at Months 4 and 8 Reported as Letters Measured by the ETDRS ChartChange From Baseline at Month 4: Fellow Eye2.0 lettersStandard Deviation 6.63
BIIB111 High DoseChange From Baseline in BCVA at Months 4 and 8 Reported as Letters Measured by the ETDRS ChartChange From Baseline at Month 8: Fellow Eye1.6 lettersStandard Deviation 5.91
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Colour Vision Total Error Score at Month 12 in Study Eye

Colour vision total error scores were assessed by the Farnsworth Munsell 100 Hue Sort Test. Farnsworth Munsell 100 Hue Test requires placing 100 colour palettes in the correct order based upon colour hue. Scores are determined by the frequency and severity of any displacement in the correct order. One error equates to one misplaced hue, by one step or position. An error score of 0 indicates no errors in ordering the hues while error score greater than 500 indicates virtually no color discrimination. A Total Error Score of 0 to 128 could be seen in a normal population.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received the study treatment (or the phone call for those in the untreated control group) and had at least one post-treatment BCVA measurement. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Untreated Control GroupChange From Baseline in Colour Vision Total Error Score at Month 12 in Study Eye35.0003 score on a scaleStandard Error 23.5973
BIIB111 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Colour Vision Total Error Score at Month 12 in Study Eye43.5915 score on a scaleStandard Error 31.772
BIIB111 High DoseChange From Baseline in Colour Vision Total Error Score at Month 12 in Study Eye54.3777 score on a scaleStandard Error 24.0358
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity Score at Month 12 in Study Eye

Change in contrast sensitivity was assessed by Pelli-Robson chart which uses a single large letter size (20/60 optotype), with contrast varying across groups of letters (6 per line), whose contrast varies from high to low. Participants read letters, starting with highest contrast, until they are unable to read 2 or 3 letters in a single group. Each group had three letters of the same contrast level, so there were three trials per contrast level. Score is assigned based on contrast of last group in which 2 or 3 letters were correctly read. Score is a measure of participant's log contrast sensitivity ranging from 0 (no letters read) to 2.25 (all letters read). Total CS score=\[(total letters correct-3) x 0.05\]. A negative change from baseline indicates worsening in contrast sensitivity score.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received study treatment (phone call for untreated control group) and had at least 1 post-treatment BCVA measurement. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Untreated Control GroupChange From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity Score at Month 12 in Study Eye-0.0595 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.0315
BIIB111 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity Score at Month 12 in Study Eye-0.0130 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.0417
BIIB111 High DoseChange From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity Score at Month 12 in Study Eye-0.0386 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.0304
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Distance From Foveal Center to Nearest Border of Preserved AF at Month 12 in Study Eye

Fundus AF was used to assess change in distance from foveal center (FC) to nearest border of preserved AF. A negative change from baseline indicate decline in distance from FC to nearest border of AF.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received the study treatment (or the phone call for those in the untreated control group) and had at least one post-treatment BCVA measurement. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Untreated Control GroupChange From Baseline in Distance From Foveal Center to Nearest Border of Preserved AF at Month 12 in Study Eye21.7796 micrometers (µm)Standard Error 9.6234
BIIB111 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Distance From Foveal Center to Nearest Border of Preserved AF at Month 12 in Study Eye23.6171 micrometers (µm)Standard Error 12.3765
BIIB111 High DoseChange From Baseline in Distance From Foveal Center to Nearest Border of Preserved AF at Month 12 in Study Eye21.1660 micrometers (µm)Standard Error 9.1863
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Reading Speed Test at Month 12 in Study Eye

The reading speed (words per minute) was calculated using the following formula: \[number of words in the text - number of misread words\] / reading time x 60. The number of misread words and reading time is collected. A negative change from baseline indicates decline in reading speed.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received the study treatment (or the phone call for those in the untreated control group) and had at least one post-treatment BCVA measurement. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Untreated Control GroupChange From Baseline in Reading Speed Test at Month 12 in Study Eye-149.5590 words per minuteStandard Error 10.9857
BIIB111 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Reading Speed Test at Month 12 in Study Eye-122.1333 words per minuteStandard Error 14.3276
BIIB111 High DoseChange From Baseline in Reading Speed Test at Month 12 in Study Eye-127.4706 words per minuteStandard Error 9.911
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25) Composite Scores at Month 12 in Study Eye

