Chronic Pain
Conditions
Keywords
Mindfulness-based stress reduction, Mindfulness, chronic pain, Feasibility, Intervention
Brief summary
The objective of this study is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a 4-week mindfulness training program for adults with chronic pain (noncancer related). The intervention is based on the MIndfulness-based Stress Reduction Program, an 8-week mindfulness training program developed to help people manage stress-related and chronic conditions. The adapted mindfulness intervention will consist of four, weekly 1 hour and 30 minute group sessions that are modified from the original program to fit the shorter length and to directly address chronic pain management. Participants will complete pre- and post-intervention surveys and daily mindfulness practice diaries, all online. The surveys will help us determine if participants experience decreased pain interference, increased quality-of-life, and increased psychological well-being over the course of the intervention. Participants will also complete a post-intervention telephone interview to help determine satisfaction with the intervention and areas where the intervention can be improved.
Interventions
4-week group Mindfulness training program for adults with chronic pain
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Single-group, mixed methods repeated measures design (pre and post assessments)
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* One or more chronic noncancer pain diagnoses (daily pain for at least 3 months) * Has a pain management provider * Reports more than minimal pain bothersomeness and interference in general activities * Able to read and understand English
Exclusion criteria
* Diagnosis of mental illness with psychotic features * History of inpatient admission for psychiatric disorder in past 2 years * Active alcohol or substance abuse within the past year * Has completed a mindfulness-based stress reduction or other mindfulness course; has or previously had a regular mindfulness meditation practice. * Unable or unwilling to comply with study procedures (online questionnaires and practice diaries, 4 weekly intervention sessions, home practice, and one semi-structured phone interview).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility - Study Retention | 4 weeks | Proportion of participants enrolled who completed the study |
| Acceptability - Intervention Satisfaction | 4 weeks (within one week post-intervention) | Question assessing participants satisfaction with the intervention |
| Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire Scores | Intervention week 2 | Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire. Each item is scored separately and rated on a scale from 1 \[not at all\] to 10 \[very\]. Scores for each item range from 1-10, with higher ratings indicating higher credibility and expectancy. |
| Feasibility - Session Attendance | 4 weeks (intervention weeks 1-4) | Average sessions attended (proportion) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Physical Functioning Scores | Baseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention) | Physical functioning short-form 4a - Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scale. Raw scores were converted using the HealthMeasures scoring service to standardized T-Scores with M=50, SD=10 and ranging from 20 to 80. A higher score indicates higher physical functioning, or a better outcome. |
| Pain Intensity Scores | Baseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention) | Pain intensity rating: 1 item from the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), with pain intensity rated on 0-10 scale with lower values indicating less pain, or better outcome. |
| Pain Interference Scores | Baseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention) | Pain Interference short-form 6b, Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scale. Raw scores were converted using the HealthMeasures scoring service to standardized T-Scores with M=50, SD=10 and ranging from 20 to 80. A lower score indicates lower pain interference, or a better outcome. |
| Depression Short-Form 4a Scores | Baseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention) | Depression short-form 4a - Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scale. Raw scores were converted using the HealthMeasures scoring service to standardized T-Scores with M=50, SD=10 and ranging from 20 to 80. A lower score indicates less depression, a better outcome. |
| Anxiety Short-Form 4a Scores | Baseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention) | Anxiety short-form 4a - Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. Raw scores were converted using the HealthMeasures scoring service to standardized T-Scores with M=50, SD=10 and ranging from 20 to 80. Lower scores represent lower anxiety, a better outcome. |
| Sleep Disturbance Short-Form 4a Scores | Baseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention) | Sleep disturbance short-form 4a - Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. Raw scores were converted using the HealthMeasures scoring service to standardized T-Scores with M=50, SD=10 and ranging from 20 to 80. Lower scores represent less sleep disturbance, a better outcome. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Positive Affect and Well-being Scores | Baseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention) | Positive Affect and Well-being Scale - 9 items. This scale comes from the Neurological Quality of Life Measurement System (Neuro QOL). Raw scores were converted using the HealthMeasures scoring service to standardized T-Scores with M=50, SD=10 and ranging from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate greater positive affect and well-being, a better outcome. |
| Trait Mindfulness Scores | Baseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention) | Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory. Possible scores range from 14 to 52, with higher scores indicating greater mindfulness, a better outcome. |
| Perceived Stress Scale Scores | Baseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention) | Perceived Stress Scale - 4 item version. Possible scores range from 0-16. Lower scores indicate lower perceived stress, a better outcome. |
| Chronic Pain Acceptance Scores | Baseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention) | Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-Revised. Scores range from 0-120 with higher scores representing higher chronic pain acceptance, a better outcome. |
