Skip to content

Patient and Family Partners in Heart Failure Care: Pilot Test of a Pre-visit Question Prompt List to Enhance Engagement During Medical Visits

Patient and Family Partners in Heart Failure: Pilot Test of a Pre-visit Question Prompt List to Enhance Engagement of Heart Failure Patients and Family Members During Medical Visits

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03491800
Enrollment
53
Registered
2018-04-09
Start date
2018-05-23
Completion date
2018-08-15
Last updated
2024-08-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to conduct a pilot study in 30 Heart Failure (HF) patients and visit companions (i.e., a family member who accompanies the patient to medical visits), to evaluate a pre- visit question/topic prompt list, designed to enhance patient and family member engagement during visits by providing a list of questions or topics that they may want to discuss with their health care provider.

Detailed description

Participants in this study will include 30 HF patients or dyads (i.e., a patient and family member who accompanies the patient into the examination room at a visit). While our study primarily will target HF dyads, if the investigators encounter recruitment difficulties, unaccompanied HF patients (i.e., HF patients who do not have a family member who can participate in the study with them) will also be enrolled. Procedures (methods): Single group pre-post study design. After providing informed consent, HF patients or dyads will receive the prompt list while in the waiting room prior to their visit. Completing the prompt list involves two steps. In step 1, participants will independently select from a predetermined list of questions (within topic areas) that they would like to ask their health care provider. The questions/topics were developed by other HF patients and family members in another phase of the study. Also, patients will be asked to choose behaviors they would like their family member to engage in during the visit (e.g., write down the provider's instructions, ask questions), from a structured list developed based on prior research. Family members will identify which behaviors they are willing to perform. In step 2, patients or dyads will collectively prioritize which questions/topics to discuss during the visit. Each dyad member will receive a prompt list to complete in the clinic waiting room immediately before their appointment. All visits will be audio-taped to assess effects of the intervention on communication behaviors during the visit. All participants will complete a questionnaire at baseline, 2 days after the audio-taped clinic visit, and at 3 months.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALQuestion/Topic Prompt List

A written document containing suggested questions that the family member and/or patient may want to ask the health care provider during the visit. A section is included for the patient to check which behaviors they would like for their family member to engage in during the visit and space is provided for the family member to check which behaviors they are willing to perform during the visit.

Sponsors

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
CollaboratorNIH
RTI International
CollaboratorOTHER
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Given the nature of the intervention and it's intended purpose (i.e., to enhance communication with participants and health care providers), it is not possible to blind participants, care providers, or the investigators.

Intervention model description

Individual patients and dyads (i.e., a HF patient and family member) will receive the question/topic prompt list immediately before their clinic visit

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patient Eligibility Criteria * Ambulatory adult patients ≥ 30 years old * Receive care in the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Cardiology practice * Have a clinical diagnosis of HF * Currently prescribed a loop diuretic * Have a New York Heart Association class II-IV * Must speak English * Have a working telephone or live with the patient Family Member Eligibility Criteria * ≥ 18 years old and able to give informed consent * Must be willing to participate in the intervention activities and provide informed consent * Must speak English * Have a working telephone or live with the patient Health Care Provider Eligibility Criteria * Must be an MD or advance practice provider (NP or PA) in the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Cardiology or General Internal Medicine practice * Must be willing to have an enrolled patient visit audio-taped

