Skip to content

Cortical Dynamics of Inhibitory Control: A Concurrent tDCS-MEG Study

Measuring Cortical Dynamics of Inhibitory Control Before, During and After Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03484377
Acronym
CDIC-tDCS
Enrollment
36
Registered
2018-03-30
Start date
2018-09-15
Completion date
2019-02-28
Last updated
2020-02-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Impulsive Behavior

Brief summary

This study aims to use concurrent Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Magnetoencephalography (MEG) with measures of impulsivity to examine the neurobiological underpinnings of rapid response impulsivity (RRI) and how these can be modified using tDCS in healthy subjects.

Detailed description

Concurrent tDCS-MEG parallel arms single-blinded experimental design (right anodal v sham tDCS) will be employed in this study. The study will be conducted at the University of Nottingham, using a sample of student volunteers. This study aims to examine the influence of anodal tDCS on beta-band and alpha-band oscillatory activities, using an anti-saccade task administered before, during and after tDCS stimulation. It can potentially help understand the neurobiological mechanisms underpinning rapid response impulsivity and how these can be influenced by tDCS. The research hypotheses are that (i) a generalised mechanism for top-down inhibitory control will play a vital role, whereby prefrontal beta-band activity initiates alpha-band activity for functional inhibition over the frontal eye fields and other areas in the neurocircuitry involved in RRI; (ii) anodal tDCS (as opposed to sham) delivered over the right DLPFC will enhance this mechanism; and (iii) there will be no significant correlations between measures of self-report impulsivity and performance on the anti-saccade task and measures of oscillatory activity.

Interventions

DEVICEAnodal tDCS

The experimental condition will use a constant current of 2mA for 20 minutes, delivered via gradual increase and decrease over 10 seconds at the onset and offset of stimulation (current ramps), respectively.

DEVICESham tDCS

The anodal electrode will be placed over the supreorbital ridge. The current will be delivered only in the first 10 seconds, after which the stimulation will cease but with the electrodes still in place throughout the session. The session will last for 20 minutes.

Sponsors

Medical Research Council
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
University of Nottingham
CollaboratorOTHER
Najat Khalifa
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Participants will be randomly allocated, using a computer generated code, to receive either anodal tDCS or sham. For sham stimulation, the current will be delivered only in the first 10 seconds, after which the stimulation will cease but with the electrodes still in place throughout the session

Intervention model description

Concurrent tDCS-MEG parallel arms single-blinded experimental design (right anodal v sham tDCS).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* University students and staff * Aged 18-40

Exclusion criteria

* Individuals with epilepsy and other neurological conditions, history of significant head injury, substance misuse, major mental disorder and those receiving psychotropic medication. * Contraindications to use of Magnetic Resonance (pacemakers, metal implants, aneurysm clips) * Pregnancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total number of correct anti-saccade (AS) trialsChange from baseline after 20 minutes of tDCSA measure of rapid response impulsivity (inhibitory control)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total number of correct pro-saccade (PS) trialsChange from baseline after 20 minutes of tDCSA behavioral measure of rapid response impulsivity (inhibitory control)
Saccade latency for anti-saccade (AS) trialsChange from baseline after 20 minutes of tDCSA behavioral measure of rapid response impulsivity (inhibitory control)
Total Scores on the UPPS+P Impulsive Behaviour ScaleBaselineA self-report measure of impulsivity
Alpha and Beta band activityChange from baseline after 20 minutes of tDCSA Cortical measure of inhibitory control recorded using Magnetoencephalography (MEG). MEG is a brain imaging technique.
Saccade latency for pro-saccade (PS) trialsChange from baseline after 20 minutes of tDCSA behavioral measure of rapid response impulsivity (inhibitory control)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Alpha and Beta band activityDuring 20 minutes of tDCS stimulationEvaluation of mechanism of action of tDCS using MEG data

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026