Skip to content

Trial to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of JCAR017 in Adult Participants With Aggressive B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

A Phase 2, Single-arm, Multi-center Trial to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of JCAR017 in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma or With Other Aggressive B-Cell Malignancies

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03484702
Acronym
TRANSCENDWORLD
Enrollment
113
Registered
2018-04-02
Start date
2018-06-05
Completion date
2023-12-15
Last updated
2024-12-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin

Keywords

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Relapse / refractory lymphoma, Transplant not eligible, High-grade B-cell lymphoma, Primary central nervous system lymphoma, Transformed follicular lymphoma, Follicular lymphoma Grade 3B, JCAR017, Liso-Cel

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of JCAR017 in participants with aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL)

Detailed description

This is a study to determine the efficacy and safety of JCAR017 in adult participants with aggressive B-cell NHL. The study will enroll participants in Europe and Japan with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) not otherwise specified (NOS; de novo or transformed follicular lymphoma \[tFL\]), high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements with DLBCL histology (HGBL), follicular lymphoma Grade 3B (FL3B), and primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). Participants with secondary central nervous system (CNS) involvement are allowed. Once enrolled, participants will undergo leukapheresis to enable JCAR017 cell product generation. Upon successful JCAR017 cell product generation, participants will receive lymphodepleting chemotherapy followed by infusion of JCAR017. JCAR017 will be administered by intravenous infusion. Participants will be followed for approximately 2 years after their JCAR017 infusion for safety, disease status, survival and health-related quality of life. Delayed adverse events following exposure to gene modified T cells will be assessed and long-term persistence of these modified T cells will continue to be monitored under a separate long-term follow-up protocol for up to 15 years after JCAR017 infusion as per competent authority guidelines.

Interventions

Specified dose on specified days

Sponsors

Celgene
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histological confirmation of diagnosis at last relapse * Adequate organ function * Adequate vascular access for leukapheresis procedure