Exclusion criteria

For patients: * blindness, * terminal illness with life expectancy \<1 year (based on physician estimation), * currently on or anticipated to start dialysis within 1 year, * oxygen dependent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, * residency in a nursing home, or * psychiatric illness that would interfere with protocol completion.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent of Eligible Participants Who Enroll6 monthsThe investigators will assess enrollment success into the study among those considered eligible. Investigators aim to have at least 50% of eligible participants enroll into the trial.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Score on the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) - Management SubscaleUp to 1 month after clinic visitThe SCHFI was used to measure self-care management. The 10-item self-care management scale assesses decision-making in response to HF symptoms. Of note, the self-care management questions are answered and scored only if the respondent endorses having experienced dyspnea or ankle swelling within the past month.The subscale score is standardized, with scores ranging from 0-100 (higher scores indicate greater self-care management). Scores ≥ 70 are reflective of adequate self-care management. A change in scale score of one-half of a standard deviation or more is considered clinically significant. Measured at Baseline and during the 1 Month Follow-Up.
Mean Score on the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) - Maintenance SubscaleUp to 1 month after clinic visitThe SCHFI was used to measure self-care maintenance. The 10-item self-care maintenance scale assesses behaviors used to maintain physiologic stability (e.g., adherence to medications, frequent weighing).This subscale score is standardized, with scores ranging from 0-100 (higher scores indicates greater self-care maintenance). Scores ≥ 70 are reflective of adequate self-care maintenance. A change in scale score of one-half of a standard deviation or more is considered clinically significant. Measured at Baseline and during the 1 Month Follow-Up.
Mean Score Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) F-Up Month 1 - Confidence SubscaleUp to 1 month afterThe 6-item subscale of the SCHFI was used to assess self-confidence in performing behaviors and making decisions to control heart failure symptoms. The subscale score is standardized, with scores ranging from 0-100 (higher scores indicates greater self-care confidence). Scores ≥ 70 are reflective of adequate self-care confidence. A change in scale score of one-half of a standard deviation or more is considered clinically significant. Measured at Baseline and during the 1 Month Follow-Up.
Mean Score on Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (CC-SCHFI) - Confidence SubscaleUp to 1 month after.The CC-SCHFI is a 22-item measure (across 3 sub-scales) that was used to assess the contribution of caregivers to the self-care maintenance and self-care management of HF patients as well as their confidence in their ability to contribute to the patients' HF self-care. This 6-item subscale uses a 4-point Likert scale (never or rarely, sometimes, frequently, always or daily), with a standardized score from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate higher confidence in ability to contribute to the patient's self-care. Measured at Baseline and during the 1 Month Follow-Up.
Mean Acceptability Checklist ScoreWithin 2 days after receiving checklistThe investigators will assess the perceived value of the checklist using a series of 11 questions developed for this study. Each question is scored using a 6-point Likert response scale where 1 = strongly disagree and 6 = strongly agree. Higher scores mean higher perceived value of the checklist.
Mean Score on Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (CC-SCHFI) - Management SubscaleUp to 1 month afterThe CC-SCHFI is a 22-item measure (across 3 sub-scales) that assesses the contribution of caregivers to the self-care maintenance and self-care management of HF patients as well as their confidence in their ability to contribute to the patients' HF self-care. This 6-item subscale uses a 4-point Likert scale (never or rarely, sometimes, frequently, always or daily), with a standardized score from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate higher contribution to the patient's self-care management. Measured at Baseline and during the 1 Month Follow-Up.
Mean Score on Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI)Up to 1 month after clinic visitThe PEPPI is a 6-item measure which assesses confidence (self-efficacy) in communicating with health care providers. Each question is scored using a 5-point likert scale (0= not at all confident to 5=very confident). Higher scores indicate greater confidence in communicating with health care providers. Measured at Baseline, 2-Day Follow-Up, and during the 1 Month Follow-Up.
Mean Score on Communication With Physicians MeasureUp to 1 month after clinic visitThe Communication with Physicians measure by Lorig was used. It is a 3-item measure assessing the frequency of patients' engagement in communication behaviors during medical visits, including, preparing a list of questions, asking questions about treatment, and discussing personal problems with provider. Each question is answered using a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 0=never to 5=always. Higher scores indicate more active engagement in communication during medical visits. Measured at Baseline and during the 1 Month Follow-Up.
Mean Score on Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (CC-SCHFI) - Maintenance SubscaleUp to 1 month afterThe CC-SCHFI is a 22-item measure (across 3 sub-scales) that assesses the contribution of caregivers to the self-care maintenance and self-care management of HF patients as well as their confidence in their ability to contribute to the patients' HF self-care. This 10- item subscale uses a 4-point Likert scale (never or rarely, sometimes, frequently, always or daily), with a standardized score from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate higher contribution to self-care maintenance. Measured at Baseline and during the 1 Month Follow-Up.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Accompanied Patients
The Question/Topic Prompt List is provided to Heart Failure (HF) Patients and their family member (if applicable) for completion prior to being seen by the doctor.
23
Companions
Family members who accompanied enrolled patient participants to a visit and participated in the study with the patient.
23
Unaccompanied Patients
The Question/Topic Prompt List is provided to individual, unaccompanied HF patient participants for completion prior to being seen by the doctor.
7
Total53

