Skip to content

Study to Investigate CSL112 in Subjects With Acute Coronary Syndrome

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of CSL112 in Subjects With Acute Coronary Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03473223
Acronym
AEGIS-II
Enrollment
18226
Registered
2018-03-22
Start date
2018-03-21
Completion date
2023-11-17
Last updated
2025-01-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Coronary Syndrome

Keywords

Coronary Artery Disease, Heart Disease, Cardiovascular Disease, Acute Myocardial Infarction, Heart Failure, Major adverse cardiovascular event, Multivessel disease, Peripheral artery disease, Cerebrovascular accident, Ischemic stroke, Hemorrhagic stroke, Atherosclerosis, Congestive heart failure, Valvular heart disease, Atrial Fibrillation, Hypertension

Brief summary

This is a phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CSL112 on reducing the risk of major adverse CV events \[MACE - cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke\] in subjects with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) diagnosed with either ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), including those managed with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or medically managed.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALApolipoprotein A-I [human] (apoA-I)

Apolipoprotein A-I \[human\] (apoA-I) purified from human plasma for intravenous administration

OTHERPlacebo

25% albumin solution diluted to 4.4%

Sponsors

CSL Behring
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female least 18 years of age * Evidence of myocardial necrosis, consistent with type I (spontaneous) MI * No suspicion of acute kidney injury * Evidence of multivessel coronary artery disease * Presence of established cardiovascular risk factor(s): 1. Diabetes mellitus on pharmacotherapy OR 2. 2 or more of the following: age ≥ 65 years, prior history of MI, peripheral arterial disease

Exclusion criteria

* Ongoing hemodynamic instability * Evidence of hepatobiliary disease * Evidence of severe chronic kidney disease * Plan to undergo scheduled coronary artery bypass graft surgery as treatment for the index MI * Known history of allergies, hypersensitivity, or deficiencies to soy bean, peanut or albumin

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With First Occurrence of Any Component of Composite MACE (CV Death, MI, or Stroke)From the time of randomization through 90 daysMACE (Major adverse cardiovascular event\[s\])(CV \[cardiovascular\] death, MI \[Myocardial Infarction\], or stroke).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With First Occurrence of CV Death, MI, or StrokeFrom the time of randomization through 180 days
Number of Participants With Occurrence of CV DeathFrom the time of randomization through 90 days
Number of Participants With First Occurrence of MIFrom the time of randomization through 90 days
Number of Participants With First Occurrence of StrokeFrom the time of randomization through 90 days
Number of Participants With First Occurrence of CV Death, Type 1 MI or StrokeFrom the time of randomization through 90, 180 and 365 days
Number of Participants With Occurrence of All-cause DeathFrom the time of randomization through 365 days
Number of Participants With Adverse EventsFrom the start of treatment through 90 daysAn AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal, clinically significant laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal (investigational) product.
Percentage of Participants With Adverse EventsFrom the start of treatment through 90 daysAn AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal, clinically significant laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal (investigational) product.
Number of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse EventsFrom the start of treatment through 379 days (Day 365 + 14 days of follow up)Treatment-related AEs were AEs considered by the Investigator to have a causal relationship to the investigational product.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse EventsFrom the start of treatment through 379 days (Day 365 + 14 days of follow up)Treatment-related AEs were AEs considered by the Investigator to have a causal relationship to the investigational product. As per the study statistical analysis plan (SAP), descriptive percentages were displayed to one decimal place, hence the percentage values were rounded off and presented.
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)From the start of treatment through 379 days (Day 365 + 14 days of follow up)SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or is a medically significant event.
Total Number of Hospitalizations for Coronary, Cerebral, and Peripheral IschemiaFrom the time of randomization through 90 daysThe total number of hospitalizations and individual hospitalizations due to coronary, cerebral, and peripheral ischemia were reported.
Number of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsBaseline and 29 daysClinical laboratory assessments included assessment of Hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, leukocytes and platelets) and Biochemistry (alkaline phosphatase \[ALP\], alanine aminotransferase \[ALT\], aspartate aminotransferase \[AST\], bilirubin, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin and estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\]). The number of participants with a shift from the Baseline value to the worst post-treatment value (low, normal, or high) was reported. The worst criterion for the parameters is as follows: hematocrit - low, hemoglobin - low, leukocytes - high, platelets - low, ALT - high, ALP - high, AST - high, bilirubin - high, direct bilirubin - high, indirect bilirubin - high, eGFR - severe impairment.
Percentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsBaseline and 29 daysClinical laboratory assessments included assessment of Hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, leukocytes and platelets) and Biochemistry (ALP, ALT, AST, bilirubin, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin and eGFR). Percentage of participants with a shift from the Baseline value to the worst post-treatment value (low, normal, or high) was reported. The worst criterion for the parameters is as follows: hematocrit - low, hemoglobin - low, leukocytes - high, platelets - low, ALT - high, ALP - high, AST - high, bilirubin - high, direct bilirubin - high, indirect bilirubin - high, eGFR - severe impairment. As per the study SAP, descriptive percentages were displayed to one decimal place, hence the percentage values were rounded off and presented.
Change From Baseline in Hematology ParametersFrom Baseline to Day 29Hematology parameters included Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets.
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: HematocritFrom Baseline to Day 29
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: HemoglobinFrom Baseline to Day 29
Change From Baseline in Hepatic ParametersFrom Baseline to Day 29Hepatic parameters included ALT, ALP and AST.
Change From Baseline in Hepatic Parameter: BilirubinFrom Baseline to Day 29
Change From Baseline in Renal Parameter: Serum CreatinineFrom Baseline to Day 29
Change From Baseline in Renal Parameter: eGFRFrom Baseline to Day 29
Change From Baseline in Renal Parameter: Blood Urea NitrogenFrom Baseline to Day 29
Percentage of Participants With SAEsFrom the start of treatment through 379 days (Day 365 + 14 days of follow up)SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect or is a medically significant event. As per the study SAP, descriptive percentages were displayed to one decimal place, hence the percentage values were rounded off and presented.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Croatia, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Singapore, Slovakia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey (Türkiye), Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 897 centers across 5 regions (North America, Latin America, Western Europe, Central and Eastern Europe, and Asia Pacific).

