Skip to content

Microwave Therapy for Treatment of Precancerous Actinic Keratoses

Microwave Therapy for Treatment of Precancerous Actinic Keratoses

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03483935
Acronym
MTAK
Enrollment
18
Registered
2018-03-30
Start date
2018-03-07
Completion date
2019-02-28
Last updated
2023-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Actinic Keratoses, Precancerous Skin Lesion

Brief summary

This is a two-stage feasibility study to determine if focussed microwave energy is a suitable treatment for Actinic Keratoses (AK). The two study stages are as follows: Stage 1: To determine the electrical properties of permittivity in AK on the hand and bald scalp for subsequent optimisation of the SWIFT instrument to provide the correct dose of microwave energy to the AK. Stage 2: 1. Evaluate the efficacy of microwave energy as a treatment for AK 2. Evaluate the long-term resolution of AK following microwave treatment 3. Assess the feasibility and acceptability of using microwave energy as a treatment for AK 4. Identify the potential mode of action of microwave energy in the treatment of AK. The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of microwave therapy versus no treatment on the resolution of AK lesions using visual assessment. The primary outcome measure is full or partial resolution of the AK assessed by skin examination.

Detailed description

This study is a collaboration between the University of Dundee, NHS Tayside and Emblation Ltd, funded by Innovate UK. Emblation is a Scottish based Small Medium sized Enterprise (SME) and is an established global leader in the design, development and manufacture of microwave medical devices. Actinic keratoses (AK) are believed the most common pre-cancerous lesions in humans and are precursors to invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), a malignancy that has more than doubled in incidence in the UK in the last decade due to ageing populations and increased UV exposure (Goon 2017). The UK incidence of cSCC now exceeds 30,000 annually (estimated \>50,000 cases/year, Public Health England, unpublished data) with significant health burden and NHS costs These skin cancers are often multiple, especially in immunosuppressed high-risk populations. AK are very common sun damage skin lesions found on sun-exposed areas of the skin, such as the backs of hands and bald scalp. Up to 70% of our elderly population have AK and 65% of cSCC arise from previously identified AK. AK are readily identified clinically so AK treatment offers an important opportunity for cancer prevention, but our ability to treat is limited by undesirable local adverse reactions from existing topical treatments which fail to balance effectiveness, side effects and cost. None of the currently available treatments for AK are suitable for widespread use in the community and are only partially effective. Other more effective treatments such as photodynamic therapy are expensive and time consuming and need to be delivered by experts in secondary care. NHS dermatologists are already overburdened and elderly patients with AK do not wish to travel. AK therapy would be greatly improved by a cheap, convenient, well-tolerated and efficacious therapy that can be delivered closer to home by General Practitioners (GPs) or nurses. Clinically, AK display a spectrum of severity from mild Grade 1 lesions, which are just visible and just (barely) palpable, through Grade 2 red and scaly lesions (easily felt and seen), to the most severe Grade 3 lesions, which are grossly hyperkeratotic and thickened skin lesions. In practice, it is easier to grade them as 'thin' (just palpable) or 'thick' (with substance to them). It is possible that the dielectric properties of Thick and Thin AK will differ and therefore the measurement study will need to be carried out on both types of AK such that the appropriate microwave dose can be given to these variable skin lesions The investigator's hypothesis is that localised microwave energy therapy is a suitable treatment for Actinic Keratosis (AK) skin lesions. The use of microwave technology is well established as ablative doses for treatment of malignancy e.g. hepatocellular carcinoma. There are no known studies using microwave for treatment of pre-cancerous skin conditions or skin cancers. Furthermore, there is very little understanding of the biological process evoked by localised microwave exposure in the skin or of the clinically-relevant biological mechanisms triggered. Emblation already have a CE-marked microwave instrument used successfully for the treatment of plantar viral warts, the SWIFT device. The investigators now wish to undertake a feasibility trial in 12 participants, each with multiple