Exclusion criteria

* Prior history of malignancies, other than aggressive relapsed/refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, unless the participant has been in remission for ≥ 2 years with the exception of non-invasive malignancies * Received previous CD19-targeted therapy * Progressive vascular tumor invasion, thrombosis, or embolism Other protocol-defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per Independent Review Committee in Cohorts 1, 2 and 3From JCAR017 infusion until disease progression, end of study, the start of another anticancer therapy, or hemopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) (up to approximately 63 months)Overall response rate (ORR) by Independent Review Committee (Cohorts 1, 2, 3). ORR is the percent of participants with best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Complete response via PET-CT: * Lymph nodes/extralymphatic: Score 1, 2, 3a with/without residual mass on 5-point scale * New lesions: No * Bone marrow: No FDG-avid disease Complete response via CT scan: * Lymph nodes/extralymphatic: Target nodes/nodal masses ≤ 1.5 cm longest transverse diameter. * Nonmeasured lesion: No * New lesions: No * Bone marrow: Normal Partial response via PET-CT: * Lymph nodes/extralymphatic: Score 4, 5b, reduced uptake from baseline * New lesions: No * Bone marrow: Residual uptake higher than normal, reduced from baseline Partial response via CT scan: * Lymph nodes/extralymphatic: 50% decrease in sum of diameters of \<= 6 target measurable nodes/extranodal sites * Nonmeasured lesion: No * Organ enlargement: Spleen length decreased \> 50% * New lesions: No
Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per Investigator in Cohort 4From JCAR017 infusion until disease progression, end of study, the start of another anticancer therapy, or hemopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) (up to approximately 63 months)Overall response rate (ORR) is the percent of participants with best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Complete response via PET-CT: * Lymph nodes/extralymphatic: Score 1, 2, 3a with/without residual mass on 5-point scale * New lesions: No * Bone marrow: No FDG-avid disease Complete response via CT scan: * Lymph nodes/extralymphatic: Target nodes/nodal masses ≤ 1.5 cm longest transverse diameter. * Nonmeasured lesion: None * New lesions: No * Bone marrow: Normal Partial response via PET-CT: * Lymph nodes/extralymphatic: Score 4, 5b, reduced uptake from baseline * New lesions: None * Bone marrow: Residual uptake higher than normal, reduced from baseline Partial response via CT scan: * Lymph nodes/extralymphatic: 50% decrease in sum of diameters of \<= 6 target measurable nodes/extranodal sites * Nonmeasured lesion: None/normal * Organ enlargement: Spleen length decreased \> 50% * New lesions: No
Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per Investigator in Cohort 5From JCAR017 infusion until disease progression, end of study, the start of another anticancer therapy, or hemopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) (up to approximately 63 months)Overall response rate (ORR) determined by Investigator assessment after JCAR017 infusion. The ORR is the percent of participants with best overall response (BOR) of either complete response (CR), complete response unconfirmed (Cru) or partial response (PR). Complete response (CR): * Brain imaging: No contrast enhancement * Corticosteroid dose: None * Eye examination: Normal * Cerebrospinal fluid cytology: Negative Complete response unconfirmed (CRu): * Brain imaging: No contrast enhancement, Minimal abnormality * Corticosteroid dose: Any * Eye examination: Normal, minor RPE abnormality * Cerebrospinal fluid cytology: Negative Partial response (PR): * Brain imaging: 50% decrease in enhancing tumor, no contrast enhancement. * Corticosteroid dose: Irrelevant * Eye examination: Minor RPE abnormality, decrease in vitreous cells or retinal infiltrate. * Cerebrospinal fluid cytology: Negative, persistent or suspicious
Number of Participants With Adverse Events in Cohort 7From leukapheresis to end of study (up to approximately 63 months)An adverse event (AE) is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of a study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, including laboratory test values, regardless of etiology. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in the frequency or intensity of a preexisting condition) should be considered an AE. Graded according to NCI CTCAE (Version 4.03) guidelines where grade 1 = mild, grade 2 = moderate, grade 3 = severe, grade 4 = life threatening, grade 5 = death.
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohort 7From leukapheresis to end of study (up to approximately 63 months)A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any adverse event (AE) occurring at any dose that: * Results in death; * Is life-threatening (ie, in the opinion of the Investigator, the participant is at immediate risk of death from the AE); * Requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization (hospitalization is defined as an inpatient admission, regardless of length of stay). * Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (a substantial disruption of the participant's ability to conduct normal life functions); * Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; * Constitutes an important medical event. Graded according to NCI CTCAE (Version 4.03) guidelines where grade 1 = mild, grade 2 = moderate, grade 3 = severe, grade 4 = life threatening, grade 5 = death.
Number of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Hematology Parameters - Cohort 7At Baseline and Day 29 after JCAR017 infusionJCAR017 treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities are defined as an abnormality that, compared to baseline, worsens by at least one grade after JCAR017 infusion. The baseline value is defined as the last available recorded value on or prior to the date of JCAR017 infusion. Grade 1 (Mild), Grade 2 (Moderate), Grade 3 (Severe), Grade 4 (Life-threatening), Grade 5 (Death).
Number of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohort 7At Baseline and Day 29 after JCAR017 infusionJCAR017 treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities are defined as an abnormality that, compared to baseline, worsens by at least one grade after JCAR017 infusion. The baseline value is defined as the last available recorded value on or prior to the date of JCAR017 infusion. Grade 1 (Mild), Grade 2 (Moderate), Grade 3 (Severe), Grade 4 (Life-threatening), Grade 5 (Death).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Using European Medicines Agency (EMA) CriteriaFrom JCAR017 infusion to progressive disease or death due to any reason, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 63 months)Progression-free survival is defined as the interval from the date of JCAR017 infusion to progressive disease or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per European Medicines Agency (EMA) criteria, participants who did not experience progressive disease and who did not die before the data cutoff date were censored at the time of the last visit with adequate response assessment when the participants were known not to have progressed. Estimated using Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimates.
Overall Survival (OS)From the date of JCAR017 infusion to the date of death due to any reason (up to approximately 63 months).Overall survival is defined as the interval from the date of JCAR017 infusion to the date of death due to any reason. Data from surviving participants was censored at the last time that the participant was known to be alive. Estimated using Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimates.
Duration of Response (DOR)From JCAR017 infusion until disease progression, death due to any reason, end of study, the start of another anticancer therapy, or hemopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) (up to approximately 63 months)DOR is from first response (complete response (CR), CR unconfirmed (CRu) or partial response (PR)) to progression (PD) or death. Those without PD or death were censored at the last assessment. CR via PET-CT: Lymph/extralymph: Score 1/2/3a w/w-out resid mass, no new lesions, No FDG-avid disease in bone marrow (BM) CR via CT scan: Lymph/extralymph: Target/nodal ≤ 1.5 cm, no new lesions, normal BM CR Cohort 5: No contrast enhance, no corticosteroid, normal eye exam, neg CSF cytology CRu Cohort 5: No contrast enhance, min abnorm, normal eye exam, neg CSF cytology PR via PET-CT: Lymph/extralymph: Score 4/5b, red uptake, no new lesions, resid uptake incr, reduced in BM PR via CT scan: Lymph/extralymph: 50% decr in sum of diam ≤ 6 target/extranodal, no new/nonmeasured lesions, Organ enlarge: Spleen decr \> 50% PR Cohort 5: 50% decr in enhancing tumor, no contrast enhance, Eye exam: Minor abnorm, decr in vitreous cells/retinal infiltrate, negative, persist or suspic CSF cytology.
Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of JCAR017 by qPCRAt baseline and up until 24 months post JCAR017 infusionCmax is the maximum or peak concentration of drug reached in the plasma following a dose of the drug. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was used to determine Cmax by detecting the JCAR017 transgene. Baseline is defined as the last available recorded value on or prior to the date of JCAR017 infusion.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5From leukapheresis to end of study (up to approximately 63 months)An adverse event (AE) is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of a study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, including laboratory test values, regardless of etiology. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in the frequency or intensity of a preexisting condition) should be considered an AE. Graded according to NCI CTCAE (Version 4.03) guidelines where grade 1 = mild, grade 2 = moderate, grade 3 = severe, grade 4 = life threatening, grade 5 = death.
Total Exposure to JCAR017 as Measured by Area Under the Curve (AUC) of JCAR017 by qPCRAt baseline and up until 24 months post JCAR017 infusionArea Under the Curve (AUC) represents the total exposure of participants to study drug. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was used to determine AUC by detecting the JCAR017 transgene. Baseline is defined as the last available recorded value on or prior to the date of JCAR017 infusion.
Percent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRAt Day 29 and Months 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 post JCAR017 infusion.Persistence is defined as a transgene count greater than or equal to the lower limit of detection (LLOD) of 5 copies per reaction. Data obtained after the start of a new anti-cancer therapy were excluded. qPCR = Quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresAt baseline and Day 1, 29, 60, 90, 180, 270, 365, 545, and 730 post JCAR017 infusion.The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, social), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain), a global health status/health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scale, and six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, financial difficulties). The questionnaire is scored on a 4-point Likert scale: 1 = not at all, 2 = a little, 3 = quite a bit, 4 = very much. The raw score is the average of the items contributing to the scale. The final scores are calculated via linear transformation of raw scores and range from 0 to 100. For functional scales higher scores indicate better QoL. For symptom scales and single items lower scores indicate fewer symptoms, i.e. better QoL. Baseline the last available recorded scores on or prior to the date of JCAR017 infusion. Only global health, fatigue, physical and cognitive functioning subscales were assessed.
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresAt baseline and Day 1, 29, 60, 90, 180, 270, 365, 545, and 730 post JCAR017 infusion.The Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional concerns subscale (FACT-LymS) consists of the FACT-General scale and a 15-item lymphoma-specific additional concerns subscale (LYM). This scale addresses symptoms and functional limitations that are important to lymphoma patients. Only the LYM subscale was administered in this study. The LYM items are scored on a 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much) response scale. Items are aggregated to a single score on a 0-60 scale. Lower scores indicate better health outcomes. Baseline the last available recorded scores on or prior to the date of JCAR017 infusion.
Time to Peak Concentration (Tmax) of JCAR017 by qPCRAt baseline and up until 24 months post JCAR017 infusionTime to maximum concentration (Tmax) is the time it takes for a drug to reach the maximum concentration (Cmax) after administration. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was used to determine Tmax by detecting the JCAR017 transgene. Baseline is defined as the last available recorded value on or prior to the date of JCAR017 infusion.
Number of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5At Baseline and Day 29 after JCAR017 infusionJCAR017 treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities are defined as an abnormality that, compared to baseline, worsens by at least one grade after JCAR017 infusion. The baseline value is defined as the last available recorded value on or prior to the date of JCAR017 infusion. Grade 1 = Mild, Grade 2 =Moderate, Grade 3 =Severe, Grade 4 =Life-threatening, Grade 5 =Death.
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5From leukapheresis to end of study (up to approximately 63 months)A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any adverse event (AE) occurring at any dose that: * Results in death; * Is life-threatening (ie, in the opinion of the Investigator, the participant is at immediate risk of death from the AE); * Requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization (hospitalization is defined as an inpatient admission, regardless of length of stay). * Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (a substantial disruption of the participant's ability to conduct normal life functions); * Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; * Constitutes an important medical event. Graded according to NCI CTCAE (Version 4) guidelines where grade 1 = mild, grade 2 = moderate, grade 3 = severe, grade 4 = life threatening, grade 5 = death.
Number of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Hematology Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5At Baseline and Day 29 after JCAR017 infusionJCAR017 treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities are defined as an abnormality that, compared to baseline, worsens by at least one grade after JCAR017 infusion. The baseline value is defined as the last available recorded value on or prior to the date of JCAR017 infusion. Grade 1 = Mild, Grade 2 =Moderate, Grade 3 =Severe, Grade 4 =Life-threatening, Grade 5 =Death.
Overall Response Rate (ORR) in Cohort 7From JCAR017 infusion until disease progression, end of study, the start of another anticancer therapy, or hemopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) (up to approximately 63 months)ORR by Independent Review Committee. ORR is the percent of participants with best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Complete response via PET-CT: * Lymph nodes/extralymphatic: Score 1, 2, 3a with/without residual mass on 5-point scale * New lesions: No * Bone marrow: No FDG-avid disease Complete response via CT scan: * Lymph nodes/extralymphatic: Target nodes/nodal masses ≤ 1.5 cm longest transverse diameter. * Nonmeasured lesion: None * New lesions: No * Bone marrow: Normal Partial response via PET-CT: * Lymph nodes/extralymphatic: Score 4, 5b, reduced uptake from baseline * New lesions: None * Bone marrow: Residual uptake higher than normal, reduced from baseline Partial response via CT scan: * Lymph nodes/extralymphatic: 50% decrease in sum of diameters of \<= 6 target measurable nodes/extranodal sites * Nonmeasured lesion: None/normal * Organ enlargement: Spleen length decreased \> 50% * New lesions: No
Complete Response Rate (CRR)From JCAR017 infusion until disease progression, end of study, the start of another anticancer therapy, or hemopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) (up to approximately 63 months)Complete response rate is defined as percentage of participants achieving a best overall response of complete response. Complete response via PET-CT: * Lymph nodes/extralymphatic: Score 1, 2, 3a with/without residual mass on 5-point scale * New lesions: No * Bone marrow: No FDG-avid disease Complete response via CT scan: * Lymph nodes/extralymphatic: Target nodes/nodal masses ≤ 1.5 cm longest transverse diameter. * Nonmeasured lesion: None * New lesions: No * Bone marrow: Normal Complete response (CR) (Cohort 5): * Brain imaging: No contrast enhancement * Corticosteroid dose: None * Eye examination: Normal * Cerebrospinal fluid cytology: Negative Complete response unconfirmed (CRu) (Cohort 5): * Brain imaging: No contrast enhancement, Minimal abnormality * Corticosteroid dose: Any * Eye examination: Normal, minor RPE abnormality * Cerebrospinal fluid cytology: Negative
Event Free Survival (EFS)From JCAR017 infusion to death due to any reason, progressive disease, or starting a new anticancer therapy (up to approximately 63 months).Event-free survival is from JCAR017 infusion to death from any cause, progressive disease, or starting a new anticancer therapy. If a participant did not have an EFS event prior to data cutoff, EFS was censored at last disease assessment. Progressive disease (PD): * Target nodes/nodal masses: PPD progression. * Extranodal lesion: LDi \> 1.5 cm and increase by ≥ 50% from PPD nadir. * Splenomegaly: \> 50% of prior increase from baseline or by at least 2 cm from baseline. * Nonmeasured lesions: New or clear progression. * New lesions: Regrowth of previously resolved lesions. * Bone marrow: New or recurrent Progressive Disease (Cohort 5): * Brain imaging: \> 25% increase in enhancing lesion from baseline or best response. * Eye Exam: Increased vitreous cell counts or progressive retinal or optic nerve infiltration. * New lesion or site of disease

