Skip to content

Satisfaction of Limited English-Proficient Patients With Phone Interpretation Services Compared to In-Person Interpreters: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Urogynecological Office Visits and Patient Satisfaction of Limited English-Proficient Patients With Phone Interpreter Services Compared to In-Person Interpreters: Randomized Controlled Trial (SIPI)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03470194
Acronym
SIPI
Enrollment
106
Registered
2018-03-19
Start date
2017-12-15
Completion date
2019-06-15
Last updated
2021-04-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Floor Disorders

Keywords

Quality Care, Access to health care, Interpretation services

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to determine if In-person interpreters increases patient satisfaction of URGYN office visits compared to the use of phone interpreter services for Limited English Proficient (LEP) patients

Detailed description

This study is a randomized controlled trial. Patients presenting to the UMass Memorial UROGYN clinic will be screened for eligibility using the inclusion and exclusion criteria. LEP patients will be identified as patients that initiate conversation in a non-English language and are only able to communicate adequately regarding their medical problem in a non-English language. After patients have been seen for their scheduled office visit, they will be invited to participate in the study. Once the patient has agreed to participate in the study the participant will be randomized. Study assignment will be revealed using sequentially numbered sealed opaque envelopes. Randomization will be performed using software and a block randomization scheme to yield a 50% chance of having an in-person interpreter. Those assigned to the control group will receive phone translation services and the experimental group will have in person interpreters. At the subsequent visit, demographic information will be collected and patients will then receive interpretation services from the phone or an in-person interpreter.

Interventions

OTHERInterpretation Modality: In Person

Use of In-Person interpretation support for LEP participant during clinical appointment

OTHERInterpretation Modality: Telephonic

Use of telephonic interpretation support for LEP participant during clinical appointment

Sponsors

University of Massachusetts, Worcester
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* LEP speaking Spanish and Portuguese female patients presenting to the U Mass UROGYN clinic with or without Ad-hoc interpreters * Spanish and Portuguese speaking female patients with LEP presenting to the U Mass UROGYN clinic for an office visit of any type

Exclusion criteria

* Unable to provide consent * Under 18 years of age * Pregnant women * Prisoners * LEP subjects who decline interpreter services * Non -Spanish or Non - Portuguese speaking subjects * Patients with cognitive impairment * Visually or hearing impaired patients * Patients not requiring a follow up appointment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient SatisfactionImmediately assessed after office visitPatient satisfaction will be measured by a 14 - item questionnaire. The questionnaire was created, validated, and used in a previous study from the field of Emergency medicine. There are 3 subscales assessing patient satisfaction with interpreter, nursing, and physician. Satisfaction with interpreters was calculated using the summation index of 4 items. Satisfaction with physician and nursing communication was measure by a summated index of 5 items that measure increasing level of satisfaction with a likert scale. Answers ranged from 1 to 4 where 4 equaled strongly agree and 1 equaled strongly disagree. All items were weighted on a 100 point scale to facilitate interpretation of the means. A lower score means less satisfaction/greater dissatisfaction and a higher score indicates more satisfaction/less dissatisfaction.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Interpretation Modality: In Person
Participants assigned to this group will use an in person interpreter for the duration of the UROGYN office visit Interpretation Modality: In Person: Use of In-Person interpretation support for LEP participant during clinical appointment
49
Interpretation Modality: Telephonic
Participants assigned to this group will use a phone interpreter for the duration of the UROGYN office visit Interpretation Modality: Telephonic: Use of telephonic interpretation support for LEP participant during clinical appointment
57
Total106

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1117

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInterpretation Modality: TelephonicTotalInterpretation Modality: In Person
Age, Continuous52.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8
54.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
55.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
30 Participants55 Participants25 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
27 Participants51 Participants24 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Language of Translation
Portugese
27 Participants51 Participants24 Participants
Language of Translation
Spanish
30 Participants55 Participants25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
57 Participants106 Participants49 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 380 / 40
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 380 / 40
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 380 / 40

Outcome results

Primary

Patient Satisfaction

Patient satisfaction will be measured by a 14 - item questionnaire. The questionnaire was created, validated, and used in a previous study from the field of Emergency medicine. There are 3 subscales assessing patient satisfaction with interpreter, nursing, and physician. Satisfaction with interpreters was calculated using the summation index of 4 items. Satisfaction with physician and nursing communication was measure by a summated index of 5 items that measure increasing level of satisfaction with a likert scale. Answers ranged from 1 to 4 where 4 equaled strongly agree and 1 equaled strongly disagree. All items were weighted on a 100 point scale to facilitate interpretation of the means. A lower score means less satisfaction/greater dissatisfaction and a higher score indicates more satisfaction/less dissatisfaction.

Time frame: Immediately assessed after office visit

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Interpretation Modality: In PersonPatient Satisfaction100 score on a scale
Interpretation Modality: TelephonicPatient Satisfaction94 score on a scale
p-value: =0.002Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026