Skip to content

4-week Mindfulness Program for Adults With Chronic Pain

Feasibility of a 4-week, Adapted Mindfulness Program for Adults With Chronic Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03495856
Enrollment
23
Registered
2018-04-12
Start date
2018-04-23
Completion date
2018-10-26
Last updated
2019-09-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain

Keywords

Mindfulness-based stress reduction, Mindfulness, chronic pain, Feasibility, Intervention

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a 4-week mindfulness training program for adults with chronic pain (noncancer related). The intervention is based on the MIndfulness-based Stress Reduction Program, an 8-week mindfulness training program developed to help people manage stress-related and chronic conditions. The adapted mindfulness intervention will consist of four, weekly 1 hour and 30 minute group sessions that are modified from the original program to fit the shorter length and to directly address chronic pain management. Participants will complete pre- and post-intervention surveys and daily mindfulness practice diaries, all online. The surveys will help us determine if participants experience decreased pain interference, increased quality-of-life, and increased psychological well-being over the course of the intervention. Participants will also complete a post-intervention telephone interview to help determine satisfaction with the intervention and areas where the intervention can be improved.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMindfulness Training For Chronic Pain

4-week group Mindfulness training program for adults with chronic pain

Sponsors

North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Single-group, mixed methods repeated measures design (pre and post assessments)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* One or more chronic noncancer pain diagnoses (daily pain for at least 3 months) * Has a pain management provider * Reports more than minimal pain bothersomeness and interference in general activities * Able to read and understand English

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of mental illness with psychotic features * History of inpatient admission for psychiatric disorder in past 2 years * Active alcohol or substance abuse within the past year * Has completed a mindfulness-based stress reduction or other mindfulness course; has or previously had a regular mindfulness meditation practice. * Unable or unwilling to comply with study procedures (online questionnaires and practice diaries, 4 weekly intervention sessions, home practice, and one semi-structured phone interview).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility - Study Retention4 weeksProportion of participants enrolled who completed the study
Acceptability - Intervention Satisfaction4 weeks (within one week post-intervention)Question assessing participants satisfaction with the intervention
Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire ScoresIntervention week 2Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire. Each item is scored separately and rated on a scale from 1 \[not at all\] to 10 \[very\]. Scores for each item range from 1-10, with higher ratings indicating higher credibility and expectancy.
Feasibility - Session Attendance4 weeks (intervention weeks 1-4)Average sessions attended (proportion)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Physical Functioning ScoresBaseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention)Physical functioning short-form 4a - Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scale. Raw scores were converted using the HealthMeasures scoring service to standardized T-Scores with M=50, SD=10 and ranging from 20 to 80. A higher score indicates higher physical functioning, or a better outcome.
Pain Intensity ScoresBaseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention)Pain intensity rating: 1 item from the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), with pain intensity rated on 0-10 scale with lower values indicating less pain, or better outcome.
Pain Interference ScoresBaseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention)Pain Interference short-form 6b, Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scale. Raw scores were converted using the HealthMeasures scoring service to standardized T-Scores with M=50, SD=10 and ranging from 20 to 80. A lower score indicates lower pain interference, or a better outcome.
Depression Short-Form 4a ScoresBaseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention)Depression short-form 4a - Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scale. Raw scores were converted using the HealthMeasures scoring service to standardized T-Scores with M=50, SD=10 and ranging from 20 to 80. A lower score indicates less depression, a better outcome.
Anxiety Short-Form 4a ScoresBaseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention)Anxiety short-form 4a - Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. Raw scores were converted using the HealthMeasures scoring service to standardized T-Scores with M=50, SD=10 and ranging from 20 to 80. Lower scores represent lower anxiety, a better outcome.
Sleep Disturbance Short-Form 4a ScoresBaseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention)Sleep disturbance short-form 4a - Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. Raw scores were converted using the HealthMeasures scoring service to standardized T-Scores with M=50, SD=10 and ranging from 20 to 80. Lower scores represent less sleep disturbance, a better outcome.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Positive Affect and Well-being ScoresBaseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention)Positive Affect and Well-being Scale - 9 items. This scale comes from the Neurological Quality of Life Measurement System (Neuro QOL). Raw scores were converted using the HealthMeasures scoring service to standardized T-Scores with M=50, SD=10 and ranging from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate greater positive affect and well-being, a better outcome.
Trait Mindfulness ScoresBaseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention)Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory. Possible scores range from 14 to 52, with higher scores indicating greater mindfulness, a better outcome.
Perceived Stress Scale ScoresBaseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention)Perceived Stress Scale - 4 item version. Possible scores range from 0-16. Lower scores indicate lower perceived stress, a better outcome.
Chronic Pain Acceptance ScoresBaseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention)Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-Revised. Scores range from 0-120 with higher scores representing higher chronic pain acceptance, a better outcome.
Pain Catastrophizing Scale ScoresBaseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention)Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Scores range from 0-52, with higher scores indicating more pain catastrophizing, or worse outcome.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment Dates: April 2018 to September 2018 Recruitment Setting: Medical clinics; University/Medical center campus and email listserve

