Skip to content

Nutritional Prognostic Factors in ALS

Nutritional Prognostic Factors in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03487536
Acronym
PEG-ALS
Enrollment
47
Registered
2018-04-04
Start date
2006-01-02
Completion date
2016-07-31
Last updated
2018-04-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastrostomy, Neuro-Degenerative Disease, Nutritional Deficiency

Brief summary

Background. Several nutritional factors have been evaluated as prognostic factors for survival in ALS patients at earlier stages of the disease \[body mass index (BMI), body composition expressed as fat free mass (FFM), fat mass (FM), phase angle (PhA), low-density lipoprotein/high-density lipoprotein (LDL/HDL) ratio, cholesterol levels\], while only two studies have evaluated some of these parameters after PEG placement. Aim. BMI and cholesterol levels were evaluated as prognostic factors for survival after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement Moreover, the relationship between body composition and BMI in a subgroup of ALS patients was evaluated.

Detailed description

Methods. Nutritional and neurological parameters were assessed at the time of PEG placement (T0) in 47 consecutive patients. Body composition and PhA were measured in only 22 patients within 2 months from T0. Survival was calculated as the time from the PEG placement to tracheostomy or death.

Interventions

OTHERNutritional assessment

BMI and cholesterol levels evaluation

Sponsors

University of Bari
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ALS patients who underwent PEG tube placement from 2006 to 2015 and were referred to the artificial nutrition team of the Gastroenterology Unit

Exclusion criteria

* ALS patients without PEG

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
nutritional assessmentat the time of PEG placement (one day)Weight and height (combined to report BMI in kg/m\^2)
biochemical nutritional assessmentonly at the time of PEG placement (one day)cholesterol levels

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
body composition assessmentwithin 2 months from the PEG implantation (one day)Evaluation of fat mass and fat free mass

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026