Countries

Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

During the pretreatment period participants underwent leukapheresis to enable JCAR017 cell product generation. Upon successful JCAR017 cell product generation, participants entered the treatment period and received lymphodepleting chemotherapy followed by infusion of JCAR017. Cohort 6 was planned but subsequently removed from the study. No participants were enrolled into Cohort 6.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of Therapy
JCAR017 was infused at a dose of 100 x 10\^6 JCAR017-positive transfected viable T cells (50 × 10\^6 CD8+ CAR+ T cells and 50 × 10\^6 CD4+ CAR+ T cells), on Day 1 (2 to 7 days after completion of Lymphodepleting chemotherapy).
45
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line Therapy
JCAR017 was infused at a dose of 100 x 10\^6 JCAR017-positive transfected viable T cells (50 × 10\^6 CD8+ CAR+ T cells and 50 × 10\^6 CD4+ CAR+ T cells), on Day 1 (2 to 7 days after completion of Lymphodepleting chemotherapy).
32
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2
JCAR017 was infused at a dose of 100 x 10\^6 JCAR017-positive transfected viable T cells (50 × 10\^6 CD8+ CAR+ T cells and 50 × 10\^6 CD4+ CAR+ T cells), on Day 1 (2 to 7 days after completion of Lymphodepleting chemotherapy).
14
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell Lymphoma
JCAR017 was infused at a dose of 100 x 10\^6 JCAR017-positive transfected viable T cells (50 × 10\^6 CD8+ CAR+ T cells and 50 × 10\^6 CD4+ CAR+ T cells), on Day 1 (2 to 7 days after completion of Lymphodepleting chemotherapy).
4
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma
JCAR017 was infused at a dose of 100 x 10\^6 JCAR017-positive transfected viable T cells (50 × 10\^6 CD8+ CAR+ T cells and 50 × 10\^6 CD4+ CAR+ T cells), on Day 1 (2 to 7 days after completion of Lymphodepleting chemotherapy).
7
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient Setting
JCAR017 was infused at a dose of 100 x 10\^6 JCAR017-positive transfected viable T cells (50 × 10\^6 CD8+ CAR+ T cells and 50 × 10\^6 CD4+ CAR+ T cells), on Day 1 (2 to 7 days after completion of Lymphodepleting chemotherapy).
11
Total113

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Treatment PeriodAdverse Event100000
Treatment PeriodDeath310000
Treatment PeriodParticipant Withdrew from Study010000
Treatment PeriodPhysician Decision010001

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyCohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyCohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaCohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaCohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingTotal
Age, Continuous60.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
73.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5
57.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.08
63.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.11
57.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.74
58.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.47
63.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.56
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
29 Participants22 Participants14 Participants2 Participants5 Participants7 Participants79 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
9 Participants9 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants24 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants3 Participants14 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants17 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
8 Participants10 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants4 Participants25 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
37 Participants19 Participants0 Participants3 Participants5 Participants7 Participants71 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants13 Participants6 Participants1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants42 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
30 Participants19 Participants8 Participants3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants71 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
32 / 4522 / 329 / 140 / 45 / 74 / 11
other
Total, other adverse events
40 / 4525 / 3212 / 141 / 45 / 79 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
19 / 458 / 322 / 140 / 42 / 71 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events in Cohort 7

An adverse event (AE) is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of a study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, including laboratory test values, regardless of etiology. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in the frequency or intensity of a preexisting condition) should be considered an AE. Graded according to NCI CTCAE (Version 4.03) guidelines where grade 1 = mild, grade 2 = moderate, grade 3 = severe, grade 4 = life threatening, grade 5 = death.

Time frame: From leukapheresis to end of study (up to approximately 63 months)

Population: All participants in the JCAR017 treated set. Prespecified to be reported for cohort 7 only

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events in Cohort 7AEs occurring between leukapheresis and lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LDC)0 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events in Cohort 7AEs occurring between LDC and JCAR017 infusion2 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events in Cohort 7AEs occurring between JCAR017 infusion and Day 309 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events in Cohort 7AEs occurring between Day 31 and Day 907 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events in Cohort 7AEs occurring between Day 91 and end of study7 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Hematology Parameters - Cohort 7

JCAR017 treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities are defined as an abnormality that, compared to baseline, worsens by at least one grade after JCAR017 infusion. The baseline value is defined as the last available recorded value on or prior to the date of JCAR017 infusion. Grade 1 (Mild), Grade 2 (Moderate), Grade 3 (Severe), Grade 4 (Life-threatening), Grade 5 (Death).

Time frame: At Baseline and Day 29 after JCAR017 infusion

Population: All participants in the JCAR017 treated set with available baseline and Day 29 hematology results. Prespecified to be reported for cohort 7 only

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Hematology Parameters - Cohort 7Leukocytes (10^9/L) - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Hematology Parameters - Cohort 7Neutrophils, Segmented (10^9/L) - Day 292 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Hematology Parameters - Cohort 7Platelets (10^9/L) - Day 295 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Hematology Parameters - Cohort 7Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (sec) - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Hematology Parameters - Cohort 7Prothrombin Intl. Normalized Ratio - Day 291 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohort 7

JCAR017 treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities are defined as an abnormality that, compared to baseline, worsens by at least one grade after JCAR017 infusion. The baseline value is defined as the last available recorded value on or prior to the date of JCAR017 infusion. Grade 1 (Mild), Grade 2 (Moderate), Grade 3 (Severe), Grade 4 (Life-threatening), Grade 5 (Death).

Time frame: At Baseline and Day 29 after JCAR017 infusion

Population: All participants in the JCAR017 treated set with available baseline and Day 29 serum chemistry results. Prespecified to be reported for cohort 7 only

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohort 7Albumin (g/L) - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohort 7Phosphate (mmol/L) - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohort 7Alkaline Phosphatase (U/L) - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohort 7Alanine Aminotransferase (U/L) - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohort 7Aspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) - Day 291 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohort 7Bilirubin (umol/L) - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohort 7Creatinine (umol/L) - Day 297 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohort 7Triglycerides (mmol/L) - Day 293 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohort 7Urate (umol/L) - Day 290 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohort 7

A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any adverse event (AE) occurring at any dose that: * Results in death; * Is life-threatening (ie, in the opinion of the Investigator, the participant is at immediate risk of death from the AE); * Requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization (hospitalization is defined as an inpatient admission, regardless of length of stay). * Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (a substantial disruption of the participant's ability to conduct normal life functions); * Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; * Constitutes an important medical event. Graded according to NCI CTCAE (Version 4.03) guidelines where grade 1 = mild, grade 2 = moderate, grade 3 = severe, grade 4 = life threatening, grade 5 = death.