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Mindfulness Training
4-week mindfulness skills group for adults with chronic pain
23
Total23

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMindfulness Training
Age, Continuous53.00 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.58
Education
College degree or greater
16 Participants
Education
High School diploma or equivalent
1 Participants
Education
Less than high school
0 Participants
Education
Some college, no college degree
5 Participants
Education
Unknown
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
22 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
19 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants
Source/location of pain
Arthritis
11 Participants
Source/location of pain
Back
18 Participants
Source/location of pain
Fibromyalgia
4 Participants
Source/location of pain
Headache/migraine
7 Participants
Source/location of pain
Neck
12 Participants
Source/location of pain
Neuropathy
11 Participants
Source/location of pain
Other
8 Participants
Source/location of pain
Pelvic
4 Participants
Yearly Household Income
$20,000 to 39,999
2 Participants
Yearly Household Income
$40,000 to $59,999
4 Participants
Yearly Household Income
$60,000 to $79,999
2 Participants
Yearly Household Income
$80,000 +
8 Participants
Yearly Household Income
Less than $20,000
5 Participants
Yearly Household Income
Unknown
2 Participants
Years with chronic pain6.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 23
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 23
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 23

Outcome results

Primary

Acceptability - Intervention Satisfaction

Question assessing participants satisfaction with the intervention

Time frame: 4 weeks (within one week post-intervention)

Population: Participants who completed the post-assessment

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Mindfulness TrainingAcceptability - Intervention SatisfactionSlightly dissatisfied1 Participants
Mindfulness TrainingAcceptability - Intervention SatisfactionNeutral1 Participants
Mindfulness TrainingAcceptability - Intervention SatisfactionSlightly satisfied1 Participants
Mindfulness TrainingAcceptability - Intervention SatisfactionVery dissatisfied0 Participants
Mindfulness TrainingAcceptability - Intervention SatisfactionModerately dissatisfied0 Participants
Mindfulness TrainingAcceptability - Intervention SatisfactionModerately satisfied7 Participants
Mindfulness TrainingAcceptability - Intervention SatisfactionVery satisfied12 Participants
Primary

Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire Scores

Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire. Each item is scored separately and rated on a scale from 1 \[not at all\] to 10 \[very\]. Scores for each item range from 1-10, with higher ratings indicating higher credibility and expectancy.

Time frame: Intervention week 2

Population: Participants who completed the measure after session 2 (week 2)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mindfulness TrainingCredibility and Expectancy Questionnaire ScoresHow logical is the mindfulness program6.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Mindfulness TrainingCredibility and Expectancy Questionnaire ScoresConfidence that program will improve chronic pain6.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Mindfulness TrainingCredibility and Expectancy Questionnaire ScoresConfidence in recommending program to friend6.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Mindfulness TrainingCredibility and Expectancy Questionnaire ScoresHow important we make this available to others7.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Mindfulness TrainingCredibility and Expectancy Questionnaire ScoresBelieve program would decrease other problems?7.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Primary

Feasibility - Session Attendance

Average sessions attended (proportion)

Time frame: 4 weeks (intervention weeks 1-4)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Mindfulness TrainingFeasibility - Session Attendance0.77 Proportion of sessions
Primary

Feasibility - Study Retention

Proportion of participants enrolled who completed the study

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: All participants who enrolled and completed the baseline assessment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Mindfulness TrainingFeasibility - Study Retention0.96 Proportion of participants
Secondary

Anxiety Short-Form 4a Scores

Anxiety short-form 4a - Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. Raw scores were converted using the HealthMeasures scoring service to standardized T-Scores with M=50, SD=10 and ranging from 20 to 80. Lower scores represent lower anxiety, a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention)

Population: Participants who completed baseline and post assessments

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mindfulness TrainingAnxiety Short-Form 4a ScoresPre59.06 T-scoreStandard Deviation 9.44
Mindfulness TrainingAnxiety Short-Form 4a ScoresPost56.84 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.02
p-value: 0.12495% CI: [-5.09, 0.66]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Depression Short-Form 4a Scores

Depression short-form 4a - Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scale. Raw scores were converted using the HealthMeasures scoring service to standardized T-Scores with M=50, SD=10 and ranging from 20 to 80. A lower score indicates less depression, a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention)

