Skip to content

Culprit Lesions in NSTEMI With Multi Vessel Disease (NSTEMI-CULPRIT)

Identification of Culprit Lesions in Non ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03479593
Acronym
NS-CULPRIT
Enrollment
100
Registered
2018-03-27
Start date
2018-01-10
Completion date
2024-01-01
Last updated
2023-03-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multi Vessel Coronary Artery Disease, NSTEMI - Non-ST Segment Elevation MI

Keywords

NSTEMI, Culprit, Cardiac magnetic resonance, Optical Coherence Tomography

Brief summary

Acute myocardial infarction owes to a plaque rupture resulting in total (STEMI) or partial occlusion (NSTEMI) of the coronary artery. In patients with a partial occlusion and multi vessel disease (MVD), identification of the lesion responsible for the current event (culprit) at the time of the examination (coronary angiogram, CAG) can be difficult. Meanwhile, identification of the culprit lesion is vital to conduct proper treatment. Furthermore, treating an artery with no plaque rupture (non-culprit), imposes a small risk for complications, which may be fatal. Precise identification of the culprit lesion in NSTEMI patients with MVD remains unsettled The purpose of this study is proper and precise identification of the culprit lesion in NSTEMI patients with MVD.

Detailed description

Background Acute myocardial infarction owes to a plaque rupture resulting in total (STEMI) or partial occlusion (NSTEMI) of the coronary artery. Current guidelines in NSTEMI recommend an invasive coronary angiogram (CAG) and possible treatment with percutaneous intervention (PCI) within 2-72 hours. In NSTEMI patients and multi vessel disease (MVD), identification of the lesion responsible for the current event (culprit) at the time of the examination can be difficult. Meanwhile, identification of the culprit lesion is vital to conduct proper treatment in order to restore blood flow to the myocardium. Furthermore, treating an artery with no plaque rupture (non-culprit), imposes a small risk for complications, which may be fatal. In addition, since the symptoms relate to the culprit lesion it is currently unclear whether all stenosis or only the culprit should be treated by PCI. Today precise identification of the culprit lesion in NSTEMI patients with MVD remains unsettled. Purpose The overall objective of this study is proper and precise identification of the culprit lesion in NSTEMI patients with MVD. Methods The study employs cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), which allows detection of myocardium exposed to even brief periods of ischemia. Furthermore, Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) which visualises the coronary artery lumen and wall. OCT allows for direct visualization of atherosclerotic plaques, presence of thrombus and atherosclerotic plaque ruptured that cannot be seen on a CAG alone. Patients will have CMR performed prior to CAG. The PCI operator determines culprit based on CAG and ECG changes alone. OCT is subsequently performed on culprit lesion(s) and stenosis ≥ 50%. Sample size calculation Assuming the culprit lesion can be correctly identified with history/angiography/ECG in 95% of cases a positive predictive value \>90% with 95% accuracy can be reached with 100 patients.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTCMR and OCT in NSTEMI patients with MVD

Lesions \>50% stenosis i patients with NSTEMI are examined by OCT. All patients will have CMR performed prior to angiography

Sponsors

Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients \> 18 years of age * NSTEMI (ECG changes and/or troponin/creatine kinase myocardial band (CK-MB) rise) within 48 hours after symptom debut. * Multivessel disease at CAG: More than one vessel with \>50% stenosis.

Exclusion criteria

* Known intolerance of heparin or contrast medium. * Inability to understand information or to provide informed consent. * estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \< 30 ml/min. * Other reasons for troponin rise not applicable to acute myocardial infarction. * Atrial fibrillation at admission. * Patients with contraindication for CMR will only have OCT performed. * Potential pregnancy * Unstable patients requiring acute CAG and PCI

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Is the PCI operator capable of identifying the culprit lesion based on ECG-changes and CAG? (CMR is the golden standard)Through study completion, an average of 1 yearCorrelation between operator identification of the culprit and CMR/OCT. The location of the culprit on CAG/ECG and OCT versus CMR will be evaluated by the chi2-test

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Positive predictive value of PCI operator identification of culprit lesion with CAG and ECG.Through study completion, an average of 1 yearcross-tables will be used to calculate the positive predictive value Receiver-operating-characteristics will be used to compare the additional diagnostic value of OCT compared to CAG/ECG.
Improvement in identification of culprit lesions evaluated by identification of an additional diagnostic value of OCT compared to CAG/ECGThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearReceiver-operating-characteristics will be used to compare the additional diagnostic value of OCT compared to CAG/ECG. CMR is the golden standard.

Countries

Denmark

Contacts

Primary ContactKathrine Ekström, MD
kathrine.ekstroem.01@regionh.dk+4535452295
Backup ContactThomas Engstrøm, DMSCi, PhD
thomas.engstroem@regionh.dk+4535458444

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026