Skip to content

MINI Bypass Versus Roux-en-Y Bypass: Differences in HOrmonal Secretions at 2 Years of Surgery

Endocrine and Absorptive Intestinal Function in Patients at Two Years of Bariatric Surgery: Omega Loop Gastric Bypass Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03482895
Acronym
MINIBHO
Enrollment
30
Registered
2018-03-29
Start date
2018-04-04
Completion date
2019-05-14
Last updated
2019-09-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bariatric Surgery

Keywords

Gastric Bypass, Intestinal Absorption, Gastrointestinal Hormones, Enteroendocrine Cells

Brief summary

Gastric bypass with omega loop technic (OLGB) seems to be as effective as gastric bypass roux-en-Y (RYGB the reference) for the management of obesity and type 2 diabetes, but with less early surgical complications and more undernutrition in long terms. This study aims to explore the profile of secretion of entero-insular hormone after a meal test in OLGB patient vs RYGB to understand the mechanisms of the improvement of type 2 diabetes after OLGB. Secondary objectives are to better understand the absorptive function of the gut after a gastric bypass, to understand why is there more undernutrition in long term after OLGB than after RYGB.

Detailed description

In the treatment of obesity associated with type 2 diabetes, there is still few informations comparing the gastric bypass roux-en-Y (RYGB), the reference method, and the bypass in Omega (OLGB). The effectiveness of both interventions is comparable regarding weight loss and the management of type 2 diabetes but the level of proof remains low. Nutritional deficiencies and chronic diarrhea are reported in both interventions. It seems that the OLGB would cause more malabsorption and undernutrition but the OLGB would lead to less early operative complications because it has only one gastro-jejunal anastomosis compared to RYGB which has two. The success of the RYGB for the remission of diabetes, is partly associated with a change in secretion's profile of intestinal hormones participating in the glucose homeostasis, especially the GLP-1. There is no studies published reporting the level of secretion (fasting or postprandial) of gastrointestinal hormones after OLGB. It is important to understand how this surgery produces its effects, especially on diabetes. MINIBHO main hypothesis is that the secretion's profile of entero-insular hormones, like GLP-1, are exacerbated after OLGB just like in RYGB, that would explain the same level of improvement of T2 diabetes after both surgery. Kinetic study of entero-insular secretion will be assessed by some blood dosages of entero-insular hormones (GLP-1, GLP-2, Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP), glicentine, Insulin, peptide C, Glucagon and glucose) in 30 patients (15 OLGB and 15 RYGB). These dosages will be made at different times after a meal test (during fasting, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes and 120 minutes after the meal) to search a significant difference in the profile of secretion between the OLGB and RYGB patients. Investigators also hypothesize that the editing method of the OLGB leads to a decrease in the food absorption profile compared to RYGB. To explore this hypothesis, citrulline and apolipoprotein B48 (ApoB48) levels will be measured, which reflect enterocyte function of the patients, and will be compared between patients operated with RYGB vs OLGB. Functional enterocyte mass will be correlated to the absorptive function of the gut which will be evaluated by the examination of the 24h feces. The main objective is to determine whether the secretion profiles of entero-insular hormone during a meal are different or not in patients operated with OLGB compared to RYGB. The secondary objectives are to evaluate in these patients the absorptive function and the functional enterocyte mass.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALBlood sampling

Quantitative analysis of enterohormones, citrulline and ApoB48

BIOLOGICALFeces sampling

Intestinal absorption assessment

Sponsors

Société Francophone Nutrition Clinique et Métabolisme
CollaboratorOTHER
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Roux en Y gastric bypass or omega loop gastric bypass at two years of the surgery (6 months more or less) * 18 years minimum * weight \> 40kg

Exclusion criteria

* Type 1 diabetes diagnosed with the positivity of anti Glutamate Acid Decarboxylase (GAD) or anti Ia2 * Treatment with Insulin, Glucagon Like Peptide 1 (GLP1) or anti-DiPeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP4) during the study * Unbalanced type 2 diabetes : HbA1c \> 8% * Anemia with hemoglobin \< 7g/dl * Gut inflammatory disease ; infectious disease, cancer, iatrogenic disease, auto-immune disease * Pregnant or breastfeeding women * allergy to Carmin (E120) * participation to another clinical trial * patient under legal protection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Kinetic of GLP-1 secretion0, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after a meal testArea under the plasma concentration versus time curve of GLP-1

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Plasmatic dosage of Apolipoprotein B48BaselinePlasmatic concentration of Apolipoprotein B48 versus enterocyte mass function
Lipidic Absorptive Coefficient1 dayPercentage between lipidic food intakes and lipidic excretion in feces
Protein Absorptive Coefficient1 dayPercentage between protein food intakes and protein excretion in feces
Glucidic Absorptive Coefficient1 dayPercentage between carbohydrate food intakes and carbohydrate excretion in feces
kinetic of GLP-2 secretion0, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after a meal testArea under the plasma concentration versus time curve of GLP-2
Plasmatic dosage of citrullineBaselinePlasmatic concentration of Citrulline versus enterocyte mass function
Kinetic of Peptide C secretion0, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after a meal testArea under the plasma concentration versus time curve of Peptide C
Kinetic of Insulin secretion0, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after a meal testArea under the plasma concentration versus time curve of Insulin
Kinetic of Glucagon secretion0, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after a meal testArea under the plasma concentration versus time curve of Glucagon
Kinetic of Glicentin secretion0, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after a meal testArea under the plasma concentration versus time curve of Glicentin
Kinetic of Glycemia0, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after a meal testArea under the plasma concentration versus time curve of glucose
Kinetic of GIP secretion0, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after a meal testArea under the plasma concentration versus time curve of GIP

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026