Population: Participants who completed baseline and post assessments

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mindfulness TrainingDepression Short-Form 4a ScoresPre56.82 T-scoreStandard Deviation 9.75
Mindfulness TrainingDepression Short-Form 4a ScoresPost53.49 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.62
p-value: 0.00595% CI: [-5.53, -1.15]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Pain Intensity Scores

Pain intensity rating: 1 item from the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), with pain intensity rated on 0-10 scale with lower values indicating less pain, or better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention)

Population: Participants who completed baseline and post-assessments

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mindfulness TrainingPain Intensity ScoresPre5.91 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.05
Mindfulness TrainingPain Intensity ScoresPost5.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.86
p-value: 0.0595% CI: [-1.55, 0]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Pain Interference Scores

Pain Interference short-form 6b, Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scale. Raw scores were converted using the HealthMeasures scoring service to standardized T-Scores with M=50, SD=10 and ranging from 20 to 80. A lower score indicates lower pain interference, or a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention)

Population: Participants who completed baseline and post assessments

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mindfulness TrainingPain Interference ScoresPre63.76 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.31
Mindfulness TrainingPain Interference ScoresPost60.10 T-scoreStandard Deviation 5.65
p-value: 0.01795% CI: [-6.63, -0.71]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Physical Functioning Scores

Physical functioning short-form 4a - Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scale. Raw scores were converted using the HealthMeasures scoring service to standardized T-Scores with M=50, SD=10 and ranging from 20 to 80. A higher score indicates higher physical functioning, or a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention)

Population: Participants who completed baseline and post assessments

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mindfulness TrainingPhysical Functioning ScoresPre38.17 T-scoreStandard Deviation 5.35
Mindfulness TrainingPhysical Functioning ScoresPost38.22 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.81
p-value: 0.93895% CI: [-1.39, 1.5]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Sleep Disturbance Short-Form 4a Scores

Sleep disturbance short-form 4a - Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. Raw scores were converted using the HealthMeasures scoring service to standardized T-Scores with M=50, SD=10 and ranging from 20 to 80. Lower scores represent less sleep disturbance, a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention)

Population: Participants who completed baseline and post-assessment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mindfulness TrainingSleep Disturbance Short-Form 4a ScoresPre56.52 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.79
Mindfulness TrainingSleep Disturbance Short-Form 4a ScoresPost51.83 T-scoreStandard Deviation 9.75
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [-7.3, -2.07]t-test, 2 sided
Other Pre-specified

Chronic Pain Acceptance Scores

Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-Revised. Scores range from 0-120 with higher scores representing higher chronic pain acceptance, a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention)

Population: Participants who completed baseline and post assessments

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mindfulness TrainingChronic Pain Acceptance ScoresPre57.64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.22
Mindfulness TrainingChronic Pain Acceptance ScoresPost70.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.46
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [8.47, 18.07]t-test, 2 sided
Other Pre-specified

Pain Catastrophizing Scale Scores

Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Scores range from 0-52, with higher scores indicating more pain catastrophizing, or worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention)

Population: Participants who completed baseline and post assessments

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mindfulness TrainingPain Catastrophizing Scale ScoresPre23.64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.79
Mindfulness TrainingPain Catastrophizing Scale ScoresPost18.68 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.38
p-value: 0.00295% CI: [-7.88, -2.03]t-test, 2 sided
Other Pre-specified

Perceived Stress Scale Scores

Perceived Stress Scale - 4 item version. Possible scores range from 0-16. Lower scores indicate lower perceived stress, a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention)

Population: Participants who completed baseline and post assessments

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mindfulness TrainingPerceived Stress Scale ScoresPre7.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
Mindfulness TrainingPerceived Stress Scale ScoresPost5.95 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.55
p-value: 0.01895% CI: [-2.31, -0.24]t-test, 2 sided
Other Pre-specified

Positive Affect and Well-being Scores

Positive Affect and Well-being Scale - 9 items. This scale comes from the Neurological Quality of Life Measurement System (Neuro QOL). Raw scores were converted using the HealthMeasures scoring service to standardized T-Scores with M=50, SD=10 and ranging from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate greater positive affect and well-being, a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention)

Population: Participants who completed baseline and post assessments

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mindfulness TrainingPositive Affect and Well-being ScoresPre47.86 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.41
Mindfulness TrainingPositive Affect and Well-being ScoresPost50.66 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.89
p-value: 0.01695% CI: [0.58, 5.01]t-test, 2 sided
Other Pre-specified

Trait Mindfulness Scores

Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory. Possible scores range from 14 to 52, with higher scores indicating greater mindfulness, a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention)

Population: Participants who completed baseline and post assessments

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mindfulness TrainingTrait Mindfulness ScoresPre34.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.79
Mindfulness TrainingTrait Mindfulness ScoresPost42.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.1
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [3.92, 12.08]t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026