Time frame: From leukapheresis to end of study (up to approximately 63 months)

Population: All participants in the JCAR017 treated set. Prespecified to be reported for cohort 7 only

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohort 7SAEs occurring between leukapheresis and lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LDC)0 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohort 7SAEs occurring between LDC and JCAR017 infusion0 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohort 7SAEs occurring between JCAR017 infusion and Day 301 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohort 7SAEs occurring between Day 31 and Day 900 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohort 7SAEs occurring between Day 91 and end of study1 Participants
Primary

Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per Independent Review Committee in Cohorts 1, 2 and 3

Overall response rate (ORR) by Independent Review Committee (Cohorts 1, 2, 3). ORR is the percent of participants with best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Complete response via PET-CT: * Lymph nodes/extralymphatic: Score 1, 2, 3a with/without residual mass on 5-point scale * New lesions: No * Bone marrow: No FDG-avid disease Complete response via CT scan: * Lymph nodes/extralymphatic: Target nodes/nodal masses ≤ 1.5 cm longest transverse diameter. * Nonmeasured lesion: No * New lesions: No * Bone marrow: Normal Partial response via PET-CT: * Lymph nodes/extralymphatic: Score 4, 5b, reduced uptake from baseline * New lesions: No * Bone marrow: Residual uptake higher than normal, reduced from baseline Partial response via CT scan: * Lymph nodes/extralymphatic: 50% decrease in sum of diameters of \<= 6 target measurable nodes/extranodal sites * Nonmeasured lesion: No * Organ enlargement: Spleen length decreased \> 50% * New lesions: No

Time frame: From JCAR017 infusion until disease progression, end of study, the start of another anticancer therapy, or hemopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) (up to approximately 63 months)

Population: All participants in the JCAR017 treated set. Prespecified to be reported for cohorts 1,2, and 3 only.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyOverall Response Rate (ORR) Per Independent Review Committee in Cohorts 1, 2 and 361.1 Percent of Participants
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyOverall Response Rate (ORR) Per Independent Review Committee in Cohorts 1, 2 and 363.0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per Independent Review Committee in Cohorts 1, 2 and 370.0 Percent of Participants
Primary

Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per Investigator in Cohort 4

Overall response rate (ORR) is the percent of participants with best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Complete response via PET-CT: * Lymph nodes/extralymphatic: Score 1, 2, 3a with/without residual mass on 5-point scale * New lesions: No * Bone marrow: No FDG-avid disease Complete response via CT scan: * Lymph nodes/extralymphatic: Target nodes/nodal masses ≤ 1.5 cm longest transverse diameter. * Nonmeasured lesion: None * New lesions: No * Bone marrow: Normal Partial response via PET-CT: * Lymph nodes/extralymphatic: Score 4, 5b, reduced uptake from baseline * New lesions: None * Bone marrow: Residual uptake higher than normal, reduced from baseline Partial response via CT scan: * Lymph nodes/extralymphatic: 50% decrease in sum of diameters of \<= 6 target measurable nodes/extranodal sites * Nonmeasured lesion: None/normal * Organ enlargement: Spleen length decreased \> 50% * New lesions: No

Time frame: From JCAR017 infusion until disease progression, end of study, the start of another anticancer therapy, or hemopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) (up to approximately 63 months)

Population: All participants in the JCAR017 treated set. Prespecified to be reported for cohort 4 only.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyOverall Response Rate (ORR) Per Investigator in Cohort 4100 Percent of Participants
Primary

Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per Investigator in Cohort 5

Overall response rate (ORR) determined by Investigator assessment after JCAR017 infusion. The ORR is the percent of participants with best overall response (BOR) of either complete response (CR), complete response unconfirmed (Cru) or partial response (PR). Complete response (CR): * Brain imaging: No contrast enhancement * Corticosteroid dose: None * Eye examination: Normal * Cerebrospinal fluid cytology: Negative Complete response unconfirmed (CRu): * Brain imaging: No contrast enhancement, Minimal abnormality * Corticosteroid dose: Any * Eye examination: Normal, minor RPE abnormality * Cerebrospinal fluid cytology: Negative Partial response (PR): * Brain imaging: 50% decrease in enhancing tumor, no contrast enhancement. * Corticosteroid dose: Irrelevant * Eye examination: Minor RPE abnormality, decrease in vitreous cells or retinal infiltrate. * Cerebrospinal fluid cytology: Negative, persistent or suspicious

Time frame: From JCAR017 infusion until disease progression, end of study, the start of another anticancer therapy, or hemopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) (up to approximately 63 months)

Population: All participants in the JCAR017 treated set. Prespecified to be reported for cohort 5 only.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyOverall Response Rate (ORR) Per Investigator in Cohort 580.0 Percent of Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores

The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, social), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain), a global health status/health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scale, and six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, financial difficulties). The questionnaire is scored on a 4-point Likert scale: 1 = not at all, 2 = a little, 3 = quite a bit, 4 = very much. The raw score is the average of the items contributing to the scale. The final scores are calculated via linear transformation of raw scores and range from 0 to 100. For functional scales higher scores indicate better QoL. For symptom scales and single items lower scores indicate fewer symptoms, i.e. better QoL. Baseline the last available recorded scores on or prior to the date of JCAR017 infusion. Only global health, fatigue, physical and cognitive functioning subscales were assessed.

Time frame: At baseline and Day 1, 29, 60, 90, 180, 270, 365, 545, and 730 post JCAR017 infusion.

