Skip to content

Postoperative Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Management of Post-amputation Pain

Effects of Postoperative Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation on Acute and Chronic Amputation Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03484429
Enrollment
16
Registered
2018-03-30
Start date
2017-12-01
Completion date
2021-04-17
Last updated
2021-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Pain, Amputation, Chronic Pain, Neuroma, Phantom Limb Pain, Postoperative Pain, Residual Limbs

Keywords

Neurostimulation, Peripheral nerve stimulation

Brief summary

Limb loss is frequently associated with postamputation pain that can be challenging to treat and often involves opioids. Advances in the field of neuromodulation has led to development of an intentionally reversible percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) system that has had promising results when treating chronic postamputation pain. PNS may offer sustained pain relief even after the treatment period has ended. Currently, there is no convincing evidence regarding the role of PNS in the acute postoperative period, which may be a critical time to control pain as those with higher pain appear to be at higher risk for developing persistent post-procedural pain. The investigators of this study aim to evaluate the feasibility and effects of PNS in the acute postoperative period and determine the feasibility of completing a randomized controlled treatment outcome study.

Detailed description

16 patients with new nontraumatic transfemoral or transtibial amputation will be enrolled in the study Having met inclusion criteria, the patients will be randomized to experimental or control groups Patients in the experimental group undergo placement of PNS leads within 7 days of amputation surgery Patients in both groups will be treated with standard pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic pain therapies and evaluated weekly for 8 weeks, then at 3, 6, and 12 months postamputation

Interventions

DEVICEPeripheral nerve stimulation

Up to 60 days of peripheral nerve stimulation

OTHERStandard Medical Therapy

Medications, physical therapy, or other pain treatments

Sponsors

Hunter Holmes Mcguire Veteran Affairs Medical Center
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Nontraumatic transfemoral (above-the-knee) or transtibial (below-the-knee) amputation * Presence of postamputation pain rated at least 4 or more

Exclusion criteria

* Beck Depression Inventory score greater than 20 * Systemic infection * Immunocompromised or taking immunosuppressive medications * Implanted electronic device * Pregnancy * Previous allergy to skin contact materials and/or anesthetic agent * Altered mental status * Inability to provide informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Average Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) ScoreBaseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3.Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their PLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0=no pain to 10=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Average Residual Limb Pain (RLP) ScoreBaseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their RLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0=no pain to 10=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Worst Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) ScoreBaseline, Weeks 1-4, 5-8, and Month 3Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their PLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0=no pain to 10=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Worst Residual Limb Pain (RLP) ScoreBaseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their RLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0=no pain to 10=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Best Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) ScoreBaseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their PLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0=no pain to 10=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Best Residual Limb Pain (RLP) ScoreBaseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their RLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0=no pain to 10=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Disability Index (PDI)Weeks 4, Week 8, and Week 12The PDI is designed to measure the degree to which aspects of life are disrupted by chronic pain. The impact of pain on various aspects of life (e.g. family/home responsibilities, recreation, social activity, occupation, sexual behavior, self-care, and life-support activities) are recorded on a 10-point scale from 0 = no disability to 10 = worst disability. The sum of scores is recorded for a total PDI score (range 0-70). A lower score is better.
Number Taking OpioidsPreop, Hospital Discharge, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, Week 12The number of subjects prescribed any opioid medication and any dose. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.
Hospital Length of Stay (LOS)Number of days from surgery to dischargeHospital LOS was calculated from day of surgery to day of discharge from inpatient hospital ward to rehabilitation facility.
30-day Readmission Rate30 days from hospital dischargePercent of Group that was readmitted to the hospital within 30 days following hospital discharge.
Average Oral Morphine Equivalents (OME)Preoperative, Hospital discharge, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Week 12Opioid consumption (daily OME) over time was collected for all subjects.
Functional Independence Measure (FIM) ScoresPreoperative, Week 4, and Week 8FIM mobility subscores were recorded by a physical therapist to measure the ability to walk, use a wheelchair, transfer to tub/shower, transfer to toilet, and mobility in bed, chair, and wheelchair. Scores range from 1 = subject requires total assistance for the task to 7 = complete independence. A higher score is better.
Pain InterferenceBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, and 12Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate how much pain has interfered with daily activities over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0 = no interference to 10 = completely interferes with activities. A lower score is better.
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Weeks 4, 8, and 12Self-report measure PGIC reflects a patient's belief about the efficacy of treatment. PGIC is a 7 point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement. Patients rate their change as 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, or 7 = very much worse. A lower score is better.
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, and 12Pain catastrophizing is the tendency to magnify the threat value of a pain stimulus and to feel helpless in the presence of pain. This is further characterized by the inability to prevent or inhibit pain-related thoughts surrounding a painful event. Pain catastrophizing affects how individuals experience pain. The PCS is a 13-item inventory of statements in which the subject is asked to rate the degree to which they agree, on a scale of 0 = not at all to 4 = all the time. The responses for each item are added for a total PCS score (range 0-52). A lower score is better.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)
Up to 60 days of PNS starting within 7 days after major lower limb amputation surgery. Subjects also received standard medical therapy (SMT). SMT is defined as pharmacotherapy, physical therapy, or other therapies.
8
Control
Subjects received SMT only after major lower limb amputation surgery. SMT is defined as pharmacotherapy, physical therapy, or other therapies.
8
Total16

