Acute Pain, Amputation, Chronic Pain, Neuroma, Phantom Limb Pain, Postoperative Pain, Residual Limbs
Conditions
Keywords
Neurostimulation, Peripheral nerve stimulation
Brief summary
Limb loss is frequently associated with postamputation pain that can be challenging to treat and often involves opioids. Advances in the field of neuromodulation has led to development of an intentionally reversible percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) system that has had promising results when treating chronic postamputation pain. PNS may offer sustained pain relief even after the treatment period has ended. Currently, there is no convincing evidence regarding the role of PNS in the acute postoperative period, which may be a critical time to control pain as those with higher pain appear to be at higher risk for developing persistent post-procedural pain. The investigators of this study aim to evaluate the feasibility and effects of PNS in the acute postoperative period and determine the feasibility of completing a randomized controlled treatment outcome study.
Detailed description
16 patients with new nontraumatic transfemoral or transtibial amputation will be enrolled in the study Having met inclusion criteria, the patients will be randomized to experimental or control groups Patients in the experimental group undergo placement of PNS leads within 7 days of amputation surgery Patients in both groups will be treated with standard pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic pain therapies and evaluated weekly for 8 weeks, then at 3, 6, and 12 months postamputation
Interventions
Up to 60 days of peripheral nerve stimulation
Medications, physical therapy, or other pain treatments
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Nontraumatic transfemoral (above-the-knee) or transtibial (below-the-knee) amputation * Presence of postamputation pain rated at least 4 or more
Exclusion criteria
* Beck Depression Inventory score greater than 20 * Systemic infection * Immunocompromised or taking immunosuppressive medications * Implanted electronic device * Pregnancy * Previous allergy to skin contact materials and/or anesthetic agent * Altered mental status * Inability to provide informed consent
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Average Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score | Baseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3. | Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their PLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0=no pain to 10=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points. |
| Average Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score | Baseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3 | Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their RLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0=no pain to 10=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points. |
| Worst Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score | Baseline, Weeks 1-4, 5-8, and Month 3 | Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their PLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0=no pain to 10=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points. |
| Worst Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score | Baseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3 | Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their RLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0=no pain to 10=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points. |
| Best Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score | Baseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3 | Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their PLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0=no pain to 10=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points. |
| Best Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score | Baseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3 | Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their RLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0=no pain to 10=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Pain Disability Index (PDI) | Weeks 4, Week 8, and Week 12 | The PDI is designed to measure the degree to which aspects of life are disrupted by chronic pain. The impact of pain on various aspects of life (e.g. family/home responsibilities, recreation, social activity, occupation, sexual behavior, self-care, and life-support activities) are recorded on a 10-point scale from 0 = no disability to 10 = worst disability. The sum of scores is recorded for a total PDI score (range 0-70). A lower score is better. |
| Number Taking Opioids | Preop, Hospital Discharge, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, Week 12 | The number of subjects prescribed any opioid medication and any dose. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points. |
| Hospital Length of Stay (LOS) | Number of days from surgery to discharge | Hospital LOS was calculated from day of surgery to day of discharge from inpatient hospital ward to rehabilitation facility. |
| 30-day Readmission Rate | 30 days from hospital discharge | Percent of Group that was readmitted to the hospital within 30 days following hospital discharge. |
| Average Oral Morphine Equivalents (OME) | Preoperative, Hospital discharge, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Week 12 | Opioid consumption (daily OME) over time was collected for all subjects. |
| Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores | Preoperative, Week 4, and Week 8 | FIM mobility subscores were recorded by a physical therapist to measure the ability to walk, use a wheelchair, transfer to tub/shower, transfer to toilet, and mobility in bed, chair, and wheelchair. Scores range from 1 = subject requires total assistance for the task to 7 = complete independence. A higher score is better. |
| Pain Interference | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, and 12 | Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate how much pain has interfered with daily activities over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0 = no interference to 10 = completely interferes with activities. A lower score is better. |
| Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) | Weeks 4, 8, and 12 | Self-report measure PGIC reflects a patient's belief about the efficacy of treatment. PGIC is a 7 point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement. Patients rate their change as 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, or 7 = very much worse. A lower score is better. |
| Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, and 12 | Pain catastrophizing is the tendency to magnify the threat value of a pain stimulus and to feel helpless in the presence of pain. This is further characterized by the inability to prevent or inhibit pain-related thoughts surrounding a painful event. Pain catastrophizing affects how individuals experience pain. The PCS is a 13-item inventory of statements in which the subject is asked to rate the degree to which they agree, on a scale of 0 = not at all to 4 = all the time. The responses for each item are added for a total PCS score (range 0-52). A lower score is better. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) Up to 60 days of PNS starting within 7 days after major lower limb amputation surgery. Subjects also received standard medical therapy (SMT). SMT is defined as pharmacotherapy, physical therapy, or other therapies. | 8 |
| Control Subjects received SMT only after major lower limb amputation surgery. SMT is defined as pharmacotherapy, physical therapy, or other therapies. | 8 |
| Total | 16 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 2 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 6 Participants | 7 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Indication for Surgery Diabetes (DM) | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Indication for Surgery Pain | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Indication for Surgery Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Indication for Surgery Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD) | 3 Participants | 4 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Level of Amputation Above Knee | 5 Participants | 4 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Level of Amputation Below Knee | 3 Participants | 4 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Perineural Catheter Infusion | 6 Days STANDARD_DEVIATION 1 | 5.5 Days STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5 | 5.75 Days STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5 |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 8 participants | 8 participants | 16 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 7 Participants | 8 Participants | 15 Participants |
| Taking Opioids Preoperatively | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 5 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 1 / 8 | 0 / 8 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 2 / 8 | 0 / 0 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 8 | 0 / 8 |
Outcome results
Average Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score
Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their PLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0=no pain to 10=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3.
