Skip to content

The Comparison Between Traditional Laparoscopy-assisted Surgery and NOSES in Radical Resection of Colorectal Cancer

The Comparison Between Traditional Laparoscopy-assisted Surgery and Total Laparoscopic Surgery With no Incision (Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery,NOSES) in Radical Resection of Colorectal Cancer

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03470142
Enrollment
158
Registered
2018-03-19
Start date
2018-03-20
Completion date
2022-03-20
Last updated
2019-09-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Laparoscopy-assisted Surgery, Total Laparoscopic Surgery With no Incision (Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery, NOSES)

Keywords

laparoscopy-assisted surgery, NOSES

Brief summary

This study is to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of traditional laparoscopy-assisted surgery and total laparoscopic surgery with no incision (natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, NOSES) for colorectal cancer and to find a better surgical method for patients.

Interventions

PROCEDUREtraditional laparoscopy-assisted surgery

All surgical procedures will be performed by the surgery team ,which is leaded by professor Sun Dong-Hui and Wang Quan. The traditional laparoscopic operation undergo and then a small incision(5cm) is made in the middle of the lower abdominal wall to trim the mesangial membrane and remove the specimen. At last the anastomosis operation undergo by the laparoscopic operation.

PROCEDUREtotal laparoscopic surgery with no incision (natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, NOSES)

All surgical procedures will be performed by the surgery team ,which is leaded by professor Sun Dong-Hui and Wang Quan. The whole procedures undergo by total laparoscopic surgery with no incision in the abdominal wall. The specimen then will be removed through natural orifice (anal).

Sponsors

Dong Yang
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. All cases should be diagnosed as rectal or sigmoid colon cancer by histology or cytology. The tumor is 5-20cm from the pectinate line. The clinical stage is T1-2, N0, M0 for rectal cancer and T1-T3, N0-2, M0 for sigmoid colon cancer. 2. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale 0-2 3. Heart, lung, liver, and kidney function can tolerate operation 4. Patients and their families are able to understand and be willing to participate in this clinical study and to sign informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. history of colorectal malignant disease 2. recent diagnosis of other malignant tumors (except for papillary carcinoma of the thyroid gland and basal cell carcinoma of the skin) 3. patients with intestinal obstruction, intestinal perforation, bleeding requiring emergency surgery 4. a history of abdominal surgery (which makes it difficult to perform laparoscopic procedures), severe systemic disease such as diabetes, severe chronic lung disease, cirrhosis, other malignant diseases 5. combined colorectal multiple carcinomas 6. poor anal function before operation and incontinence of defecation 7. with a history of serious mental illness 8. pregnant or lactating women 9. The researchers believe that the patients are unsuitable to participate in the researchers with other cases. A patient or family refusal to join

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the incidence of complicationsone month after surgeryAll postoperative complications in the perioperative period will be classified by the Clavien-Dindo classification.The classification mainly focuses on the medical perspective, with major emphasis on the risk and invasiveness of the therapy used to correct a complication. From light to heavy, it consists of five grades (Ⅰ to Ⅴ)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the blood loss during the operationin the perioperative periodThe descriptive name of unit would be millilitre (ml).
Postoperative recovery of intestinal peristalsisin the perioperative periodThe descriptive name of unit would be hour (h).
Visual Analogue Scale/Scorein the perioperative periodA Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a measurement instrument that tries to measure a characteristic or attitude that is believed to range across a continuum of values and cannot easily be directly measured.It is often used in epidemiologic and clinical research to measure the intensity or frequency of various symptoms.For example, the amount of pain that a patient feels ranges across a continuum from none to an extreme amount of pain ( from 0 to 10).
the operation timein the perioperative periodThe descriptive name of unit would be minute (min).
3-year disease-free survivalthree years after operation
cases converted to laparotomyin the perioperative periodThe procedure for cases who underwent laparoscopy-assisted surgery or NOSES can not go successfully, and then it will be converted to laparotomy. The number of all those cases should be recorded.
The mean postoperative hospital stayin the perioperative periodThe descriptive name of unit would be day (d).
the functional outcome of defecation, if there is incontinenceThree months after operationAnal incontinence was evaluated using the Wexner Continence Grading Scale , the score being calculated after the patients' completion of a daily defecatory questionnaire. Range is from 0 (normal continence) to 20 (maximum incontinence with maximum disturbance of lifestyle).

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactDong Yang, Master
714488468@qq.com
Backup ContactQuan Wang, Doctor
wangquanjdyy@163.com043181875602

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026