Hypertension,Essential, White Coat Hypertension
Conditions
Keywords
hypertension, screening, guidelines, implementation, randomized
Brief summary
The goal of this study is to use a cluster-randomized design (1:1 ratio) among 8 primary care clinics affiliated with New York-Presbyterian Hospital to test the effectiveness of a theory-informed multifaceted implementation strategy designed to increase the uptake of the 2015 United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) hypertension screening guidelines. The primary outcome is the ordering of out-of-office blood pressure testing, either ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) or home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM), by primary care clinicians for patients with newly elevated office blood pressure (BP), as recommended by the 2015 guidelines.
Detailed description
The goal of this study is to assess the effect of a multifaceted implementation strategy aimed at increasing adherence to the 2015 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations for hypertension screening, with a focus on implementation in primary care clinics that reach medically underserved patients. The accurate diagnosis of hypertension is essential for targeting appropriate therapy at the patients who can most benefit from hypertension treatment. On the other hand, inappropriate diagnosis of hypertension can lead to unnecessary treatment with blood pressure (BP) medications, wasteful healthcare utilization, and adverse psychological consequences from being mislabeled as having a chronic disease. There are challenges to measuring BP in clinical settings that make inappropriate diagnosis common. A systematic review conducted by the USPSTF in 2014 found that 5%-65% of patients with elevated office BP do not have high out-of-office BP readings according to ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) or home BP monitoring (HBPM). This is commonly referred to as white-coat hypertension. In contrast to patients with sustained hypertension (elevated BP in office and out-of-office settings), patients with white-coat hypertension do not appear to be at increased cardiovascular risk nor to benefit from antihypertensive treatment. Based primarily on these observations, in 2015, the USPSTF updated their hypertension screening guidelines to recommend that patients with elevated office BP undergo out-of-office BP testing (ABPM or HBPM) to rule-out white-coat hypertension prior to a new diagnosis of hypertension. While ABPM is recommended as the first-line out-of-office screening test, HBPM is cited as a reasonable alternative if ABPM is unavailable. Despite the USPSTF guideline recommendation, ABPM and HBPM are currently infrequently utilized in the US, particularly as part of hypertension diagnosis. Accordingly, the investigators conducted focus groups with primary care providers, patients, and other key stakeholders (medical directors, nurse supervisors, medical assistants, nurse practitioners, front desk staff) to identify the major barriers to implementation of the new hypertension screening guidelines. The investigators then applied the Behavior Change Wheel, a trans-theoretical intervention development framework, to categorize barriers and select theory-informed intervention components that would address these barriers. The investigators arrived at a theory-informed implementation strategy for improving out-of-office BP testing, which included educational activities for providers (i.e., presentations at grand rounds or other venues at which physicians are present); training registered nurses to be capable of assisting with teaching patients to conduct HBPM; disseminating information on how to order ABPM and HBPM to clinicians, nurses, and front desk staff via huddles, emails, and other electronic communications; creating a computerized electronic health record (EHR)-embedded clinical decision support tool that prompts recall of the USPSTF hypertension guidelines and facilitates ordering of HBPM and ABPM for eligible patients; creating and disseminating patient information materials on ABPM and HBPM; providing periodic feedback about clinic-level success with adhering to the guideline, and developing an easily accessible, culturally-adapted and locally tailored ABPM service. The investigators now aim to test this multifaceted implementation strategy to increase the uptake of the USPSTF hypertension recommendations in the ambulatory care network (ACN) of New York-Presbyterian Hospital (NYP), a network of primary care clinics serving 120,000 patients from underserved communities in New York City. Specifically, the investigators are conducting a 2-year cluster randomized trial (Phase II of the project) following a 6-month implementation phase in which we randomize matched pairs of 8 ACN clinics (1:1) to either receive the multicomponent guideline implementation strategy (N = 4 clinics) or a wait-list control (N = 4 clinics). The investigators aim to assess the effectiveness of this intervention on the completion of out-of-office BP testing (ABPM or HBPM) prior to hypertension diagnosis (primary outcome) as well as the effect on out-of-office test ordering, irrespective of test completion (secondary outcome).