Population: Subjects who completed up to 60 days of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and standard medical therapy (SMT) or (SMT) only.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Average Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score | Baseline | 4.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.2 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Average Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score | Weeks 1-4 | 2.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.4 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Average Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score | Weeks 5-8 | 1.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Average Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score | Month 3 | 1.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Control | Average Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score | Month 3 | 1.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.2 |
| Control | Average Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score | Baseline | 3.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.7 |
| Control | Average Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score | Weeks 5-8 | 2.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.2 |
| Control | Average Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score | Weeks 1-4 | 3.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.7 |
Average Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score
Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their RLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0=no pain to 10=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3
Population: Subjects who completed up to 60 days of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and standard medical therapy (SMT) or (SMT) only.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Average Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score | Baseline | 7.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.2 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Average Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score | Weeks 1-4 | 3.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.5 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Average Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score | Weeks 5-8 | 1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Average Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score | Month 3 | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Control | Average Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score | Month 3 | 1.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.9 |
| Control | Average Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score | Baseline | 4.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.4 |
| Control | Average Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score | Weeks 5-8 | 2.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2 |
| Control | Average Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score | Weeks 1-4 | 2.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.6 |
Best Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score
Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their PLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0=no pain to 10=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3
Population: Subjects who completed up to 60 days of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and standard medical therapy (SMT) or (SMT) only.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Best Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score | Baseline | 1.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.1 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Best Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score | Weeks 1-4 | 0.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Best Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score | Weeks 5-8 | 0.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Best Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score | Month 3 | 0.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Control | Best Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score | Month 3 | 1.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.4 |
| Control | Best Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score | Baseline | 1.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.6 |
| Control | Best Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score | Weeks 5-8 | 1.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Control | Best Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score | Weeks 1-4 | 1.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.4 |
Best Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score
Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their RLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0=no pain to 10=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3
Population: Subjects who completed up to 60 days of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and standard medical therapy (SMT) or (SMT) only.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Best Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score | Baseline | 4.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Best Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score | Weeks 1-4 | 1.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.4 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Best Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score | Weeks 5-8 | 0.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Best Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score | Month 3 | 0.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Control | Best Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score | Month 3 | 0.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Control | Best Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score | Baseline | 1.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Control | Best Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score | Weeks 5-8 | 1.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Control | Best Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score | Weeks 1-4 | 1.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
Worst Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score
Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their PLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0=no pain to 10=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1-4, 5-8, and Month 3
Population: Subjects who completed up to 60 days of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and standard medical therapy (SMT) or (SMT) only.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Worst Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score | Baseline | 6.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.4 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Worst Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score | Weeks 1-4 | 3.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.1 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Worst Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score | Weeks 5-8 | 2.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.6 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Worst Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score | Month 3 | 2.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.7 |
| Control | Worst Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score | Month 3 | 2.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.2 |
| Control | Worst Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score | Baseline | 5.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4 |
| Control | Worst Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score | Weeks 5-8 | 3.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.3 |
| Control | Worst Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score | Weeks 1-4 | 5.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
Worst Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score
Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their RLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0=no pain to 10=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3
Population: Subjects who completed up to 60 days of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and standard medical therapy (SMT) or (SMT) only.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Worst Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score | Month 3 | 0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Worst Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score | Baseline | 8.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.9 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Worst Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score | Weeks 1-4 | 5.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Worst Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score | Weeks 5-8 | 1.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Control | Worst Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score | Weeks 5-8 | 3.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.7 |
| Control | Worst Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score | Month 3 | 1.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.9 |
| Control | Worst Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score | Weeks 1-4 | 4.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.5 |
| Control | Worst Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score | Baseline | 7.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.9 |
30-day Readmission Rate
Percent of Group that was readmitted to the hospital within 30 days following hospital discharge.
