Skip to content

Advanced Monitoring to Inform and Guide Perioperative Hemodynamic Optimization 1 (AMIGO-1) Study

A Single Centre Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial of Advanced Minimally Invasive Monitoring to Optimize Hemodynamic Management in Major Noncardiac Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03477617
Acronym
AMIGO-1
Enrollment
60
Registered
2018-03-26
Start date
2018-05-03
Completion date
2019-09-01
Last updated
2020-09-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intraoperative Fluid Management

Brief summary

Serious complications occur in about 16% of major surgeries. Episode of hypotension during surgery may be a leading cause of these complications. Even though hypotension occurs frequently during surgery, choosing the correct treatment remains difficult in clinical practice. Physicians are often uncertain as to whether low blood pressure should be treated with intravenous fluid or vasoactive drugs. The first treatment of choice typically involves administering more intravenous fluid; however, excessive fluid administration during surgery has been shown to be deleterious. New minimally invasive hemodynamic monitors now offer a potential solution by guiding physicians with respect to the choice of appropriate intervention (i.e., fluid versus vasoactive drugs). The Investigators will conduct a single-center feasibility randomized control trial (RCT) at the Toronto General Hospital (Toronto, ON, Canada) of an algorithm to manage hypotension during surgery based on the information captured by a minimally invasive monitor. Sixty participants who are aged 40 years or older and scheduled to undergo an abdominal, pelvic or vascular surgery will be randomized to have the intraoperative hypotension managed by either the new algorithm (guided by the monitor) or usual care. Participants will be recruited over 12 to 18 months, and followed for 30 days to describe differences in clinical care, hemodynamics, complications, and death. The feasibility of a future multicenter RCT will be assessed based on this present study demonstrating that (1) the algorithm can be practically implemented in a clinical setting where hemodynamic monitors are not typically used; (2) initial descriptive data suggest differences in care between groups; (3) there are no obvious major harms from the protocol; and (4) there is an acceptable participation rate among eligible patients. These data will inform any required changes to the algorithm and protocol to allow for its application in a future study.

Interventions

OTHERIntraoperative Hemodynamic Algorithm

Anesthesiologists are instructed to use the study's algorithm to manage intraoperative hypotension in response to the cardiac output monitor values.

COMBINATION_PRODUCTUsual hemodynamic management

Anesthesiologists are instructed to manage intraoperative hypotension based on their usual clinical care, without information from cardiac output monitor

Sponsors

University Health Network, Toronto
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Parallel Assignment Participants are randomized to two groups; both groups will have an intraoperative minimally invasive cardiac output monitor connected. In the intervention arm, the anesthesiologist will treat episodes of hypotension using a hemodynamic algorithm based on the information for the cardiac output monitor. In the control arm, the anesthesiologist will treat episodes of hypotension using standard of care management and will be blinded to the information from the cardiac output monitor. Data from the monitor will be stored for comparison between the arms. This is a pilot study; therefore, the main objective is to assess feasibility of a future multicenter RCT, based on the following domains: (i) participation rate among eligible patients; (ii) practicality of implementing the study intervention in a clinical setting; (iii) collect descriptive data for differences between the 2 arms; (iv) collect safety data to ensure no harm has resulted from the study protocol

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥40 years * Abdominal, retroperitoneal, pelvic or vascular surgery requiring general anesthesia and planned postoperative stay of ≥48 hours for medical reasons * Elevated perioperative cardiovascular risk based on at least one of the following: * cardiovascular comorbidities: coronary artery disease, heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, or peripheral arterial disease * elevated age (≥70 y), * smoker, * hypertension, * diabetes mellitus, * or preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤60mL/min/1.73m2 * Planned placement of invasive arterial line for clinical care

Exclusion criteria

* Preoperative dialysis dependence * Minimally invasive procedures (i.e., laparoscopic or endovascular approach) * Intra-thoracic procedures * Non-sinus rhythm * Liver resection surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Survey score on practicality of study algorithm (Intervention)2 years• Practicality of study algorithm will be measured by the survey scores of the anesthesiologists involved in the intraoperative care, assessing several domains using a 5 point Likert scale such as (1) Ease of use, (2) Clinical Utility, (3) Validity
Participation rate (Feasibility trial pre-RCT)2 years• Participation rate: The number of patients consented to the study over the number of eligible patients. This will help estimate recruitment rates in a future clinical randomized trial.
Incidence of treatment related Adverse Events2 yearsNumber of participants with Adverse Events thought to be at least possibly related to the study treatment will be reported. This outcome will assure that no harm has resulted from the study protocol and the protocol is safe for a future randomized control trial

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Volume of intravenous fluid and volume of blood products (therapeutic interventions) for each arm of the study.During intra-operative period and recovery, an average of 12 hours.• The volume of IV fluid and volume of blood products prescribed by the anesthesiologist will be reported as mean (in mL) separately for each study arm. Since this is a feasibility trial the statistical analysis for this study will be descriptive in nature, therefore no statistical differences will be reported between the 2 arms.
Dose of vasoactive medication (therapeutic interventions) for each arm of the study.During intra-operative period and recovery, an average of 12 hours.• The dose of vasoactive medications prescribed by the anesthesiologist will be reported as means (in the unit of each vasoactive medication i.e., mg, mcg, etc.) separately for each study arm. Since this is a feasibility trial the statistical analysis for this study will be descriptive in nature, therefore no statistical differences will be reported between the 2 arms.
Hypotension (blood pressure in mmHg) (therapeutic interventions) for each arm of the studyDuring intra-operative period and up to 72 hours after surgery.• Hypotension is the indication for receiving treatment in the study; therefore, blood pressure will be measured during surgery (every 5 minutes electronically by the non-invasive monitors) and after surgery (every hour by an ambulatory blood pressure monitor) separately for each study arm. Since this is a feasibility trial the statistical analysis for this study will be descriptive in nature, therefore no statistical differences will be reported between the 2 arms.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026