Pre-assignment details

A total of 18,848 participants were screened, with 622 identified as screen failures. Of the screened participants, 18,226 were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive study interventions (CSL112 or Placebo).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
CSL112
Participants received 6 grams of CSL112 (apoA-I purified from human plasma) once weekly via IV infusion for up to 4 weeks.
9,112
Placebo
Participants received placebo (25% albumin solution diluted to 4.4%) once weekly via IV infusion for up to 4 weeks.
9,107
Total18,219

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyIndirect contact3229
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up11
Overall StudyOther (Not specified)3220
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject4742

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalCSL112
Age, Continuous65.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.21
65.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.15
65.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.09
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1596 Participants3162 Participants1566 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
7383 Participants14793 Participants7410 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
128 Participants264 Participants136 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
36 Participants87 Participants51 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
781 Participants1524 Participants743 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
181 Participants362 Participants181 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Multiracial or other
356 Participants670 Participants314 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander
10 Participants18 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Not Reported by subject
45 Participants91 Participants46 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
7698 Participants15467 Participants7769 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2386 Participants4712 Participants2326 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6721 Participants13507 Participants6786 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
348 / 9,112355 / 9,107
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 9,0100 / 9,027
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1,514 / 9,0101,557 / 9,027

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With First Occurrence of Any Component of Composite MACE (CV Death, MI, or Stroke)

MACE (Major adverse cardiovascular event\[s\])(CV \[cardiovascular\] death, MI \[Myocardial Infarction\], or stroke).

Time frame: From the time of randomization through 90 days

Population: Analysis was performed on the ITT analysis set. The ITT analysis set comprised all randomized participants with the exception of 7 participants enrolled at site(s) excluded from analysis per sponsor decision. The ITT analysis set utilized the treatment to which the participant was randomized regardless of the treatment actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CSL112Number of Participants With First Occurrence of Any Component of Composite MACE (CV Death, MI, or Stroke)439 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With First Occurrence of Any Component of Composite MACE (CV Death, MI, or Stroke)472 Participants
p-value: 0.12195% CI: [0.8126, 1.0538]Cox proportional hazards regression
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hematocrit

Time frame: From Baseline to Day 29

Population: Analysis was performed on the SAS. The SAS comprised all participants in the ITT Analysis set who received any amount of the investigational product, and were analyzed based on the actual treatment received. Here, the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed (N), included all participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CSL112Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hematocrit-0.003 liter per liter (L/L)Standard Deviation 0.0382
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hematocrit-0.004 liter per liter (L/L)Standard Deviation 0.0381
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hemoglobin

Time frame: From Baseline to Day 29

Population: Analysis was performed on the SAS. The SAS comprised all participants in the ITT Analysis set who received any amount of the investigational product, and were analyzed based on the actual treatment received. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed (N), included all participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CSL112Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hemoglobin-1.1 grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 11.96
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hemoglobin-1.3 grams per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 12.08
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters

Hematology parameters included Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets.