Time frame: 30 days from hospital discharge
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | 30-day Readmission Rate | 0 Participants |
| Control | 30-day Readmission Rate | 2 Participants |
Average Oral Morphine Equivalents (OME)
Opioid consumption (daily OME) over time was collected for all subjects.
Time frame: Preoperative, Hospital discharge, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Week 12
Population: All study participants were evaluated.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Average Oral Morphine Equivalents (OME) | Weeks 1-4 | 23.4 oral morphine equivalents (mg) | Standard Deviation 47.7 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Average Oral Morphine Equivalents (OME) | Weeks 5-8 | 13.5 oral morphine equivalents (mg) | Standard Deviation 24.9 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Average Oral Morphine Equivalents (OME) | Hospital Discharge | 44.1 oral morphine equivalents (mg) | Standard Deviation 57.2 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Average Oral Morphine Equivalents (OME) | Week 12 | 13.5 oral morphine equivalents (mg) | Standard Deviation 23.9 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Average Oral Morphine Equivalents (OME) | Preop | 36.1 oral morphine equivalents (mg) | Standard Deviation 60.5 |
| Control | Average Oral Morphine Equivalents (OME) | Week 12 | 10.7 oral morphine equivalents (mg) | Standard Deviation 20.7 |
| Control | Average Oral Morphine Equivalents (OME) | Preop | 7.2 oral morphine equivalents (mg) | Standard Deviation 13.3 |
| Control | Average Oral Morphine Equivalents (OME) | Hospital Discharge | 36.1 oral morphine equivalents (mg) | Standard Deviation 30.4 |
| Control | Average Oral Morphine Equivalents (OME) | Weeks 5-8 | 20.3 oral morphine equivalents (mg) | Standard Deviation 31 |
| Control | Average Oral Morphine Equivalents (OME) | Weeks 1-4 | 16.6 oral morphine equivalents (mg) | Standard Deviation 30 |
Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores
FIM mobility subscores were recorded by a physical therapist to measure the ability to walk, use a wheelchair, transfer to tub/shower, transfer to toilet, and mobility in bed, chair, and wheelchair. Scores range from 1 = subject requires total assistance for the task to 7 = complete independence. A higher score is better.
Time frame: Preoperative, Week 4, and Week 8
Population: All qualifying subjects were evaluated.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores | Bed/Chair/Wheelchair Mobility (Week 4) | 5.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores | Walk (Week 8) | 1.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores | Walk (Preop) | 1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores | Tub/Shower Transfer (Preop) | 4.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.6 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores | Walk (Week 4) | 1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores | Wheelchair (Week 4) | 5.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores | Toilet Transfer (Preop) | 4.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores | Tub/Shower Transfer (Week 4) | 5.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores | Toilet Transfer (Week 4) | 5.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores | Wheelchair (Preop) | 4.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.6 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores | Toilet Transfer (Week 8) | 5.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores | Tub/Shower Transfer (Week 8) | 5.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores | Bed/Chair/Wheelchair Mobility (Preop) | 4.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores | Bed/Chair/Wheelchair Mobility (Week 8) | 5.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores | Wheelchair (Week 8) | 5.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Control | Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores | Bed/Chair/Wheelchair Mobility (Week 8) | 6.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Control | Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores | Walk (Week 8) | 1.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Control | Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores | Wheelchair (Preop) | 5.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Control | Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores | Wheelchair (Week 4) | 5.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Control | Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores | Wheelchair (Week 8) | 6.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Control | Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores | Tub/Shower Transfer (Preop) | 4.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Control | Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores | Tub/Shower Transfer (Week 4) | 5.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Control | Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores | Bed/Chair/Wheelchair Mobility (Preop) | 4.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Control | Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores | Bed/Chair/Wheelchair Mobility (Week 4) | 5.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Control | Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores | Walk (Preop) | 1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Control | Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores | Tub/Shower Transfer (Week 8) | 5.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Control | Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores | Toilet Transfer (Preop) | 3.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.4 |
| Control | Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores | Toilet Transfer (Week 4) | 5.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.7 |
| Control | Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores | Toilet Transfer (Week 8) | 5.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Control | Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores | Walk (Week 4) | 1.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
Hospital Length of Stay (LOS)
Hospital LOS was calculated from day of surgery to day of discharge from inpatient hospital ward to rehabilitation facility.
