Skip to content

A ComparIson of Strategies to PrepAre SeveRely CALCified Coronary Lesions

A ComparIson of Strategies to Prepare Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions - A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Super High-Pressure NC PTCA Balloon Versus Scoring PTCA Balloon in Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03487432
Acronym
ISAR-CALC
Enrollment
74
Registered
2018-04-04
Start date
2018-07-20
Completion date
2019-10-23
Last updated
2019-11-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Calcified Coronary Artery Disease (Grade 3)

Brief summary

The objective of this prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial is to evaluate the completeness of stent expansion following a strategy of lesion preparation with either a Super High-Pressure NC PTCA Balloon (OPN NC) or a Scoring PTCA Balloon (NSE Alpha) after unsuccessful lesion preparation with conventional NC balloon angioplasty in an angiographically well-defined group of patients with severely calcified coronary lesions (grade 3) undergoing coronary stent implantation (SYNERGY everolimus-eluting stent (EES)).

Interventions

DEVICESuper High-Pressure NC PTCA Balloon (OPN NC)

Strategy of Super High-Pressure NC PTCA Balloon (OPN NC) after unsuccessful lesion preparation with conventional NC balloon angioplasty.

DEVICEScoring PTCA Balloon (NSE Alpha)

Strategy of Scoring PTCA Balloon (NSE Alpha) after unsuccessful lesion preparation with conventional NC balloon angioplasty.

Sponsors

SIS Medical AG
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age above 18 years and consentable; * Persistent angina symptoms despite optimal medical therapy and/or evidence of inducible ischemia; * Angiographically-proven coronary artery disease; * De novo lesion in a native coronary artery; * Target reference vessel diameter between 2.25 and 4.00 mm by visual estimation; * Calcification of the target lesion as determined by angiography (grade 3); * Unsuccessful lesion preparation (\<30% reduction of baseline diameter stenosis) with conventional NC balloon angioplasty * Written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Myocardial infarction (within 1 week); * Limited long-term prognosis due to other conditions; * Target lesion is in a coronary artery bypass graft; * Target lesion is an in-stent restenosis; * Target lesion is aorto-ostial; * Target vessel thrombus.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stent expansion index (SEI)intraproceduralStent expansion index (SEI), defined as minimum stent area divided by mean reference area in an optical coherence tomography (OCT) quantitative analysis

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedural Success30 days'Procedural Success', defined as the achievement of angiographic success without any MACE, defined as cardiac death, target vessel related myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization (PTCA/PCI or coronary artery bypass graft \[CABG\])
Strategy Successintraprocedural'Strategy Success' defined as procedural success using the assigned study device and stent, without requirement for lesion preparations with further devices (i.e. rotational atherectomy \[RA\])
Acute lumen gain,intraproceduralAcute lumen gain, defined as minimal lumen diameter (MLD) post balloon angioplasty minus baseline MLD (mm)
Angiographic Successintraprocedural'Angiographic Success', defined as the achievement of residual angiographic stenosis \<30% of the target lesion in the presence of TIMI 3 flow
Rate of vessel perforationintraproceduralRate of vessel perforation
Procedure durationintraproceduralProcedure duration in min
Contrast volumeintraproceduralContrast volume in mL
Complementary lesion preparationsintraproceduralNumber of complementary lesion preparations with further devices (i.e. rotational atherectomy \[RA\])

Countries

Germany, Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026