Time frame: From Baseline to Day 29

Population: Analysis was performed on the SAS. The SAS comprised all participants in the ITT Analysis set who received any amount of the investigational product, and were analyzed based on the actual treatment received. Here, the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed (N), included all participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure and the Number Analyzed (n), included all participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure for the specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CSL112Change From Baseline in Hematology ParametersLeukocytes-1.024 10^9 cells per literStandard Deviation 2.2905
CSL112Change From Baseline in Hematology ParametersMonocytes-0.089 10^9 cells per literStandard Deviation 0.1886
CSL112Change From Baseline in Hematology ParametersEosinophils0.045 10^9 cells per literStandard Deviation 0.1766
CSL112Change From Baseline in Hematology ParametersNeutrophils-1.068 10^9 cells per literStandard Deviation 2.0892
CSL112Change From Baseline in Hematology ParametersLymphocytes0.084 10^9 cells per literStandard Deviation 0.5534
CSL112Change From Baseline in Hematology ParametersPlatelets0.4 10^9 cells per literStandard Deviation 56.09
CSL112Change From Baseline in Hematology ParametersBasophils0.004 10^9 cells per literStandard Deviation 0.0455
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hematology ParametersPlatelets-1.4 10^9 cells per literStandard Deviation 55.31
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hematology ParametersBasophils0.005 10^9 cells per literStandard Deviation 0.0462
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hematology ParametersEosinophils0.047 10^9 cells per literStandard Deviation 0.1727
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hematology ParametersLeukocytes-0.969 10^9 cells per literStandard Deviation 2.2683
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hematology ParametersLymphocytes0.080 10^9 cells per literStandard Deviation 0.5409
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hematology ParametersMonocytes-0.087 10^9 cells per literStandard Deviation 0.1961
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hematology ParametersNeutrophils-1.011 10^9 cells per literStandard Deviation 2.0343
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hepatic Parameter: Bilirubin

Time frame: From Baseline to Day 29

Population: Analysis was performed on the SAS. The SAS comprised all participants in the ITT Analysis set who received any amount of the investigational product, and were analyzed based on the actual treatment received. Here, the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed (N), included all participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure and the Number Analyzed (n), included all participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure for each specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CSL112Change From Baseline in Hepatic Parameter: BilirubinBilirubin-2.6 micromol per liter (umol/L)Standard Deviation 4.71
CSL112Change From Baseline in Hepatic Parameter: BilirubinDirect Bilirubin-0.4 micromol per liter (umol/L)Standard Deviation 1.32
CSL112Change From Baseline in Hepatic Parameter: BilirubinIndirect Bilirubin-2.0 micromol per liter (umol/L)Standard Deviation 3.85
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hepatic Parameter: BilirubinBilirubin-1.9 micromol per liter (umol/L)Standard Deviation 5.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hepatic Parameter: BilirubinDirect Bilirubin-0.3 micromol per liter (umol/L)Standard Deviation 1.75
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hepatic Parameter: BilirubinIndirect Bilirubin-1.4 micromol per liter (umol/L)Standard Deviation 3.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hepatic Parameters

Hepatic parameters included ALT, ALP and AST.

