Skip to content

Transvaginal Versus Transobturator Paravaginal Repair

Transvaginal Versus Transobturator Paravaginal Repair Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03489902
Enrollment
40
Registered
2018-04-06
Start date
2017-01-01
Completion date
2018-03-01
Last updated
2018-04-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cystocele

Brief summary

Clinical trial comparing the new technique for paravaginal repair versus the traditional technique

Detailed description

trial comparing the transobturator paravaginal repair versus the traditional technique

Interventions

PROCEDUREtraditional transvaginal Paravaginal Repair

traditional transvaginal application of sutures to the white line

PROCEDURETransobturator Paravaginal Repair

Transobturator application of sutures to the white line in cases needing paravaginal repair

Sponsors

Ain Shams Maternity Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

paravaginal defect cystocele midline and paravaginal defect cystocele

Exclusion criteria

* uterine descent previous cystocele surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Operative data1 dayOperative time

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pelvic organ prolapse quantification system3 monthEvaluation of the postoperative degree of anterior vaginal wall descent
Operative Details1 dayblood loss

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026