Skip to content

Intracorporeal vs Extracorporeal Urinary Diversion After Robot Assisted Radical Cystectomy

Randomized Clinical Trial of Intracorporeal vs Extracorporeal Urinary Diversion After Robot Assisted Radical Cystectomy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03469362
Enrollment
38
Registered
2018-03-19
Start date
2018-04-25
Completion date
2024-09-11
Last updated
2025-03-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bladder Cancer

Brief summary

Intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICD) provides superior postoperative outcomes compared to extracorporeal urinary diversion (ECD). The investigators' hypothesis that ICD may provide clinical benefit is based on principles of less bowel and ureteral handling, superior operating room workflow, less exposure to the external environment, and optimal visualization with ICD while utilizing a smaller incision compared to ECD. ICD should have less bowel-related complications, lower pain scores allowing patients to be discharged from the hospital sooner and regain functional independence more quickly.

Interventions

PROCEDUREExtracorporeal Urinary Diversion

Extra-corporeal urinary diversion, provided as part of standard of care, will have the ureters sutured into the ileal conduit by hand.

PROCEDUREIntracorporal Urinary Diversion

Intracorporal Urinary Diversion, provided as part of standard of care, will have the ureters sutured into the ileal conduit using the Da Vinci robot.

Sponsors

University of Miami
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Biopsy-proven urothelial cancer being considered for RARC. * Clinical stage T1-T4, N0-1, M0 or refractory carcinoma in situ. * Subject must be already scheduled to have a RARC at the discretion of the surgeon and with the patient's agreement.

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to give informed consent * Prior major abdominal and pelvic open surgical procedures that would preclude a safe robotic approach, as determined by the treating surgeon. * At the discretion of the treating surgeon, any pre-existing condition such as severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease that precludes a safe initiation or maintenance of pneumoperitoneum over a prolonged period of time and during surgery. * Age \<18 or \>99 years.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
90-day Major Post-Operative Complication Rate90 daysMajor complication rate at 90-days from RARC + urinary diversion using the modified Clavien-Dindo grading system. Major complication is defined as Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥ 3.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Length of Hospital Stay in ECD vs ICD Study ParticipantsAbout 2 weeksLength of hospital stay for study participants undergoing ECD versus ICD urinary diversion post-RARC, as recorded at hospital discharge.
90-day Readmission Rate90 daysRate of readmission to hospital at 90 days post-RARC followed by ECD or ICD urinary diversion.
Rate of Return to the Operating room within 90 daysUp to 90 daysRate of return to the operating room within 90 days after RARC followed by ICD or ECD Urinary Diversion.
Mortality Rate at 90 days90 daysRate of mortality (death) at 90 days in study participants
Rate of Bowel-Specific ComplicationsUp to 36 monthsRate of bowel-specific complications in study participants (including incidence of mechanical bowel obstruction, anastomotic leaks, and surgical site infections) and post operative pain. Bowel-specific complications will be assessed using the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.
90-day Any Post-Operative Complication Rate90 daysAny complication rates at 90-days from RARC + urinary diversion, using the modified Clavien-Dindo grading system as low grade (1-2) or high grade (3-5).
Functional Independence Recovery as measured by the IADL QuestionnaireUp to 36 monthsRate of functional independence recovery as measured by an aggregate of patient-reported scores on the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) questionnaire. For the IADL, the total score ranges from 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating functional functional improvement and lower scores indicating functional deterioration.
Functional Independence Recovery as measured by the Hand Grip Strength Test.Up to 36 monthsThe Hand Grip Strength Test measures the amount of static force that a participant's hand can squeeze around a dynamometer. The test is measured in kilograms.
Functional Independence Recovery as measured by the Timed Up and Go (TUG) Walking TestUp to 36 monthsThe TUG test times participants as they rise from a standard chair, walk 3 meters, turn, walk back and sit again. The test is measured in seconds.
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) as assessed by SF-8 Health SurveyUp to 36 monthsHRQoL measured by patient scores on the Short Form 8 (SF-8) Health Survey. The SF-8 is a questionnaire consisting of 8-items and two component summary scores: Physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS). They are scored by weighting each score to a norm-based scoring model. The total scores will be reported as a percentile with higher score indicating better health-related quality of life.
HRQoL as assessed by the FACT-VCI QuestionnaireUp to 36 monthsHRQoL measured by patient scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Vanderbilt Cystectomy Index (FACT-VCI) questionnaire. The FACT-VCI is a condition-specific instrument for patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) and urinary diversion (UD) for bladder cancer. The questionnaire consists of 44 items scored on a range from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very Much), resulting in an ordinal Likert scale, with higher scores indicating a better HRQoL. The FACT-VCI measures quality of life across five domains: Physical wellbeing, social/family wellbeing, emotional wellbeing, functional wellbeing and an additional concerns subscale.
Functional Independence Recovery as measured by the ADL QuestionnaireUp to 36 monthsRate of functional independence recovery as measured by patient-reported scores on the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) questionnaire. For the ADL, the total score ranges from 0 to 6, with the higher scores indicating functional improvement and lower scores indicating functional deterioration.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026