Population: All participants in the JCAR017-treated set with completed baseline questionnaires and with at least one completed post-baseline questionnaire.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 365-6.67 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.337
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 602.78 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 12.444
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 293.03 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 24.418
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 1-3.43 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 17.301
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 605.00 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 14.778
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 5454.94 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 25.526
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 545-6.48 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 18.53
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 545-3.70 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 26.69
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 603.11 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 15.135
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 60-9.63 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 18.623
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 180-8.33 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 21.254
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 29-2.63 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 18.555
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 730-11.11 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 12.975
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 3650.67 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 16.163
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 7300.93 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 22.947
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 1-3.33 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.97
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 365-11.67 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 22.292
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 90-4.53 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 19.795
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 900.00 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 13.074
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 29-2.53 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 16.203
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 730-1.39 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 18.06
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 2703.33 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 10.05
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 180-2.78 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 15.624
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 902.47 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 14.766
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 1806.94 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 13.685
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 7301.11 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 15.785
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 11.63 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 26.959
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 545-7.41 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 18.84
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 365-3.33 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 14.861
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 1807.78 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 12.975
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 2706.25 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.14
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 2700.00 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 22.473
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 903.46 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 16.781
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 29-1.26 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 14.301
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 1-4.41 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 17.07
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 270-9.26 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 15.594
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 600.98 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 10.978
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 1-3.62 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 17.376
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 901.28 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 22.527
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 2700.00 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 293.51 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 14.25
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 180-2.08 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 5.893
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 90-1.28 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 12.659
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 365-4.76 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.141
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 1801.04 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 23.332
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 7303.70 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 9.072
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 2709.72 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 9.742
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 2700.00 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 22.222
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 3653.57 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 11.664
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 290.00 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 18.002
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 1802.78 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 34.503
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 5453.57 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 26.726
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 730-4.17 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 12.638
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 90-4.27 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 17.881
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 1-6.09 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 21.074
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 60-1.31 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.743
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 29-4.21 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 10.706
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 60-0.39 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 21.275
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 292.34 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 12.046
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 903.59 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 12.054
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 607.84 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 17.547
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 11.45 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 16.173
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 180-8.33 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 31.219
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 2701.11 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 19.052
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 1-5.07 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 17.898
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 730-5.56 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.607
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 3650.95 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 16.069
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 545-1.59 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 19.698
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 5452.38 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 11.501
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 545-1.90 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 19.135
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 730-8.89 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 28.493
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 3650.00 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 270-3.33 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 26.745
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 730-3.33 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.607
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 90-5.71 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 11.174
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 7305.56 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 14.344
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 13.33 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.32
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 2703.33 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 13.944
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 270-6.67 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 14.907
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 545-13.33 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 23.094
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 180-5.71 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 19.024
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 604.17 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 16.457
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 180-13.10 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 35.635
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 730-4.17 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 15.957
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 36513.89 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 33.179
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 600.00 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 27.889
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 270-2.67 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 22.41
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 90-5.95 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 17.817
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 365-4.17 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.333
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 904.76 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.893
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 1-6.67 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 10.244
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 18011.90 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.893
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 1-3.33 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 11.44
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 730-6.25 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 7.979
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 603.70 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 31.946
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 293.33 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 13.147
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 904.76 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 35.635
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 365-16.67 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 29-10.00 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 14.824
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 545-3.70 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 27.962
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 29-4.17 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 17.236
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 295.56 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 17.568
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 545-5.56 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 24.056
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 1-1.67 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 9.461
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 60-4.44 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 15.587
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 180-4.76 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 38.946
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 545-5.56 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 19.245
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 365-12.50 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 25.909
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 1800.00 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 1-8.33 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 290.00 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 600.00 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 900.00 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 180-16.67 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 2700.00 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 3650.00 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 5450.00 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 7300.00 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 1-6.67 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 296.67 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 600.00 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 906.67 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 180-6.67 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 2706.67 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 3656.67 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 5456.67 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 7306.67 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 10.00 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 290.00 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 600.00 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 900.00 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 2700.00 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 3650.00 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 5450.00 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 7300.00 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 10.00 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 29-11.11 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 6011.11 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 90-11.11 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 18022.22 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 270-11.11 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 365-11.11 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 545-11.11 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 730-11.11 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 18015.56 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 27.756
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 73020.83 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 29.463
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 545-41.67 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 82.496
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 2916.67 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 11.785
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 90-37.04 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 12.83
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 9011.11 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 23.413
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 5450.00 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 47.14
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 730-16.67 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 7.857
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 36530.56 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 26.788
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 1-20.00 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 30.832
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 180-37.04 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 23.13
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 7303.33 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 42.426
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 54513.33 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 47.14
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 27025.00 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 22.048
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 60-2.22 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 10.184
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 18.33 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 25.685
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 270-29.63 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 42.066
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 27024.44 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 27.756
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 18025.00 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 22.048
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 545-5.56 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 23.57
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 9022.22 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 41.107
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 29-13.89 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 27.778
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 365-44.44 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 22.222
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 36522.22 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 38.49
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 9011.11 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 19.245
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 29-8.33 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 16.667
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 6033.33 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 44.096
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 36522.22 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 26.943
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 18016.67 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 28.868
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 1-2.67 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 19.777
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 298.33 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 21.517
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 730-16.67 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 23.57
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 1-3.33 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 13.944
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 60-14.81 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 35.717
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 27033.33 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 44.096
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 6013.89 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 26.788
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 2703.33 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 7.454
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 5459.33 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 11.155
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 609.26 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.784
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 3656.67 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 9.129
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 3655.33 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 11.926
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 5453.33 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 7.454
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 270-6.67 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 31.972
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 180-2.22 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 24.825
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 29-1.85 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 14.299
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 730-4.17 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.333
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 90-0.74 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 18.692
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 11.23 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 18.794
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 60-2.96 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 10.062
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 29-8.15 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 18.493
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 296.17 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 14.815
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 1-3.70 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 14.948
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 545-11.11 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 15.713
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 600.00 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 17.568
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 730-2.08 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 21.916
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 5451.67 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 9.129
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 90-3.70 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 22.906
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 3653.33 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 7.454
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 1-7.41 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 12.108
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 1800.00 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 33.702
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 2703.33 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 9.501
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 1802.78 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.607
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 270-2.22 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 34.605
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresGlobal Health Status: Change from baseline Day 904.63 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.448
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 730-8.33 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 16.667
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 900.00 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.333
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 60-1.85 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 13.029
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 29-7.41 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 12.108
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 180-5.56 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.607
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresCognitive Functioning: Change from baseline Day 1-1.85 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 10.015
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresFatigue: Change from baseline Day 365-13.33 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 14.487
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoresPhysical Functioning: Change from baseline Day 730-3.33 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 11.547
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) Scores

The Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional concerns subscale (FACT-LymS) consists of the FACT-General scale and a 15-item lymphoma-specific additional concerns subscale (LYM). This scale addresses symptoms and functional limitations that are important to lymphoma patients. Only the LYM subscale was administered in this study. The LYM items are scored on a 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much) response scale. Items are aggregated to a single score on a 0-60 scale. Lower scores indicate better health outcomes. Baseline the last available recorded scores on or prior to the date of JCAR017 infusion.

Time frame: At baseline and Day 1, 29, 60, 90, 180, 270, 365, 545, and 730 post JCAR017 infusion.

Population: All participants in the JCAR017-treated set with completed baseline questionnaires and with at least one completed post-baseline questionnaire.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 5450.7 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 7.14
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 7301.4 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 7.12
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 60-2.8 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 5.42
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 270-0.3 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 6.78
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 3651.3 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 7.01
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 1800.6 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 5.14
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 29-1.7 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 7.14
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 10.7 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.17
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 90-0.4 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 5.42
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 730-0.8 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.33
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 270-3.7 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 2.25
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 29-2.7 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 4.56
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 60-2.0 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 4.2
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 10.1 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 7.05
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 545-3.7 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 4.35
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 90-2.8 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 3.83
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 365-3.3 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 180-1.8 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 5.65
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 291.3 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 7.24
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 270-1.0 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 10.07
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 900.6 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 9.25
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 545-4.7 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 4.16
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 730-1.8 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 5.32
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 60-3.3 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 9.99
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 3652.0 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 12.03
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 180-3.6 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 10.2
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 11.9 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 5.92
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 270-8.0 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 11.0 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 29-4.0 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 60-4.0 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 90-5.0 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 1802.0 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 365-6.0 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 545-3.0 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 730-2.0 Scores on a Scale
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 180-8.0 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 7
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 90-6.7 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.5
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 365-6.7 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 10.69
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 60-4.7 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.33
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 730-1.5 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 12.02
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 5453.5 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 6.36
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 29-6.5 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.1
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 1-4.0 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 6.52
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 270-10.00 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 12.53
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 1-1.2 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 11.08
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 90-1.7 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 8.67
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 2702.4 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 5.22
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 730-1.5 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.29
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 545-1.0 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 4.85
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 3651.4 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 7.33
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 60-0.4 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 9.95
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 1801.0 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 7.27
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingChange From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma Additional Concerns Subscale (FACT-LymS) ScoresChange from baseline Day 291.0 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 9.08
Secondary

Complete Response Rate (CRR)

