Skip to content

A Study of the Combination of Ibrutinib Plus Venetoclax Versus Chlorambucil Plus Obinutuzumab for the First-line Treatment of Participants With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (SLL)

A Randomized, Open-label, Phase 3 Study of the Combination of Ibrutinib Plus Venetoclax Versus Chlorambucil Plus Obinutuzumab for the First-line Treatment of Subjects With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (SLL).

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03462719
Acronym
GLOW
Enrollment
211
Registered
2018-03-12
Start date
2018-04-17
Completion date
2029-04-05
Last updated
2026-08-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess progression-free survival (PFS) from treatment with ibrutinib plus venetoclax (I+VEN) compared with obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil (G-Clb) as assessed by an Independent Review Committee (IRC).

Interventions

DRUGIbrutinib

Participants will receive ibrutinib 420 mg orally once daily up to 15 cycles.

DRUGVenetoclax

Participants will receive venetoclax in combination with ibrutinib for a total of 12 cycles, beginning at Cycle 4. For the first 5 weeks of venetoclax treatment, the treatment dose will be ramped up from 20 to 400 mg.

DRUGChlorambucil

Participants will receive chlorambucil at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg body weight on Days 1 and 15 of Cycles 1 to 6.

DRUGObinutuzumab

Participant will receive obinutuzumab 1000 mg intravenously on Days 1, 8, and 15 of Cycle 1, and Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 6.

DRUGIbrutinib (as Subsequent Therapy)

Participants will receive ibrutinib 420 mg orally once daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity during the subsequent therapy phase.

Sponsors

Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY
Pharmacyclics LLC.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult participants who are: (a) greater than or equal to (\>=) 65 years old or, (b) 18 to 64 years old and have at least 1 of the following: 1. Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) score \> 6 2. Creatinine clearance (CrCl) estimated less than (\<) 70 milliliter per minute (mL/min) using Cockcroft-Gault equation * Diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) that meets International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (iwCLL) criteria * Measurable nodal disease (by computed tomography \[CT\]), defined as at least one lymph node \> 1.5 centimeter (cm) in longest diameter * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) Grade less than or equal to (\<=) 2 * Active CLL/SLL requiring treatment per the iwCLL criteria

Exclusion criteria

* Prior anti-leukemic therapy for CLL or SLL * Presence of deletion of the short arm of chromosome 17 (del17p) or known TP53 mutation detected at a threshold of \>10 percent (%) variable allele frequency (VAF) * Major surgery within 4 weeks of first dose of study treatment * Known bleeding disorders (example, von Willebrand's disease or hemophilia) * Central nervous system (CNS) involvement or suspected Richter's syndrome