VFQ-25 consists of a base set of 25 vision-targeted questions representing 11 vision-related constructs, plus an additional single-item general health rating question. All items are scored so that a high score represents better functioning. Each item is then converted to a 0 to 100 scale so that the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. A score of 0 represents the worst outcome and 100 represents the best outcome. A negative change from baseline indicates decline in VFQ-25 score.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received the study treatment (or the phone call for those in the untreated control group) and had at least one post-treatment BCVA measurement. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Untreated Control GroupChange From Baseline in the 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25) Composite Scores at Month 12 in Study Eye-2.6971 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.2786
BIIB111 Low DoseChange From Baseline in the 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25) Composite Scores at Month 12 in Study Eye1.7236 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.6624
BIIB111 High DoseChange From Baseline in the 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25) Composite Scores at Month 12 in Study Eye0.7964 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.2308
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Bivariate Contour Ellipse Area 63% Using Microperimetry at Month 12 in Study Eye

Microperimetry was conducted to assess change in bivariate contour ellipse area 63%. A negative change from baseline indicates decline in bivariate contour ellipse area 63%.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received the study treatment (or the phone call for those in the untreated control group) and had at least one post-treatment BCVA measurement. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Untreated Control GroupChange From Baseline in the Bivariate Contour Ellipse Area 63% Using Microperimetry at Month 12 in Study Eye-3.2161 square degrees (deg^2)Standard Error 1.2623
BIIB111 Low DoseChange From Baseline in the Bivariate Contour Ellipse Area 63% Using Microperimetry at Month 12 in Study Eye-3.3771 square degrees (deg^2)Standard Error 1.6405
BIIB111 High DoseChange From Baseline in the Bivariate Contour Ellipse Area 63% Using Microperimetry at Month 12 in Study Eye-2.5555 square degrees (deg^2)Standard Error 1.2403
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Bivariate Contour Ellipse Area 95% Using Microperimetry at Month 12 in Study Eye

Microperimetry was conducted to assess change in bivariate contour ellipse area 95%. A negative change from baseline indicates decline in bivariate contour ellipse area 95%.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received the study treatment (or the phone call for those in the untreated control group) and had at least one post-treatment BCVA measurement. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Untreated Control GroupChange From Baseline in the Bivariate Contour Ellipse Area 95% Using Microperimetry at Month 12 in Study Eye-10.1986 deg^2Standard Error 4.1004
BIIB111 Low DoseChange From Baseline in the Bivariate Contour Ellipse Area 95% Using Microperimetry at Month 12 in Study Eye-14.6926 deg^2Standard Error 5.3134
BIIB111 High DoseChange From Baseline in the Bivariate Contour Ellipse Area 95% Using Microperimetry at Month 12 in Study Eye-11.6863 deg^2Standard Error 4.0207
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Central Ellipsoid Area Using SD-OCT at Month 12 in Study Eye

SD-OCT was used to assess change in central ellipsoid area. The measurements were taken after dilation of the participant's pupil. A negative change from baseline indicates decline in central ellipsoid area.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received the study treatment (or the phone call for those in the untreated control group) and had at least one post-treatment BCVA measurement. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Untreated Control GroupChange From Baseline in the Central Ellipsoid Area Using SD-OCT at Month 12 in Study Eye-0.2382 mm^2Standard Error 0.0364
BIIB111 Low DoseChange From Baseline in the Central Ellipsoid Area Using SD-OCT at Month 12 in Study Eye-0.4229 mm^2Standard Error 0.0527
BIIB111 High DoseChange From Baseline in the Central Ellipsoid Area Using SD-OCT at Month 12 in Study Eye-0.3440 mm^2Standard Error 0.0332
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Central Horizontal Ellipsoid Width Using SD-OCT at Month 12 in Study Eye

SD-OCT was used to assess change in central horizontal ellipsoid width. The measurements were taken after dilation of the participant's pupil. A negative change from baseline indicates decline in central horizontal ellipsoid width.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received the study treatment (or the phone call for those in the untreated control group) and had at least one post-treatment BCVA measurement. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Untreated Control GroupChange From Baseline in the Central Horizontal Ellipsoid Width Using SD-OCT at Month 12 in Study Eye-81.9178 µmStandard Error 20.6192
BIIB111 Low DoseChange From Baseline in the Central Horizontal Ellipsoid Width Using SD-OCT at Month 12 in Study Eye-116.3811 µmStandard Error 27.8213
BIIB111 High DoseChange From Baseline in the Central Horizontal Ellipsoid Width Using SD-OCT at Month 12 in Study Eye-170.7214 µmStandard Error 20.4062
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Choroidal Thickness Using SD-OCT at Month 12 in Study Eye