Time frame: From Baseline to Day 29

Population: Analysis was performed on the SAS. The SAS comprised all participants in the ITT Analysis set who received any amount of the investigational product, and were analyzed based on the actual treatment received. Here, the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed (N), included all participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure and the Number Analyzed (n), included all participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure for each specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CSL112Change From Baseline in Hepatic ParametersALT-5.5 units per literStandard Deviation 25.52
CSL112Change From Baseline in Hepatic ParametersALP3.2 units per literStandard Deviation 26.13
CSL112Change From Baseline in Hepatic ParametersAST-21.2 units per literStandard Deviation 41.9
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hepatic ParametersALT-6.5 units per literStandard Deviation 28.91
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hepatic ParametersALP4.5 units per literStandard Deviation 24.55
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hepatic ParametersAST-20.7 units per literStandard Deviation 61.63
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Renal Parameter: Blood Urea Nitrogen

Time frame: From Baseline to Day 29

Population: Analysis was performed on the SAS. The SAS comprised all participants in the ITT Analysis set who received any amount of the investigational product, and were analyzed based on the actual treatment received. Here, the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed (N), included all participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CSL112Change From Baseline in Renal Parameter: Blood Urea Nitrogen0.0 millimoles per literStandard Deviation 2.76
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Renal Parameter: Blood Urea Nitrogen0.0 millimoles per literStandard Deviation 2.67
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Renal Parameter: eGFR

Time frame: From Baseline to Day 29

Population: Analysis was performed on the SAS. The SAS comprised all participants in the ITT Analysis set who received any amount of the investigational product, and were analyzed based on the actual treatment received. Here, the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed (N), included all participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CSL112Change From Baseline in Renal Parameter: eGFR-1.3 milliliter per minute per 1.73 meter^2Standard Deviation 11.87
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Renal Parameter: eGFR-1.2 milliliter per minute per 1.73 meter^2Standard Deviation 12.15
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Renal Parameter: Serum Creatinine

Time frame: From Baseline to Day 29

Population: Analysis was performed on the SAS. The SAS comprised all participants in the ITT Analysis set who received any amount of the investigational product, and were analyzed based on the actual treatment received. Here, the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed (N), included all participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CSL112Change From Baseline in Renal Parameter: Serum Creatinine2.4 umol/LStandard Deviation 24.39
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Renal Parameter: Serum Creatinine2.1 umol/LStandard Deviation 21.23
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal, clinically significant laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal (investigational) product.

Time frame: From the start of treatment through 90 days

Population: Analysis was performed on the Safety analysis set (SAS). The SAS comprised all participants in the ITT Analysis set who received any amount of the investigational product, and were analyzed based on the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CSL112Number of Participants With Adverse Events3938 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events3927 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory Assessments

Clinical laboratory assessments included assessment of Hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, leukocytes and platelets) and Biochemistry (alkaline phosphatase \[ALP\], alanine aminotransferase \[ALT\], aspartate aminotransferase \[AST\], bilirubin, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin and estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\]). The number of participants with a shift from the Baseline value to the worst post-treatment value (low, normal, or high) was reported. The worst criterion for the parameters is as follows: hematocrit - low, hemoglobin - low, leukocytes - high, platelets - low, ALT - high, ALP - high, AST - high, bilirubin - high, direct bilirubin - high, indirect bilirubin - high, eGFR - severe impairment.

Time frame: Baseline and 29 days

Population: Analysis was performed on the SAS. The SAS comprised all participants in the ITT Analysis set who received any amount of the investigational product, and were analyzed based on the actual treatment received. Here, the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed (N), included all participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure and the Number Analyzed (n), included all participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure for the specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CSL112Number of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsHematocrit - High to Low0 Participants
CSL112Number of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsHematocrit - Normal to Low365 Participants
CSL112Number of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsHemoglobin - High to Low0 Participants
CSL112Number of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsHemoglobin - Normal to Low457 Participants
CSL112Number of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsLeukocytes - Normal to High267 Participants
CSL112Number of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsLeukocytes - Low to High2 Participants
CSL112Number of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsPlatelets - High to Low0 Participants
CSL112Number of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsPlatelets - Normal to Low92 Participants
CSL112Number of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsALT - Normal to High658 Participants
CSL112Number of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsALT - Low to High0 Participants
CSL112Number of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsALP - Normal to High307 Participants
CSL112Number of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsALP - Low to High1 Participants
CSL112Number of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsAST - Normal to High239 Participants
CSL112Number of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsAST - Low to High2 Participants
CSL112Number of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsBilirubin - Normal to High73 Participants
CSL112Number of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsBilirubin - Low to High0 Participants
CSL112Number of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsDirect Bilirubin - Normal to High18 Participants
CSL112Number of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsDirect Bilirubin - Low to High0 Participants
CSL112Number of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsIndirect Bilirubin - Normal to High31 Participants
CSL112Number of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsIndirect Bilirubin - Low to High0 Participants
CSL112Number of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentseGFR - Normal to Severe Impairment1 Participants
CSL112Number of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentseGFR - Mild Impairment to Severe Impairment15 Participants
CSL112Number of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentseGFR - Moderate Impairment to Severe Impairment91 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsALP - Low to High0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsHematocrit - High to Low1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsDirect Bilirubin - Low to High0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsHematocrit - Normal to Low393 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsAST - Normal to High253 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsHemoglobin - High to Low1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentseGFR - Normal to Severe Impairment2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsHemoglobin - Normal to Low447 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsAST - Low to High0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsLeukocytes - Normal to High271 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsIndirect Bilirubin - Normal to High42 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsLeukocytes - Low to High1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsBilirubin - Normal to High112 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsPlatelets - High to Low0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentseGFR - Moderate Impairment to Severe Impairment99 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsPlatelets - Normal to Low114 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsBilirubin - Low to High1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsALT - Normal to High612 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsIndirect Bilirubin - Low to High0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsALT - Low to High0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsDirect Bilirubin - Normal to High21 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsALP - Normal to High350 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentseGFR - Mild Impairment to Severe Impairment9 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With First Occurrence of CV Death, MI, or Stroke