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression Free Survival (PFS)Up to 2 years 10 monthsPFS: time between date of randomization and date of disease progression, as assessed by IRC, or date of death due to any cause, whichever occurs first, regardless of use of subsequent anti-cancer therapy prior to PD or death using iWCLL2008 criteria : New enlarged lymph nodes \>15 mm, new hepatomegaly or splenomegaly, or other organ infiltrates, bone lesion, ascites or pleural effusion due to CLL; \>=50% increase in longest diameter (LDi) from nadir in existing lymph node (LDi \>15 mm) or \>=50% increase from nadir in sum of diameters of multiple nodes (and at least 1 node with LDi \>15 mm); \>=50% increase from nadir in enlargement of liver/spleen; \>=50% increase from baseline in lymphocyte count (ALC; to \>=5\*10\^9/L); or \>=50% increase from nadir in ALC in \>=2 serial assessments if ALC is \>=30000\*10\^9/L and lymphocyte doubling time is rapid unless considered treatment-related lymphocytosis; new cytopenia attributable to CLL; transformation to more aggressive histology.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negative RateUp to 2 years 10 monthsMRD-negative rate is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved MRD-negative status (that is, less than \[\<\] 1 chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cell per 10,000 leukocytes or \<0.01 percentage \[%\]) in the bone marrow as assessed by next-generation sequencing (NGS). Participants with missing MRD data were considered MRD positive.
Complete Response Rate (CRR)Up to 2 years 10 monthsComplete response rate is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved complete response or complete response with an incomplete marrow recovery (CRi) on or prior to initiation of subsequent anti-leukemic therapy per the IRC assessment. International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (iWCLL) 2008 criteria: CR- No lymphadenopathy and hepatosplenomegaly, no constitutional symptoms, neutrophils \>1.5\*10\^9/liter (L), platelets \>100\*10\^9/L, Hgb \>11 gram per deciliter (g/dL), absolute lymphocyte count \<4000/microliter (mcL) and normocellular bone marrow with \<30% lymphocytes and no B lymphoid nodules; CRi- CR with incomplete recovery of bone marrow.
Overall Response Rate (ORR)Up to 2 years 10 monthsORR: percentage of participants who achieved best overall response of either CR, CRi, nodular PR (nPR) and partial response (PR). iWCLL 2008 criteria: CR- No lymphadenopathy and hepatosplenomegaly, no constitutional symptoms, neutrophils \>1.5\*10\^9/liter (L), platelets \>100\*10\^9/L, Hgb \>11 g/dL and ALC \<4000/mcL, normocellular bone marrow with \<30% lymphocytes and no B lymphoid nodules; CRi- CR with incomplete recovery of bone marrow; nPR- participants meet criteria for CR, but bone marrow biopsy shows B-lymphoid nodules (reflecting residual disease); PR-2 of following when abnormal at baseline: \>=50% decrease in ALC, \>=50% decrease in sum of products of multiple nodes, \>=50% decrease in enlargement of spleen or liver; and 1 of following: neutrophils \>1.5\*10\^9/L, Platelets \>100\*10\^9/L and Hgb\>11 g/dL or \>=50% improvement over baseline in any of these; 50% reduction in bone marrow infiltrates or B lymphoid nodules; no new enlarged nodes or new hepatosplenomegaly.
Overall Survival (OS)Up to 4 years 10 monthsOS is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death from any cause.
Duration of Response (DOR)Up to 2 years 10 monthsDOR is defined as the interval between the date of initial documentation of a response including partial response with lymphocytosis (PRL) and the date of first documented evidence of PD or death or date of censoring per the IRC assessment. iWCLL 2008 criteria for PD: New enlarged nodes \>1.5 cm, new hepatomegaly or splenomegaly, or other organ infiltrates; \>= 50% increase from nadir in existing lymph node or \>=50% increase from nadir in sum of product of diameters of multiple nodes; \>=50% increase from nadir in enlargement of liver or spleen; \>=50% increase from baseline in lymphocyte count (and to \>=5\*10\^9/L) unless considered treatment-related lymphocytosis; new cytopenia (Hemoglobin b or platelets) attributable to CLL; transformation to a more aggressive histology.
Time-to-Next TreatmentUp to 2 years 10 monthsTime-to-next treatment was measured from the date of randomization to the start date of any subsequent anti-leukemic therapy.
Time to Worsening as Measured by Using EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)Up to 2 years 10 monthsTime to worsening= time interval (months) from randomization to first observation of deterioration. EQ-5D-5L consists of a 5-item descriptive system and the EuroQol visual analog scale (EQ-5D VAS). EQ-5D-VAS self-rating records respondent's own assessment of his/her overall health status at time of completion, on scale of 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine). Worsening is defined as a decrease of \>= 7 points (on a 0-100 scale). EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self -care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) to describe participant's current health state. Responses for 5 dimensions are combined into a 5-digit number describing respondents health state that can be converted into a single index value or utility score (using the United Kingdom weights), ranging from -1 to 1, where lower scores indicate a worse health status. Worsening is defined as a decrease of \>=0.08 points (on a 0-1 scale).
Time to Worsening Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30)Up to 2 years 10 monthsTime to worsening= time interval from randomization to first observation of deterioration. EORTC QLQ-C30 includes 30 separate items: 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social Functioning), 1 global health status (GHS) and QoL scale, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Each item, except GHS, is answered on 4-point scale (1=not at all to 4=very much) and GHS is measured on 1-7 scale: 1=very poor and 7=excellent. Scores derived using validated scoring algorithms as per EORTC QLQ-C30 Manual and linearly transformed in a range from 0-100. For functional and global QoL scales, higher scores=better level of functioning/QoL. For symptom-oriented scales, higher score=more severe symptoms. Worsening in functional and global health scores=decrease of \>=10 points (on 0-100 scale) and in symptom scores=increase of \>=10 points (on 0-100 scale).
Time to Worsening and Time to Improvement as Measured by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Total ScoreUp to 2 years 10 monthsResponses to the 13-item FACIT Fatigue Scale are reported on a 5-point categorical response scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worst score) to 52 (best score). Time to Worsening is defined as time interval (months) from randomization to first observation of deterioration. Worsening is defined as a decrease \>= 3 points (on a 0-52 scale). Time to improvement is defined as the time interval (months) from randomization to the first observation of improvement. Improvement is defined as an increase \>=3 points (on a 0-52 scale).
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) as a Measure of Safety and TolerabilityUp to 4 years 10 monthsAn adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant participating in a clinical study that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the pharmaceutical/biological agent under study.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsUp to 4 years 10 monthsNumber of participants with abnormal clinical laboratory findings (hematology and serum chemistry) were reported.
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Hemoglobin ImprovementUp to 2 years 10 monthsSustained hemoglobin improvement is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved an increase in hemoglobin levels from baseline by \>= 2 grams per deciliter (g/dL) and lasts for at least 56 days without blood transfusion or growth factors.
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Platelet ImprovementUp to 2 years 10 monthsSustained platelet improvement is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved an increase in platelet levels from baseline by \>= 50% and lasts for at least 56 days without blood transfusion or growth factors.
Plasma Concentration of Ibrutinib and VenetoclaxIbrutinib: Pre-dose-Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 5 and 6 (each cycle is defined as 28 days), Venetoclax: Pre-dose-Day 1 of Cycles 5 and 6Plasma concentrations of ibrutinib and venetoclax were determined by validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Countries