AK on dorsal hand skin or bald scalp or both. The trial will examine the tolerability, acceptability, efficacy and long-term resolution of AK following one or more treatments with microwave energy delivered using the SWIFT device. Previous studies performed by Emblation using SWIFT on plantar viral warts found it to be effective and safe. Some participants experienced minor discomfort during the microwave therapy but any pain stopped when treatment stopped. Some reddening of the skin at the treatment site may occur but this resolved after 24 hours. Some instances of a haematoma have been seen at larger doses, typically resolving within 7 days. This will be a two-stage study, stage 1 to measure the electrical properties of AKs in patients. The data from stage 1 allows derivation of the power settings to be used with SWIFT for AK in stage 2, to conduct a randomised controlled trial of microwave treatment, delivered using SWIFT, versus no treatment. The SWIFT device has variable power and duration controls, the protocol suitable for plantar viral warts is unlikely to be compatible with AK. Plantar warts (verrucas) are considerably thicker than AK and are located on much thicker, more robust areas of normal skin. AK are most common in the elderly population and are located on thinner, more delicate skin. The investigators therefore anticipate that AK will require a smaller dose of microwave energy than plantar warts. In order to derive the correct power and duration settings for the Swift instrument and impart the correct amount of electromagnetic energy (referred to as dose) into the AK, the dielectric properties of AK need to be determined to confirm how the specific tissue responds to the electromagnetic energy (microwave). By measuring relative permittivity (commonly abbreviated to Epsilon relative Er) the dielectric properties of the AK can be determined. The established method of measurement requires the tissue/material under test to come into contact with a specially designed probe attached to an instrument that measures the response to a radiated signal at the same frequency (8GHz) as that used in Emblation's product Swift. There are a number of instrument and probe manufacturers e.g. Keysight (HP/Agilent), SPEAG, Anritsu. The probe can be used to test solids, liquids and biological tissues by placing the probe in direct contact for a few seconds whilst remaining still during data acquisition by the instrument. The instrument (Anritsu MS46122A) providing the probe excitation conforms to the following standards: CE Mark, Low voltage (2006/95/EC) and Safety (EN 61010-1:2010). The energy imparted into the lesion for the measurement will not exceed 0.5mW, by way of comparison this is far less than a mobile phone (up to 500mW) and a FitBit (1.6mW) thus there is no inherent danger to the volunteer. Emblation employees will operate the instruments and direct the subjects to the probe. Other study team staff may work in conjunction with NHS staff at the time of recruitment and/or at the time of measurement. Microwave energy is converted to heat in the skin layers and forms the basis of the therapy. The target temperature of 43-46 degrees Centigrade is crucial in eliciting the correct immune response in the tissue. As the current instrument is 'tuned' with an antenna for plantar warts, it may not be as efficient at imparting the energy into the AK lesions and the target temperature may not be achieved with the same power and duration settings. Conversely, if the AK provides a more efficient conversion of microwave to temperature, potentially too high a temperature may be reached at a given power and duration combination. Stage 1 data will be analysed to model the efficiency of the current antenna in computer simulations and values for input power (W) and duration (s) will be derived from the modelling data, subsequently to be used in the stage 2 of the trial. This will provide the correct dose of microwave energy to be used in Stage 2. Once the settings required for AK have been determined, participants will be recruited into Stage 2 in order to determine efficacy, long term resolution, tolerability and potential mode of action of microwave treatment for AK.

Interventions

Microwave energy delivered using the microwave instrument, SWIFT, manufactured by Emblation and CE marked for dermatology applications.

Sponsors

Emblation Limited
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Dundee
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Randomised, internally controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female participants * Age 18 years and over * Clinical diagnosis of precancerous Actinic Keratosis made by a dermatologist * Able to perform study assessments

