Skip to content

2-5 Intermittent Caloric Restriction in HIV

2-5 Intermittent Caloric Restriction for Weight Loss and Insulin Resistance in HIV-Infected Adults With Features of the Metabolic Syndrome

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03489109
Acronym
2-5toWIN
Enrollment
35
Registered
2018-04-05
Start date
2018-05-09
Completion date
2021-12-17
Last updated
2022-10-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Metabolic Syndrome

Keywords

Fasting

Brief summary

Background: Weight gain can lead to obesity and diabetes even in people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Researchers want to see if the technique intermittent calorie restriction can help overweight people with HIV as an alternative to traditional diets. Objective: To see if intermittent calorie restriction leads to weight loss and improved blood sugar in obese people with HIV. Eligibility: Adults ages 18-65 with HIV who are obese and do not have diabetes Design: Participants will be screened with a medical history, physical exam, and blood and urine tests. Before starting treatment, participants will: * Have a nutritional consultation * Get a pedometer to record daily steps * Test a restricted diet for 1 day * Have a body x-ray At the baseline visit, participants will have: * Blood drawn after they drink a sugar drink * Questions about their health and eating * A nutritional consultation * Resting energy expenditure measured. Participants will fast overnight. Then they will lie down while a plastic bubble goes over the head and a plastic sheet covers the upper body. Oxygen flows into the bubble. * Liver stiffness test. A wand on the stomach releases sound waves like an ultrasound. For 12 weeks, some participants will be on a standard diet. Others will restrict how much food they eat 2 days a week. On those days they will eat about 25% of their recommended calories. Participants will keep a diary of their diet and steps. Participants will have 4 visits during the 12-week diet and 1 visit 12 weeks after the diet ends. They will repeat previous tests.

Detailed description

The high prevalence of obesity coupled with chronic inflammation and immune activation places human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected individuals at increased risk for metabolic complications emphasizing the need for more aggressive management of obesity and related co-morbidities in the aging HIV-infected population. The most effective treatment for obesity and metabolic syndrome is lifestyle modification, usually with a combination of caloric restriction and increased exercise. Intermittent caloric restriction (ICR) or intermittent fasting simplifies caloric restriction by severely limiting calories only a few days per week and allowing ad lib diet on the other days. Weight loss benefits are similar to those seen with conventional diets, however, data suggests possible added health benefits from intermittent fasting. We propose to study the benefits of a 2-5 ICR strategy on weight, insulin resistance, and cardiovascular disease markers in obese HIV-infected adults with features of the metabolic syndrome. In a prospective pilot study, 50 HIVinfected adults will be randomized 1:1 to ICR or standard-of-care instruction of healthy diet and lifestyle for a 12-week intervention period. We hypothesize that ICR (2 days per week) will be an effective and acceptable diet strategy that will result in significant weight reduction, improvements in insulin sensitivity, and related metabolic parameters.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALIntermittent fasting

Subject will consume approximately 25% of their daily calories for 2 days per week. The other 5 days they will eat their normal diet

OTHERStandard of Care

Subject will receive standard of care recommendations for healthy diet and lifestyle

Sponsors

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Lead SponsorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