Belgium, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, France, Israel, Netherlands, Poland, Russia, Spain, Sweden, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORJanssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)
Participants received ibrutinib 420 milligrams (mg) orally once daily for 3 cycles (each cycle is of 28 days) followed by the combination of ibrutinib 420 mg and venetoclax 400 mg orally once daily for 12 cycles (including a 5-week venetoclax dose ramp up starting in cycle 4). Participants who subsequently developed independent review committee (IRC)-confirmed progressive disease (PD) and had active disease requiring treatment were eligible to participate in the Subsequent Therapy Phase and received single-agent ibrutinib until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
106
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)
Participants received chlorambucil 0.5 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) body weight orally once daily on Days 1 and 15 of Cycles 1 to 6 in combination with obinutuzumab 1000 mgs intravenously (IV) once daily on Days 1, 8, and 15 of Cycle 1 and Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 6 (each cycle is of 28 days). Participants who subsequently developed IRC-confirmed progressive disease (PD) and had active disease requiring treatment were eligible to participate in the Subsequent Therapy Phase and received single-agent ibrutinib until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
105
Total211

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)TotalTreatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)
Age, Continuous72 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.16
71.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.01
71 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.02
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
99 Participants200 Participants101 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants7 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants7 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
101 Participants202 Participants101 Participants
Region of Enrollment
BELGIUM
2 Participants9 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
CANADA
10 Participants17 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
CZECH REPUBLIC
13 Participants22 Participants9 Participants
Region of Enrollment
DENMARK
5 Participants12 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
FRANCE
3 Participants7 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
ISRAEL
12 Participants18 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
NETHERLANDS
6 Participants7 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
POLAND
10 Participants22 Participants12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
RUSSIAN FEDERATION
16 Participants39 Participants23 Participants
Region of Enrollment
SPAIN
9 Participants19 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
SWEDEN
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
TURKEY
13 Participants21 Participants8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
UNITED KINGDOM
4 Participants12 Participants8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
UNITED STATES
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
42 Participants89 Participants47 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
63 Participants122 Participants59 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
17 / 10636 / 105
other
Total, other adverse events
98 / 10698 / 105
serious
Total, serious adverse events
49 / 10630 / 105

Outcome results

Primary

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS: time between date of randomization and date of disease progression, as assessed by IRC, or date of death due to any cause, whichever occurs first, regardless of use of subsequent anti-cancer therapy prior to PD or death using iWCLL2008 criteria : New enlarged lymph nodes \>15 mm, new hepatomegaly or splenomegaly, or other organ infiltrates, bone lesion, ascites or pleural effusion due to CLL; \>=50% increase in longest diameter (LDi) from nadir in existing lymph node (LDi \>15 mm) or \>=50% increase from nadir in sum of diameters of multiple nodes (and at least 1 node with LDi \>15 mm); \>=50% increase from nadir in enlargement of liver/spleen; \>=50% increase from baseline in lymphocyte count (ALC; to \>=5\*10\^9/L); or \>=50% increase from nadir in ALC in \>=2 serial assessments if ALC is \>=30000\*10\^9/L and lymphocyte doubling time is rapid unless considered treatment-related lymphocytosis; new cytopenia attributable to CLL; transformation to more aggressive histology.

Time frame: Up to 2 years 10 months

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all randomized participants who were analyzed according to assigned treatment group, regardless of the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Progression Free Survival (PFS)NA Months
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Progression Free Survival (PFS)20.96 Months
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.131, 0.357]Log Rank
Secondary

Complete Response Rate (CRR)

Complete response rate is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved complete response or complete response with an incomplete marrow recovery (CRi) on or prior to initiation of subsequent anti-leukemic therapy per the IRC assessment. International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (iWCLL) 2008 criteria: CR- No lymphadenopathy and hepatosplenomegaly, no constitutional symptoms, neutrophils \>1.5\*10\^9/liter (L), platelets \>100\*10\^9/L, Hgb \>11 gram per deciliter (g/dL), absolute lymphocyte count \<4000/microliter (mcL) and normocellular bone marrow with \<30% lymphocytes and no B lymphoid nodules; CRi- CR with incomplete recovery of bone marrow.