Interventions
Key components include: * educational presentations to primary care providers at grand rounds * patient information materials on ABPM and HBPM * training registered nurses to assist providers with teaching patients to conduct HBPM * information on how to order ABPM and HBPM to clinicians, nurses and front desk staff via huddles, emails, and other electronic communications * a computerized EHR-embedded clinical decision support tool that prompts providers to recall the USPSTF hypertension guidelines and facilitates ordering of HBPM and ABPM for guideline-eligible patients * periodic feedback to primary care providers about clinic-level success with appropriately ordering ABPM and HBPM for eligible patients * an accessible, culturally-adapted and locally tailored ABPM service
Primary care clinicians diagnose hypertension according to usual care
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Outcomes assessors will be blinded to group assignment when coding medical records to determine whether providers ordered out-of-office BP testing for eligible patients.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Patient Inclusion Criteria (as per electronic medical records): * Elevated blood pressure (BP) (systolic BP\>=140 mmHg or diastolic BP \>=90 mmHg) at a scheduled clinic visit with a primary care provider from a clinic that is participating in the study; if multiple BP readings were taken from a visit, then the average of the readings will be used Patient
Exclusion criteria
(as per electronic medical records): * Prior diagnosis of hypertension * Prior diagnosis of white-coat hypertension * Prior evaluation for white-coat hypertension by 24-hr ABPM or HBPM * Prescribed antihypertensive medication * Manual office BP \<140/90 mmHg * Severely elevated BP (systolic BP\>=180 mmHg or diastolic BP\>=110 mmHg) * Evidence of target-organ damage (chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease) Clinic Inclusion Criteria: * Primary care clinics that are part of the New York-Presbyterian Hospital Ambulatory Care Network and were not part of implementation development Clinic
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Patient Visits With Completion of Out-of-office BP Monitoring Within 6 Months of an Eligible Visit During the Pre-Implementation Period | 6 months (Pre-Implementation period) | Patient completed out-of-office BP testing \[ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) or home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM)\] (either Y/N) per eligible visits were tallied. |
| Percentage of Patient Visits With Completion of Out-of-office BP Monitoring Within 6 Months of an Eligible Visit During the Post-Implementation Period | 6 months (Post-Implementation period) | Patient completed out-of-office BP testing \[ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) or home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM)\] (either Y/N) per eligible visits were tallied. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Patient Visits With Out-of-office BP Monitoring Test Ordered by Clinician During the Post-Implementation Period | 6 months (Post-Implementation period) | Primary care clinician ordered out-of-office BP testing \[ABPM or HBPM\] (either Y/N) for eligible visits were tallied. |
| Percentage of Patient Visits With Out-of-office BP Monitoring Test Ordered by Clinician During the Pre-Implementation Period | 6 months (Pre-Implementation period) | Primary care clinician ordered out-of-office BP testing \[ABPM or HBPM\] (either Y/N) for eligible visits were tallied. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Patients were passively recruited from the electronic health record.