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAccompanied PatientsCompanionsUnaccompanied PatientsTotal
Age, Continuous60.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9
58.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
61.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.2
59.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.96
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
23 Participants23 Participants6 Participants52 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Mean Score on Communication With Physicians Measure3.35 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.31
3.00 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.66
3.27 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
Mean Score on the CC-SCHFI - Confidence Subscale68.24 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.98
68.24 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.98
Mean Score on the CC-SCHFI - Maintenance Subscale57.72 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.37
57.72 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.37
Mean Score on the CC-SCHFI - Management Subscale75.56 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.46
75.56 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.46
Mean Score on the PEPPI3.68 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.32
3.83 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.31
3.52 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.56
3.72 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.38
Mean Score on the SCHFI - Confidence Subscale67.48 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.44
60.23 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.39
65.93 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.4
Mean Score on the SCHFI - Maintenance Subscale76.20 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.72
81.10 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.76
77.25 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.64
Mean Score on the SCHFI - Management Subscale69.17 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.43
66.25 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.29
68.44 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.95
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
10 Participants11 Participants1 Participants22 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
11 Participants12 Participants6 Participants29 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
23 Participants23 Participants7 Participants53 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants19 Participants5 Participants30 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants4 Participants2 Participants23 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Percent of Eligible Participants Who Enroll

The investigators will assess enrollment success into the study among those considered eligible. Investigators aim to have at least 50% of eligible participants enroll into the trial.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Includes all participants screened for enrollment into the study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Patient and CompanionsPercent of Eligible Participants Who Enroll44 percentage of participants
Secondary

Mean Acceptability Checklist Score

The investigators will assess the perceived value of the checklist using a series of 11 questions developed for this study. Each question is scored using a 6-point Likert response scale where 1 = strongly disagree and 6 = strongly agree. Higher scores mean higher perceived value of the checklist.

Time frame: Within 2 days after receiving checklist

Population: Data were reported when present and applicable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Patient and CompanionsMean Acceptability Checklist ScoreEasy to fill out5.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35
Patient and CompanionsMean Acceptability Checklist ScoreAdequate time in waiting room to finish checklist5.48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Patient and CompanionsMean Acceptability Checklist ScoreInstructions clear and understandable5.95 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.21
Patient and CompanionsMean Acceptability Checklist ScoreClearer understanding of companion's concerns4.75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.94
Patient and CompanionsMean Acceptability Checklist ScoreEasier to talk to doctor5.09 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.16
Patient and CompanionsMean Acceptability Checklist ScoreEasy to use during discussion with Dr5.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.32
Patient and CompanionsMean Acceptability Checklist ScoreFelt supported by companion due to checklist5.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.52
Patient and CompanionsMean Acceptability Checklist ScoreExisting questions matched what I wanted to ask5.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Patient and CompanionsMean Acceptability Checklist ScoreWould use checklist at next appt5.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.75
Patient and CompanionsMean Acceptability Checklist ScoreAble to learn more from Dr using checklist5.28 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.36
Patient and CompanionsMean Acceptability Checklist ScoreChecklist helped to get more questions asked5.39 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.34
CompanionsMean Acceptability Checklist ScoreWould use checklist at next appt5.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.58
CompanionsMean Acceptability Checklist ScoreAble to learn more from Dr using checklist5.24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.39
CompanionsMean Acceptability Checklist ScoreClearer understanding of companion's concerns5.53 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.23
CompanionsMean Acceptability Checklist ScoreAdequate time in waiting room to finish checklist5.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
CompanionsMean Acceptability Checklist ScoreEasier to talk to doctor5.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.36
CompanionsMean Acceptability Checklist ScoreEasy to fill out5.95 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.21
CompanionsMean Acceptability Checklist ScoreInstructions clear and understandable5.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.29
CompanionsMean Acceptability Checklist ScoreChecklist helped to get more questions asked5.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.27
CompanionsMean Acceptability Checklist ScoreEasy to use during discussion with Dr5.94 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.24
CompanionsMean Acceptability Checklist ScoreExisting questions matched what I wanted to ask5.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.42
Unaccompanied PatientsMean Acceptability Checklist ScoreInstructions clear and understandable5.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.89
Unaccompanied PatientsMean Acceptability Checklist ScoreEasier to talk to doctor4.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.46
Unaccompanied PatientsMean Acceptability Checklist ScoreExisting questions matched what I wanted to ask5.14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.69
Unaccompanied PatientsMean Acceptability Checklist ScoreAdequate time in waiting room to finish checklist5.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.89
Unaccompanied PatientsMean Acceptability Checklist ScoreEasy to fill out6.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Unaccompanied PatientsMean Acceptability Checklist ScoreEasy to use during discussion with Dr5.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.23
Unaccompanied PatientsMean Acceptability Checklist ScoreWould use checklist at next appt4.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.86
Unaccompanied PatientsMean Acceptability Checklist ScoreChecklist helped to get more questions asked4.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Unaccompanied PatientsMean Acceptability Checklist ScoreAble to learn more from Dr using checklist4.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.64
Secondary

