Skip to content

AMO-01 to Treat Adolescents and Adults With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) and Co-morbid Epilepsy

An Open-label Study to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of a Single 6-hour Intravenous Infusion of AMO-01 to Treat Adolescents and Adults With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) and Co-morbid Epilepsy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03493607
Enrollment
6
Registered
2018-04-10
Start date
2018-05-30
Completion date
2020-03-31
Last updated
2025-06-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Epilepsy, Phelan-McDermid Syndrome

Keywords

AMO-01, Shank3, Clinical Trial

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of a single 6-hour intravenous infusion of AMO-01 to treat adolescents and adults with PMS and co-morbid epilepsy. Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by a chromosomal deletion or mutation at 22q13.3 that contains the SHANK3/ProSAP2 gene. A key co-morbidity in PMS is the presence of epilepsy. Currently there are no approved treatments for PMS. Furthermore, there has been relatively little clinical study of pharmacological interventions for PMS. AMO-01 may provide benefit to PMS patients exhibiting behavioral abnormalities and seizures.

Interventions

DRUGAMO-01

Subjects will receive a single 6-hour intravenous infusion for a total dose administration or 120 mg/m2 of AMO-01.

Sponsors

Alexander Kolevzon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Single Group, open label

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subjects under study must have a diagnosis of Phelan McDermid syndrome (PMS) with genetic confirmation of pathogenic SHANK3 deletion or mutation. 2. Subjects must be post pubertal males or females aged ≥12 years and ≤45 years at Screening. 3. Subject must have a diagnosis of epilepsy. 4. Subjects must have a syndrome-specific Clinical Global Impression- Severity Score of 4 or greater at Screening 5. Subject's parent or legally authorized representative (LAR) must provide written informed consent before any study related procedures are conducted. Where a parent or LAR provides consent, there must also be assent from the subject (as required by local regulations). 6. Subject's caregiver must be willing and able to support the subject's participation for the duration of the study. 7. Subject's caregiver is able and willing to maintain an accurate and complete daily written seizure diary for the entire duration of the study.

Exclusion criteria

1. Receiving medications/therapies not stable (i.e. changed) within 4 weeks prior to Screening. For each enrollee, every effort should be made to maintain stable regimens of allowed concomitant medications and allowed non -medicine based therapies throughout the course of the study, from Screening until the last study assessment. 2. Known hypersensitivity to farnesylated dibenzodiazepinone or any of the formulation components. 3. Subjects with a history of uncontrolled hypotension or hypertension (Polysorbate 80 is a major constituent of AMO-01 and can cause hypotension). 4. Subjects that have received Coumadin or heparin in the 2 weeks preceding Screening. 5. Medical illness or other concern which would cause the investigator to conclude that the subject will not be able to perform the study procedures or assessments or would confound interpretation of data obtained during assessments. 6. Females who are pregnant, lactating or not willing to use a protocol-defined acceptable contraception method if sexually active and not surgically sterile. 7. Males, engaged in sexual relations with a female of child bearing potential, not using an acceptable contraception method if sexually active and not surgically sterile. 8. Clinically significant abnormalities in safety laboratory tests, vital signs or ECG, as measured at Screening (may repeat to confirm). 9. Current clinically significant (as determined by the investigator) neurological, cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, endocrine or respiratory disease that may impact the interpretability of the study results. 10. Current clinically significant (as determined by the investigator) lymphedema that may compromise venous access and/or may have an adverse impact on study drug distribution and clearance. 11. Judged clinically to be at risk of suicide by the investigator. 12. Average QTcF value of \>450 msec at Screening (may repeat to confirm). 13. Subjects in whom an indwelling intravenous line could not be established or maintained.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Adverse Events8 weeksAn adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a study subject, temporally associated with the use of the experimental medication, whether or not considered related to the medication. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of the experimental medication. Adverse events will be monitored throughout all 8 weeks of study participation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Weekly Seizure Counts4 weeksSeizure frequency was measured by a caregiver-completed seizure diary throughout the duration of the trial. A seizure diary was provided to each family at the screening visit to record each seizure event, its date/time, duration, and type. The study team reviewed the diary at each visit with the caregiver and weekly seizure frequency was calculated. The week 1 seizure count was the number of seizures in the 7 days following the infusion day. Similarly, the week 2 seizure count was the number of seizures in the 7 days between weeks 1 and 2. Lastly, the week 4 seizure count was the sum of seizures in the 14 days between weeks 2 and 4, divided by 2.
Change in CGI - Improvement and Severity Scalebaseline, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 4Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Rating Scales are commonly used to measure symptom severity and global improvement in treatment studies of patients with developmental disorders. There Severity Scale (CGI-S) is a 7-point scale (1, normal, not at all ill; 2, borderline mentally ill; 3, mildly ill; 4, moderately ill; 5, markedly ill; 6, severely ill; or 7, extremely ill.) that requires the clinician to rate the severity of illness at the time of assessment. The Improvement Scale (CGI-I) is a 7-point scale (1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; or 7, very much worse.) that requires the clinician to assess how much the illness has improved or worsened relative to baseline.
Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)8 weeks9 item visual analogue scale completed by the clinician that scores the severity of concerns in domains that are clinically relevant in PMS. For each subject, the clinician is instructed to identify the top 4 or 5 that are of particular concern and that the clinician would most like to see change during the course of treatment with the study medication. The severity of the clinician's concern in each domain is scored by using a 10 cm visual analogue scale, with anchors of 0 not at all severe at the left and 100 very severe at the right end.
Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC)baseline, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 4rating scaled used to monitor an array of behavioral features among patients with intellectual disabilities. It takes 15-30 minutes to complete. 16 items, Each item is scored as 0 (never a problem), 1 (slight problem), 2 (moderately serious problem), or 3 (severe problem). with total from 0 to 48.
Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R)Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 442-item rating scale that is completed by a parent or caregiver. It reports on the severity of repetitive behaviors. each item scored on 4-point scale: 0-Behavior does not occur, 1-Behavior occurs and is a mild problem, 2-Behavior occurs and is a moderate problem, 3-Behavior occurs and is a severe problem. with total score from 0 (mild) to 126 (severe). Subscale ranges: stereotypic behavior (0 - 27);self-injurious behavior (0 - 24); compulsive behavior (0 - 18); ritualistic/Sameness Behavior (0 - 36); restricted Interests (0 - 9). Higher score in all subscales reflect increasing severity.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment began in Feb 2017, with first enrollment in May of 2018. Study was opened for enrollment through Jan 2021 when decision was made to close study due to low enrollment. Participants completed study visits. Last participant seen March 2020.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
AMO-01
Subjects received a single 6-hour intravenous infusion for a total dose administration or 120 mg/m2 of AMO-01.
6
Total6