SD-OCT was used to assess change in choroidal thickness. The measurements were taken after dilation of the participant's pupil. A negative change from baseline indicates decline in choroidal thickness.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received the study treatment (or the phone call for those in the untreated control group) and had at least one post-treatment BCVA measurement. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Untreated Control GroupChange From Baseline in the Choroidal Thickness Using SD-OCT at Month 12 in Study Eye-5.4897 µmStandard Error 2.1873
BIIB111 Low DoseChange From Baseline in the Choroidal Thickness Using SD-OCT at Month 12 in Study Eye-7.9579 µmStandard Error 2.9207
BIIB111 High DoseChange From Baseline in the Choroidal Thickness Using SD-OCT at Month 12 in Study Eye-4.6371 µmStandard Error 2.1446
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Foveal Subfield Thickness Using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) at Month 12 in Study Eye

SD-OCT was used to assess change in foveal subfield thickness. The measurements were taken after dilation of the participant's pupil. A negative change from baseline indicates decline in foveal subfield thickness.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received the study treatment (or the phone call for those in the untreated control group) and had at least one post-treatment BCVA measurement. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Untreated Control GroupChange From Baseline in the Foveal Subfield Thickness Using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) at Month 12 in Study Eye-6.3152 µmStandard Error 2.7779
BIIB111 Low DoseChange From Baseline in the Foveal Subfield Thickness Using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) at Month 12 in Study Eye-19.8654 µmStandard Error 3.6998
BIIB111 High DoseChange From Baseline in the Foveal Subfield Thickness Using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) at Month 12 in Study Eye-15.7993 µmStandard Error 2.7233
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Mean Retinal Sensitivity Using Microperimetry at Month 12 in Study Eye

Microperimetry was conducted to assess change in mean retinal sensitivity within the macula. Retinal mean sensitivity to light was measured in decibels (dBs) in multiple spots across the central and peripheral retina (entire visual field). Higher numbers (dBs) indicate higher retinal sensitivity. A negative change from baseline indicates decline in retinal sensitivity.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received the study treatment (or the phone call for those in the untreated control group) and had at least one post-treatment BCVA measurement. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Untreated Control GroupChange From Baseline in the Mean Retinal Sensitivity Using Microperimetry at Month 12 in Study Eye-0.3443 dBsStandard Error 0.1134
BIIB111 Low DoseChange From Baseline in the Mean Retinal Sensitivity Using Microperimetry at Month 12 in Study Eye-0.2965 dBsStandard Error 0.1478
BIIB111 High DoseChange From Baseline in the Mean Retinal Sensitivity Using Microperimetry at Month 12 in Study Eye-0.5015 dBsStandard Error 0.1112
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Total Macular Volume Using SD-OCT at Month 12 in Study Eye

SD-OCT was used to assess change in total macular volume. The measurements were taken after dilation of the participant's pupil. A negative change from baseline indicates decline in total macular volume.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received the study treatment (or the phone call for those in the untreated control group) and had at least one post-treatment BCVA measurement. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Untreated Control GroupChange From Baseline in the Total Macular Volume Using SD-OCT at Month 12 in Study Eye-0.0895 cubic millimeters (mm^3)Standard Error 0.0485
BIIB111 Low DoseChange From Baseline in the Total Macular Volume Using SD-OCT at Month 12 in Study Eye-0.2876 cubic millimeters (mm^3)Standard Error 0.0646
BIIB111 High DoseChange From Baseline in the Total Macular Volume Using SD-OCT at Month 12 in Study Eye-0.2088 cubic millimeters (mm^3)Standard Error 0.0476
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Area of Preserved Autofluorescence (AF) at Month 12 in Study Eye

Fundus AF was used to assess change in total area of preserved AF. Areas of preserved AF were identified as well-demarcated regions of relative hyper AF compared with the background areas of surrounding atrophy. A negative change from baseline indicate decline in total area of preserved AF.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received the study treatment (or the phone call for those in the untreated control group) and had at least one post-treatment BCVA measurement. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' indicates the number of participants with data available for outcome measure analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Untreated Control GroupChange From Baseline in Total Area of Preserved Autofluorescence (AF) at Month 12 in Study Eye-0.3872 square millimeters (mm^2)Standard Error 0.0389
BIIB111 Low DoseChange From Baseline in Total Area of Preserved Autofluorescence (AF) at Month 12 in Study Eye-0.5413 square millimeters (mm^2)Standard Error 0.0501
BIIB111 High DoseChange From Baseline in Total Area of Preserved Autofluorescence (AF) at Month 12 in Study Eye-0.5136 square millimeters (mm^2)Standard Error 0.0371
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a ≥10 -Letter Improvement From Baseline in BCVA at Month 12 Measured by the ETDRS Chart

