Skip to content

Comparison of Three Techniques of Nasogastric Tube Insertion Without Instrumentation

Comparison of Three Techniques of Nasogastric Tube Insertion Without Instrumentation in Anesthetised Intubated Patients: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03492008
Enrollment
27
Registered
2018-04-09
Start date
2016-01-01
Completion date
2016-12-31
Last updated
2018-04-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

General Anesthesia

Keywords

nasogastric tube, general anesthesia, head position

Brief summary

This study compares two modified techniques(contralateral cricothyroid pressure and ipsilateral head turning technique) of nasogastric tube insertion in anesthetized and intubated patients with the conventional technique.

Detailed description

The insertion of nasogastric tube in anesthetized, paralysed and intubated unconscious patients may be difficult, with a reported failure rate of nearly 50% on the first attempt, with the head in neutral position there are many different maneuvers to facilitate the insertion of nasogastric tube published. Our hypothesis is that contralateral cricothyroid pressure to the selected nostril for nasogastric tube insertion will be able to avoid the difficulty. Therefore we are going to compare this technique with the conventional technique (head in neutral position) with lateral head turning group and contralateral cricothyroid pressure group We hope that the contralateral cricothyroid pressure will increase the success rate, as this will be helpful in intubated patients with neck pathology.

Interventions

Nasogastric tube insertion with patient's head in neutral position

OTHERContralateral cricothyroid pressure

Cricothyroid pressure is applied externally in the contralateral direction of selected nostril before nasogastric insertion.

OTHERIpsilateral head turning

Patient's head is turned to the ipsilateral side of the selected nostril before nasogastric tube insertion.

Sponsors

University of Malaya
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patient who is scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia requiring NGT insertion * aged 20 to 70 years old * with normal airway (Commack Lehane 1 or 2) and neck movements.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient who has nasal stenosis, nasal septal deviation, upper airway deformity, base of skull fracture, oesophageal disorders, coagulopathy, and pregnant.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall success rateAt induction of general anesthesiaPercentage

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
First attempt success rateAt induction of general anesthesiaPercentage
Time taken to successful nasogastric tube placementAt induction of general anesthesiaProcedure start time is defined as the time when the nasogastric tube is inserted through the nostril. The procedure end time is defined as the time of successful insertion and confirmed NGT placement or the time after two failed attempts. The outcome is measured in second.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026