Skip to content

Role of PRF With MTA and Theracal After Pulpotomy in Relieving Pain

Role of PRF With MTA and Theracal After Pulpotomy in Relieving Pain and Maintaining the Vitality of the Remaining Radicular Pulp Tissue in Permanent Posterior Teeth With Closed Root Apices: Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03493321
Enrollment
98
Registered
2018-04-10
Start date
2019-08-22
Completion date
2019-09-30
Last updated
2019-08-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neuritis

Brief summary

this research will evaluate the effect of PRF with different bioactive materials in dentistry

Detailed description

PRF will be used with MTA and Theracal to evaluate its effect upon these materials in reliving pain and maintains the teeth vitality in permanent teeth with closed apices, in order to improve the materials outcome.

Interventions

OTHERPRF with Theracal

using the PRF which is a new technique with an bioactive material which is the Theracal to evaluate its effect upon the radicular pulp tissue

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients suffering from Symptomatic pulpitis. * Patients should be free from any systemic disease that may affect normal healing and predictable outcome. * Patients who will agree to the consent and will commit to follow-up period. * Patients with mature root. * Patients with no periapical lesion. * Patients with localized pain. * Posterior teeth only will be involved

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with immature roots. * Patients with any systemic disease that may affect normal healing. * Patients with periapical lesions or infections. * Pregnant females. * Patients who could/would not participate in a 1-year follow-up. * Patients with fistula. * Patients with necrotic pulp. * Patients with old age.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pain after the process1 yearQuestionnaire by asking the patient about the pain intensity

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
dentin bridge formation1 yearX-ray
no periapical radiolucency1 yearX-ray

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026