Skip to content

Cost-effectiveness of the Single-implant Mandibular Overdenture Versus Mandibular Conventional Denture

A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Alongside a Cost-effectiveness Analysis of the Mandibular Conventional Complete Denture Versus Single-implant Mandibular Overdenture

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03463174
Enrollment
80
Registered
2018-03-13
Start date
2015-03-10
Completion date
2017-10-31
Last updated
2018-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complete Edentulism, Mouth, Edentulous

Keywords

overdenture, edentulism, dental implant, cost-effectiveness, economic analysis, effectiveness

Brief summary

This is a randomized clinical trial designed to assess the 1-year effectiveness of two treatment modalities for the mandibular edentulists: conventional complete dentures and single-implant mandibular overdenture.

Detailed description

This randomized clinical trial alongside a cost-effectiveness analysis will include edentulous individuals who meet eligibility criteria. New maxillary and mandibular dentures will be fabricated for all participants following a standardized protocol. Then, participants will be randomized into one of the treatment groups: conventional complete denture group or single-implant mandibular overdenture group. Each participant allocated to the overdenture group will then receive an implant (Titamax TI cortical - Neodent, Brazil) in the mandibular midline followed by the immediate connection of an O-Ring/ball attachment with intra-oral incorporation of the retention system in the mandibular denture. Direct costs related to therapies in both groups will be identified, measured and valuated for one year after treatment and patient-reported outcomes will be assessed. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios will be estimated and graphically presented on cost-effectiveness planes. A Markov decision tree will be constructed to set out the consequences of the competing alternatives. Sensitivity analysis on the most important assumptions will be performed in order to assess the robustness of the model.

Interventions

Placement of an implant in the mandibular midline.

No intervention.

Sponsors

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Universidade Federal de Goias
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* To present favorable general health and the need to be rehabilitated with a new set of complete dentures * To agree to be randomly assigned to one of the two study groups * To be able to comprehend and answer the data collection instruments.

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of general health conditions that may contraindicate implant surgery (such as uncontrolled type II diabetes mellitus or uncontrolled cardiovascular conditions) * Insufficient height and volume in the midline region to receive an implant of at least 3.75mm x 9.0mm * Presence of evident signs of cognitive impairment and/or oral conditions requiring additional treatments, such as oral lesions and temporomandibular disorders * Inability to attend to the scheduled appointments and follow-up visits

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL)From baseline to 12 months after the interventionThe cross-culturally adapted Brazilian version of the Oral Health Impact Profile for edentulous subjects (OHIP-EDENT) will be used. It contains 19 items divided in four different subscale domains: (I) masticatory discomfort and disability (four items), (II) psychological discomfort and disability (five items), (III) social disability (five items), and (IV) oral pain and discomfort (five items). The items are answerable by a 3-point Likert scale and responses will be summed to result an overall score. Higher scores represent worse OHRQoL.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Satisfaction with the denturesFrom baseline to 12 months after the interventionParticipants will report how satisfied they are on a 0-100 scale by choosing a multiple of 10. Zero will be considered the least satisfied possible and 100 the most satisfied possible.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
CostsFrom denture's fabrication to 12 months after the interventionAll the direct dental costs related to the clinical and laboratory phases of both treatment groups will be listed, measured and valued.

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026