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to give informed consent * Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), pacemaker or other implantable device * Metal implants at site of treatment * Known allergy or intolerance to microwave therapy * Unstable co-morbidities (cardiovascular disease, active malignancy, vasculopathy, inflammatory arthritis) which, in the opinion of the Chief Investigator (CI), would make the patient unsuitable to be enrolled in the study. * Individuals who are immunosuppressed (organ transplant recipients, haematologic malignancies, HIV). * Individuals will not be enrolled to the study if they are participating in the clinical phase of another interventional trial or have done so within the last 30 days. Individuals who are participating in the follow-up phase of another interventional trial, or who are enrolled in an observational study, will be co-enrolled where the CIs of each study agree that it is appropriate.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Resolution of AK Lesions Following Microwave TreatmentBaseline, day 8, 15, 28, 42, 60 and 120The resolution of each treated AK lesion will be determined by clinical assessment. Resolution is predetermined as either partial (resolution of the area covered by the microwave probe, but with a rim or persistent AK) or full (complete resolution of the entire AK) over all time periods. Response will be assessed at visits 3 (day 8), 4 (day 15), 6 (day 28), 8 (day 42), 10 (day 60) and 11 (day 120). Mixed-effects logistic regression models analysed the effect of microwave therapy with random effects for participant and visit (≤ 6 per participant). Each visit will be analysed as a categorical variable as they were spaced unequally in time. Variables representing sex, age, skin site (hand/scalp) and AK subtype (thick/thin) will be included as covariates. The data reported in the outcome table is the number of resolved AK lesions.
Complete Resolution of AKs Following Microwave TreatmentBaseline, day 8, 15, 28, 42, 60 and 120The resolution of each treated AK lesion will be determined by clinical assessment. Resolution is predetermined as either partial (resolution of the area covered by the microwave probe, but with a rim or persistent AK) or full (complete resolution of the entire AK) over all time periods. Treatment will be given at day 1, with a second treatment on day 28 based on a clinical decision. Response will be assessed at visits 3 (day 8), 4 (day 15), 6 (day 28), 8 (day 42), 10 (day 60) and 11 (day 120). Clinical photos will be taken at each hospital visit. Mixed-effects logistic regression models analysed the effect of microwave therapy with random effects for participant and visit (≤ 6 per participant). Each visit will be analysed as a categorical variable as they were spaced unequally in time. Variables representing sex, age, skin site (hand/scalp) and AK subtype (thick/thin) will be included as covariates.
Partial Resolution of AKs Following Microwave TreatmentBaseline, day 8, 15, 28, 42, 60 and 120The resolution of each treated AK lesion will be determined by clinical assessment. Resolution is predetermined as either partial (resolution of the area covered by the microwave probe, but with a rim or persistent AK) or full (complete resolution of the entire AK) over all time periods. Treatment will be given at day 1, with a second treatment on day 28 based on a clinical decision. Response will be assessed at visits 3 (day 8), 4 (day 15), 6 (day 28), 8 (day 42), 10 (day 60) and 11 (day 120). Clinical photos will be taken at each hospital visit. Mixed-effects logistic regression models analysed the effect of microwave therapy with random effects for participant and visit (≤ 6 per participant). Each visit will be analysed as a categorical variable as they were spaced unequally in time. Variables representing sex, age, skin site (hand/scalp) and AK subtype (thick/thin) will be included as covariates.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Level of Pain Experienced During TreatmentTreatment 1 (day 1) and treatment 2 (day 28)To evaluate the safety and tolerability of microwave treatment as a therapy for AK, participants were asked about level of pain during treatment. Participants were asked to rate their pain level during each treatment as i) mild, ii) moderate or iii) severe.
Change in Hematoxylin and Eosin StainDay 15 OR day 42To identify the mode of action of microwave treatment on biomarkers of cell survival.
Duration of Pain Post TreatmentTreatment 1 (day 1) and Treatment 2 (day 28)To evaluate the safety and tolerability of microwave treatment as a therapy for AK, participants were asked about the duration of pain immediately after each treatment. Duration was grouped into 5 pre-determined periods, i) few seconds, ii) up to 5 minutes, iii) up to 10 minutes, iv) up to 20 minutes and v) over 30 minutes. The decision to administer a second treatment was made by the investigator.
Change in Ki67 Staining Determined Immunohistochemically by the Use of Specific Antibodies on Fixed MaterialDay 15To identify the mode of action of microwave treatment on biomarkers of cell proliferation as a therapy for AK. Results are provided on the staining positivity scale of +, ++ and +++. The minimum value is + , meaning the least staining. The maximum value is +++, meaning the most staining identified.

