Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Hypertension
Conditions
Brief summary
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Community Health Assessment Program in the Philippines (CHAP-P), looking at the differences between communities implementing CHAP-P versus communities not implementing CHAP-P.
Detailed description
In this study, the investigators are evaluating the effectiveness of the CHAP-P intervention in communities of the Zamboanga Peninsula, Philippines. Specifically, the investigators are looking at the difference between hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels in randomly selected residents of control communities versus those in communities implementing the CHAP-P intervention. The investigators are also looking at the differences between control and intervention communities in modifiable lifestyle risk factors for diabetes, screening rates for diabetes, rates of newly diagnosed cases of diabetes, general diabetes management, and hospital admission rates, as well as the cost effectiveness of CHAP-P. The CHAP-P intervention consists of initial and follow-up sessions where trained local volunteers (Barangay Health Workers, or BHWs) take physical measurements (blood pressure, height, weight, waist circumference) and facilitate a diabetes risk survey; based on these findings, they provide education, materials, and referrals to local health resources as needed. The participant groups in this evaluation include those that attend CHAP-P sessions, randomly selected community members that provide consent for a survey and HbA1c testing, and community members and BHWs/other Lead Local Organization staff who provide consent for focus groups and interviews.
Interventions
OTHERCHAP-P Sessions
Residents of intervention communities (barangays) aged 40+ are openly invited to attend CHAP-P sessions. At CHAP-P sessions, trained local volunteers (Barangay Health Workers, or BHWs) collect consent, measure blood pressure, collect other physical measurements, and conduct a survey to determine clients' risk of diabetes. Based on the findings, BHWs provide education and/or referrals. CHAP-P sessions are held twice a month, and clients are encouraged to continuing attending for ongoing follow-up and monitoring.
Sponsors
Ateneo de Zamboanga University
Université de Montréal
Global Alliance for Chronic Diseases (GACD)
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
International Development Research Centre, Canada
McMaster University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
This study is a parallel 26-community cluster randomized controlled trial. A community cluster design was chosen as CHAP-P is intended as a community-level intervention. Thirteen communities (barangays) will receive the CHAP-P sessions and will be considered intervention, while the other 13 communities will receive care as usual and will be considered control. Measures of individual participants will be taken as a repeated cross-sectional sample at baseline and at six months. A community process evaluation and cost-effectiveness evaluation will also be undertaken.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
(Community Survey Participants & CHAP-P Session Participants): * Aged 40 years of age or older * Resident of community
Exclusion criteria
(Community Survey Participants & CHAP-P Session Participants): * Under 40 years of age * Resident of a different community Inclusion Criteria (Barangay Health Workers \[BHW\]/Lead Local Organization \[LLO\] Staff) \- Must be a BHW or other LLO staff who is participating in the CHAP-P Intervention
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| HbA1c | Baseline, 6 months | Mean difference in HbA1c at 6 months in the intervention group compared to the control group. Measured with the A1CNow+ point-of-care device in a community location after the completion of the in-home community survey. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Medication Compliance | Baseline, 6 months | Mean difference in medication compliance at 6 months in the intervention group compared to the control group. Self-reported, via community survey questions. |
| Blood Pressure | Baseline, 6 months | Mean difference in blood pressure at 6 months in the intervention group compared to the control group. Measured using a blood pressure device, the Microlife WatchBP Office Target. |
| Community Residents Newly Diagnosed with Diabetes | 6 months | Mean difference in number of community residents newly diagnosed with diabetes at 6 months in the intervention group compared to the control group. Numbers taken from Rural Health Unit databases |
| Hospital admission rates | -12 months, 12 months | Mean difference in hospital admission rates due to diabetes and diabetes-related conditions, hypertension, myocardial infarction, stroke, congestive heart failure at 6 months in the intervention group compared to the control group. Numbers taken from central Department of Health database (12 months before and 12 month after CHAP-P implementation, and divided by mid-year population estimates) |
| Mortality rates | -12 months, 12 months | Mean difference in mortality rates due to diabetes and diabetes-related conditions, hypertension, myocardial infarction, stroke, congestive heart failure based on International Classification of Disease (ICD)-10 codes at 6 months in the intervention group compared to the control group. Numbers taken from Regional Field Health Surveillance Information Systems (measured 12 months before and 12 month after CHAP-P implementation, 6 month estimated by dividing by mid-year population estimates) |
| Quality of Life (EQ5D-5L) | Baseline, 6 months | Mean difference in quality of life at 6 months in the intervention group compared to the control group. Measured with the EuroQol-5 dimension-5 level (EQ5D-5L), included in the community survey |
| Knowledge about Diabetes and Hypertension | Baseline, 6 Months | Mean difference in knowledge about diabetes and hypertension at 6 months in the intervention group compared to the control group. Measured with elements of the Health Awareness and Behaviour Tool (HABiT) included in the community survey. |
| Physical Activity | Baseline, 6 months | Mean difference in physical activity at 6 months in the intervention group compared to the control group. Measured with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (International Physical Activity Quotient, IPAQ), included in the community survey. |
| Risk Behaviours for Diabetes/Cardiovascular Issues | Baseline, 6 months | Mean difference in risk behavhiours for diabetes/cardiovascular issues (activity, diet, smoking, alcohol, stress) at 6 months in the intervention group compared to the control group. Measured with elements of the Health Awareness and Behaviour Tool (HABiT) included in the community survey. |
| Perceived Concern and Understanding of Risk | Baseline, 6 months | Mean difference in perceived concern and understanding of risk at 6 months in the intervention group compared to the control group. Measured with elements of the Health Awareness and Behaviour Tool (HABiT) included in the community survey. |
| Confidence in Behaviour Change | Baseline, 6 months | Mean difference in confidence in behaviour change at 6 months in the intervention group compared to the control group. Measured with elements of the Health Awareness and Behaviour Tool (HABiT) included in the community survey. |
| Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) | 12 months | Secondary; calculated from the EQ5D-5L. |
| Cost-effectiveness | 12 months | Comparing program cost of implementing CHAP-P (collected via team tracking) and healthcare resource utilization costs (collected via self-report from participants during community survey) to percentage reduction in HbA1c and blood pressure. |
| Cost-utility | 12 months | Cost of program and healthcare resource utilization costs per QALY |
| Risk Factors for Diabetes | Baseline, 6 months | Mean difference in risk factors for diabetes at 6 months in the intervention group compared to the control group. Measured with the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC), included in the community survey |
Countries
Philippines
Outcome results
None listed