Complete response rate is defined as percentage of participants achieving a best overall response of complete response. Complete response via PET-CT: * Lymph nodes/extralymphatic: Score 1, 2, 3a with/without residual mass on 5-point scale * New lesions: No * Bone marrow: No FDG-avid disease Complete response via CT scan: * Lymph nodes/extralymphatic: Target nodes/nodal masses ≤ 1.5 cm longest transverse diameter. * Nonmeasured lesion: None * New lesions: No * Bone marrow: Normal Complete response (CR) (Cohort 5): * Brain imaging: No contrast enhancement * Corticosteroid dose: None * Eye examination: Normal * Cerebrospinal fluid cytology: Negative Complete response unconfirmed (CRu) (Cohort 5): * Brain imaging: No contrast enhancement, Minimal abnormality * Corticosteroid dose: Any * Eye examination: Normal, minor RPE abnormality * Cerebrospinal fluid cytology: Negative

Time frame: From JCAR017 infusion until disease progression, end of study, the start of another anticancer therapy, or hemopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) (up to approximately 63 months)

Population: All participants in the JCAR017 treated set.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyComplete Response Rate (CRR)33.3 Percent of Participants
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyComplete Response Rate (CRR)48.1 Percent of Participants
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Complete Response Rate (CRR)50.0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaComplete Response Rate (CRR)0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaComplete Response Rate (CRR)0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingComplete Response Rate (CRR)88.9 Percent of Participants
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR is from first response (complete response (CR), CR unconfirmed (CRu) or partial response (PR)) to progression (PD) or death. Those without PD or death were censored at the last assessment. CR via PET-CT: Lymph/extralymph: Score 1/2/3a w/w-out resid mass, no new lesions, No FDG-avid disease in bone marrow (BM) CR via CT scan: Lymph/extralymph: Target/nodal ≤ 1.5 cm, no new lesions, normal BM CR Cohort 5: No contrast enhance, no corticosteroid, normal eye exam, neg CSF cytology CRu Cohort 5: No contrast enhance, min abnorm, normal eye exam, neg CSF cytology PR via PET-CT: Lymph/extralymph: Score 4/5b, red uptake, no new lesions, resid uptake incr, reduced in BM PR via CT scan: Lymph/extralymph: 50% decr in sum of diam ≤ 6 target/extranodal, no new/nonmeasured lesions, Organ enlarge: Spleen decr \> 50% PR Cohort 5: 50% decr in enhancing tumor, no contrast enhance, Eye exam: Minor abnorm, decr in vitreous cells/retinal infiltrate, negative, persist or suspic CSF cytology.

Time frame: From JCAR017 infusion until disease progression, death due to any reason, end of study, the start of another anticancer therapy, or hemopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) (up to approximately 63 months)

Population: All participants in the JCAR017 treated set who achieved a best overall response of complete response (and/ or CRu in cohort 5) or partial response/ remission.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyDuration of Response (DOR)3.83 Months
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyDuration of Response (DOR)3.91 Months
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Duration of Response (DOR)9.07 Months
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaDuration of Response (DOR)17.97 Months
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaDuration of Response (DOR)17.63 Months
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingDuration of Response (DOR)NA Months
Secondary

Event Free Survival (EFS)

Event-free survival is from JCAR017 infusion to death from any cause, progressive disease, or starting a new anticancer therapy. If a participant did not have an EFS event prior to data cutoff, EFS was censored at last disease assessment. Progressive disease (PD): * Target nodes/nodal masses: PPD progression. * Extranodal lesion: LDi \> 1.5 cm and increase by ≥ 50% from PPD nadir. * Splenomegaly: \> 50% of prior increase from baseline or by at least 2 cm from baseline. * Nonmeasured lesions: New or clear progression. * New lesions: Regrowth of previously resolved lesions. * Bone marrow: New or recurrent Progressive Disease (Cohort 5): * Brain imaging: \> 25% increase in enhancing lesion from baseline or best response. * Eye Exam: Increased vitreous cell counts or progressive retinal or optic nerve infiltration. * New lesion or site of disease

Time frame: From JCAR017 infusion to death due to any reason, progressive disease, or starting a new anticancer therapy (up to approximately 63 months).

Population: All participants in the JCAR017 treated set.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyEvent Free Survival (EFS)2.99 Months
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyEvent Free Survival (EFS)3.12 Months
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Event Free Survival (EFS)6.33 Months
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaEvent Free Survival (EFS)23.95 Months
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaEvent Free Survival (EFS)14.23 Months
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingEvent Free Survival (EFS)NA Months
Secondary

Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of JCAR017 by qPCR

Cmax is the maximum or peak concentration of drug reached in the plasma following a dose of the drug. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was used to determine Cmax by detecting the JCAR017 transgene. Baseline is defined as the last available recorded value on or prior to the date of JCAR017 infusion.

Time frame: At baseline and up until 24 months post JCAR017 infusion

Population: All participants in the JCAR017 treated set with baseline and on-study PK measurements.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyMaximum Concentration (Cmax) of JCAR017 by qPCR23132.1 Copies/ugGeometric Coefficient of Variation 434.6
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyMaximum Concentration (Cmax) of JCAR017 by qPCR21960.0 Copies/ugGeometric Coefficient of Variation 278.1
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of JCAR017 by qPCR17337.8 Copies/ugGeometric Coefficient of Variation 894.4
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaMaximum Concentration (Cmax) of JCAR017 by qPCR51121.0 Copies/ug
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaMaximum Concentration (Cmax) of JCAR017 by qPCR7661.6 Copies/ugGeometric Coefficient of Variation 1730
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingMaximum Concentration (Cmax) of JCAR017 by qPCR32027.1 Copies/ugGeometric Coefficient of Variation 101.4
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5

An adverse event (AE) is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of a study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, including laboratory test values, regardless of etiology. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in the frequency or intensity of a preexisting condition) should be considered an AE. Graded according to NCI CTCAE (Version 4.03) guidelines where grade 1 = mild, grade 2 = moderate, grade 3 = severe, grade 4 = life threatening, grade 5 = death.

Time frame: From leukapheresis to end of study (up to approximately 63 months)

Population: All participants in the JCAR017 treated set. Prespecified to be reported for Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 only

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5AEs occurring between Day 31 and Day 9025 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5AEs occurring between leukapheresis and lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LDC)5 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5AEs occurring between Day 91 and end of study10 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5AEs occurring between LDC and JCAR017 infusion29 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5AEs occurring between JCAR017 infusion and Day 3036 Participants
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5AEs occurring between Day 31 and Day 9010 Participants
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5AEs occurring between JCAR017 infusion and Day 3026 Participants
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5AEs occurring between LDC and JCAR017 infusion23 Participants
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5AEs occurring between Day 91 and end of study9 Participants
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5AEs occurring between leukapheresis and lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LDC)5 Participants
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Number of Participants With Adverse Events in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5AEs occurring between JCAR017 infusion and Day 3010 Participants
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Number of Participants With Adverse Events in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5AEs occurring between leukapheresis and lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LDC)0 Participants
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Number of Participants With Adverse Events in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5AEs occurring between LDC and JCAR017 infusion8 Participants
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Number of Participants With Adverse Events in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5AEs occurring between Day 31 and Day 908 Participants
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Number of Participants With Adverse Events in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5AEs occurring between Day 91 and end of study7 Participants
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaNumber of Participants With Adverse Events in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5AEs occurring between Day 91 and end of study0 Participants
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaNumber of Participants With Adverse Events in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5AEs occurring between leukapheresis and lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LDC)0 Participants
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaNumber of Participants With Adverse Events in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5AEs occurring between Day 31 and Day 901 Participants
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaNumber of Participants With Adverse Events in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5AEs occurring between JCAR017 infusion and Day 301 Participants
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaNumber of Participants With Adverse Events in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5AEs occurring between LDC and JCAR017 infusion0 Participants
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaNumber of Participants With Adverse Events in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5AEs occurring between JCAR017 infusion and Day 305 Participants
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaNumber of Participants With Adverse Events in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5AEs occurring between Day 31 and Day 903 Participants
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaNumber of Participants With Adverse Events in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5AEs occurring between leukapheresis and lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LDC)0 Participants
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaNumber of Participants With Adverse Events in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5AEs occurring between Day 91 and end of study2 Participants
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaNumber of Participants With Adverse Events in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5AEs occurring between LDC and JCAR017 infusion4 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Hematology Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5

JCAR017 treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities are defined as an abnormality that, compared to baseline, worsens by at least one grade after JCAR017 infusion. The baseline value is defined as the last available recorded value on or prior to the date of JCAR017 infusion. Grade 1 = Mild, Grade 2 =Moderate, Grade 3 =Severe, Grade 4 =Life-threatening, Grade 5 =Death.