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited to the Stage 1, dose finding study in March 2018. Participants were recruited to Stage 2, the RCT, between May 2018 and October 2018. Participants for both stages were recruited from the Department of Dermatology, Ninewells Hospital, NHS Tayside, UK.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Dose Finding Population
Consented participants had the electric properties of permittivity in AK on hand and bald scalp assessed for subsequent optimisation of the dose of microwave therapy to be used in the RCT.
7
RCT Study Population
This was a randomized, internally controlled, feasibility study. Consented participants had the treatment site (scalp/forehead or hands) selected based on a clinical decision. Participants were randomized to treatment to the left or right side. The microwave treatment was delivered using the microwave instrument, SWIFT, manufactured by Emblation and CE marked for this indication. The microwave dose was between 2 Watt and 4 Watt. The treatment will consist of 3, 2 to 3 second bursts delivered to the same lesion with 5-20 seconds between bursts. No treatment was administered to the control side.
11
Total18

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDose Finding PopulationRCT Study PopulationTotal
Age, Continuous74 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
78 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
NA years
History of other cancer0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
History of skin cancer0 Participants10 Participants10 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants7 Participants12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 70 / 11
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 711 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 71 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Complete Resolution of AKs Following Microwave Treatment

The resolution of each treated AK lesion will be determined by clinical assessment. Resolution is predetermined as either partial (resolution of the area covered by the microwave probe, but with a rim or persistent AK) or full (complete resolution of the entire AK) over all time periods. Treatment will be given at day 1, with a second treatment on day 28 based on a clinical decision. Response will be assessed at visits 3 (day 8), 4 (day 15), 6 (day 28), 8 (day 42), 10 (day 60) and 11 (day 120). Clinical photos will be taken at each hospital visit. Mixed-effects logistic regression models analysed the effect of microwave therapy with random effects for participant and visit (≤ 6 per participant). Each visit will be analysed as a categorical variable as they were spaced unequally in time. Variables representing sex, age, skin site (hand/scalp) and AK subtype (thick/thin) will be included as covariates.

Time frame: Baseline, day 8, 15, 28, 42, 60 and 120

Population: Eleven participants were randomized and 179 AKs (93 treated, 86 untreated) assessed. All participants completed treatment as planned.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Microwave Energy TreatmentComplete Resolution of AKs Following Microwave TreatmentDay 84 Number of lesions
Microwave Energy TreatmentComplete Resolution of AKs Following Microwave TreatmentDay 157 Number of lesions
Microwave Energy TreatmentComplete Resolution of AKs Following Microwave TreatmentDay 2820 Number of lesions
Microwave Energy TreatmentComplete Resolution of AKs Following Microwave TreatmentDay 4223 Number of lesions
Microwave Energy TreatmentComplete Resolution of AKs Following Microwave TreatmentDay 6041 Number of lesions
Microwave Energy TreatmentComplete Resolution of AKs Following Microwave TreatmentDay 12039 Number of lesions
ControlComplete Resolution of AKs Following Microwave TreatmentDay 605 Number of lesions
ControlComplete Resolution of AKs Following Microwave TreatmentDay 81 Number of lesions
ControlComplete Resolution of AKs Following Microwave TreatmentDay 423 Number of lesions
ControlComplete Resolution of AKs Following Microwave TreatmentDay 151 Number of lesions
ControlComplete Resolution of AKs Following Microwave TreatmentDay 1206 Number of lesions
ControlComplete Resolution of AKs Following Microwave TreatmentDay 282 Number of lesions
Primary

Partial Resolution of AKs Following Microwave Treatment

The resolution of each treated AK lesion will be determined by clinical assessment. Resolution is predetermined as either partial (resolution of the area covered by the microwave probe, but with a rim or persistent AK) or full (complete resolution of the entire AK) over all time periods. Treatment will be given at day 1, with a second treatment on day 28 based on a clinical decision. Response will be assessed at visits 3 (day 8), 4 (day 15), 6 (day 28), 8 (day 42), 10 (day 60) and 11 (day 120). Clinical photos will be taken at each hospital visit. Mixed-effects logistic regression models analysed the effect of microwave therapy with random effects for participant and visit (≤ 6 per participant). Each visit will be analysed as a categorical variable as they were spaced unequally in time. Variables representing sex, age, skin site (hand/scalp) and AK subtype (thick/thin) will be included as covariates.

