Skip to content

Clinical Trial Comparing Two Bladder Instillations for IC/BPS

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Different Bladder Instillation Treatments for Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03463915
Enrollment
90
Registered
2018-03-13
Start date
2019-01-25
Completion date
2020-10-23
Last updated
2021-09-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bladder Pain Syndrome, Interstitial Cystitis

Keywords

Interstitial cystitis, Bladder pain syndrome, IC/BPS, Women, Pelvic pain, Urologic pain, Bladder instillation, Kenalog, Steroid

Brief summary

Interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) is a condition that results in long-term bladder and pelvic pain. IC/BPS affects women more often than men. How the disorder develops is not completely known. Bladder instillation is a commonly used treatment in which a mixture of different ingredients are passed into the bladder to help IC/BPS symptoms. There is room to learn more about bladder instillations and which ingredients in them work best. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a bladder instillation that contains a steroid (triamcinolone acetonide) to a bladder instillation that does not contain a steroid to treat IC/BPS in women. The study hypothesis is that women with IC/BPS treated with bladder instillations that contain a steroid will have improved outcomes compared to women treated with bladder instillations that do not contain a steroid.

Detailed description

Interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) is a chronic pain disorder involving the genitourinary tract. IC/BPS disproportionately affects women with over 80% of patients with IC/BPS as female. Like other chronic pain conditions, IC/BPS is physically and emotionally taxing on patients. IC/BPS costs the United States over $100 million annually due to direct healthcare costs and loss of worker productivity. The exact pathophysiology of the disease is unknown, leading to a limitation in our ability to treat the disorder effectively. The current leading etiologic theory is that IC/BPS is a neurologically-derived chronic systemic pain syndrome due to its association with musculoskeletal pelvic pain, irritable bowel syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, and vulvodynia. Although several options exist to treat IC/BPS, therapeutic effects are often transient. Previous studies in chronic pain disorders have shown that multimodal treatment is more effective than single-agent treatment, so future therapy should aim to augment rather than replace current treatments. Bladder instillation is a commonly used treatment in which a mixture of different agents is instilled into the bladder to improve IC/BPS symptoms. The data on the efficacy of bladder instillations, as well as which ingredients in the mixture are effective, are limited. Small studies have shown the potential of steroids in decreasing IC/BPS; the mechanism of action is hypothesized to be due to decrease inflammation in the bladders of these patients. The knowledge gap that exists is the necessity of a steroid in the bladder instillation treatment for IC/BPS symptoms especially since this tends to be the most expensive ingredient. To evaluate the utility of a steroid in the bladder instillation treatment of IC/BPS, we propose a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial that will compare the efficacy of bladder instillations with and without triamcinolone acetonide on IC/BPS symptoms in women. We hypothesize that the addition of triamcinolone acetonide in bladder instillation therapy will result in a more robust treatment response than bladder instillations without triamcinolone acetonide. Our rationale is based on 1) the results of small studies that showed improvement of IC/BPS symptoms with use of a steroid and 2) the hypothesized mechanism of action of steroids decreasing inflammation in the bladder.

Interventions

DRUGBladder instillation WITH triamcinolone acetonide

Bladder instillation mixture of heparin (10,000 units), 2% viscous lidocaine (10 mL), 8.4% sodium bicarbonate (15 mL of 1 mEq/mL), 0.5% bupivacaine (10 mL of 5 mg/mL) plus triamcinolone acetonide (1 vial, 40 milligrams (mg)/1 milliliters (mL).

DRUGBladder instillation WITHOUT triamcinolone acetonide

Bladder instillation mixture of heparin (10,000 units), 2% viscous lidocaine (10 mL), 8.4% sodium bicarbonate (15 mL of 1 mEq/mL), and 0.5% bupivacaine (10 mL of 5 mg/mL).

Sponsors

Olivia Cardenas-Trowers, M.D.
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Women 18 years and older * Women with IC/BPS who have a score of ≥ 6 on either index (problem or symptom index) of the O'Leary-Sant questionnaire who have selected bladder instillations as part of their IC/BPS treatment * Suitability for follow-up

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications and/or allergies to the ingredients used in the bladder instillations * Diagnosis of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura * Does not desire to undergo bladder instillation therapy or unwilling to undergo bladder instillation therapy on schedule mandated by study * Have a known alternative diagnosis explaining bladder pain symptoms that would preclude the diagnosis of IC/BPS (e.g. radiation cystitis, active urinary tract infection with bacteria or fungus treated within last 2 weeks or diagnosed at index visit, bladder injury or trauma within the last 30 days) * Inability to speak or read English * Bladder instillation within the past 4 weeks