Time frame: From the time of randomization through 365 days

Population: Analysis was performed on the ITT analysis set. The ITT analysis set comprised all randomized participants with the exception of 7 participants enrolled at site(s) excluded from analysis per sponsor decision. The ITT analysis set utilized the treatment to which the participant was randomized regardless of the treatment actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CSL112Number of Participants With First Occurrence of CV Death, MI, or Stroke885 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With First Occurrence of CV Death, MI, or Stroke944 Participants
p-value: 0.06995% CI: [0.8511, 1.0224]Cox proportional hazards regression
Secondary

Number of Participants With First Occurrence of CV Death, MI, or Stroke

Time frame: From the time of randomization through 180 days

Population: Analysis was performed on the ITT analysis set. The ITT analysis set comprised all randomized participants with the exception of 7 participants enrolled at site(s) excluded from analysis per sponsor decision. The ITT analysis set utilized the treatment to which the participant was randomized regardless of the treatment actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CSL112Number of Participants With First Occurrence of CV Death, MI, or Stroke622 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With First Occurrence of CV Death, MI, or Stroke683 Participants
p-value: 0.03895% CI: [0.8132, 1.0106]Cox proportional hazards regression
Secondary

Number of Participants With First Occurrence of CV Death, Type 1 MI or Stroke

Time frame: From the time of randomization through 90, 180 and 365 days

Population: Analysis was performed on the ITT analysis set. The ITT analysis set comprised all randomized participants with the exception of 7 participants enrolled at site(s) excluded from analysis per sponsor decision. The ITT analysis set utilized the treatment to which the participant was randomized regardless of the treatment actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CSL112Number of Participants With First Occurrence of CV Death, Type 1 MI or StrokeThrough Day 90272 Participants
CSL112Number of Participants With First Occurrence of CV Death, Type 1 MI or StrokeThrough Day 180400 Participants
CSL112Number of Participants With First Occurrence of CV Death, Type 1 MI or StrokeThrough Day 365594 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With First Occurrence of CV Death, Type 1 MI or StrokeThrough Day 90308 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With First Occurrence of CV Death, Type 1 MI or StrokeThrough Day 180444 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With First Occurrence of CV Death, Type 1 MI or StrokeThrough Day 365639 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With First Occurrence of MI

Time frame: From the time of randomization through 90 days

Population: Analysis was performed on the ITT analysis set. The ITT analysis set comprised all randomized participants with the exception of 7 participants enrolled at site(s) excluded from analysis per sponsor decision. The ITT analysis set utilized the treatment to which the participant was randomized regardless of the treatment actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CSL112Number of Participants With First Occurrence of MI312 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With First Occurrence of MI342 Participants
p-value: 0.11395% CI: [0.7801, 1.0603]Cox proportional hazards regression
Secondary

