Skip to content

HAIC of FOLFOX vs. HAIC of OXA for Advanced HCC

Sorafenib Plus Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy of Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil/Leucovorin Versus Sorafenib Plus Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy of Oxaliplatin for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Major Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03468231
Enrollment
300
Registered
2018-03-16
Start date
2018-03-09
Completion date
2020-03-09
Last updated
2018-03-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Keywords

Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, Sorafenib, Oxaliplatin plus Fluorouracil/Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) of oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil/leucovorin compared with HAIC of oxaliplatin alone in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with major portal venous tumor thrombus (PVTT).

Detailed description

Sorafenib is the most widely used palliative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal venous tumor thrombus (PVTT). Our previous prospective study revealed that sorafenib combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) of oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil/leucovorin confer a survival benefit to HCC with major PVTT. However, HAIC of fluorouracil is not such for advanced HCC. Whether HAIC of oxaliplatin is as effective as HAIC of oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil/leucovorin is controversial. Thus, the investigators carried out this prospective randomized control study to find out it.

Interventions

DRUGSorafenib

Oral Sorafenib, 400mg, Bid

administration of Oxaliplatin , fluorouracil, and leucovorin via the tumor feeding arteries

administration of Oxaliplatin via the tumor feeding arteries

Sponsors

First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
CollaboratorOTHER
Dongguan People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Kaiping Central Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University
CollaboratorOTHER
Guangzhou No.12 People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
The First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China
CollaboratorOTHER
Sun Yat-sen University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

In the OXA group, saline replace the fluorouracil and leucovorin solution and patients are treated the same time as the FOLFOX group.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

The diagnosis of HCC was based on the diagnostic criteria for HCC used by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) * Patients must have at least one tumor lesion that can be accurately measured according to EASL criteria. * diagnosed with major or main portal vein invasion (Vp3 or Vp4) * KPS≥70; * with no previous treatment * No Cirrhosis or cirrhotic status of Child-Pugh class A only * Not amendable to surgical resection ,local ablative therapy and any other cured treatment. * The following laboratory parameters: * Platelet count ≥ 75,000/µL * Hemoglobin ≥ 8.5 g/dL * Total bilirubin ≤ 30mmol/L * Serum albumin ≥ 30 g/L * ASL and AST ≤ 5 x upper limit of normal * Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal * INR ≤ 1.5 or PT/APTT within normal limits * Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \>1,500/mm3 * Ability to understand the protocol and to agree to and sign a written informed consent document

Exclusion criteria

* Evidence of hepatic decompensation including ascites, gastrointestinal bleeding or hepatic encephalopathy * Known history of HIV * History of organ allograft * Known or suspected allergy to the investigational agents or any agent given in association with this trial. * Cardiac ventricular arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy * Evidence of bleeding diathesis. * Patients with clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding within 30 days prior to study entry. * Any other hemorrhage/bleeding event \> CTCAE Grade 3 within 4 weeks of first dose of study drug * Serious non-healing wound, ulcer, or bone fracture * Known central nervous system tumors including metastatic brain disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall survival10 monthsOverall survival

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progress free survival10 monthsProgress free survival
Adverse Events30 daysNumber of adverse events. Postoperative adverse events were graded based on CTCAE v4.0
Number of of Patients developed Adverse Events30 daysNumber of of patients who developed adverse event. Postoperative adverse events were graded based on CTCAE v4.0
Tumor response10 monthsoverall response

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactMing Shi, MD
shiming@sysucc.org.cn(8620)-87343938
Backup ContactRongPing Guo, MD
guorp@sysucc.org.cn(8620)-87342266

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026