Skip to content

Short vs Long Arm Cast for Distal Radius Fractures: the Verona Trial

Short vs Long Arm Cast for Distal Radius Fractures: the Verona Trial. Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Short Arm Cast Versus Long Arm Cast in Conservative Management of Distal Radius Fractures

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03468023
Acronym
SLA-Ver
Enrollment
353
Registered
2018-03-16
Start date
2017-03-15
Completion date
2020-03-28
Last updated
2020-09-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Radius Fracture Distal

Keywords

Cast treatment, above-elbow cast, below-elbow cast, long arm cast, short arm cast

Brief summary

This study prospectively compares the performance of an above-elbow cast (long arm cast) and a below-elbow cast (short arm cast) to maintain reduction in conservatively managed distal radius fractures.

Detailed description

The choice of cast length in conservative management of distal radius fractures still represents a much debated controversy. Classic teaching was to immobilize the elbow to reduce risk of secondary displacement; however, short arm casts are felt to be equally effective with less complications and higher patient comfort. There is currently no conclusive evidence for or against immobilization of the elbow in patients treated with cast immobilization.

Interventions

PROCEDUREShort arm cast

Application of a below-elbow cast

PROCEDURELong arm cast

Application of an above-elbow cast

Sponsors

Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Non-inferiority trial aimed at comparing the non inferiority of a short arm cast (below elbow cast) as opposed to a long arm cast (below elbow cast) in terms of fracture reduction maintenance ratio. The sample size was selected as the highest required to test all non-inferiority thresholds and considering a drop-out percentage of 15%. Continuous values of all radiological parameters were used in order to keep results objective and reproducible. At the end of recruitment observed drop-out percentage was 26%.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of distal radius fracture * Indication to conservative treatment * Need for manipulation to reduce fracture

Exclusion criteria

* Open fractures * Existence of any skin lesion or wound that would impair cast treatment * Neurovascular deficits * Bilateral fractures * Association with any other fracture of the homolateral arm

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Secondary displacement ratio35 daysPercentage of fractures that displace during treatment as subjectively assessed on radiographs by investigators.
Variation of radial length35 daysDifference between radial length values as objectively measured on postreduction radiographs and endtreatment radiographs.
Variation of radial inclination35 daysDifference between radial inclination values as objectively measured on postreduction radiographs and endtreatment radiographs.
Variation of volar tilt35 daysDifference between volar tilt vaues as objectively measured on postreduction radiographs and endtreatment radiographs.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
DASH score35 daysDisability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score measured at the end of the treatment relating to patient's comfort during treatment.
SF-1235 daysShort Form 12 health questionnaire administered at the end of the treatment relating to patient's quality of life during treatment.
Post-treatment elbow range of motion (ROM)35 daysDegrees of extension, flexion, pronation and supination of the elbow measured at the end of the treatment.

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026