Time frame: Baseline, day 8, 15, 28, 42, 60 and 120

Population: Eleven participants were randomized and 179 AKs (93 treated, 86 untreated) assessed. All participants completed treatment as planned.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Microwave Energy TreatmentPartial Resolution of AKs Following Microwave TreatmentDay 869 Number of Lesions
Microwave Energy TreatmentPartial Resolution of AKs Following Microwave TreatmentDay 1566 Number of Lesions
Microwave Energy TreatmentPartial Resolution of AKs Following Microwave TreatmentDay 2866 Number of Lesions
Microwave Energy TreatmentPartial Resolution of AKs Following Microwave TreatmentDay 4263 Number of Lesions
Microwave Energy TreatmentPartial Resolution of AKs Following Microwave TreatmentDay 6040 Number of Lesions
Microwave Energy TreatmentPartial Resolution of AKs Following Microwave TreatmentDay 12045 Number of Lesions
ControlPartial Resolution of AKs Following Microwave TreatmentDay 606 Number of Lesions
ControlPartial Resolution of AKs Following Microwave TreatmentDay 81 Number of Lesions
ControlPartial Resolution of AKs Following Microwave TreatmentDay 426 Number of Lesions
ControlPartial Resolution of AKs Following Microwave TreatmentDay 156 Number of Lesions
ControlPartial Resolution of AKs Following Microwave TreatmentDay 1207 Number of Lesions
ControlPartial Resolution of AKs Following Microwave TreatmentDay 287 Number of Lesions
Primary

Resolution of AK Lesions Following Microwave Treatment

The resolution of each treated AK lesion will be determined by clinical assessment. Resolution is predetermined as either partial (resolution of the area covered by the microwave probe, but with a rim or persistent AK) or full (complete resolution of the entire AK) over all time periods. Response will be assessed at visits 3 (day 8), 4 (day 15), 6 (day 28), 8 (day 42), 10 (day 60) and 11 (day 120). Mixed-effects logistic regression models analysed the effect of microwave therapy with random effects for participant and visit (≤ 6 per participant). Each visit will be analysed as a categorical variable as they were spaced unequally in time. Variables representing sex, age, skin site (hand/scalp) and AK subtype (thick/thin) will be included as covariates. The data reported in the outcome table is the number of resolved AK lesions.

Time frame: Baseline, day 8, 15, 28, 42, 60 and 120

Population: Eleven participants were randomized and 179 AKs (93 treated, 86 untreated) assessed. All participants completed treatment as planned.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Microwave Energy TreatmentResolution of AK Lesions Following Microwave TreatmentDay 873 AK lesions
Microwave Energy TreatmentResolution of AK Lesions Following Microwave TreatmentDay 1573 AK lesions
Microwave Energy TreatmentResolution of AK Lesions Following Microwave TreatmentDay 2886 AK lesions
Microwave Energy TreatmentResolution of AK Lesions Following Microwave TreatmentDay 4286 AK lesions
Microwave Energy TreatmentResolution of AK Lesions Following Microwave TreatmentDay 6081 AK lesions
Microwave Energy TreatmentResolution of AK Lesions Following Microwave TreatmentDay 12084 AK lesions
ControlResolution of AK Lesions Following Microwave TreatmentDay 6011 AK lesions
ControlResolution of AK Lesions Following Microwave TreatmentDay 82 AK lesions
ControlResolution of AK Lesions Following Microwave TreatmentDay 429 AK lesions
ControlResolution of AK Lesions Following Microwave TreatmentDay 157 AK lesions
ControlResolution of AK Lesions Following Microwave TreatmentDay 12013 AK lesions
ControlResolution of AK Lesions Following Microwave TreatmentDay 289 AK lesions
Secondary

Change in Hematoxylin and Eosin Stain

To identify the mode of action of microwave treatment on biomarkers of cell survival.

