Urethral Injury
Conditions
Brief summary
It is prospective randomized comparative clinical trial comparing primary urethral realignment vs. suprapubic cystostomy in initial management of pediatric pelvic fracture urethral injury regarding: 1. The success rate after initial intervention. 2. The need for urethroplasty in the failed realignment group and cystostomy group. 3. The success rate of urethroplasty in the failed realignment group and cystostomy group.
Interventions
Endoscopic realignment of rupture urethra over a urethral catheter
Percutaneous cystostomy catheter will be inserted under sonographic guidance
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Male children less than 18 years presenting with pelvic fracture urethral injury
Exclusion criteria
* Associated bladder neck injury. * Associated rectal injury. * Late presentation \>2weeks since trauma. * History of previous urethral intervention.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The success rate after initial intervention (realignment or suprapubic cystostomy). | 3 months after initial intervention. | The fulfillment of success criteria after initial intervention which includes good stream, no postvoid residual urine, normal Qmax for age and free retrograde urethrogram |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The success rate of urethroplasty in both groups. | 3 months after urethroplasty. | The surgical outcome of urethroplasty in cases of children with posterior urethral stricture after failed realignment or suprapubic cystostomy. |
| The need for urethroplasty in both groups. | 3 months after initial intervention | Comparison of the need for urethroplasty in children with failed realignment or suprapubic cystostomy. |