Neglect, Hemispatial, Stroke
Conditions
Keywords
stroke, neglect, virtual reality, head mount display, rehabilitation
Brief summary
Head-mounted display based virtual reality rehabilitation for hemispatial neglect.
Detailed description
The investigators examine about the efficacy of field-of-regard-focused visual exploration therapy implemented using a head-mounted display virtual reality system for hemispatial neglect rehabilitation following stroke.
Interventions
field of regard-focused visual exploration therapy in addition to conventional therapy
conventional therapy for stroke rehabilitation
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* presence of left hemispatial neglect as demonstrated by a score above the cut-off on the line bisection test or star cancellation test of the Behavioral Inattention Test, or mild-to-moderate neglect-related functional impairment defined by a score of 1-20 points on the Catherine Bergego Scale * age 19 to 65 years * first-time right hemispheric ischemic or haemorrhagic stroke as evidenced by brain imaging and medical records * a score \>25 on the Mini-Mental State Examination
Exclusion criteria
* presence of oculomotor palsies or visual defects as assessed via standard neurological examination * orthopaedic disorders affecting neck movement * inability to maintain a seated position.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Field of regard-response time | Baseline, 4 weeks from baseline, 8 weeks from baseline | time interval between target onset and response with field of regard setting |
| Change in Field of regard-success rate | Baseline, 4 weeks from baseline, 8 weeks from baseline | percentage of correct responses (clicking the left or right mouse button in response to a blue or red target, respectively) with field of regard setting |
| Change in Field of regard-head movement | Baseline, 4 weeks from baseline, 8 weeks from baseline | sum of all quantified head-rotations with field of regard setting |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Star cancellation test | Baseline, 4 weeks from baseline, 8 weeks from baseline | The experimenter crossed out the two small, central stars of the sheet as an example, following which participants were asked to mark the remaining small stars. |
| Field of view-response time | Baseline, 4 weeks from baseline, 8 weeks from baseline | time interval between target onset and response with field of view setting |
| Catherine Bergego Scale | Baseline, 4 weeks from baseline, 8 weeks from baseline | a standardised checklist designed to detect the degree of neglect during everyday life via direct observation of functioning during ten tasks |
| Field of view-success rate | Baseline, 4 weeks from baseline, 8 weeks from baseline | percentage of correct responses (clicking the left or right mouse button in response to a blue or red target, respectively) with field of view setting |
| Line bisection test | Baseline, 4 weeks from baseline, 8 weeks from baseline | Participants were asked to bisect the given lines by marking the centre of each line using their preferred or unaffected hand |
Countries
South Korea