Pre-assignment details
This 2-group, pre-post cluster randomized trial was conducted within a primary care network of 8 practices and 1186 patients (857 intervention; 329 control). Depending on the practice/clinic and the implementation period, patients will receive usual care or care that has been impacted by the multifaceted implementation strategy.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Intervention Clinics (Pre-Implementation) Participants are patients with elevated office blood pressure and no prior diagnosis of hypertension who attend primary care visits at clinics that were randomly allocated to receive the implementation strategy before the multifaceted implementation strategy had been delivered (i.e., pre-implementation period, no exposure to intervention) | 456 |
| Intervention Clinics (Post-Implementation) Participants are patients with elevated office blood pressure and no prior diagnosis of hypertension who attend primary care visits at clinics that were randomly allocated to receive the implementation strategy after the multifaceted implementation strategy had been delivered (i.e., post-implementation period, exposure to intervention) | 401 |
| Control (Usual Care) Clinics (Pre-Implementation) Participants are patients with elevated office blood pressure and no prior diagnosis of hypertension who attend primary care visits at clinics that were randomly allocated to not receive the multifaceted implementation strategy and receive usual care before the implementation period begins (i.e., pre-implementation period, no exposure to intervention) | 139 |
| Control (Usual Care) Clinics (Post-Implementation) Participants are patients with elevated office blood pressure and no prior diagnosis of hypertension who attend primary care visits at clinics that were randomly allocated to not receive the multifaceted implementation strategy and receive usual care after the implementation period begins (i.e., post-implementation period, no exposure to intervention) | 190 |
| Total | 1,186 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Intervention Clinics (Pre-Implementation) | Total | Control (Usual Care) Clinics (Post-Implementation) | Control (Usual Care) Clinics (Pre-Implementation) | Intervention Clinics (Post-Implementation) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 51.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1 | 53.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.7 | 59.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.1 | 58.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 16 | 51.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.5 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 152 Participants | 368 Participants | 53 Participants | 50 Participants | 113 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 70 Participants | 209 Participants | 43 Participants | 17 Participants | 79 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 234 Participants | 609 Participants | 94 Participants | 72 Participants | 209 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 53 Participants | 123 Participants | 11 Participants | 9 Participants | 50 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 317 Participants | 818 Participants | 122 Participants | 97 Participants | 282 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 86 Participants | 245 Participants | 57 Participants | 33 Participants | 69 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 456 participants | 1186 participants | 190 participants | 139 participants | 401 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 289 Participants | 808 Participants | 157 Participants | 105 Participants | 257 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 167 Participants | 378 Participants | 33 Participants | 34 Participants | 144 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 857 | 0 / 329 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 857 | 0 / 329 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 857 | 0 / 329 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Patient Visits With Completion of Out-of-office BP Monitoring Within 6 Months of an Eligible Visit During the Post-Implementation Period
Patient completed out-of-office BP testing \[ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) or home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM)\] (either Y/N) per eligible visits were tallied.
Time frame: 6 months (Post-Implementation period)
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Clinics | Percentage of Patient Visits With Completion of Out-of-office BP Monitoring Within 6 Months of an Eligible Visit During the Post-Implementation Period | 5.7 percentage of visits |
| Control Clinics | Percentage of Patient Visits With Completion of Out-of-office BP Monitoring Within 6 Months of an Eligible Visit During the Post-Implementation Period | 4.3 percentage of visits |
Percentage of Patient Visits With Completion of Out-of-office BP Monitoring Within 6 Months of an Eligible Visit During the Pre-Implementation Period
Patient completed out-of-office BP testing \[ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) or home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM)\] (either Y/N) per eligible visits were tallied.
Time frame: 6 months (Pre-Implementation period)
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Clinics | Percentage of Patient Visits With Completion of Out-of-office BP Monitoring Within 6 Months of an Eligible Visit During the Pre-Implementation Period | 0.6 percentage of visits |
| Control Clinics | Percentage of Patient Visits With Completion of Out-of-office BP Monitoring Within 6 Months of an Eligible Visit During the Pre-Implementation Period | 5.4 percentage of visits |
Percentage of Patient Visits With Out-of-office BP Monitoring Test Ordered by Clinician During the Post-Implementation Period
Primary care clinician ordered out-of-office BP testing \[ABPM or HBPM\] (either Y/N) for eligible visits were tallied.
Time frame: 6 months (Post-Implementation period)
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Clinics | Percentage of Patient Visits With Out-of-office BP Monitoring Test Ordered by Clinician During the Post-Implementation Period | 7.9 percentage of visits |
| Control Clinics | Percentage of Patient Visits With Out-of-office BP Monitoring Test Ordered by Clinician During the Post-Implementation Period | 9.2 percentage of visits |
Percentage of Patient Visits With Out-of-office BP Monitoring Test Ordered by Clinician During the Pre-Implementation Period
Primary care clinician ordered out-of-office BP testing \[ABPM or HBPM\] (either Y/N) for eligible visits were tallied.
Time frame: 6 months (Pre-Implementation period)
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Clinics | Percentage of Patient Visits With Out-of-office BP Monitoring Test Ordered by Clinician During the Pre-Implementation Period | 2.8 percentage of visits |
| Control Clinics | Percentage of Patient Visits With Out-of-office BP Monitoring Test Ordered by Clinician During the Pre-Implementation Period | 8.7 percentage of visits |