Skip to content

Prevalence of PE in ED Patients With Isolated Syncope

Prevalence of Pulmonary Embolism in Emergency Department Patients With Isolated Syncope

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03487237
Acronym
PEEPS
Enrollment
459
Registered
2018-04-03
Start date
2018-05-23
Completion date
2018-12-18
Last updated
2018-12-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Syncope

Keywords

Syncope, Pulmonary embolism, emergency department, clinical decision rule

Brief summary

Syncope is a rapid onset, transient, loss of consciousness with a short duration. This symptom has been reported to be a specific presentation of patients with pulmonary embolism. However, the prevalence of pulmonary embolism in patients with syncope remains debated. This prospective cohort study will recruit patients presenting to the emergency department with a syncope, who will systematically undergo formal workup for pulmonary embolism. The main objective of this study is to assess the prevalence of pulmonary embolism in ED patients with syncope

Detailed description

Syncope is a rapid onset, transient, loss of consciousness with a short duration. This symptom has been reported to be a specific presentation of patients with pulmonary embolism. However, the prevalence of pulmonary embolism in patients with syncope remains debated. This prospective cohort study will recruit patients presenting to the emergency department with a syncope, who will systematically undergo formal workup for pulmonary embolism. The main objective of this study is to assess the prevalence of pulmonary embolism in ED patients with syncope

Interventions

BIOLOGICALDdimer testing

Included patients will undergo a formal work up for pulmonary embolism: Ddimer testing, followed if positive by a computed tomography pulmonary angiogram or V/Q scan.

Sponsors

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \>= 18 years visiting the Emergency Department, * history of syncope in the past 24 hours: loss of consciousness, rapid onset, short duration (\<1 min), transient, with spontaneous and rapid recovery without post event confusion * With or without prodromes * Without any other obvious cause * Informed written consent * Affiliation to a social security system (AME Excepted)

Exclusion criteria

\- Other criteria for PE suspicion : Acute onset of dyspnea Acute severe chest pain, * Pregnancy * Concurrent anticoagulation treatment * Other obvious cause of syncope : Seizure, Stroke, Traumatic brain injury , toxic intake , Atrioventricular block type 3

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
diagnosis of Pulmonary embolism within 72 hrs after ED visit Safety72 hours after ED visitdiagnosis of Pulmonary embolism within 72 hrs after ED visit ( Ddimer testing, followed if positive by a computed tomography pulmonary angiogram or V/Q scan).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Validation of usual clinical decision rules-WellsDay 0Wells score: Clinical signs and symptoms of DVT 3 Immobilization or surgery within 4 weeks 1.5 Heart rate \> 100 beats per min 1.5 Previous DVT or PE 1.5 Hemoptysis 1 Malignancy 1 Alternative diagnosis is less likely than PE 3 Low: 0-1; intermediate: 2-6; high: \>6
Validation of usual clinical decision rules-Revised Geneva ScoreDay 0Age \> 65 years 1 Previous DVT or PE 3 Surgery or fracture within 1 monht 2 Active malignant condition within a year 2 Unilateral lower limb pain 3 Hemoptysis 2 Heart Rate 75 - 94 beats per min 3 \>94 beats per min 5 Pain on lower limb deep venous palpation and unilateral edema 5 low: 0-3; intermediate: 4-10; high: \>11
Validation of usual clinical decision rules-PERCDay 0PERC: * Age less than 50 years * Heart rate less than 100 beats per minute * No prior history of thrombo-embolic event * Oxygen saturation greater than 94% * No trauma or surgery in the past four weeks * No hemoptysis * No exogenous estrogen intake * No unilateral leg swelling
Prevalence of Pulmonary Embolism among patients with cancer history.Day 28
rate of false positive of the PERC rule72 hours after ED visitPatients with a PERC=0 ultimately diagnosed with a pulmonary embolism within 72 hours

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026