Time frame: At Baseline and Day 29 after JCAR017 infusion

Population: All participants in the JCAR017 treated set with available baseline and Day 29 hematology results. Prespecified to be reported for cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 only

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Hematology Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (sec) - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Hematology Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Leukocytes (10^9/L) - Day 294 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Hematology Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Prothrombin Intl. Normalized Ratio - Day 291 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Hematology Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Neutrophils, Segmented (10^9/L) - Day 2911 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Hematology Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Platelets (10^9/L) - Day 2913 Participants
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Hematology Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (sec) - Day 291 Participants
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Hematology Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Platelets (10^9/L) - Day 298 Participants
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Hematology Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Neutrophils, Segmented (10^9/L) - Day 296 Participants
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Hematology Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Prothrombin Intl. Normalized Ratio - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Hematology Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Leukocytes (10^9/L) - Day 292 Participants
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Number of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Hematology Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Platelets (10^9/L) - Day 299 Participants
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Number of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Hematology Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Leukocytes (10^9/L) - Day 291 Participants
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Number of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Hematology Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Neutrophils, Segmented (10^9/L) - Day 293 Participants
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Number of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Hematology Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (sec) - Day 291 Participants
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Number of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Hematology Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Prothrombin Intl. Normalized Ratio - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Hematology Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Prothrombin Intl. Normalized Ratio - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Hematology Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Leukocytes (10^9/L) - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Hematology Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (sec) - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Hematology Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Platelets (10^9/L) - Day 291 Participants
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Hematology Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Neutrophils, Segmented (10^9/L) - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Hematology Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Platelets (10^9/L) - Day 293 Participants
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Hematology Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (sec) - Day 291 Participants
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Hematology Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Leukocytes (10^9/L) - Day 291 Participants
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Hematology Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Prothrombin Intl. Normalized Ratio - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Hematology Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Neutrophils, Segmented (10^9/L) - Day 291 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5

JCAR017 treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities are defined as an abnormality that, compared to baseline, worsens by at least one grade after JCAR017 infusion. The baseline value is defined as the last available recorded value on or prior to the date of JCAR017 infusion. Grade 1 = Mild, Grade 2 =Moderate, Grade 3 =Severe, Grade 4 =Life-threatening, Grade 5 =Death.

Time frame: At Baseline and Day 29 after JCAR017 infusion

Population: All participants in the JCAR017 treated set with available baseline and Day 29 serum chemistry results. Prespecified to be reported for cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Triglycerides (mmol/L) - Day 2910 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Creatinine (umol/L) - Day 2923 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Alkaline Phosphatase (U/L) - Day 292 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Bilirubin (umol/L) - Day 292 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Alanine Aminotransferase (U/L) - Day 2910 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Urate (umol/L) - Day 291 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Aspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) - Day 296 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Phosphate (mmol/L) - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Albumin (g/L) - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Bilirubin (umol/L) - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Creatinine (umol/L) - Day 2920 Participants
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Phosphate (mmol/L) - Day 291 Participants
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Albumin (g/L) - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Urate (umol/L) - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Alkaline Phosphatase (U/L) - Day 291 Participants
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Alanine Aminotransferase (U/L) - Day 293 Participants
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Aspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) - Day 293 Participants
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Triglycerides (mmol/L) - Day 296 Participants
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Number of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Alanine Aminotransferase (U/L) - Day 291 Participants
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Number of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Phosphate (mmol/L) - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Number of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Triglycerides (mmol/L) - Day 292 Participants
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Number of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Creatinine (umol/L) - Day 296 Participants
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Number of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Bilirubin (umol/L) - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Number of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Aspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) - Day 291 Participants
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Number of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Albumin (g/L) - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Number of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Alkaline Phosphatase (U/L) - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Number of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Urate (umol/L) - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Urate (umol/L) - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Albumin (g/L) - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Phosphate (mmol/L) - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Alkaline Phosphatase (U/L) - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Alanine Aminotransferase (U/L) - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Aspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Bilirubin (umol/L) - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Creatinine (umol/L) - Day 291 Participants
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Triglycerides (mmol/L) - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Bilirubin (umol/L) - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Aspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) - Day 293 Participants
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Alanine Aminotransferase (U/L) - Day 292 Participants
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Urate (umol/L) - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Triglycerides (mmol/L) - Day 292 Participants
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Alkaline Phosphatase (U/L) - Day 291 Participants
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Phosphate (mmol/L) - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Albumin (g/L) - Day 290 Participants
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaNumber of Participants With Increase From Baseline in Select Serum Chemistry Parameters - Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5Creatinine (umol/L) - Day 293 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5

A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any adverse event (AE) occurring at any dose that: * Results in death; * Is life-threatening (ie, in the opinion of the Investigator, the participant is at immediate risk of death from the AE); * Requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization (hospitalization is defined as an inpatient admission, regardless of length of stay). * Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (a substantial disruption of the participant's ability to conduct normal life functions); * Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; * Constitutes an important medical event. Graded according to NCI CTCAE (Version 4) guidelines where grade 1 = mild, grade 2 = moderate, grade 3 = severe, grade 4 = life threatening, grade 5 = death.

Time frame: From leukapheresis to end of study (up to approximately 63 months)

Population: All participants in the JCAR017 treated set. Prespecified to be reported for cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 only

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5SAEs occurring between Day 31 and Day 907 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5SAEs occurring between leukapheresis and lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LDC)0 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5SAEs occurring between Day 91 and end of study5 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5SAEs occurring between LDC and JCAR017 infusion1 Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5SAEs occurring between JCAR017 infusion and Day 3016 Participants
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5SAEs occurring between Day 31 and Day 903 Participants
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5SAEs occurring between JCAR017 infusion and Day 307 Participants
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5SAEs occurring between LDC and JCAR017 infusion0 Participants
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5SAEs occurring between Day 91 and end of study3 Participants
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5SAEs occurring between leukapheresis and lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LDC)1 Participants
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5SAEs occurring between JCAR017 infusion and Day 300 Participants
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5SAEs occurring between leukapheresis and lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LDC)0 Participants
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5SAEs occurring between LDC and JCAR017 infusion0 Participants
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5SAEs occurring between Day 31 and Day 902 Participants
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5SAEs occurring between Day 91 and end of study1 Participants
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5SAEs occurring between Day 91 and end of study0 Participants
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5SAEs occurring between leukapheresis and lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LDC)0 Participants
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5SAEs occurring between Day 31 and Day 900 Participants
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5SAEs occurring between JCAR017 infusion and Day 300 Participants
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5SAEs occurring between LDC and JCAR017 infusion0 Participants
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5SAEs occurring between JCAR017 infusion and Day 301 Participants
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5SAEs occurring between Day 31 and Day 901 Participants
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5SAEs occurring between leukapheresis and lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LDC)0 Participants
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5SAEs occurring between Day 91 and end of study0 Participants
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Cohorts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5SAEs occurring between LDC and JCAR017 infusion0 Participants
Secondary