Time frame: Number of days from surgery to discharge
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Hospital Length of Stay (LOS) | 7 days | Standard Deviation 1.6 |
| Control | Hospital Length of Stay (LOS) | 6 days | Standard Deviation 3.3 |
Number Taking Opioids
The number of subjects prescribed any opioid medication and any dose. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Time frame: Preop, Hospital Discharge, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, Week 12
Population: Between Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8, three subjects in the PNS Group terminated due to unrelated medical events (2) or withdrew consent (1). After Week 12, two subjects in the Control Group terminated due to unrelated medical events or withdrew consent (data for one subject was collected prior to withdrawal).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Number Taking Opioids | Baseline | 3 Participants |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Number Taking Opioids | Weeks 5-8 | 1 Participants |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Number Taking Opioids | Hospital Discharge | 6 Participants |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Number Taking Opioids | Week 12 | 1 Participants |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Number Taking Opioids | Weeks 1-4 | 3 Participants |
| Control | Number Taking Opioids | Week 12 | 3 Participants |
| Control | Number Taking Opioids | Weeks 5-8 | 4 Participants |
| Control | Number Taking Opioids | Hospital Discharge | 7 Participants |
| Control | Number Taking Opioids | Baseline | 2 Participants |
| Control | Number Taking Opioids | Weeks 1-4 | 5 Participants |
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Pain catastrophizing is the tendency to magnify the threat value of a pain stimulus and to feel helpless in the presence of pain. This is further characterized by the inability to prevent or inhibit pain-related thoughts surrounding a painful event. Pain catastrophizing affects how individuals experience pain. The PCS is a 13-item inventory of statements in which the subject is asked to rate the degree to which they agree, on a scale of 0 = not at all to 4 = all the time. The responses for each item are added for a total PCS score (range 0-52). A lower score is better.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Population: Subjects who were enrolled in the study and for whom this data was collected.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) | Baseline | 20.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.7 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) | Week 4 | 10.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.2 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) | Week 8 | 4.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.1 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) | Week 12 | 17 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.8 |
| Control | Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) | Week 12 | 9.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.3 |
| Control | Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) | Baseline | 12.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.2 |
| Control | Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) | Week 8 | 4.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.4 |
| Control | Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) | Week 4 | 8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.4 |
Pain Disability Index (PDI)
The PDI is designed to measure the degree to which aspects of life are disrupted by chronic pain. The impact of pain on various aspects of life (e.g. family/home responsibilities, recreation, social activity, occupation, sexual behavior, self-care, and life-support activities) are recorded on a 10-point scale from 0 = no disability to 10 = worst disability. The sum of scores is recorded for a total PDI score (range 0-70). A lower score is better.
Time frame: Weeks 4, Week 8, and Week 12
Population: Subjects who were enrolled in the study and for whom this data was collected.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Pain Disability Index (PDI) | Week 4 | 22.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.3 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Pain Disability Index (PDI) | Week 8 | 15.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.3 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Pain Disability Index (PDI) | Week 12 | 44.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 38.8 |
| Control | Pain Disability Index (PDI) | Week 4 | 6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.3 |
| Control | Pain Disability Index (PDI) | Week 8 | 6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.9 |
| Control | Pain Disability Index (PDI) | Week 12 | 7.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.3 |
Pain Interference
Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate how much pain has interfered with daily activities over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0 = no interference to 10 = completely interferes with activities. A lower score is better.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Population: Subjects who were enrolled in the study and for whom this data was collected.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Pain Interference | Baseline | 2.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.1 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Pain Interference | Week 4 | 2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Pain Interference | Week 8 | 1.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Pain Interference | Week 12 | 0.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Control | Pain Interference | Week 12 | 0.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Control | Pain Interference | Baseline | 3.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
| Control | Pain Interference | Week 8 | 1.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.1 |
| Control | Pain Interference | Week 4 | 1.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Self-report measure PGIC reflects a patient's belief about the efficacy of treatment. PGIC is a 7 point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement. Patients rate their change as 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, or 7 = very much worse. A lower score is better.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Population: Subjects who were enrolled in the study and for whom this data was collected.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) | Week 4 | 4.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) | Week 8 | 4.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.7 |
| Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) | Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) | Week 12 | 3.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.2 |
| Control | Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) | Week 4 | 3.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.2 |
| Control | Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) | Week 8 | 5.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.1 |
| Control | Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) | Week 12 | 2.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.5 |