| Pain Catastrophizing Scale Scores | Baseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention) | Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Scores range from 0-52, with higher scores indicating more pain catastrophizing, or worse outcome. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Recruitment Dates: April 2018 to September 2018 Recruitment Setting: Medical clinics; University/Medical center campus and email listserve
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Mindfulness Training 4-week mindfulness skills group for adults with chronic pain | 23 |
| Total | 23 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Mindfulness Training |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 53.00 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.58 |
| Education College degree or greater | 16 Participants |
| Education High School diploma or equivalent | 1 Participants |
| Education Less than high school | 0 Participants |
| Education Some college, no college degree | 5 Participants |
| Education Unknown | 1 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 1 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 22 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 4 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 19 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 23 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 17 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 6 Participants |
| Source/location of pain Arthritis | 11 Participants |
| Source/location of pain Back | 18 Participants |
| Source/location of pain Fibromyalgia | 4 Participants |
| Source/location of pain Headache/migraine | 7 Participants |
| Source/location of pain Neck | 12 Participants |
| Source/location of pain Neuropathy | 11 Participants |
| Source/location of pain Other | 8 Participants |
| Source/location of pain Pelvic | 4 Participants |
| Yearly Household Income $20,000 to 39,999 | 2 Participants |
| Yearly Household Income $40,000 to $59,999 | 4 Participants |
| Yearly Household Income $60,000 to $79,999 | 2 Participants |
| Yearly Household Income $80,000 + | 8 Participants |
| Yearly Household Income Less than $20,000 | 5 Participants |
| Yearly Household Income Unknown | 2 Participants |
| Years with chronic pain | 6.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 23 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 1 / 23 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 23 |
Outcome results
Acceptability - Intervention Satisfaction
Question assessing participants satisfaction with the intervention
Time frame: 4 weeks (within one week post-intervention)
Population: Participants who completed the post-assessment
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mindfulness Training | Acceptability - Intervention Satisfaction | Slightly dissatisfied | 1 Participants |
| Mindfulness Training | Acceptability - Intervention Satisfaction | Neutral | 1 Participants |
| Mindfulness Training | Acceptability - Intervention Satisfaction | Slightly satisfied | 1 Participants |
| Mindfulness Training | Acceptability - Intervention Satisfaction | Very dissatisfied | 0 Participants |
| Mindfulness Training | Acceptability - Intervention Satisfaction | Moderately dissatisfied | 0 Participants |
| Mindfulness Training | Acceptability - Intervention Satisfaction | Moderately satisfied | 7 Participants |
| Mindfulness Training | Acceptability - Intervention Satisfaction | Very satisfied | 12 Participants |
Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire Scores
Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire. Each item is scored separately and rated on a scale from 1 \[not at all\] to 10 \[very\]. Scores for each item range from 1-10, with higher ratings indicating higher credibility and expectancy.
Time frame: Intervention week 2
Population: Participants who completed the measure after session 2 (week 2)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mindfulness Training | Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire Scores | How logical is the mindfulness program | 6.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.4 |
| Mindfulness Training | Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire Scores | Confidence that program will improve chronic pain | 6.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.2 |
| Mindfulness Training | Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire Scores | Confidence in recommending program to friend | 6.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
| Mindfulness Training | Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire Scores | How important we make this available to others | 7.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.7 |
| Mindfulness Training | Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire Scores | Believe program would decrease other problems? | 7.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
Feasibility - Session Attendance
Average sessions attended (proportion)
Time frame: 4 weeks (intervention weeks 1-4)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Mindfulness Training | Feasibility - Session Attendance | 0.77 Proportion of sessions |
Feasibility - Study Retention
Proportion of participants enrolled who completed the study
Time frame: 4 weeks
Population: All participants who enrolled and completed the baseline assessment
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Mindfulness Training | Feasibility - Study Retention | 0.96 Proportion of participants |
Anxiety Short-Form 4a Scores
Anxiety short-form 4a - Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. Raw scores were converted using the HealthMeasures scoring service to standardized T-Scores with M=50, SD=10 and ranging from 20 to 80. Lower scores represent lower anxiety, a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention)
Population: Participants who completed baseline and post assessments
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mindfulness Training | Anxiety Short-Form 4a Scores | Pre | 59.06 T-score | Standard Deviation 9.44 |
| Mindfulness Training | Anxiety Short-Form 4a Scores | Post | 56.84 T-score | Standard Deviation 8.02 |
Depression Short-Form 4a Scores