-INCLUSION CRITERIA: 1. Aged 18 to 65 years 2. HIV RNA level less than or equal to 200 copies/mL for greater than or equal to1 year (1 measure greater than or equal to 200 allowed if also \<500 and preceded and followed by one or more undetectable values) 3. Cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) \>200 cells/mL and no active opportunistic infection or malignancy 4. BMI greater than or equal to 30 kg/m\^2 5. One or more components of the metabolic syndrome as defined below. * Risk Factor: Waist circumference * Men: Defining Level: \>102 cm * Women: Defining Level: \>88 cm * Risk Factor: Triglycerides, greater than or equal to 150 mg/dL * Risk Factor: High density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol * Men: Defining Level: \<40 mg/dL * Women: Defining Level: \<50 mg/dL * Risk Factor: Blood pressure, greater than or equal to 130 / greater than or equal to 85 mmHg * Risk Factor: Fasting glucose, greater than or equal to 110 mg/dL 6. Fasting blood glucose \>60 mg/dL at screening 7. Willingness to allow sample storage for future research 8. Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Established diagnosis of diabetes mellitus use of anti-diabetes medications, or a hemoglobin A1C (HgbA1C) of \>7.0% 2. History of eating disorder, uncontrolled mood or thought disorder, significant gastrointestinal disorder or malabsorption, or significant hepatic or renal impairment 3. Current use of medical therapy for overweight/obesity including phentermine, orlistat, lorcaserin, naltrexone/bupropion, and liraglutide or history of weight loss surgery. Concomitant use of medications with side effects known to potentially influence appetite are allowed if on a stable dose for at least 12 months 4. History of symptomatic hypoglycemia. 5. Use of systemic glucocorticoids (stable dose daily inhaled corticosteroid allowed) 6. Chronic viral hepatitis C; subjects with a history of hepatitis C successfully treated can enroll \>12 months after sustained virologic response 7. Alcohol or substance use disorder in the past year as defined by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)-V or positive urine drug screen 8. Current pregnancy, actively seeking to become pregnant or breastfeeding 9. Any serious health or other condition which, in the opinion of the PI or their designee, could potentially interfere with the ability of a subject to comply with the procedures and assessments of the protocol or to safely participate and complete the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in WeightAssessed before 12-week intervention (baseline) and at week 12The effect of intermittent fasting was measured by change in weight between baseline and at week 12
Change in Insulin SensitivityAssessed before 12-week intervention (baseline) and at week 12The effect of intermittent fasting on insulin sensitivity was measured by change in homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) between baseline and week 12. Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) is a method to measure insulin sensitivity. Optimal insulin sensitivity is a HOMA-IR ratio less than 1. Levels above 1.9 signal early insulin resistance, while levels above 2.9 signal significant insulin resistance.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Lipid Panel LevelsAssessed before 12-week intervention (baseline) and at week 12The effect of Intermittent fasting was measured by change in lipid profile levels between baseline and week 12. Lipid profile levels assessed include serum triglyceride, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and total cholesterol levels.
Change in C-reactive Protein (CRP) LevelsAssessed before 12-week intervention (baseline) and at week 12The effect of Intermittent fasting on biomarker of inflammation was measured by C-reactive protein (CRP) levels between baseline and week 12
Change in Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) ScoreAssessed before 12-week intervention (baseline) and at week 12The effect of Intermittent fasting on body composition was evaluated using Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) score from Fibroscan. Measurement of controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) is a non-invasive quantitative and qualitative assessment of liver steatosis. CAP measures ultrasonic attenuation (in dB/m) at a frequency of 3.5 MHz (on a go-and-return path). Values range from 100 to 400 dB/m. Higher levels indicate increased hepatic fat.
Self-reported Compliance Rate With Assigned DietCompliance reported at Week 12Compliance with assigned diet was assessed by participant self-reported rating. Participants used a self rating score of 0-100% with 0% = noncompliant and 100% = completely compliant with assigned diet. Compliance rate per participant was calculated using average of all daily reported scores. The overall compliance rate was averaged over all participants to get the mean compliance.
Change in Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) ScoreAssessed before 12-week intervention (baseline) and at week 12The effect of Intermittent fasting on mood was evaluated by change in the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) score between baseline and week 12. The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is a 21-item measure of depression with each question on a 4-point scale ranging from 0=minimal to 3 = more severe (full list score values = 0,1,2,3). Total scores are a sum of individual items. Minimal depression = 0-13, mild depression = 14-19, moderate depression = 20-28, and severe depression = 29-63. The maximum score is 63 and the minimum possible score is zero.
Change in Visceral Adipose TissueAssessed before 12-week intervention (baseline) and at week 12The effect of intermittent fasting was evaluated by change in visceral adiposity using total body dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) between baseline and at week 12.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Of the 35 subjects who were consented to protocol, four subjects withdrew prior to start of study, one subject was screen failure and 30 subjects started the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intermittent Fasting Diet
HIV positive subjects with body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 (obese) consume approximately 25% of their daily calories for 2 non-consecutive days per week, normal diet for the other 5 days, and receive healthy lifestyle counseling for 12 weeks.
14
Standard of Care Diet
HIV positive subjects with body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 (obese) receive nutritional and healthy lifestyle counseling for 12 weeks.
16
Total30

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIntermittent Fasting DietStandard of Care DietTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
14 Participants16 Participants30 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants14 Participants24 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
10 Participants11 Participants21 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants8 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants8 Participants14 Participants
Weight112.1 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.4
109.6 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.9
110.8 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.4

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 140 / 16
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 147 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 140 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Insulin Sensitivity

The effect of intermittent fasting on insulin sensitivity was measured by change in homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) between baseline and week 12. Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) is a method to measure insulin sensitivity. Optimal insulin sensitivity is a HOMA-IR ratio less than 1. Levels above 1.9 signal early insulin resistance, while levels above 2.9 signal significant insulin resistance.

