Skip to content

Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Emergency Departments

Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Emergency Departments

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03473587
Enrollment
191
Registered
2018-03-22
Start date
2014-11-07
Completion date
2018-05-30
Last updated
2018-03-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer

Brief summary

This trial will compare the effects of a culturally targeted intervention designed to assist participants to identify and overcome individual barriers to colorectal cancer (CRC) and to promote CRC screenings using motivational interviewing (Ml) delivered by a lay health advisor (LHA) compared to the current standard-of-care (distribution of a brochure describing CRC screening services offered by the hospital) on CRC screening compliance.

Detailed description

The specific aim of this project is to adapt and pilot a tailored intervention to promote CRC screenings in a rural Appalachian Kentucky emergency department (ED) in order to: (a) evaluate the feasibility of providing a cancer screening promotion intervention in an emergency department (ED) that serves a rural Appalachian community; and (b) assess the effects of the intervention on barriers to CRC screening, stage of readiness to screen and CRC screening engagement. The first phase of the project will involve the adaptation and pretesting of the intervention. This phase will take approximately 6 months. The second phase of the project will involve piloting the intervention and evaluating its efficacy and feasibility and will take place over the following 18 months. We will conduct a randomized controlled trial to examine the efficacy and feasibility of delivering the LHA delivered MI intervention to promote CRC screening in persons waiting in a rural Appalachian emergency department (ED) for non urgent complaints. We will evaluate efficacy by measurement of CRC screening status at baseline and three and six months post intervention.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMotivational interview

A lay health advisor will engage the subject in a motivational interview to promote the importance of colorectal cancer screening

BEHAVIORALStandard of care

A lay health advisor will provide the subject with a brochure promoting the importance of colorectal cancer screening

Sponsors

University of Kentucky
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. 50+ years of age 2. Rural Appalachian resident 3. No personal history of colorectal cancer 4. No cognitive impairment 5. Ability to speak and understand English 6. Has not had one of the following colorectal cancer screening tests-- 1. Fecal Occult Blood Test within the past year 2. Flexible sigmoidoscopy within the past five years, or 3. Colonoscopy within the past ten years

Exclusion criteria

\-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in colorectal cancer screening rate6 monthsNumber of participants that seek out colorectal cancer screening after a motivational interview with a lay health advisor compared to standard of care (being provided a screening brochure)

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactJennifer Hatcher, RN, PhD
jennifer.hatcher@uky.edu859-257-5263

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026