BCVA was assessed for both eyes using the ETDRS VA chart. BCVA test should be performed prior to pupil dilation, and distance refraction should be carried out before BCVA is measured. Initially, letters are read at a distance of 4 meters from the chart. If \<20 letters are read at 4 meters, testing at 1 meter should be performed. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or VA). Percentage of participants with a ≥10 -letter improvement from baseline in BCVA at Month 12 was reported for both eyes.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received the study treatment (or the phone call for those in the untreated control group) and had at least one post-treatment BCVA measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Untreated Control GroupPercentage of Participants With a ≥10 -Letter Improvement From Baseline in BCVA at Month 12 Measured by the ETDRS ChartStudy Eye1.6 percentage of participants
Untreated Control GroupPercentage of Participants With a ≥10 -Letter Improvement From Baseline in BCVA at Month 12 Measured by the ETDRS ChartFellow Eye0 percentage of participants
BIIB111 Low DosePercentage of Participants With a ≥10 -Letter Improvement From Baseline in BCVA at Month 12 Measured by the ETDRS ChartStudy Eye17.6 percentage of participants
BIIB111 Low DosePercentage of Participants With a ≥10 -Letter Improvement From Baseline in BCVA at Month 12 Measured by the ETDRS ChartFellow Eye8.8 percentage of participants
BIIB111 High DosePercentage of Participants With a ≥10 -Letter Improvement From Baseline in BCVA at Month 12 Measured by the ETDRS ChartStudy Eye13.8 percentage of participants
BIIB111 High DosePercentage of Participants With a ≥10 -Letter Improvement From Baseline in BCVA at Month 12 Measured by the ETDRS ChartFellow Eye6.2 percentage of participants
95% CI: [5.3, 32.2]
95% CI: [3.5, 23]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With No Decrease From Baseline in BCVA or a Decrease From Baseline in BCVA of <5 ETDRS Letters at Month 12 Measured by the EDRS Chart

BCVA was assessed for both eyes using the ETDRS VA chart. BCVA test should be performed prior to pupil dilation, and distance refraction should be carried out before BCVA is measured. Initially, letters are read at a distance of 4 meters from the chart. If \<20 letters are read at 4 meters, testing at 1 meter should be performed. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or VA). Percentage of participants with no decrease or a decrease of \<5 letters from baseline in BCVA at Month 12 was reported for both eyes.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received the study treatment (or the phone call for those in the untreated control group) and had at least one post-treatment BCVA measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Untreated Control GroupPercentage of Participants With No Decrease From Baseline in BCVA or a Decrease From Baseline in BCVA of <5 ETDRS Letters at Month 12 Measured by the EDRS ChartStudy Eye67.7 percentage of participants
Untreated Control GroupPercentage of Participants With No Decrease From Baseline in BCVA or a Decrease From Baseline in BCVA of <5 ETDRS Letters at Month 12 Measured by the EDRS ChartFellow Eye75.8 percentage of participants
BIIB111 Low DosePercentage of Participants With No Decrease From Baseline in BCVA or a Decrease From Baseline in BCVA of <5 ETDRS Letters at Month 12 Measured by the EDRS ChartStudy Eye70.6 percentage of participants
BIIB111 Low DosePercentage of Participants With No Decrease From Baseline in BCVA or a Decrease From Baseline in BCVA of <5 ETDRS Letters at Month 12 Measured by the EDRS ChartFellow Eye85.3 percentage of participants
BIIB111 High DosePercentage of Participants With No Decrease From Baseline in BCVA or a Decrease From Baseline in BCVA of <5 ETDRS Letters at Month 12 Measured by the EDRS ChartStudy Eye83.1 percentage of participants
BIIB111 High DosePercentage of Participants With No Decrease From Baseline in BCVA or a Decrease From Baseline in BCVA of <5 ETDRS Letters at Month 12 Measured by the EDRS ChartFellow Eye90.8 percentage of participants
95% CI: [-17.2, 21]
95% CI: [0.3, 30.1]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026