Overall Response Rate (ORR) in Cohort 7

ORR by Independent Review Committee. ORR is the percent of participants with best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Complete response via PET-CT: * Lymph nodes/extralymphatic: Score 1, 2, 3a with/without residual mass on 5-point scale * New lesions: No * Bone marrow: No FDG-avid disease Complete response via CT scan: * Lymph nodes/extralymphatic: Target nodes/nodal masses ≤ 1.5 cm longest transverse diameter. * Nonmeasured lesion: None * New lesions: No * Bone marrow: Normal Partial response via PET-CT: * Lymph nodes/extralymphatic: Score 4, 5b, reduced uptake from baseline * New lesions: None * Bone marrow: Residual uptake higher than normal, reduced from baseline Partial response via CT scan: * Lymph nodes/extralymphatic: 50% decrease in sum of diameters of \<= 6 target measurable nodes/extranodal sites * Nonmeasured lesion: None/normal * Organ enlargement: Spleen length decreased \> 50% * New lesions: No

Time frame: From JCAR017 infusion until disease progression, end of study, the start of another anticancer therapy, or hemopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) (up to approximately 63 months)

Population: All participants in the JCAR017 treated set. Prespecified to be reported for cohort 7 only.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyOverall Response Rate (ORR) in Cohort 788.9 Percent of Participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival is defined as the interval from the date of JCAR017 infusion to the date of death due to any reason. Data from surviving participants was censored at the last time that the participant was known to be alive. Estimated using Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimates.

Time frame: From the date of JCAR017 infusion to the date of death due to any reason (up to approximately 63 months).

Population: All participants in the JCAR017 treated set.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyOverall Survival (OS)15.84 Months
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyOverall Survival (OS)16.82 Months
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Overall Survival (OS)14.72 Months
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaOverall Survival (OS)31.74 Months
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaOverall Survival (OS)14.23 Months
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingOverall Survival (OS)NA Months
Secondary

Percent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCR

Persistence is defined as a transgene count greater than or equal to the lower limit of detection (LLOD) of 5 copies per reaction. Data obtained after the start of a new anti-cancer therapy were excluded. qPCR = Quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

Time frame: At Day 29 and Months 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 post JCAR017 infusion.

Population: All participants in the JCAR017 treated set with baseline and on-study JCAR017 transgene results.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 1240.0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 633.3 Percent of Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRDay 2988.2 Percent of Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 270.0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 941.7 Percent of Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 2428.6 Percent of Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 1825.0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 361.5 Percent of Participants
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 350.0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 645.5 Percent of Participants
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRDay 2995.2 Percent of Participants
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 2450.0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 266.7 Percent of Participants
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 1857.1 Percent of Participants
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 1257.1 Percent of Participants
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 940.0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Percent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 3100.0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Percent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 12100.0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Percent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 1875.0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Percent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 2100.0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Percent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 24100.0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Percent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 671.4 Percent of Participants
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Percent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRDay 29100.0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Percent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 960.0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRDay 29100.0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 120.0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 2100.0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 240.0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 180.0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 3100.0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 90.0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 60.0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 2100.0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 1266.7 Percent of Participants
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRDay 2980.0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 3100.0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 6100.0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 9100.0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 18100.0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 24100.0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 2420.0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 1820.0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 616.7 Percent of Participants
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 337.5 Percent of Participants
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 262.5 Percent of Participants
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRDay 29100.0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 120.0 Percent of Participants
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingPercent of Participants With Presence of JCAR017 Transgene in Peripheral Blood by qPCRMonth 925.0 Percent of Participants
Secondary

Progression Free Survival (PFS) Using European Medicines Agency (EMA) Criteria

Progression-free survival is defined as the interval from the date of JCAR017 infusion to progressive disease or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per European Medicines Agency (EMA) criteria, participants who did not experience progressive disease and who did not die before the data cutoff date were censored at the time of the last visit with adequate response assessment when the participants were known not to have progressed. Estimated using Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimates.

Time frame: From JCAR017 infusion to progressive disease or death due to any reason, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 63 months)

Population: All participants in the JCAR017 treated set.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyProgression Free Survival (PFS) Using European Medicines Agency (EMA) Criteria2.99 Months
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyProgression Free Survival (PFS) Using European Medicines Agency (EMA) Criteria3.12 Months
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Progression Free Survival (PFS) Using European Medicines Agency (EMA) Criteria6.33 Months
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaProgression Free Survival (PFS) Using European Medicines Agency (EMA) Criteria14.23 Months
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaProgression Free Survival (PFS) Using European Medicines Agency (EMA) Criteria23.95 Months
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingProgression Free Survival (PFS) Using European Medicines Agency (EMA) CriteriaNA Months
Secondary

Time to Peak Concentration (Tmax) of JCAR017 by qPCR

Time to maximum concentration (Tmax) is the time it takes for a drug to reach the maximum concentration (Cmax) after administration. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was used to determine Tmax by detecting the JCAR017 transgene. Baseline is defined as the last available recorded value on or prior to the date of JCAR017 infusion.

Time frame: At baseline and up until 24 months post JCAR017 infusion

Population: All participants in the JCAR017 treated set with baseline and on-study PK measurements.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyTime to Peak Concentration (Tmax) of JCAR017 by qPCR11.6 Days
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyTime to Peak Concentration (Tmax) of JCAR017 by qPCR9.0 Days
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Time to Peak Concentration (Tmax) of JCAR017 by qPCR84.1 Days
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaTime to Peak Concentration (Tmax) of JCAR017 by qPCR10.0 Days
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaTime to Peak Concentration (Tmax) of JCAR017 by qPCR9.0 Days
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingTime to Peak Concentration (Tmax) of JCAR017 by qPCR12.2 Days
Secondary

Total Exposure to JCAR017 as Measured by Area Under the Curve (AUC) of JCAR017 by qPCR

Area Under the Curve (AUC) represents the total exposure of participants to study drug. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was used to determine AUC by detecting the JCAR017 transgene. Baseline is defined as the last available recorded value on or prior to the date of JCAR017 infusion.

Time frame: At baseline and up until 24 months post JCAR017 infusion

Population: All participants in the JCAR017 treated set with baseline and on-study PK measurements.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed ≥ 2 Lines of TherapyTotal Exposure to JCAR017 as Measured by Area Under the Curve (AUC) of JCAR017 by qPCR185586.667 Days*copies/ugGeometric Coefficient of Variation 325.6
Cohort 2: Transplant Ineligible Diffuse B-cell Lymphoma Who Failed First Line TherapyTotal Exposure to JCAR017 as Measured by Area Under the Curve (AUC) of JCAR017 by qPCR157499.362 Days*copies/ugGeometric Coefficient of Variation 211.9
Cohort 3: Japan Specific - Meeting Eligibility Criteria for Cohort 1 or 2Total Exposure to JCAR017 as Measured by Area Under the Curve (AUC) of JCAR017 by qPCR134819.085 Days*copies/ugGeometric Coefficient of Variation 1268.9
Cohort 4: Newly Diagnosed High-Grade B-cell LymphomaTotal Exposure to JCAR017 as Measured by Area Under the Curve (AUC) of JCAR017 by qPCR286119.439 Days*copies/ug
Cohort 5: Primary Central Nervous System LymphomaTotal Exposure to JCAR017 as Measured by Area Under the Curve (AUC) of JCAR017 by qPCR64945.715 Days*copies/ugGeometric Coefficient of Variation 1345.7
Cohort 7: Meeting Cohort 1 Criteria Suitable for Treatment in an Outpatient SettingTotal Exposure to JCAR017 as Measured by Area Under the Curve (AUC) of JCAR017 by qPCR199731.737 Days*copies/ugGeometric Coefficient of Variation 136.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 3, 2026