Uterovaginal and Vaginal Vault Prolapse
Conditions
Keywords
treatment
Brief summary
This prospective interventional randomized controlled trial is conducted to compare a new technique for Sacrospinous-Sacrotuberous fixation with the traditional sacrospinous ligament fixation technique for treatment of uterovaginal and vaginal vault prolapse.
Interventions
PROCEDURESacrospinous-Sacrotuberous fixation
Sacrospinous-Sacrotuberous fixation
Sponsors
Ain Shams University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
40 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Age from 40 to 60 years. 2. POP Q stage III & IV 3. Uterovaginal prolapse. 4. Vaginal vault prolapse. 5. BMI \>35.
Exclusion criteria
1. Age \> 40 years or \< 60 years. 2. POP Q stage I or II. 3. BMI \< 35. 4. Previous repair of uterovaginal or vaginal vault prolapse. 5. Comorbidity with Stress Urinary Incontinence. 6. Presence of persistent risk factor increasing intra-abdominal pressure e.g. chronic chest conditions. 7. Any significant comorbidity or psychiatric disorder that would compromise patient's consent.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Number of participants with recurrence of uterovaginal and vaginal vault prolapse | 1 year |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| blood loss | intraoperative | — |
| Injury to surrounding structures | intraoperative | Number of participants that experience injury of important surrounding structure intraoperative |
| operative time | intraoperative | — |
Countries
Egypt
Outcome results
None listed