Skip to content

RSA Study of Persona TKA With CR vs MC Polyethylene

Aspects of Alignment, Function, and Migration Behaviour in Two Conceptually Different Articular Surface Designs in the Cruciate Retaining Version of the Cemented Persona Knee System - A Randomized Study Evaluated by RSA and CT Analysis

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03494348
Enrollment
60
Registered
2018-04-11
Start date
2017-10-01
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2022-11-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Keywords

Radiostereometry (RSA), Total Knee Arthroplasty

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate, over a 2 year period, the migration pattern, function and the possibility of anatomical reconstruction of a relatively new total knee arthroplasty (TKA) concept, the Persona. Sixty patients will be randomized into 2 groups of 30 patients each, with one group receiving the Persona TKA with a conventional Cruciate Retaining (CR) polyethylene articular surface and the other group with a newly developed Medial Congruent (MC) articular surface. Patients will be followed up with Radiostereometry (RSA), conventional radiography, outcome questionnaires, clinical evaluation and Computer Tomography (CT). The migration pattern of the components will be evaluated as well as the degree of anatomical reconstruction and clinical result. We plan also to do a 5 year follow-up of the patients with RSA and PROMS.

Interventions

DEVICEMedial Congruent Polyethylene (MC)

One group receives the conventional CR surface and the other the new MC articular surface

Sponsors

Zimmer Biomet
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Region Skane
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Osteoarthritis of the knee necessitating knee replacement * ASA I-III * BMI 18 - 35

Exclusion criteria

* Joint sepsis in history * immunosuppresive drugs last 5 years * Rheumatoid arthritis * Severe osteoporosis or other metabolic bone diseases * Neuromuscular diseases * Personal disorders suspected of limiting rehab and completion of the trial period * Previous osteotomy of affected limb * Intra-articular knee fracture of affected limb * Peroperative fracture * Severe deformity of affected joint in need of augmentation or excessive release * Obvious need for more constrained knee than CR

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiostereometry (RSA)First postoperative day, 3 months, 1 year, 2 years and 5 yearsMeasure the change in component migration over time (translation and rotation around the x-, y- and z-axis)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Computer Tomography (CT)Preoperatively and 3 months postoperativelyMeasure the preoperative malalignment of the knee and the postoperatively achieved alignment and achieved prosthesis position
Conventional radiographyPreoperatively and 3 months postoperativelyMeasure the preoperative malalignment of the knee and the postoperatively achieved alignment and achieved prosthesis position
General health questionnairePreoperatively, 1, 2 and 5 years postoperativelyEuroQol (EQ-5D) -standardized instrument for use of general health outcome
Knee specific health questionnairePreoperatively, 1, 2 and 5 years postoperativelyKnee disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - this is a knee specific questionnaire measuring patients knee function and pain situation

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026