Number of Participants With First Occurrence of Stroke

Time frame: From the time of randomization through 90 days

Population: Analysis was performed on the ITT analysis set. The ITT analysis set comprised all randomized participants with the exception of 7 participants enrolled at site(s) excluded from analysis per sponsor decision. The ITT analysis set utilized the treatment to which the participant was randomized regardless of the treatment actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CSL112Number of Participants With First Occurrence of Stroke57 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With First Occurrence of Stroke49 Participants
p-value: 0.76795% CI: [0.7867, 1.6886]Cox proportional hazards regression
Secondary

Number of Participants With Occurrence of All-cause Death

Time frame: From the time of randomization through 365 days

Population: Analysis was performed on the ITT analysis set. The ITT analysis set comprised all randomized participants with the exception of 7 participants enrolled at site(s) excluded from analysis per sponsor decision. The ITT analysis set utilized the treatment to which the participant was randomized regardless of the treatment actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CSL112Number of Participants With Occurrence of All-cause Death341 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Occurrence of All-cause Death345 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Occurrence of CV Death

Time frame: From the time of randomization through 90 days

Population: Analysis was performed on the ITT analysis set. The ITT analysis set comprised all randomized participants with the exception of 7 participants enrolled at site(s) excluded from analysis per sponsor decision. The ITT analysis set utilized the treatment to which the participant was randomized regardless of the treatment actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CSL112Number of Participants With Occurrence of CV Death107 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Occurrence of CV Death128 Participants
p-value: 0.07495% CI: [0.6399, 1.0695]Cox proportional hazards regression
Secondary

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or is a medically significant event.

Time frame: From the start of treatment through 379 days (Day 365 + 14 days of follow up)

Population: Analysis was performed on the SAS. The SAS comprised all participants in the ITT Analysis set who received any amount of the investigational product, and were analyzed based on the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CSL112Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)1514 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)1557 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events

Treatment-related AEs were AEs considered by the Investigator to have a causal relationship to the investigational product.

Time frame: From the start of treatment through 379 days (Day 365 + 14 days of follow up)

Population: Analysis was performed on the SAS. The SAS comprised all participants in the ITT Analysis set who received any amount of the investigational product, and were analyzed based on the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CSL112Number of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events350 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events304 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal, clinically significant laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal (investigational) product.

Time frame: From the start of treatment through 90 days

Population: Analysis was performed on the SAS. The SAS comprised all participants in the ITT Analysis set who received any amount of the investigational product, and were analyzed based on the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CSL112Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events43.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events43.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory Assessments

Clinical laboratory assessments included assessment of Hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, leukocytes and platelets) and Biochemistry (ALP, ALT, AST, bilirubin, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin and eGFR). Percentage of participants with a shift from the Baseline value to the worst post-treatment value (low, normal, or high) was reported. The worst criterion for the parameters is as follows: hematocrit - low, hemoglobin - low, leukocytes - high, platelets - low, ALT - high, ALP - high, AST - high, bilirubin - high, direct bilirubin - high, indirect bilirubin - high, eGFR - severe impairment. As per the study SAP, descriptive percentages were displayed to one decimal place, hence the percentage values were rounded off and presented.