Time frame: Assessed before 12-week intervention (baseline) and at week 12

Population: Analysis only includes subjects who completed study through Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intermittent Fasting DietChange in Insulin Sensitivity-0.9 unitlessStandard Deviation 1.7
Standard of Care DietChange in Insulin Sensitivity-1.5 unitlessStandard Deviation 3.3
Primary

Change in Weight

The effect of intermittent fasting was measured by change in weight between baseline and at week 12

Time frame: Assessed before 12-week intervention (baseline) and at week 12

Population: Analysis only includes subjects who completed through Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intermittent Fasting DietChange in Weight-1.5 kilogramsStandard Deviation 4.9
Standard of Care DietChange in Weight-1.8 kilogramsStandard Deviation 3.8
Secondary

Change in Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) Score

The effect of Intermittent fasting on mood was evaluated by change in the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) score between baseline and week 12. The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is a 21-item measure of depression with each question on a 4-point scale ranging from 0=minimal to 3 = more severe (full list score values = 0,1,2,3). Total scores are a sum of individual items. Minimal depression = 0-13, mild depression = 14-19, moderate depression = 20-28, and severe depression = 29-63. The maximum score is 63 and the minimum possible score is zero.

Time frame: Assessed before 12-week intervention (baseline) and at week 12

Population: Analysis only included subjects who completed study through week 12 and completed the questionnaire

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intermittent Fasting DietChange in Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) Score3.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.8
Standard of Care DietChange in Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) Score8.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.7
Secondary

Change in Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) Score

The effect of Intermittent fasting on body composition was evaluated using Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) score from Fibroscan. Measurement of controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) is a non-invasive quantitative and qualitative assessment of liver steatosis. CAP measures ultrasonic attenuation (in dB/m) at a frequency of 3.5 MHz (on a go-and-return path). Values range from 100 to 400 dB/m. Higher levels indicate increased hepatic fat.

Time frame: Assessed before 12-week intervention (baseline) and at week 12

Population: Analysis only includes subjects who completed study through week 12. Unable to obtain a Fibroscan on 10 participants because of body habitus.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intermittent Fasting DietChange in Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) Score-3.8 dB/mStandard Deviation 28.3
Standard of Care DietChange in Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) Score-6.6 dB/mStandard Deviation 74.6
Secondary

Change in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels

The effect of Intermittent fasting on biomarker of inflammation was measured by C-reactive protein (CRP) levels between baseline and week 12

Time frame: Assessed before 12-week intervention (baseline) and at week 12

Population: Analysis only includes subjects who completed study through week 12

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intermittent Fasting DietChange in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels1.7 mg/LStandard Deviation 4.8
Standard of Care DietChange in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels0.3 mg/LStandard Deviation 4.9
Secondary

Change in Lipid Panel Levels

The effect of Intermittent fasting was measured by change in lipid profile levels between baseline and week 12. Lipid profile levels assessed include serum triglyceride, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and total cholesterol levels.

Time frame: Assessed before 12-week intervention (baseline) and at week 12

Population: Analysis only includes subjects who completed study through week 12

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intermittent Fasting DietChange in Lipid Panel LevelsLDL Cholesterol1.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 17
Intermittent Fasting DietChange in Lipid Panel LevelsHDL Cholesterol-1.3 mg/dLStandard Deviation 3.4
Intermittent Fasting DietChange in Lipid Panel LevelsTotal Cholesterol-0.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 17.4
Intermittent Fasting DietChange in Lipid Panel LevelsTriglyceride-4.8 mg/dLStandard Deviation 23.5
Standard of Care DietChange in Lipid Panel LevelsTotal Cholesterol-1 mg/dLStandard Deviation 12.5
Standard of Care DietChange in Lipid Panel LevelsHDL Cholesterol-2.7 mg/dLStandard Deviation 5.7
Standard of Care DietChange in Lipid Panel LevelsLDL Cholesterol1.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 10.9
Standard of Care DietChange in Lipid Panel LevelsTriglyceride0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 22.9
Secondary

Change in Visceral Adipose Tissue

The effect of intermittent fasting was evaluated by change in visceral adiposity using total body dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) between baseline and at week 12.

Time frame: Assessed before 12-week intervention (baseline) and at week 12

Population: Analysis only includes subjects who completed study through week 12. Ten participants were unable to complete this exam

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intermittent Fasting DietChange in Visceral Adipose Tissue-224 mgStandard Deviation 206
Standard of Care DietChange in Visceral Adipose Tissue-149 mgStandard Deviation 541
Secondary

Self-reported Compliance Rate With Assigned Diet

Compliance with assigned diet was assessed by participant self-reported rating. Participants used a self rating score of 0-100% with 0% = noncompliant and 100% = completely compliant with assigned diet. Compliance rate per participant was calculated using average of all daily reported scores. The overall compliance rate was averaged over all participants to get the mean compliance.

Time frame: Compliance reported at Week 12

Population: Analysis only included subjects who completed study through week 12. 11 subjects did not report their compliance rate.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intermittent Fasting DietSelf-reported Compliance Rate With Assigned Diet80 Percentage of ComplianceStandard Deviation 16
Standard of Care DietSelf-reported Compliance Rate With Assigned Diet67 Percentage of ComplianceStandard Deviation 22

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026