Skip to content

Non-technical Skills of Emergency Physicians in a Virtual Emergency Department

Nontechnical Skills Assessment of Emergency Physicians and Quality of Care in a Virtual Emergency Department

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03478579
Acronym
3D-QUAMU
Enrollment
30
Registered
2018-03-27
Start date
2018-06-01
Completion date
2020-12-01
Last updated
2022-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Emergencies

Keywords

serious game, simulation, virtual emergency department, nontechnical skills

Brief summary

The investigators will study nontechnical skills of emergency physicians in a virtual standardized emergency room and their impact on quality of care.

Detailed description

The ability to manage multiple patients and anticipate the risk of error related to task interruptions or disruptions has been identified among relevant non-technical skills (NTS) for practicing emergency medicine. However, the link between these skills and the quality of care has not been quantified. NTS are usually analyzed by qualitative methods such as interviews, direct observations, or questionnaires that have low performance according to the GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation). The investigators have created and validated an experimental model of a virtual, authentic and realistic Emergency Department (ED). The platform has been modelled in a Second Life environment. The NTS of emergency physicians will be assessed and recorded during simulated care of multiple virtual patients. The NTS association with ED length of stay and disposition decision will be analyzed. This study will be an internal pilot study and will include 30 emergency physicians who practice emergency medicine for at least two years. Sessions will be performed in the Toulouse Institute of Health Care Simulation, Toulouse University Hospital. They will be composed of three stages: briefing (30 minutes), simulated practice (3 hours), and debriefing with an explicit interview (30 minutes). Two researchers and a computer technician will supervise the sessions. The data will be obtained by analyzing the video recorded during the simulated practice and the interview.

Interventions

OTHERobservational

No intervention, it is observational study

Sponsors

University Hospital, Toulouse
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Active emergency physicians working in an ED of the French Midi-Pyrenees region * Two years of practice in emergency medicine or more * Volunteer to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Emergency physician working in another setting than ED, outside the Midi-Pyrenees region, or practicing emergency medicine for less than 2 years.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Nontechnical skills3 hoursThe nontechnical skills will be assessed by the Anaesthetists' Non-Technical Skills (ANTS) system.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of care will be measured by a composite criteria (process and result)3 hoursQuality of care will be measured by a composite criterion associating a process indicator and a result indicator : * The process indicator is the average time to medical care of patients * The result indicator corresponds to the relevance of the choice of the orientation of each patient by the emergency doctor at the end of medical care
ED length of stay3 hoursThe quality of care will be assessed by ED length of stay : ED length of stay will be measured from triage completion to disposition decision
The authenticity of the virtual emergency medicine service3 hoursEvaluation of the consistency : perceived internal consistency in the proposed rules and situations will be assessed using a 4-item questionnaire by answering yes or no

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026