Time frame: Day 15 OR day 42

Population: all participants treated with microwave therapy.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Microwave Energy TreatmentChange in Hematoxylin and Eosin Stain11 Participants
Secondary

Change in Ki67 Staining Determined Immunohistochemically by the Use of Specific Antibodies on Fixed Material

To identify the mode of action of microwave treatment on biomarkers of cell proliferation as a therapy for AK. Results are provided on the staining positivity scale of +, ++ and +++. The minimum value is + , meaning the least staining. The maximum value is +++, meaning the most staining identified.

Time frame: Day 15

Population: One AK lesion from the microwave treatment allocation was pre-selected for biopsy. Biopsy taken from all participants 15 days post microwave energy treatment.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Microwave Energy TreatmentChange in Ki67 Staining Determined Immunohistochemically by the Use of Specific Antibodies on Fixed Material+ stain positivity9 Participants
Microwave Energy TreatmentChange in Ki67 Staining Determined Immunohistochemically by the Use of Specific Antibodies on Fixed Material++ stain positivity1 Participants
Microwave Energy TreatmentChange in Ki67 Staining Determined Immunohistochemically by the Use of Specific Antibodies on Fixed Material+++ stain positivity1 Participants
Secondary

Duration of Pain Post Treatment

To evaluate the safety and tolerability of microwave treatment as a therapy for AK, participants were asked about the duration of pain immediately after each treatment. Duration was grouped into 5 pre-determined periods, i) few seconds, ii) up to 5 minutes, iii) up to 10 minutes, iv) up to 20 minutes and v) over 30 minutes. The decision to administer a second treatment was made by the investigator.

Time frame: Treatment 1 (day 1) and Treatment 2 (day 28)

Population: 11 participants had a total of 93 AKs treated at visit 1 (day 1), with 10 participants having a total of 51 of the original 93 AKs receiving a second treatment at visit 6 (day 28).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Microwave Energy TreatmentDuration of Pain Post TreatmentDuration: Up to 5 minutes2 Participants
Microwave Energy TreatmentDuration of Pain Post TreatmentDuration: Up to 20 minutes1 Participants
Microwave Energy TreatmentDuration of Pain Post TreatmentDuration: Up to 10 minutes1 Participants
Microwave Energy TreatmentDuration of Pain Post TreatmentDuration: Over 30 minutes0 Participants
Microwave Energy TreatmentDuration of Pain Post TreatmentDuration: Few seconds7 Participants
ControlDuration of Pain Post TreatmentDuration: Over 30 minutes0 Participants
ControlDuration of Pain Post TreatmentDuration: Few seconds8 Participants
ControlDuration of Pain Post TreatmentDuration: Up to 5 minutes2 Participants
ControlDuration of Pain Post TreatmentDuration: Up to 10 minutes0 Participants
ControlDuration of Pain Post TreatmentDuration: Up to 20 minutes0 Participants
Secondary

Level of Pain Experienced During Treatment

To evaluate the safety and tolerability of microwave treatment as a therapy for AK, participants were asked about level of pain during treatment. Participants were asked to rate their pain level during each treatment as i) mild, ii) moderate or iii) severe.

Time frame: Treatment 1 (day 1) and treatment 2 (day 28)

Population: 11 participants had a total of 93 AKs treated at visit 1 (day 1), with 10 participants having a total of 51 of the original 93 AKs receiving a second treatment at visit 6 (day 28).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Microwave Energy TreatmentLevel of Pain Experienced During TreatmentModerate pain during treatment32 Number of AK lesions treated
Microwave Energy TreatmentLevel of Pain Experienced During TreatmentMild pain during treatment7 Number of AK lesions treated
Microwave Energy TreatmentLevel of Pain Experienced During TreatmentSevere pain during treatment54 Number of AK lesions treated
ControlLevel of Pain Experienced During TreatmentModerate pain during treatment27 Number of AK lesions treated
ControlLevel of Pain Experienced During TreatmentMild pain during treatment5 Number of AK lesions treated
ControlLevel of Pain Experienced During TreatmentSevere pain during treatment19 Number of AK lesions treated

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026