Mean Score on Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (CC-SCHFI) - Confidence Subscale

The CC-SCHFI is a 22-item measure (across 3 sub-scales) that was used to assess the contribution of caregivers to the self-care maintenance and self-care management of HF patients as well as their confidence in their ability to contribute to the patients' HF self-care. This 6-item subscale uses a 4-point Likert scale (never or rarely, sometimes, frequently, always or daily), with a standardized score from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate higher confidence in ability to contribute to the patient's self-care. Measured at Baseline and during the 1 Month Follow-Up.

Time frame: Up to 1 month after.

Population: This measure is completed by Companions only. Data are missing for 1 Companion

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CompanionsMean Score on Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (CC-SCHFI) - Confidence SubscaleBaseline68.24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.98
CompanionsMean Score on Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (CC-SCHFI) - Confidence Subscale1 Month Follow-Up73.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.02
p-value: 0.21t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Mean Score on Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (CC-SCHFI) - Maintenance Subscale

The CC-SCHFI is a 22-item measure (across 3 sub-scales) that assesses the contribution of caregivers to the self-care maintenance and self-care management of HF patients as well as their confidence in their ability to contribute to the patients' HF self-care. This 10- item subscale uses a 4-point Likert scale (never or rarely, sometimes, frequently, always or daily), with a standardized score from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate higher contribution to self-care maintenance. Measured at Baseline and during the 1 Month Follow-Up.

Time frame: Up to 1 month after

Population: This measure is completed by Companions only. Patient responses are not applicable here and are captured in a separate outcome measure. Data are missing for 1 Companion.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CompanionsMean Score on Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (CC-SCHFI) - Maintenance SubscaleBaseline57.72 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.37
CompanionsMean Score on Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (CC-SCHFI) - Maintenance Subscale1 Month Follow-Up57.42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.18
p-value: 0.95t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Mean Score on Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (CC-SCHFI) - Management Subscale

The CC-SCHFI is a 22-item measure (across 3 sub-scales) that assesses the contribution of caregivers to the self-care maintenance and self-care management of HF patients as well as their confidence in their ability to contribute to the patients' HF self-care. This 6-item subscale uses a 4-point Likert scale (never or rarely, sometimes, frequently, always or daily), with a standardized score from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate higher contribution to the patient's self-care management. Measured at Baseline and during the 1 Month Follow-Up.

Time frame: Up to 1 month after

Population: This measure is completed by Companions only. Accompanied and Unaccompanied responses are not applicable here and are captured in a separate outcome measure. Data are missing for 14 Companions.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CompanionsMean Score on Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (CC-SCHFI) - Management Subscale1 Month Follow-Up72.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.81
CompanionsMean Score on Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (CC-SCHFI) - Management SubscaleBaseline75.56 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.46
p-value: 0.52t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Mean Score on Communication With Physicians Measure

The Communication with Physicians measure by Lorig was used. It is a 3-item measure assessing the frequency of patients' engagement in communication behaviors during medical visits, including, preparing a list of questions, asking questions about treatment, and discussing personal problems with provider. Each question is answered using a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 0=never to 5=always. Higher scores indicate more active engagement in communication during medical visits. Measured at Baseline and during the 1 Month Follow-Up.

Time frame: Up to 1 month after clinic visit

Population: This measure was only answered by patients. Companion responses are not applicable here. Data are missing for 1 Accompanied patients and 1 Unaccompanied patients.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Patient and CompanionsMean Score on Communication With Physicians MeasureBaseline3.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.31
Patient and CompanionsMean Score on Communication With Physicians Measure1 Month Follow-Up3.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.99
Unaccompanied PatientsMean Score on Communication With Physicians MeasureBaseline3.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.66
Unaccompanied PatientsMean Score on Communication With Physicians Measure1 Month Follow-Up2.72 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.98
p-value: 0.6t-test, 2 sided
p-value: 0.4t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Mean Score on Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI)

The PEPPI is a 6-item measure which assesses confidence (self-efficacy) in communicating with health care providers. Each question is scored using a 5-point likert scale (0= not at all confident to 5=very confident). Higher scores indicate greater confidence in communicating with health care providers. Measured at Baseline, 2-Day Follow-Up, and during the 1 Month Follow-Up.