Time frame: Baseline and 29 days

Population: Analysis was performed on the SAS. The SAS comprised all participants in the ITT Analysis set who received any amount of the investigational product, and were analyzed based on the actual treatment received. Here, the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed (N), included all participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure and the Number Analyzed (n), included all participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure for the specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CSL112Percentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsHematocrit - High to Low0.0 percentage of participants
CSL112Percentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsHematocrit - Normal to Low5.3 percentage of participants
CSL112Percentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsHemoglobin - High to Low0.0 percentage of participants
CSL112Percentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsHemoglobin - Normal to Low6.3 percentage of participants
CSL112Percentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsLeukocytes - Normal to High3.7 percentage of participants
CSL112Percentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsLeukocytes - Low to High0.0 percentage of participants
CSL112Percentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsPlatelets - High to Low0.0 percentage of participants
CSL112Percentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsPlatelets - Normal to Low1.3 percentage of participants
CSL112Percentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsALT - Normal to High8.3 percentage of participants
CSL112Percentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsALT - Low to High0.0 percentage of participants
CSL112Percentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsALP - Normal to High3.7 percentage of participants
CSL112Percentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsALP - Low to High0.0 percentage of participants
CSL112Percentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsAST - Normal to High3.0 percentage of participants
CSL112Percentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsAST - Low to High0.0 percentage of participants
CSL112Percentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsBilirubin - Normal to High0.9 percentage of participants
CSL112Percentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsBilirubin - Low to High0.0 percentage of participants
CSL112Percentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsDirect Bilirubin - Normal to High0.2 percentage of participants
CSL112Percentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsDirect Bilirubin - Low to High0.0 percentage of participants
CSL112Percentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsIndirect Bilirubin - Normal to High0.4 percentage of participants
CSL112Percentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsIndirect Bilirubin - Low to High0.0 percentage of participants
CSL112Percentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentseGFR - Normal to Severe Impairment0.0 percentage of participants
CSL112Percentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentseGFR - Mild Impairment to Severe Impairment0.2 percentage of participants
CSL112Percentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentseGFR - Moderate Impairment to Severe Impairment1.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsALP - Low to High0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsHematocrit - High to Low0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsDirect Bilirubin - Low to High0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsHematocrit - Normal to Low5.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsAST - Normal to High3.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsHemoglobin - High to Low0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentseGFR - Normal to Severe Impairment0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsHemoglobin - Normal to Low6.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsAST - Low to High0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsLeukocytes - Normal to High3.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsIndirect Bilirubin - Normal to High0.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsLeukocytes - Low to High0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsBilirubin - Normal to High1.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsPlatelets - High to Low0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentseGFR - Moderate Impairment to Severe Impairment1.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsPlatelets - Normal to Low1.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsBilirubin - Low to High0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsALT - Normal to High7.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsIndirect Bilirubin - Low to High0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsALT - Low to High0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsDirect Bilirubin - Normal to High0.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsALP - Normal to High4.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-treatment Value in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentseGFR - Mild Impairment to Severe Impairment0.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With SAEs

SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect or is a medically significant event. As per the study SAP, descriptive percentages were displayed to one decimal place, hence the percentage values were rounded off and presented.

Time frame: From the start of treatment through 379 days (Day 365 + 14 days of follow up)

Population: Analysis was performed on the SAS. The SAS comprised all participants in the ITT Analysis set who received any amount of the investigational product, and were analyzed based on the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CSL112Percentage of Participants With SAEs16.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With SAEs17.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events

Treatment-related AEs were AEs considered by the Investigator to have a causal relationship to the investigational product. As per the study statistical analysis plan (SAP), descriptive percentages were displayed to one decimal place, hence the percentage values were rounded off and presented.

Time frame: From the start of treatment through 379 days (Day 365 + 14 days of follow up)

Population: Analysis was performed on the SAS. The SAS comprised all participants in the ITT Analysis set who received any amount of the investigational product, and were analyzed based on the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CSL112Percentage of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events3.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events3.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Total Number of Hospitalizations for Coronary, Cerebral, and Peripheral Ischemia

The total number of hospitalizations and individual hospitalizations due to coronary, cerebral, and peripheral ischemia were reported.

Time frame: From the time of randomization through 90 days

Population: Analysis was performed on the ITT analysis set. The ITT analysis set comprised all randomized participants with the exception of 7 participants enrolled at site(s) excluded from analysis per sponsor decision. The ITT analysis set utilized the treatment to which the participant was randomized regardless of the treatment actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CSL112Total Number of Hospitalizations for Coronary, Cerebral, and Peripheral IschemiaTotal hospitalizations433 hospitalizations
CSL112Total Number of Hospitalizations for Coronary, Cerebral, and Peripheral IschemiaCoronary ischemia367 hospitalizations
CSL112Total Number of Hospitalizations for Coronary, Cerebral, and Peripheral IschemiaCerebral ischemia39 hospitalizations
CSL112Total Number of Hospitalizations for Coronary, Cerebral, and Peripheral IschemiaPeripheral ischemia27 hospitalizations
PlaceboTotal Number of Hospitalizations for Coronary, Cerebral, and Peripheral IschemiaPeripheral ischemia30 hospitalizations
PlaceboTotal Number of Hospitalizations for Coronary, Cerebral, and Peripheral IschemiaTotal hospitalizations442 hospitalizations
PlaceboTotal Number of Hospitalizations for Coronary, Cerebral, and Peripheral IschemiaCerebral ischemia36 hospitalizations
PlaceboTotal Number of Hospitalizations for Coronary, Cerebral, and Peripheral IschemiaCoronary ischemia376 hospitalizations
p-value: 0.34195% CI: [0.8442, 1.1171]Negative binomial regression model

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026