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event20
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPeripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)ControlTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
6 Participants7 Participants13 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Indication for Surgery
Diabetes (DM)
1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Indication for Surgery
Pain
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Indication for Surgery
Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD)
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Indication for Surgery
Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD)
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Level of Amputation
Above Knee
5 Participants4 Participants9 Participants
Level of Amputation
Below Knee
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Perineural Catheter Infusion6 Days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
5.5 Days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
5.75 Days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
8 participants8 participants16 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants8 Participants15 Participants
Taking Opioids Preoperatively3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 80 / 8
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 80 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 80 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

Average Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score

Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their PLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0=no pain to 10=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3.

Population: Subjects who completed up to 60 days of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and standard medical therapy (SMT) or (SMT) only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Average Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) ScoreBaseline4.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Average Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) ScoreWeeks 1-42.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Average Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) ScoreWeeks 5-81.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Average Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) ScoreMonth 31.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
ControlAverage Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) ScoreMonth 31.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
ControlAverage Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) ScoreBaseline3.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
ControlAverage Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) ScoreWeeks 5-82.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
ControlAverage Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) ScoreWeeks 1-43.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Primary

Average Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score

Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their RLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0=no pain to 10=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3

Population: Subjects who completed up to 60 days of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and standard medical therapy (SMT) or (SMT) only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Average Residual Limb Pain (RLP) ScoreBaseline7.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Average Residual Limb Pain (RLP) ScoreWeeks 1-43.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Average Residual Limb Pain (RLP) ScoreWeeks 5-81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Average Residual Limb Pain (RLP) ScoreMonth 30 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
ControlAverage Residual Limb Pain (RLP) ScoreMonth 31.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
ControlAverage Residual Limb Pain (RLP) ScoreBaseline4.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
ControlAverage Residual Limb Pain (RLP) ScoreWeeks 5-82.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
ControlAverage Residual Limb Pain (RLP) ScoreWeeks 1-42.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Primary

Best Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score

Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their PLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0=no pain to 10=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3

Population: Subjects who completed up to 60 days of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and standard medical therapy (SMT) or (SMT) only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Best Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) ScoreBaseline1.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Best Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) ScoreWeeks 1-40.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Best Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) ScoreWeeks 5-80.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Best Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) ScoreMonth 30.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
ControlBest Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) ScoreMonth 31.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
ControlBest Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) ScoreBaseline1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
ControlBest Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) ScoreWeeks 5-81.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
ControlBest Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) ScoreWeeks 1-41.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Primary