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAMO-01
Age, Continuous20.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.07
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Adverse Events

An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a study subject, temporally associated with the use of the experimental medication, whether or not considered related to the medication. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of the experimental medication. Adverse events will be monitored throughout all 8 weeks of study participation.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AMO-01Number of Adverse Events19 events
Secondary

Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC)

rating scaled used to monitor an array of behavioral features among patients with intellectual disabilities. It takes 15-30 minutes to complete. 16 items, Each item is scored as 0 (never a problem), 1 (slight problem), 2 (moderately serious problem), or 3 (severe problem). with total from 0 to 48.

Time frame: baseline, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 4

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AMO-01Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC)Inappropriate Speech1.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
AMO-01Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC)Stereotypy6.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.09
AMO-01Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC)Irritability8.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.02
AMO-01Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC)Lethargy15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.13
AMO-01Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC)Hyperactivity20.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.34
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 1Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC)Hyperactivity14.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.79
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 1Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC)Inappropriate Speech1.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 1Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC)Stereotypy4.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.08
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 1Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC)Lethargy12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 1Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC)Irritability9.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.89
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 2Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC)Inappropriate Speech0.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.41
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 2Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC)Irritability6.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.72
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 2Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC)Lethargy9.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.01
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 2Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC)Stereotypy4.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.76
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 2Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC)Hyperactivity15.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.09
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 4Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC)Inappropriate Speech0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 4Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC)Hyperactivity13.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.27
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 4Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC)Lethargy8.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.96
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 4Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC)Irritability4.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.19
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 4Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC)Stereotypy3.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.93
Secondary

Change in CGI - Improvement and Severity Scale

Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Rating Scales are commonly used to measure symptom severity and global improvement in treatment studies of patients with developmental disorders. There Severity Scale (CGI-S) is a 7-point scale (1, normal, not at all ill; 2, borderline mentally ill; 3, mildly ill; 4, moderately ill; 5, markedly ill; 6, severely ill; or 7, extremely ill.) that requires the clinician to rate the severity of illness at the time of assessment. The Improvement Scale (CGI-I) is a 7-point scale (1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; or 7, very much worse.) that requires the clinician to assess how much the illness has improved or worsened relative to baseline.

Time frame: baseline, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 4

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AMO-01Change in CGI - Improvement and Severity ScaleSeverity5.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.82
AMO-01Change in CGI - Improvement and Severity ScaleImprovement0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 1Change in CGI - Improvement and Severity ScaleImprovement0.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.98
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 1Change in CGI - Improvement and Severity ScaleSeverity5.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.82
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 2Change in CGI - Improvement and Severity ScaleImprovement1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 2Change in CGI - Improvement and Severity ScaleSeverity5.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.82
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 4Change in CGI - Improvement and Severity ScaleSeverity5.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.75
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 4Change in CGI - Improvement and Severity ScaleImprovement1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.89
Secondary

Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

9 item visual analogue scale completed by the clinician that scores the severity of concerns in domains that are clinically relevant in PMS. For each subject, the clinician is instructed to identify the top 4 or 5 that are of particular concern and that the clinician would most like to see change during the course of treatment with the study medication. The severity of the clinician's concern in each domain is scored by using a 10 cm visual analogue scale, with anchors of 0 not at all severe at the left and 100 very severe at the right end.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AMO-01Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Social Communication80.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.61
AMO-01Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Seizures62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.43
AMO-01Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Sleep43.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.66
AMO-01Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Repetitive Behavior70.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.97
AMO-01Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Thinking and Learning86.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.83
AMO-01Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Sensory50.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.78
AMO-01Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Gross Motor28.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.23
AMO-01Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Activities of Daily Living78.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.33
AMO-01Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Speech86.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.13
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 1Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Social Communication77.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.24
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 1Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Speech84.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.89
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 1Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Thinking and Learning77.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.87
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 1Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Sleep29.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.15
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 1Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Seizures41.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.11
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 1Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Gross Motor26.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.01
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 1Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Sensory48.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.17
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 1Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Activities of Daily Living75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.95
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 1Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Repetitive Behavior65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.08
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 2Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Sleep43.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.43
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 2Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Gross Motor24.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.45
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 2Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Repetitive Behavior60.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.17
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 2Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Sensory52.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.97
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 2Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Activities of Daily Living76.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.75
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 2Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Thinking and Learning81.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.83
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 2Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Seizures47.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.31
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 2Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Social Communication77.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.89
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 2Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Speech84.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.85
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 4Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Repetitive Behavior54 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.77
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 4Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Sleep45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.66
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 4Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Sensory50.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.82
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 4Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Speech81.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.06
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 4Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Social Communication74.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.92
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 4Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Activities of Daily Living78.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.76
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 4Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Thinking and Learning78.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.58
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 4Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Gross Motor25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.45
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 4Clinician-completed PMS Domain Specific Causes for Concerns Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Seizures44.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.66
Secondary

Number of Weekly Seizure Counts

Seizure frequency was measured by a caregiver-completed seizure diary throughout the duration of the trial. A seizure diary was provided to each family at the screening visit to record each seizure event, its date/time, duration, and type. The study team reviewed the diary at each visit with the caregiver and weekly seizure frequency was calculated. The week 1 seizure count was the number of seizures in the 7 days following the infusion day. Similarly, the week 2 seizure count was the number of seizures in the 7 days between weeks 1 and 2. Lastly, the week 4 seizure count was the sum of seizures in the 14 days between weeks 2 and 4, divided by 2.

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AMO-01Number of Weekly Seizure Counts22.6 seizure eventStandard Deviation 42.9
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 1Number of Weekly Seizure Counts4.3 seizure eventStandard Deviation 7.8
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 2Number of Weekly Seizure Counts15.8 seizure eventStandard Deviation 37.3
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 4Number of Weekly Seizure Counts14.3 seizure eventStandard Deviation 33.2
Secondary

Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R)

42-item rating scale that is completed by a parent or caregiver. It reports on the severity of repetitive behaviors. each item scored on 4-point scale: 0-Behavior does not occur, 1-Behavior occurs and is a mild problem, 2-Behavior occurs and is a moderate problem, 3-Behavior occurs and is a severe problem. with total score from 0 (mild) to 126 (severe). Subscale ranges: stereotypic behavior (0 - 27);self-injurious behavior (0 - 24); compulsive behavior (0 - 18); ritualistic/Sameness Behavior (0 - 36); restricted Interests (0 - 9). Higher score in all subscales reflect increasing severity.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 4

Population: Subjects received a single 6-hour intravenous infusion for a total dose administration or 120 mg/m2 of AMO-01.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AMO-01Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R)Stereotyped Behavior3.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
AMO-01Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R)Compulsive Behavior2.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.27
AMO-01Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R)Ritualistic Behavior0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
AMO-01Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R)Sameness Behavior2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.68
AMO-01Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R)Restricted Behavior1.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
AMO-01Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R)Total11.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.26
AMO-01Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R)Self-Injury1.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.94
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 1Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R)Sameness Behavior1.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.75
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 1Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R)Restricted Behavior1.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.04
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 1Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R)Total8.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.56
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 1Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R)Ritualistic Behavior0.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.41
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 1Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R)Compulsive Behavior1.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.47
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 1Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R)Self-Injury1.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.51
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 1Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R)Stereotyped Behavior3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.68
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 2Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R)Stereotyped Behavior3.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.07
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 2Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R)Ritualistic Behavior0.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.41
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 2Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R)Sameness Behavior2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.76
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 2Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R)Compulsive Behavior2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.76
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 2Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R)Restricted Behavior1.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.97
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 2Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R)Self-Injury2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.45
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 2Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R)Total11.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.48
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 4Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R)Sameness Behavior2.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.66
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 4Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R)Ritualistic Behavior0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 4Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R)Compulsive Behavior2.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.81
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 4Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R)Total10.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.87
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 4Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R)Self-Injury1.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.35
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 4Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R)Restricted Behavior1.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.56
Participants With Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS) at Week 4Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R)Stereotyped Behavior2.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.42

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026