Skip to content

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sirolimus Versus Everolimus Versus Mycophenolate in Kidney Transplantation

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sirolimus, Everolimus or Mycophenolate in Renal Transplant Recipients Receiving Induction With Anti-thymocyte Globulin, Tacrolimus and Prednisone

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03468478
Acronym
SEM
Enrollment
1209
Registered
2018-03-16
Start date
2017-06-18
Completion date
2021-08-23
Last updated
2023-04-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kidney Transplant Infection

Brief summary

This study was designed to compare 3 immunosuppression regimens: sirolimus and tacrolimus versus everolimus and tacrolimus versus mycophenolate and tacrolimus. The primary outcome is the incidence of cytomegalovirus infection / disease, a relevant medical need in the absence of pharmacological prophylaxis.

Interventions

DRUGSirolimus

sirolimus combined to reduced dose of tacrolimus

DRUGEverolimus

everolimus combined to reduced dose of tacrolimus

DRUGMycophenolic acid

Control arm: mycophenolate combined to regular tacrolimus

Sponsors

Hospital do Rim e Hipertensão
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Recipients, adults of the first living or deceased donor kidney transplant; 2. Patients who agreed to participate in the study and signed the informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

1. Receptors with a medical history of nephrotic syndrome or focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis confirmed as the etiology of end-stage renal disease; 2. Receptors with poor understanding about chronic kidney disease and its treatment alternatives; 3. Receptors with early history of non compliance to treatment with immunosuppressive drugs; 4. Retransplantation; 5. Multi-organ recipients; 6. Recipients with BMI\> 30 kg / m2; 7. KDPI\> 80%; 8. Cold ischemia time greater than 24 hours; 9. Receptors with a percentage of anti-HLA antibodies above 50%, either class I or Class II; 10. Women of childbearing potential who do not undertake contraceptive methods (condoms or oral contraceptives). 11. Patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy prior to transplantation, except low dose of prednisone; 12. Patients with severe uncontrolled dyslipidemia; 13. Patients who have a known contraindication for administration of any of the immunosuppressive drugs provided for in this study;

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Cytomegalovirus Infection or Disease12 months follow upIncidence of CMV infection/disease in three study groups (SRL, EVR anda MPS).

Countries

Brazil

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sirolimus +Tacrolimus
Patients will receive initial dose of 0,05 mg/kg BID oftacrolimus to reach blood trough concentration between 3-5 ng/mL. Initial dose of sirolimus of 3mg once a day to reach blood trough concentration between 4-8 ng/mL. Sirolimus: sirolimus combined to reduced dose of tacrolimus
86
Everolimus +Tacrolimus
Patients will receive initial dose of 0,05 mg/kg BID de tacrolimus to reach blood trough concentration between 3-5 ng/mL. Initial dose of 1.5 mg BID of everolimus to reach blood trough concentration between 4-8 ng/mL. Everolimus: everolimus combined to reduced dose of tacrolimus
90
Mycophenolate +Tacrolimus
Patients will receive initial dose of 0,1 mg/kg BID de tacrolimusto reach blood trough concentration between Fixed dose of mycophenolate (mycophenolate mofetil, 1 g BID or sodium mycophenolate, 720 mg BID). Mycophenolic acid: Control arm: mycophenolate combined to regular tacrolimus
90
Total266

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSirolimus +TacrolimusTotalMycophenolate +TacrolimusEverolimus +Tacrolimus
Age, Continuous43.35 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
44.01 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.18
44.15 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.32
44.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.76
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
7 Participants32 Participants16 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
17 Participants55 Participants13 Participants25 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
61 Participants177 Participants60 Participants56 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
86 participants266 participants90 participants90 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants74 Participants23 Participants29 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
64 Participants192 Participants67 Participants61 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 861 / 903 / 90
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 860 / 900 / 90
serious
Total, serious adverse events
43 / 8647 / 9071 / 90

Outcome results

Primary

Incidence of Cytomegalovirus Infection or Disease

Incidence of CMV infection/disease in three study groups (SRL, EVR anda MPS).

Time frame: 12 months follow up

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sirolimus +TacrolimusIncidence of Cytomegalovirus Infection or Disease9 Participants
Everolimus +TacrolimusIncidence of Cytomegalovirus Infection or Disease7 Participants
Mycophenolate +TacrolimusIncidence of Cytomegalovirus Infection or Disease39 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026