Best Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score

Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their RLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0=no pain to 10=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3

Population: Subjects who completed up to 60 days of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and standard medical therapy (SMT) or (SMT) only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Best Residual Limb Pain (RLP) ScoreBaseline4.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Best Residual Limb Pain (RLP) ScoreWeeks 1-41.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Best Residual Limb Pain (RLP) ScoreWeeks 5-80.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Best Residual Limb Pain (RLP) ScoreMonth 30.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
ControlBest Residual Limb Pain (RLP) ScoreMonth 30.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
ControlBest Residual Limb Pain (RLP) ScoreBaseline1.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
ControlBest Residual Limb Pain (RLP) ScoreWeeks 5-81.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
ControlBest Residual Limb Pain (RLP) ScoreWeeks 1-41.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Primary

Worst Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) Score

Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their PLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0=no pain to 10=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1-4, 5-8, and Month 3

Population: Subjects who completed up to 60 days of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and standard medical therapy (SMT) or (SMT) only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Worst Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) ScoreBaseline6.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Worst Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) ScoreWeeks 1-43.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Worst Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) ScoreWeeks 5-82.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Worst Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) ScoreMonth 32.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
ControlWorst Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) ScoreMonth 32.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
ControlWorst Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) ScoreBaseline5.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
ControlWorst Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) ScoreWeeks 5-83.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
ControlWorst Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) ScoreWeeks 1-45.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Primary

Worst Residual Limb Pain (RLP) Score

Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate their RLP over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0=no pain to 10=worst pain they have ever experienced. A lower score is better. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Month 3

Population: Subjects who completed up to 60 days of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and standard medical therapy (SMT) or (SMT) only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Worst Residual Limb Pain (RLP) ScoreMonth 30 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Worst Residual Limb Pain (RLP) ScoreBaseline8.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Worst Residual Limb Pain (RLP) ScoreWeeks 1-45.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Worst Residual Limb Pain (RLP) ScoreWeeks 5-81.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
ControlWorst Residual Limb Pain (RLP) ScoreWeeks 5-83.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
ControlWorst Residual Limb Pain (RLP) ScoreMonth 31.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
ControlWorst Residual Limb Pain (RLP) ScoreWeeks 1-44.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
ControlWorst Residual Limb Pain (RLP) ScoreBaseline7.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Secondary

30-day Readmission Rate

Percent of Group that was readmitted to the hospital within 30 days following hospital discharge.

Time frame: 30 days from hospital discharge

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)30-day Readmission Rate0 Participants
Control30-day Readmission Rate2 Participants
Secondary

Average Oral Morphine Equivalents (OME)

Opioid consumption (daily OME) over time was collected for all subjects.

Time frame: Preoperative, Hospital discharge, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, and Week 12

Population: All study participants were evaluated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Average Oral Morphine Equivalents (OME)Weeks 1-423.4 oral morphine equivalents (mg)Standard Deviation 47.7
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Average Oral Morphine Equivalents (OME)Weeks 5-813.5 oral morphine equivalents (mg)Standard Deviation 24.9
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Average Oral Morphine Equivalents (OME)Hospital Discharge44.1 oral morphine equivalents (mg)Standard Deviation 57.2
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Average Oral Morphine Equivalents (OME)Week 1213.5 oral morphine equivalents (mg)Standard Deviation 23.9
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Average Oral Morphine Equivalents (OME)Preop36.1 oral morphine equivalents (mg)Standard Deviation 60.5
ControlAverage Oral Morphine Equivalents (OME)Week 1210.7 oral morphine equivalents (mg)Standard Deviation 20.7
ControlAverage Oral Morphine Equivalents (OME)Preop7.2 oral morphine equivalents (mg)Standard Deviation 13.3
ControlAverage Oral Morphine Equivalents (OME)Hospital Discharge36.1 oral morphine equivalents (mg)Standard Deviation 30.4
ControlAverage Oral Morphine Equivalents (OME)Weeks 5-820.3 oral morphine equivalents (mg)Standard Deviation 31
ControlAverage Oral Morphine Equivalents (OME)Weeks 1-416.6 oral morphine equivalents (mg)Standard Deviation 30
Secondary

Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Scores

FIM mobility subscores were recorded by a physical therapist to measure the ability to walk, use a wheelchair, transfer to tub/shower, transfer to toilet, and mobility in bed, chair, and wheelchair. Scores range from 1 = subject requires total assistance for the task to 7 = complete independence. A higher score is better.

Time frame: Preoperative, Week 4, and Week 8

Population: All qualifying subjects were evaluated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Functional Independence Measure (FIM) ScoresBed/Chair/Wheelchair Mobility (Week 4)5.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Functional Independence Measure (FIM) ScoresWalk (Week 8)1.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Functional Independence Measure (FIM) ScoresWalk (Preop)1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Functional Independence Measure (FIM) ScoresTub/Shower Transfer (Preop)4.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Functional Independence Measure (FIM) ScoresWalk (Week 4)1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Functional Independence Measure (FIM) ScoresWheelchair (Week 4)5.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Functional Independence Measure (FIM) ScoresToilet Transfer (Preop)4.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Functional Independence Measure (FIM) ScoresTub/Shower Transfer (Week 4)5.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Functional Independence Measure (FIM) ScoresToilet Transfer (Week 4)5.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Functional Independence Measure (FIM) ScoresWheelchair (Preop)4.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Functional Independence Measure (FIM) ScoresToilet Transfer (Week 8)5.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Functional Independence Measure (FIM) ScoresTub/Shower Transfer (Week 8)5.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Functional Independence Measure (FIM) ScoresBed/Chair/Wheelchair Mobility (Preop)4.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Functional Independence Measure (FIM) ScoresBed/Chair/Wheelchair Mobility (Week 8)5.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Functional Independence Measure (FIM) ScoresWheelchair (Week 8)5.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
ControlFunctional Independence Measure (FIM) ScoresBed/Chair/Wheelchair Mobility (Week 8)6.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
ControlFunctional Independence Measure (FIM) ScoresWalk (Week 8)1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
ControlFunctional Independence Measure (FIM) ScoresWheelchair (Preop)5.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
ControlFunctional Independence Measure (FIM) ScoresWheelchair (Week 4)5.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
ControlFunctional Independence Measure (FIM) ScoresWheelchair (Week 8)6.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
ControlFunctional Independence Measure (FIM) ScoresTub/Shower Transfer (Preop)4.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
ControlFunctional Independence Measure (FIM) ScoresTub/Shower Transfer (Week 4)5.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
ControlFunctional Independence Measure (FIM) ScoresBed/Chair/Wheelchair Mobility (Preop)4.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
ControlFunctional Independence Measure (FIM) ScoresBed/Chair/Wheelchair Mobility (Week 4)5.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
ControlFunctional Independence Measure (FIM) ScoresWalk (Preop)1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
ControlFunctional Independence Measure (FIM) ScoresTub/Shower Transfer (Week 8)5.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
ControlFunctional Independence Measure (FIM) ScoresToilet Transfer (Preop)3.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
ControlFunctional Independence Measure (FIM) ScoresToilet Transfer (Week 4)5.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
ControlFunctional Independence Measure (FIM) ScoresToilet Transfer (Week 8)5.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
ControlFunctional Independence Measure (FIM) ScoresWalk (Week 4)1.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Secondary

Hospital Length of Stay (LOS)

Hospital LOS was calculated from day of surgery to day of discharge from inpatient hospital ward to rehabilitation facility.

