Skip to content

Innovative Gait Biofeedback Strategies for Stroke Rehabilitation

Innovative Biofeedback Strategies for Gait Training

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03466372
Enrollment
20
Registered
2018-03-15
Start date
2018-03-22
Completion date
2018-10-03
Last updated
2019-05-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gait, Hemiplegic, Stroke, Cardiovascular

Keywords

gait biofeedback, gait rehabilitation, paretic propulsion, gait motor learning

Brief summary

The long-term study goal is to develop a more engaging, motivating gait biofeedback methodologies specifically designed for post-stroke gait training. The current project aims to address fundamental questions regarding the optimal methodology to deliver AGRF biofeedback during gait, and the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of AGRF progression protocols for improved gait patterns and gait function. The study objectives are to (1) evaluate the immediate effects of biofeedback training methodology on gait biomechanics; and (2) evaluate the feasibility and short-term effects on gait performance of a real-time biofeedback protocol incorporating progression criteria (similar to those employed during clinical rehabilitative training).

Detailed description

Even after discharge from rehabilitation, residual gait deficits are prevalent in stroke survivors, leading to decreased walking speed and endurance. Because gait dysfunctions limit community mobility, stroke survivors and rehabilitation clinicians consider restoration of walking a major goal of rehabilitation. Biomechanical impairments, such as reduced knee and ankle flexion during swing phase negatively affect gait function and increase the risk for falls. During the stance phase, decreased contribution of the paretic leg to forward propulsion during paretic terminal stance is a critical post-stroke gait deficit shown to be correlated with hemiparetic severity, walking speed, and gait asymmetry. These gait deficits can lead to falls, increased energy cost of gait, and decreased endurance. Also, a slowed self-selected walking speed is one of the hallmarks of post-stroke gait, and greatly limits community participation in individuals post-stroke. Very few interventions provide targeted practice of biomechanically appropriate movement patterns exclusively or preferentially to the paretic leg. Biofeedback can enhance an individual's awareness of the impairment targeted during gait training, enabling self-correction of aberrant gait patterns. Real-time biofeedback gait training has been used for modulating step length asymmetry in people post-stroke. A recent study developed a protocol combining treadmill training with visual and auditory real-time biofeedback to increase anterior ground reaction force (AGRF). AGRF biofeedback may be a beneficial strategy to target unilateral propulsion deficits in people post-stroke. The goal of this study is to develop improved methodologies for AGRF gait biofeedback and to evaluate the feasibility and short-term effects of gait biofeedback. To achieve this goal, experiments will be performed on young able-bodied individuals as well as stroke survivors.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALbiofeedback

treadmill walking with biofeedback regarding propulsion and other gait parameters

Sponsors

Emory University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Stroke participants: * age 30-90 years (stroke) or 18-50 years (able-bodied controls) * chronic stroke (\>6 months post stroke) * ambulatory with or without the use of a cane or walker * able to walk for 2 minutes at the self-selected speed without an orthoses * resting heart rate 40-100 beats per minute Able-bodied participants: * age 18 to 50 years * no history of neurologic disease * no history of orthopedic disease or injury affecting the lower extremity.

Exclusion criteria

Stroke participants: * Cerebellar signs (ataxic (drunken) gait or decreased coordination during rapid alternating hand or foot movements * History of lower extremity joint replacement * Inability to communicate with investigators * Neglect/hemianopia, or unexplained dizziness in last 6 months * Neurologic conditions other than stroke * Orthopedic problems in the lower limbs or spine (or other medical conditions) that limit walking or cause pain during walking. Able-bodied controls * History of neurologic disease * History of orthopedic disease or injury to the lower extremity in the past 6 months * Pain or discomfort during walking * Cardiovascular or medical condition affecting ability to exercise or walk.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
paretic pushoff (AGRF)Immediately after the 6-minute biofeedback training bout (Post-0 minutes)peak GRF generated by the leg affected by the stroke

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
non-paretic peak AGRFImmediately after the 6-minute biofeedback training bout (Post-0 minutes)peak GRF generated by the leg not affected by the stroke
paretic trailing limb angleImmediately after the 6-minute biofeedback training bout (Post-0 minutes)angle measuring limb orientation with respect to vertical at terminal stance

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026