Time frame: Up to 1 month after clinic visit

Population: Reported data are less than the total number of participants who completed each arm due to participants not responding to questions for this measure. Data are missing for 1 Accompanied, 1 Unaccompanied, and 1 Companion.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Patient and CompanionsMean Score on Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI)Baseline3.68 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.32
Patient and CompanionsMean Score on Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI)1 Month Follow-Up3.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.29
CompanionsMean Score on Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI)Baseline3.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
CompanionsMean Score on Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI)1 Month Follow-Up3.81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.33
Unaccompanied PatientsMean Score on Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI)Baseline3.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.56
Unaccompanied PatientsMean Score on Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI)1 Month Follow-Up3.78 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.39
p-value: 0.23t-test, 2 sided
p-value: 0.67t-test, 2 sided
p-value: 0.054t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Mean Score on the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) - Maintenance Subscale

The SCHFI was used to measure self-care maintenance. The 10-item self-care maintenance scale assesses behaviors used to maintain physiologic stability (e.g., adherence to medications, frequent weighing).This subscale score is standardized, with scores ranging from 0-100 (higher scores indicates greater self-care maintenance). Scores ≥ 70 are reflective of adequate self-care maintenance. A change in scale score of one-half of a standard deviation or more is considered clinically significant. Measured at Baseline and during the 1 Month Follow-Up.

Time frame: Up to 1 month after clinic visit

Population: This measure is completed by Accompanied and Unaccompanied patients only. Companion responses are not applicable here and are captured in a separate outcome measure. Data are missing for 1 Accompanied patients and 1 Unaccompanied patients.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Patient and CompanionsMean Score on the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) - Maintenance SubscaleBaseline76.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.72
Patient and CompanionsMean Score on the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) - Maintenance Subscale1 Month Follow-Up76.51 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.7
Unaccompanied PatientsMean Score on the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) - Maintenance SubscaleBaseline81.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.76
Unaccompanied PatientsMean Score on the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) - Maintenance Subscale1 Month Follow-Up76.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.43
p-value: 0.9t-test, 2 sided
p-value: 0.3t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Mean Score on the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) - Management Subscale

The SCHFI was used to measure self-care management. The 10-item self-care management scale assesses decision-making in response to HF symptoms. Of note, the self-care management questions are answered and scored only if the respondent endorses having experienced dyspnea or ankle swelling within the past month.The subscale score is standardized, with scores ranging from 0-100 (higher scores indicate greater self-care management). Scores ≥ 70 are reflective of adequate self-care management. A change in scale score of one-half of a standard deviation or more is considered clinically significant. Measured at Baseline and during the 1 Month Follow-Up.

Time frame: Up to 1 month after clinic visit

Population: This measure is completed by Accompanied and Unaccompanied patients only. Companion responses are not applicable here and are captured in a separate outcome measure. Data are missing for 11 Accompanied patients and 3 Unaccompanied patients.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Patient and CompanionsMean Score on the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) - Management SubscaleBaseline69.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.43
Patient and CompanionsMean Score on the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) - Management Subscale1 Month Follow-Up61.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.72
Unaccompanied PatientsMean Score on the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) - Management SubscaleBaseline66.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.29
Unaccompanied PatientsMean Score on the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) - Management Subscale1 Month Follow-Up62.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.45
p-value: 0.3t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Mean Score Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) F-Up Month 1 - Confidence Subscale

The 6-item subscale of the SCHFI was used to assess self-confidence in performing behaviors and making decisions to control heart failure symptoms. The subscale score is standardized, with scores ranging from 0-100 (higher scores indicates greater self-care confidence). Scores ≥ 70 are reflective of adequate self-care confidence. A change in scale score of one-half of a standard deviation or more is considered clinically significant. Measured at Baseline and during the 1 Month Follow-Up.

Time frame: Up to 1 month after

Population: This measure is completed by Accompanied and Unaccompanied patients only. Companion responses are not applicable here and are captured in a separate outcome measure. Data are missing for 1 Accompanied patients and 1 Unaccompanied patients.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Patient and CompanionsMean Score Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) F-Up Month 1 - Confidence SubscaleBaseline67.48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.44
Patient and CompanionsMean Score Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) F-Up Month 1 - Confidence Subscale1 Month Follow-Up70.51 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.67
Unaccompanied PatientsMean Score Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) F-Up Month 1 - Confidence SubscaleBaseline60.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.39
Unaccompanied PatientsMean Score Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) F-Up Month 1 - Confidence Subscale1 Month Follow-Up61.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.16
p-value: 0.4t-test, 2 sided
p-value: 0.85t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026