Time frame: Number of days from surgery to discharge

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Hospital Length of Stay (LOS)7 daysStandard Deviation 1.6
ControlHospital Length of Stay (LOS)6 daysStandard Deviation 3.3
Secondary

Number Taking Opioids

The number of subjects prescribed any opioid medication and any dose. Data from Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8 were averaged to obtain a numerical score for these time points.

Time frame: Preop, Hospital Discharge, Weeks 1-4, Weeks 5-8, Week 12

Population: Between Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 5-8, three subjects in the PNS Group terminated due to unrelated medical events (2) or withdrew consent (1). After Week 12, two subjects in the Control Group terminated due to unrelated medical events or withdrew consent (data for one subject was collected prior to withdrawal).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Number Taking OpioidsBaseline3 Participants
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Number Taking OpioidsWeeks 5-81 Participants
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Number Taking OpioidsHospital Discharge6 Participants
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Number Taking OpioidsWeek 121 Participants
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Number Taking OpioidsWeeks 1-43 Participants
ControlNumber Taking OpioidsWeek 123 Participants
ControlNumber Taking OpioidsWeeks 5-84 Participants
ControlNumber Taking OpioidsHospital Discharge7 Participants
ControlNumber Taking OpioidsBaseline2 Participants
ControlNumber Taking OpioidsWeeks 1-45 Participants
Secondary

Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)

Pain catastrophizing is the tendency to magnify the threat value of a pain stimulus and to feel helpless in the presence of pain. This is further characterized by the inability to prevent or inhibit pain-related thoughts surrounding a painful event. Pain catastrophizing affects how individuals experience pain. The PCS is a 13-item inventory of statements in which the subject is asked to rate the degree to which they agree, on a scale of 0 = not at all to 4 = all the time. The responses for each item are added for a total PCS score (range 0-52). A lower score is better.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Population: Subjects who were enrolled in the study and for whom this data was collected.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)Baseline20.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.7
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)Week 410.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.2
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)Week 84.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.1
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)Week 1217 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.8
ControlPain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)Week 129.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.3
ControlPain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)Baseline12.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.2
ControlPain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)Week 84.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.4
ControlPain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)Week 48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.4
Secondary

Pain Disability Index (PDI)

The PDI is designed to measure the degree to which aspects of life are disrupted by chronic pain. The impact of pain on various aspects of life (e.g. family/home responsibilities, recreation, social activity, occupation, sexual behavior, self-care, and life-support activities) are recorded on a 10-point scale from 0 = no disability to 10 = worst disability. The sum of scores is recorded for a total PDI score (range 0-70). A lower score is better.

Time frame: Weeks 4, Week 8, and Week 12

Population: Subjects who were enrolled in the study and for whom this data was collected.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Pain Disability Index (PDI)Week 422.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.3
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Pain Disability Index (PDI)Week 815.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.3
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Pain Disability Index (PDI)Week 1244.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 38.8
ControlPain Disability Index (PDI)Week 46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.3
ControlPain Disability Index (PDI)Week 86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.9
ControlPain Disability Index (PDI)Week 127.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.3
Secondary

Pain Interference

Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) questionnaire, subjects were asked to rate how much pain has interfered with daily activities over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0 = no interference to 10 = completely interferes with activities. A lower score is better.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Population: Subjects who were enrolled in the study and for whom this data was collected.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Pain InterferenceBaseline2.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Pain InterferenceWeek 42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Pain InterferenceWeek 81.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Pain InterferenceWeek 120.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
ControlPain InterferenceWeek 120.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
ControlPain InterferenceBaseline3.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
ControlPain InterferenceWeek 81.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
ControlPain InterferenceWeek 41.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Secondary

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

Self-report measure PGIC reflects a patient's belief about the efficacy of treatment. PGIC is a 7 point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement. Patients rate their change as 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, or 7 = very much worse. A lower score is better.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Population: Subjects who were enrolled in the study and for whom this data was collected.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 44.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 84.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 123.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
ControlPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 43.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
ControlPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 85.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
ControlPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 122.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026