Videolaryngoscopy
Conditions
Brief summary
The primary goal of this study was to identify parameters affecting the failure of videolaryngoscopy in clinical practice; secondly, the incidence of videolaryngoscopy use and the most frequently used patient groups.
Detailed description
Videolaryngoscopy is widely used in the management of patients with presumed difficult airway. It offers an improved laryngeal view compared with direct laryngoscopy and increases the likelihood of successful intubation in patients for whom direct laryngoscopy is anticipated to be difficult. It is among the most frequently preferred difficult airway devices due to its ease of use, portability and direct laryngoscopy resemblance. The use of videolaryngoscopy has been shown to improve intubation success in many cases associated with difficult intubation, such as morbid obesity, pregnancy, limitation of cervical motility, and poor mouth opening.
Interventions
Videolaryngoscopy device type
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* All patients who used videolaryngoscopy for intubation
Exclusion criteria
\-
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Intubation success | 15 minutes | The success of intubation attempt with videolaryngoscopy (yes/no) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The reason of videolaryngoscopy | 15 minutes | Why videolaryngoscopy is preferred instead of standard direct laryngoscopy |
| The type of videolaryngoscopy blade | 15 minutes | acute angled/macintosh/miller blade |
| The rescue technique | 30 minutes | The rescue technique used for patients who could not be intubated with videolaryngoscopy |
| Factors affecting success of videolaryngoscopy | 30 minutes | Mallampati score, thyromental distance, neck movements, upper lip bite test, mouth opening |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)