Skip to content

Home-Based High Intensity Interval Training Intervention for Low Active Adults

The Effect of a Home-Based High Intensity Interval Training Intervention on Increasing Exercise Among Low Active Adults

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03479177
Enrollment
50
Registered
2018-03-27
Start date
2018-07-01
Completion date
2019-09-01
Last updated
2019-10-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiovascular Diseases

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of a home-based high intensity interval training intervention on exercise among low active adults (defined as engaging in exercise 90 minutes or less per week). Participants will be randomly assigned to a HIIT-based intervention or a wait-list control each lasting 12 weeks (participants in the wait-list control condition will have the option of receiving the HIIT intervention following the 12 weeks).

Detailed description

The intervention will be a 12-week high intensity interval training workout that will consist of home-based exercise sessions prescribed by the exercise counselor. The exercise sessions will be based on exercises the participant can confidentially engage in (regular push-ups vs. knee push-ups vs. wall push-ups). The goal will be to engage in three exercise sessions per week. The participants will receive weekly telephone calls during the first month and bi-weekly calls during months 2 and 3. The exercise counselor will also engage in dialogue that will motivate the participant to exercise.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALHigh Intensity Interval Training

The exercise sessions will be based on exercises the participant can confidentially engage in (regular push-ups vs. knee push-ups vs. wall push-ups). The goal will be to engage in three exercise sessions per week. The participants will receive weekly telephone calls during the first month and bi-weekly calls during months 2 and 3. The exercise counselor will also engage in dialogue that will motivate the participant to exercise.

Sponsors

University of Minnesota
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 18 and older * Exercising for 90 minutes or less each week * Access to the Internet

Exclusion criteria

* A history of coronary heart disease (history of myocardial infarction, symptoms of angina) * Orthopedic problems that would limit physical activity participation * Diabetes * Stroke * Osteoarthritis * Any other medical condition that may make physical activity unsafe or unwise. * Current or planned pregnancy * Psychosis or current suicidal ideation * Psychiatric hospitalization within the last six months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Exercise minutes per weekChange from Baseline to 12 weeksExercise minutes per week as assessed by an accelerometer for one week at baseline and 12 weeks. Higher reported minutes per week indicates a higher level of physical activity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
BiometricsChange from Baseline to 12 weeksBody Mass Index will be calculated based on combining weight and height to report BMI as kg/m\*2. The higher the number (level) of BMI, indicative of higher weight to height ratio.
Social Support for Exercise QuestionnaireChange from Baseline to 12 weeksAssesses the degree to which the individuals has friends and family who support their exercise. Participants rate how often family member or friend expresses social support for physical activity with scale (0=none, 4=very often). Overall total score range 0- 104 with subscales for family (0-52) and friends (0-52).
Physical Activity Self-efficacy QuestionnaireChange from Baseline to 12 weeksAssesses the amount of confidence the individual has to engage in exercise. Five questions, responses are on a scale from 1- 5 with participants indicating how confident they are on that scale of engaging in exercise in that situation (1=not at all confident, 5=extremely confident). Range of scores 5-25.
Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES)Change from Baseline to 12 weeksAssesses the degree to which the individual enjoys exercise. The Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale is an 18-item scale that assesses enjoyment for physical activity by asking participants to rate how you feel at the moment about the physical activity you have been doing using a 7- point bipolar Likert scale, from 1 (I enjoy it) to 7 (I hate it). Eleven items were negatively worded and seven items were positively worded. After reverse scoring the 11negatively worded items, an overall enjoyment for physical activity score is determined by summing the items, with a range of 18-126 being possible. Higher scores indicate higher enjoyment.
Outcome Expectancies QuestionnaireChange from Baseline to 12 weeksAssesses what benefits the individual expects to gain from exercise. Responses on a scale from 1-5 (1=strongly disagree, 5=strongly agree), with participants indicating how strongly they agree to potential outcomes of exercise. Scores range from 9-45 with higher scores indicating greater outcome expectation.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026