Skip to content

Dual Site-dual Channel Non-invasive Brain Stimulation for Motor Function in Stroke Patients

Effect of Dual Site-dual Channel Non-invasive Brain Stimulation for Recovery of Motor Function in Stroke Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03486769
Enrollment
30
Registered
2018-04-03
Start date
2018-05-23
Completion date
2020-03-17
Last updated
2020-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

transcranial direct current stimulation, dual stimulation

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of dual site-dual channel non-invasive brain stimulation for recovery of motor function in post stroke patients. Simultaneous dual site-dual channel stimulation was applied by using two sets of transcranial direct current stimulation devices. All subjects will go through three conditions of transcranial direct current stimulation with for 30 minutes. Three conditions are 1) Dual stimulation 1: i) anodal stimulation on ipsilesional primary motor cortex and cathodal stimulation on contralesional primary motor cortex, ii) anodal stimulation on ipsilesional premotor cortex and cathodal stimulation on contralesional supraorbital area. 2) Dual stimulation 2: i) anodal stimulation on ipsilesional primary motor cortex and cathodal stimulation on contralesional primary motor cortex, ii) anodal stimulation on ipsilesional anterior intraparietal sulcus and cathodal stimulation on contralesional supraorbital area. 3) Single stimulation: anodal stimulation on ipsilesional primary motor cortex and cathodal stimulation on contralesional primary motor cortex.

Interventions

stimulating primary motor cortex with anodal transcranial direct current stimulation

stimulating premotor cortex with anodal transcranial direct current stimulation

DEVICEaIPS stimulation

stimulating anterior intraparietal sulcus with anodal transcranial direct current stimulation

BEHAVIORALhand motor task

hand motor task for 30 minutes during transcranial direct current stimulation

Sponsors

Samsung Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* unilateral hemiplegic stroke patient * Fugl Meyer Assessment score between 9 to 84

Exclusion criteria

* difficult to understand experimental tasks because of extremely severe cognitive impairment * history of psychiatric disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in motor evoked potentiaBaseline and after intervention (approximately 2 weeks)measure the motor threshold and amplitude of motor evoked potential in first dorsal interosseous muscle.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
changes in nine hole peg testBaseline and after intervention (approximately 2 weeks)Nine-Hole Peg Test is used to measure finger dexterity in patients with various neurological diagnoses.
changes in grip and tip pinch strength testBaseline and after intervention (approximately 2 weeks)measure the hand strength (grip and tip pinch)
changes in box and block testBaseline and after intervention (approximately 2 weeks)box and block test measures unilateral gross manual dexterity
Changes in brain activation of resting-state functional MRIBaseline and after intervention (approximately 2 weeks)Neuroplasticity measure
Changes of Cortical activationBaseline and after intervention (approximately 2 weeks)Cortical activation is measured by functional Near-Infrared-Spectroscopy (fNIRS) (NIRScout, NIRx, Germany)

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026