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Treatment Response as Measured by the Total Score on the O'Leary-Sant QuestionnaireAssessed at baseline, 3 and 6 weeks; change from baseline to week 6 reportedTotal scores range: 0-36 (0= no symptoms to 36= the most severe symptoms)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q)Assessed at baseline, 3 and 6 weeks; change from baseline to week 6 reportedTotal scores range: 0-100 (higher scores on the symptom-severity scale suggestive of greater severity of symptoms and higher scores on the quality-of-life scale suggestive of better quality of life)
Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI)Assessed at baseline, 3 and 6 weeks; change from baseline to week 6 reported20 question self-administered questionnaire on the presence and absence of pelvic floor symptoms. Score ranges from 0 (least distress) to 300 (most distress).
Pelvic Pain and Urgency/Frequency (PUF) QuestionnaireAssessed at baseline, 3 and 6 weeks; change from baseline to week 6 reportedTotal scores range: 0-35 (0= no symptoms to 35= the most severe symptoms)
Change From Baseline in Treatment Response as Measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for PainAssessed at baseline, 3 and 6 weeks; change from baseline to week 6 reportedVAS is measured on marking on a 10-centimeter (cm) ruler (measured in cm, 0= no pain and 10= most severe pain possible)
Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventEnd of study (6 weeks)Adverse events will only be those determined to be related to the study drug
Sexual Function Measured by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-Revised (PISQ-IR) QuestionnaireAssessed at baseline, 3 and 6 weeks; change from baseline to week 6 reportedMeasures sexual function in women with pelvic floor disorders. Queries about arousal, orgasm, partner-related issues, sexual quality, and desire. The tool also takes into account those who are not sexually active. The questionnaire was used in the study solely to determine if patients had improved dyspareunia (as a categorical variable).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were women with IC/BPS who were recruited from January 2019 to October 2020 from the University of Louisville Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery clinic in Louisville, KY.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Bladder Instillation WITH Triamcinolone Acetonide
Six weekly bladder instillations WITH triamcinolone acetonide: Bladder instillation mixture of heparin (10,000 units), 2% viscous lidocaine (10 mL), 8.4% sodium bicarbonate (15 mL of 1 mEq/mL), 0.5% bupivacaine (10 mL of 5 mg/mL) plus triamcinolone acetonide (1 vial, 40 mg/1 mL).
45
Bladder Instillation WITHOUT Triamcinolone Acetonide
Six weekly bladder instillations WITHOUT triamcinolone acetonide: mixture of heparin (10,000 units), 2% viscous lidocaine (10 mL), 8.4% sodium bicarbonate (15 mL of 1 mEq/mL), and 0.5% bupivacaine (10 mL of 5 mg/mL).
45
Total90

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBladder Instillation WITH Triamcinolone AcetonideBladder Instillation WITHOUT Triamcinolone AcetonideTotal
Age, Continuous37.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
46.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
42.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
45 participants45 participants90 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
45 Participants45 Participants90 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 450 / 45
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 451 / 45
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 450 / 45

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Treatment Response as Measured by the Total Score on the O'Leary-Sant Questionnaire

Total scores range: 0-36 (0= no symptoms to 36= the most severe symptoms)

Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 3 and 6 weeks; change from baseline to week 6 reported

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bladder Instillation WITH Triamcinolone AcetonideChange From Baseline in Treatment Response as Measured by the Total Score on the O'Leary-Sant Questionnaire-6.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.1
Bladder Instillation WITHOUT Triamcinolone AcetonideChange From Baseline in Treatment Response as Measured by the Total Score on the O'Leary-Sant Questionnaire-5.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Treatment Response as Measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain

VAS is measured on marking on a 10-centimeter (cm) ruler (measured in cm, 0= no pain and 10= most severe pain possible)

Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 3 and 6 weeks; change from baseline to week 6 reported

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bladder Instillation WITH Triamcinolone AcetonideChange From Baseline in Treatment Response as Measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain-1.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Bladder Instillation WITHOUT Triamcinolone AcetonideChange From Baseline in Treatment Response as Measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain-1.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Secondary

Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event

Adverse events will only be those determined to be related to the study drug

Time frame: End of study (6 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Bladder Instillation WITH Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event1 Participants
Bladder Instillation WITHOUT Triamcinolone AcetonideNumber of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event5 Participants
Secondary

Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q)

Total scores range: 0-100 (higher scores on the symptom-severity scale suggestive of greater severity of symptoms and higher scores on the quality-of-life scale suggestive of better quality of life)

Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 3 and 6 weeks; change from baseline to week 6 reported

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bladder Instillation WITH Triamcinolone AcetonideOveractive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q)-24.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.1
Bladder Instillation WITHOUT Triamcinolone AcetonideOveractive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q)-18.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.6
Secondary

Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI)

20 question self-administered questionnaire on the presence and absence of pelvic floor symptoms. Score ranges from 0 (least distress) to 300 (most distress).

Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 3 and 6 weeks; change from baseline to week 6 reported

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bladder Instillation WITH Triamcinolone AcetonidePelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI)-5.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.5
Bladder Instillation WITHOUT Triamcinolone AcetonidePelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI)-6.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.7
Secondary

Pelvic Pain and Urgency/Frequency (PUF) Questionnaire

Total scores range: 0-35 (0= no symptoms to 35= the most severe symptoms)

Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 3 and 6 weeks; change from baseline to week 6 reported

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bladder Instillation WITH Triamcinolone AcetonidePelvic Pain and Urgency/Frequency (PUF) Questionnaire-5.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.1
Bladder Instillation WITHOUT Triamcinolone AcetonidePelvic Pain and Urgency/Frequency (PUF) Questionnaire-2.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.5
Secondary

Sexual Function Measured by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-Revised (PISQ-IR) Questionnaire

Measures sexual function in women with pelvic floor disorders. Queries about arousal, orgasm, partner-related issues, sexual quality, and desire. The tool also takes into account those who are not sexually active. The questionnaire was used in the study solely to determine if patients had improved dyspareunia (as a categorical variable).

Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 3 and 6 weeks; change from baseline to week 6 reported

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Bladder Instillation WITH Triamcinolone AcetonideSexual Function Measured by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-Revised (PISQ-IR) Questionnaire4 participants
Bladder Instillation WITHOUT Triamcinolone AcetonideSexual Function Measured by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-Revised (PISQ-IR) Questionnaire4 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026