Depression short-form 4a - Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scale. Raw scores were converted using the HealthMeasures scoring service to standardized T-Scores with M=50, SD=10 and ranging from 20 to 80. A lower score indicates less depression, a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention)
Population: Participants who completed baseline and post assessments
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mindfulness Training | Depression Short-Form 4a Scores | Pre | 56.82 T-score | Standard Deviation 9.75 |
| Mindfulness Training | Depression Short-Form 4a Scores | Post | 53.49 T-score | Standard Deviation 8.62 |
Pain Intensity Scores
Pain intensity rating: 1 item from the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), with pain intensity rated on 0-10 scale with lower values indicating less pain, or better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention)
Population: Participants who completed baseline and post-assessments
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mindfulness Training | Pain Intensity Scores | Pre | 5.91 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.05 |
| Mindfulness Training | Pain Intensity Scores | Post | 5.14 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.86 |
Pain Interference Scores
Pain Interference short-form 6b, Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scale. Raw scores were converted using the HealthMeasures scoring service to standardized T-Scores with M=50, SD=10 and ranging from 20 to 80. A lower score indicates lower pain interference, or a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention)
Population: Participants who completed baseline and post assessments
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mindfulness Training | Pain Interference Scores | Pre | 63.76 T-score | Standard Deviation 7.31 |
| Mindfulness Training | Pain Interference Scores | Post | 60.10 T-score | Standard Deviation 5.65 |
Physical Functioning Scores
Physical functioning short-form 4a - Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scale. Raw scores were converted using the HealthMeasures scoring service to standardized T-Scores with M=50, SD=10 and ranging from 20 to 80. A higher score indicates higher physical functioning, or a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention)
Population: Participants who completed baseline and post assessments
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mindfulness Training | Physical Functioning Scores | Pre | 38.17 T-score | Standard Deviation 5.35 |
| Mindfulness Training | Physical Functioning Scores | Post | 38.22 T-score | Standard Deviation 6.81 |
Sleep Disturbance Short-Form 4a Scores
Sleep disturbance short-form 4a - Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. Raw scores were converted using the HealthMeasures scoring service to standardized T-Scores with M=50, SD=10 and ranging from 20 to 80. Lower scores represent less sleep disturbance, a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention)
Population: Participants who completed baseline and post-assessment
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mindfulness Training | Sleep Disturbance Short-Form 4a Scores | Pre | 56.52 T-score | Standard Deviation 7.79 |
| Mindfulness Training | Sleep Disturbance Short-Form 4a Scores | Post | 51.83 T-score | Standard Deviation 9.75 |
Chronic Pain Acceptance Scores
Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-Revised. Scores range from 0-120 with higher scores representing higher chronic pain acceptance, a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention)
Population: Participants who completed baseline and post assessments
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mindfulness Training | Chronic Pain Acceptance Scores | Pre | 57.64 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.22 |
| Mindfulness Training | Chronic Pain Acceptance Scores | Post | 70.91 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.46 |
Pain Catastrophizing Scale Scores
Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Scores range from 0-52, with higher scores indicating more pain catastrophizing, or worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention)
Population: Participants who completed baseline and post assessments
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mindfulness Training | Pain Catastrophizing Scale Scores | Pre | 23.64 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.79 |
| Mindfulness Training | Pain Catastrophizing Scale Scores | Post | 18.68 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.38 |
Perceived Stress Scale Scores
Perceived Stress Scale - 4 item version. Possible scores range from 0-16. Lower scores indicate lower perceived stress, a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention)
Population: Participants who completed baseline and post assessments
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mindfulness Training | Perceived Stress Scale Scores | Pre | 7.23 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.7 |
| Mindfulness Training | Perceived Stress Scale Scores | Post | 5.95 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.55 |
Positive Affect and Well-being Scores
Positive Affect and Well-being Scale - 9 items. This scale comes from the Neurological Quality of Life Measurement System (Neuro QOL). Raw scores were converted using the HealthMeasures scoring service to standardized T-Scores with M=50, SD=10 and ranging from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate greater positive affect and well-being, a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention)
Population: Participants who completed baseline and post assessments
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mindfulness Training | Positive Affect and Well-being Scores | Pre | 47.86 T-score | Standard Deviation 7.41 |
| Mindfulness Training | Positive Affect and Well-being Scores | Post | 50.66 T-score | Standard Deviation 7.89 |
Trait Mindfulness Scores
Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory. Possible scores range from 14 to 52, with higher scores indicating greater mindfulness, a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks (pre to post-intervention)
Population: Participants who completed baseline and post assessments
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mindfulness Training | Trait Mindfulness Scores | Pre | 34.23 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.79 |
| Mindfulness Training | Trait Mindfulness Scores | Post | 42.23 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.1 |