Burnout, Professional, Stress, Psychological, Occupational
Conditions
Keywords
e-mental health, stress, burnout, self-efficacy, social support
Brief summary
The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of internet intervention for reduction of occupational stress and its negative consequences (job burnout, depression) among medical professionals through the enhancement of the resources that are critical for coping with stress: self-efficacy and perceived social support.
Detailed description
Medical professionals are at high risk for job stress and burnout. Research show that the negative effects of stress can be reduced through strengthening personal resources such as self-efficacy and perceived social support. In line with cultivation and enabling hypotheses (Schwarzer & Knoll, 2007; Benight & Bandura, 2004) either self-efficacy cultivates perceived support, or rather perceived support enables self-efficacy. This study aims at testing both hypotheses in experimental design by applying them as a theoretical framework for the Med-Stress: evidence-based, CBT-framed internet intervention to foster resource accumulation among medical professionals. The effectiveness of intervention will be tested in a four-arm randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of: 1) self-efficacy and perceived support sequential enhancement (cultivation hypothesis), 2) perceived support and self-efficacy sequential enhancement (enabling hypothesis), 3) only self-efficacy, and 4) only social support enhancement (controls). Primary outcomes are job stress and burnout, secondary outcomes include work engagement, depression, and secondary traumatic stress. Self-efficacy and perceived support are expected to mediate the relationships between condition assignment and outcomes. Assessments include baseline (T1), three- or six-weeks post-test (depending on the condition, T2), as well as six- and twelve-months follow-ups (T3, T4). Intervention effect sizes and between-groups comparisons at post-test and follow-ups will be calculated. This study will contribute to the findings on the role of personal resources in the development of job stress and burnout by demonstrating the cultivation vs enabling effects of self-efficacy and perceived social support.
Interventions
The condition reflects cultivation hypothesis and consists of 2 sequential modules with self-efficacy enhancement module (SE) preceding perceived social support enhancement module (SS). Each module is comprised of 3 evidence-based, CBT-framed exercises: 1) SE: mastery experience, vicarious experience, and action planning, 2) SS: received support & cognitive distortions, social skills & peer support, action planning. Participants will have an option to engage in one or more out of four additional modules: relaxation, cognitive reconstruction, mindfulness, and lifestyle. The condition takes 6 weeks, 1 week per exercise.
The condition reflects enabling hypothesis and consists of 2 sequential modules with perceived social support enhancement module (SS) preceding self-efficacy enhancement module (SE). Each module is comprised of 3 evidence-based, CBT-framed exercises: 1) SS: received support & cognitive distortions, social skills & peer support, and action planning, 2) SE: mastery experience, vicarious experience, and action planning. Participants will have an option to engage in one or more out of four additional modules: relaxation, cognitive reconstruction, mindfulness, and lifestyle. The condition takes 6 weeks, 1 week per exercise.
The condition consists of self-efficacy enhancement module (SE) and is comprised of 3 evidence-based, CBT-framed exercises: mastery experience, vicarious experience, and action planning. Participants will have an option to engage in one or more out of four additional modules: relaxation, cognitive reconstruction, mindfulness, and lifestyle. The condition takes 3 weeks, 1 week per exercise.
The condition consists of perceived social support enhancement module (SS) and is comprised of 3 evidence-based, CBT-framed exercises: received support & cognitive distortions, social skills & peer support, and action planning. Participants will have an option to engage in one or more out of four additional modules: relaxation, cognitive reconstruction, mindfulness, and lifestyle. The condition takes 3 weeks, 1 week per exercise.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Age of at least 18 years * Professionally active medical providers * Internet connection
Exclusion criteria
* No access to a device with Internet connection
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change on Perceived Stress Scale 14 (PSS-14) | Change from baseline on PSS-14 (3 or 6 weeks depending on the study condition) | The PSS-14 is a measure of perceived stress. It consists of 14 items with response scale ranging from 0 to 4. Higher total score represents higher perceived stress. Instruction was adapted to refer to work-related stress. |
| Change on Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) | Change from baseline on OLBI (3 or 6 weeks depending on the study condition) | The OLBI is a measure of job burnout. It consists of 16 items with response scale ranging from 1 to 4. The questionnaire consists of two subscales: exhaustion and disengagement, To compute total score subscales are summed. Higher total score represents higher job burnout. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change on Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-3) | Change from baseline on UWES-3 (3 or 6 weeks depending on the study condition) | The UWES-3 is a measure of work engagement. It consists of 3 items with response scale ranging from 0 to 6. Higher total score represents higher work engagement. |
| Change on Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) | Change from baseline on PHQ-9 (3 or 6 weeks depending on the study condition) | The PHQ-9 is a measure of depression. It consists of 9 items with response scale ranging from 0 to 3. Higher total score represents higher depression. |
| Change on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist 5 (PCL-5) | Change from baseline on PCL-5 (3 or 6 weeks depending on the study condition) | The PCL-5 is a measure of posttraumatic stress disorder. It consists of 20 items with response scale ranging from 0 to 4. The questionnaire consists of four subscales: intrusions, avoidance, negative alterations in cognition and mood, and arousal. To compute total score subscales are summed. Higher total score represents higher posttraumatic stress disorder. Instruction was adapted to refer to work-related secondary traumatic stress. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change on Work Stress and Job Burnout Self-Efficacy Scale (WSBSES) | Change from baseline on WSBSES (3 or 6 weeks depending on the study condition) | The WSBSES is a measure of self-efficacy to cope with work stress and job burnout. It consists of 28 items with the response scale ranging from 1 to 7. Higher total score represents higher self-efficacy. |
| Change on Who Can You Count On Scale | Change from baseline on Who Can You Count On Scale (3 or 6 weeks depending on the study condition) | The scale measures perceived social support. It consists of 32 items with response scale ranging from 1 to 5. The questionnaire consists of 4 subscales: support form supervisors, support from friends, support from family, friends. To compute total score subscales are summed. Higher total score represents higher perceived social support. |
| Change on Berlin Social Support Scales (BSSS), Subscale 3 | Change from baseline on BSSS, Subscale 3 (3 or 6 weeks depending on the study condition) | The BSSS Subscale 3 measures social support seeking. Instruction and rating scale ware adapted to refer to social support self-efficacy. It consists of 5 items with response scale ranging from 1 to 7. Higher total score represents higher social support self-efficacy. |
| Secondary Trauma Exposure Scale (STES) | Baseline | The STES measures job-related indirect exposure to traumatic events. It consists of 12 items with response scale for 10 items ranging from 0 to 1 and for remaining 2 items from 0 to 7. Higher total score represents higher secondary trauma exposure. |
| Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ) | Baseline | The CEQ measures expectancy and credibility of the intervention. It consists of 6 items, with response scale for 4 items ranging from 1 to 9, and for remaining 2 items from 0% to 100%. Higher total score represents higher treatment credibility and user's expectancy for improvement. |
Countries
Poland