Emphysema
Conditions
Brief summary
Rationale: The published clinical trials investigating the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction, showing important patient-related improvements in efficacy, led to the acknowledgement of the treatment in the GOLD-COPD2017 guidelines. Interaction with pulmonary rehabilitation, impact on patient-reported outcomes, physical activity, and extrapulmonary consequences are all topics to gain more insight in. This importantly, to further develop and optimize this innovative and personalized therapy. Objective: To study in detail the impact and optimal timing of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on exercise physiology and patient-reported outcomes and the impact of the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using endobronchial valves (EBV) on cardiopulmonary function, metabolism and changes in body composition. Study design: This study is a randomized controlled trial with 3 study-arms. Group 1 will first follow a PR program and afterwards undergo the EBV treatment. Group 2 will first undergo the EBV treatment and approximately 8 weeks later will follow a PR program. Group 3 will only undergo the EBV treatment (and can choose to follow a PR program after completing the 6 month FU visit). Study population: The study population exist of patients with severe emphysema who undergo a bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using one-way valves. Intervention: Most patients will undergo a bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using endobronchial valves and a pulmonary rehabilitation program. One group of patient will under a bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using endobronchial valves and can choose whether they also want to follow a pulmonary rehabilitation program afterwards. Main study parameters: The main study parameter is the difference in change in endurance time measured by an endurance cycle test between the EBV treatment group and the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction + rehabilitation group (EBV+PR).
Detailed description
Rationale: The published clinical trials investigating the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction, showing important patient-related improvements in efficacy, led to the acknowledgement of the treatment in the GOLD-COPD2017 guidelines. Interaction with pulmonary rehabilitation, impact on patient-reported outcomes, physical activity, and extrapulmonary consequences are all topics to gain more insight in. This importantly, to further develop and optimize this innovative and personalized therapy. Objective: To study in detail the impact and optimal timing of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on exercise physiology and patient-reported outcomes and the impact of the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using endobronchial valves (EBV) on cardiopulmonary function, metabolism and changes in body composition. Study design: This study is a randomized controlled trial with 3 study-arms. Group 1 will first follow a PR program and afterwards undergo the EBV treatment. Group 2 will first undergo the EBV treatment and approximately 8 weeks later will follow a PR program. Group 3 will only undergo the EBV treatment (and can choose to follow a PR program after completing the 6 month FU visit). Study population: The study population exist of patients with severe emphysema who undergo a bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using one-way valves. Intervention: Most patients will undergo a bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using endobronchial valves and a pulmonary rehabilitation program. One group of patient will under a bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using endobronchial valves and can choose whether they also want to follow a pulmonary rehabilitation program afterwards. Main study parameters: The main study parameter is the difference in change in endurance time measured by an endurance cycle test between the EBV treatment group and the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction + rehabilitation group (EBV+PR). Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: This study has no major risks for the participating patients. The patients will be exposed to additional exercise capacity and physical activity measurements, 3 additional questionnaires, a CT scan of the quadriceps muscle, a DEXA scan and peripheral blood collection. Furthermore, a subgroup of patients will be exposed to a cardiac MRI or muscle and fat biopsies. Patient can directly benefit from the EBV treatment and the pulmonary rehabilitation program. Indirect benefit might be achieved, because, at a group level the investigators will learn more about this novel treatment for our severe emphysema patients and will be able to further optimize this treatment.
Interventions
Following a PR program
Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using endobronchial valves (EBV)
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* COPD. * FEV1 ≤45%pred AND FEV1/FVC \<70%. * TLC \>100%pred AND RV\>175%pred. * CAT ≥18. * \>50% emphysema destruction @-910HU. * \>95% complete major fissure measured by quantitative CT analysis. * Non-smoking \>6 months. * Signed informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
* PaCO2\>8.0 kPa, or PaO2\<6.0kPa. * 6-minute walk test \<160m. * Significant chronic bronchitis, bronchiectasis, or other infectious lung disease. * 3 of more hospitalizations due to pulmonary infection within last 12 months before baseline assessments * Previous lobectomy, LVRS, or lung transplantation. * LVEF\<45% and or RVSP\>50mmHg. * Anticoagulant therapy which cannot be weaned off prior to procedure. * Patient is significantly immunodeficient. * Involved in other pulmonary drug studies within 30 days prior to this study. * Pulmonary nodule which requires intervention * Any disease or condition that interferes with completion of initial or follow-up assessments
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Endurance time | After 6 months | The difference in change in endurance time measured by an endurance cycle test between the EBV treatment group and the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction + rehabilitation group (EBV+PR). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Pulmonary rehabilitation2 | After 6 months | • the difference between the EBV treatment group and the EBV+PR group in change in: * Lung function measured by bodyplehtysmography |
| Pulmonary rehabilitation3 | After 6 months | • the difference between the EBV treatment group and the EBV+PR group in change in: * Exercise capacity measured by an 6-minute walk distance test |
| Pulmonary rehabilitation1 | After 6 months | • the difference between the EBV treatment group and the EBV+PR group in change in: * Physical activity measured by accelerometry |
| Cardiopulmonary function | After 8 weeks | • the change after EBV treatment in RVEDVI as measured with cardiac MRI. |
| Metabolism and change in body composition | After 8 weeks | • the change after EBV treatment in fat-free mass index, fat mass, and fat distribution measured by a dexa scan. |
| Patient reported outcomes | After 6 months | • the change after EBV treatment in fatigue level measured by the CIS questionnaire. |
Countries
Netherlands