Skip to content

Periacetabular Osteotomy With and Without Arthroscopic Management of Central Compartment Pathology

Periacetabular Osteotomy With and Without Arthroscopic Management of Central Compartment Pathology: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03481010
Enrollment
204
Registered
2018-03-29
Start date
2018-04-04
Completion date
2030-12-31
Last updated
2025-12-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hip Dysplasia

Brief summary

At present, it is not clear whether performing a hip arthroscopy at the same time as a PAO improves patient outcomes after surgery compared to a PAO alone. This research project will randomize patients to receive either a PAO alone, or a PAO and a hip arthroscopy at the same time.

Detailed description

Hip dysplasia is a developmental abnormality of the acetabulum (hip socket) that causes abnormal stresses inside the hip joint and leads to painful arthritis at a young age. Many patients develop painful symptoms in their hip before advanced arthritis occurs. The periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a surgical procedure that reorients the acetabulum to reduce the stresses inside the hip joint. The PAO is very effective at improving symptoms and quality of life. However, some patients may have residual symptoms. Frequently, people with hip dysplasia will have an MRI done before their surgery, which helps to identify other the abnormalities inside their hip joint (e.g., labral tears). These abnormalities inside the joint cannot easily be addressed through PAO alone, however they can be addressed with hip arthroscopy. Hip arthroscopy is a separate minimally invasive surgical procedure that allows the surgeon to access the inside of the hip joint with a small camera and address any abnormalities. At present, it is not clear whether performing a hip arthroscopy at the same time as a PAO improves patient outcomes after surgery compared to a PAO alone. This research project will randomize patients to receive either a PAO alone, or a PAO and a hip arthroscopy at the same time. Patients will be followed for 2 years after surgery. Symptomatic differences between the two patient groups will be assessed to determine added benefit of the hip arthroscopy.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPAO with hip arthroscopy

Participants who are randomized to the Scope-PAO group will receive central compartment hip arthroscopy in addition to the PAO.

PROCEDUREPAO without hip arthroscopy

Participants who are randomized to the PAO-only group will receive a Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy (PAO) for treatment of hip dysplasia.

Sponsors

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Skeletally mature patient undergoing Bernese periacetabular osteotomy for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia/hip instability * Pre-Operative MRI at 3T and/or gadolinium MR arthrogram * Age, 16-50 years old * Patient capable of giving informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Prior hip/pelvis surgery of any kind on the surgical side * Prior hip arthroplasty surgery on either side * Radiographic evidence of arthritis (i.e. Tönnis grade =2) * Known connective tissue disorder (e.g. Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, etc.) * Known neuromuscular disorder (e.g. Cerebral Palsy, Spina bifida, etc.) * Known skeletal dysplasia (e.g. Achondroplasia, Multiple Epiphyseal Dysplasia, etc.) * Cognitive impairment that prevents accurate completion of patient-reported outcome questionnaires. * Patient unable/unwilling to complete all required follow-up visits * Concurrent proximal femoral osteotomy and/or surgical hip dislocation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
iHOT-3324 monthsPatient-reported quality of life will be the primary outcome used for comparison between the two treatment groups as measured by the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33). The iHOT-33 is a validated, self-administered quality of life assessment tool for young, active patients with hip symptoms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PROMIS Global 10before surgery, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months after surgeryGlobal Health assessment will be compared using the PROMIS Global 10 Score. This 10-item tool assesses general domains of health related quality of life in the domains of physical, mental, and social well-being.
Operative timeintra-operativeTotal operative time is expected to be longer in the Scope-PAO treatment group, however the average increase in time will be valuable information for future research assessing cost-effectiveness of this treatment strategy. Total operative time will be measured from the time the patient enters the operating room to the time the patient is ready for transfer to post-anesthetic care unit (PACU). This time interval represents the best assessment of the overall time cost to the health care system associated with the surgical procedure while avoiding confounding due to delays in transfer to PACU.
HOOSbefore surgery, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months after surgeryHip-specific symptoms and functional impairment will be compared using the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS). This 40-item patient reported outcome tool has been validated for use in patients with and without hip osteoarthritis and has shown good responsiveness, reliability and reproducibility in this patient population.
Adverse Events2-4 weeks and 3 months after surgeryAdverse events will be assessed prospectively at the first and second post-operative visits using Sink et al.'s classification system that grades the complications based on required treatment and long-term morbidity.
Cost-Effectiveness6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after surgeryThe cost-effectiveness of the two study groups will be assessed prospectively using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire. This 6-item validated questionnaire quantifies work impairments. Four scores are derived: percentage of absenteeism, percentage of presenteeism (reduced productivity while at work), an overall work impairment score that combines absenteeism and presenteeism and percentage of impairment in activities performed outside of work. Greater scores indicate greater impairment.
Hospital Length of Stayup to one monthLength of stay, measured in days, will be assessed from date of admission to date of discharge up to one month.

Countries

Canada, United States

Contacts

Primary ContactGeoffrey Wilkin, MD
gwilkin@toh.ca613-798-5555
Backup ContactCheryl Kreviazuk
ckreviazuk@ohri.ca613-737-8920

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026