Chronic Hip Pain
Conditions
Keywords
Bone apposition, Stryker, MRI, Trident II, Total Hip Replacement
Brief summary
The study aims to describe bone apposition and fixation of the Trident and Trident II Tritatnium acetabular system in patients 1 year status post total hip replacement. We will be studying this by comparing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)s taken 1 year s/p total hip replacement with a Trident II cup with MRI's taken of patients with the Trident Cup who had MRIs done at 1 year post-op.
Interventions
Patients who are part of Arm 2 will undergo an MRI at their 1 year post-operative visit.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
1 control group who have had been implanted with a Trident cup and have already had MRIs taken at their one year post-operative visit. This group's MRI's will be compared with MRI's from Tridend II patients who have had MRI's at 1 year post-operative visit.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Patients who had a primary total hip replacement with a Stryker Trident II acetabular cup that have one year or more follow up. 2. Patients that are willing able able to have an MRI at their one year follow up visit. 3. Patients entered into the CORRe database (our HSS institutional joint replacement registry).
Exclusion criteria
1. Patients who have not been consented as part of the CORRe database. 2. Patients who are unable or refuse to have an MRI at their 1 year follow up.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Comparison of bone apposition and fixation in patients with the Trident II Tritanium hip system with bone apposition and fixation in patients with Trident cups. | 1 year |
Countries
United States