Time frame: Up to 2 years 10 months

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who were analyzed according to assigned treatment group, regardless of the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Complete Response Rate (CRR)38.7 Percentage of Participants
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Complete Response Rate (CRR)11.4 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR is defined as the interval between the date of initial documentation of a response including partial response with lymphocytosis (PRL) and the date of first documented evidence of PD or death or date of censoring per the IRC assessment. iWCLL 2008 criteria for PD: New enlarged nodes \>1.5 cm, new hepatomegaly or splenomegaly, or other organ infiltrates; \>= 50% increase from nadir in existing lymph node or \>=50% increase from nadir in sum of product of diameters of multiple nodes; \>=50% increase from nadir in enlargement of liver or spleen; \>=50% increase from baseline in lymphocyte count (and to \>=5\*10\^9/L) unless considered treatment-related lymphocytosis; new cytopenia (Hemoglobin b or platelets) attributable to CLL; transformation to a more aggressive histology.

Time frame: Up to 2 years 10 months

Population: Population analyzed included ITT amongst who were responders (PR or better).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Duration of Response (DOR)28.85 Months
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Duration of Response (DOR)21.13 Months
Secondary

Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negative Rate

MRD-negative rate is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved MRD-negative status (that is, less than \[\<\] 1 chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cell per 10,000 leukocytes or \<0.01 percentage \[%\]) in the bone marrow as assessed by next-generation sequencing (NGS). Participants with missing MRD data were considered MRD positive.

Time frame: Up to 2 years 10 months

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who were analyzed according to assigned treatment group, regardless of the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negative Rate55.7 Percentage of participants
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negative Rate21.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Findings

Number of participants with abnormal clinical laboratory findings (hematology and serum chemistry) were reported.

Time frame: Up to 4 years 10 months

Population: The safety analysis set is defined as all randomized participants who received at least one dose of any one of the four study drugs (ibrutinib, venetoclax, chlorambucil, or obinutuzumab).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) (Increase)23 Participants
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypercalcemia13 Participants
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsHematology: Any hemoglobin, platelet, or ANC decrease94 Participants
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypoalbuminemia36 Participants
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Alkaline Phosphatase (Increase)19 Participants
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypocalcemia27 Participants
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsHematology: Platelets (Decrease)52 Participants
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Phosphate (Decrease)16 Participants
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Bilirubin (Increase)36 Participants
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Potassium (Decrease)25 Participants
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Alanine Transaminase (ALT) (Increase)22 Participants
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Potassium (Increase)31 Participants
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Creatinine (Increase)33 Participants
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Sodium (Decrease)25 Participants
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsHematology: Hemoglobin (Decrease)38 Participants
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Sodium (Increase)12 Participants
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Creatinine Clearance (Decrease)40 Participants
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Uric Acid (Increase)37 Participants
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsHematology: Absolute Neutrophils Counts (Decrease)81 Participants
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Uric Acid (Increase)19 Participants
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsHematology: Absolute Neutrophils Counts (Decrease)95 Participants
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsHematology: Hemoglobin (Decrease)42 Participants
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsHematology: Platelets (Decrease)78 Participants
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsHematology: Any hemoglobin, platelet, or ANC decrease103 Participants
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Alanine Transaminase (ALT) (Increase)26 Participants
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) (Increase)30 Participants
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Alkaline Phosphatase (Increase)21 Participants
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Bilirubin (Increase)25 Participants
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Creatinine (Increase)17 Participants
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Creatinine Clearance (Decrease)17 Participants
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypercalcemia3 Participants
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypoalbuminemia20 Participants
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Hypocalcemia30 Participants
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Phosphate (Decrease)6 Participants
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Potassium (Decrease)9 Participants
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Potassium (Increase)22 Participants
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Sodium (Decrease)26 Participants
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory FindingsChemistry: Sodium (Increase)8 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant participating in a clinical study that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the pharmaceutical/biological agent under study.

Time frame: Up to 4 years 10 months

Population: The safety analysis set is defined as all randomized participants who received at least one dose of any one of the four study drugs (ibrutinib, venetoclax, chlorambucil, or obinutuzumab).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability105 Participants
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability99 Participants
Secondary

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR: percentage of participants who achieved best overall response of either CR, CRi, nodular PR (nPR) and partial response (PR). iWCLL 2008 criteria: CR- No lymphadenopathy and hepatosplenomegaly, no constitutional symptoms, neutrophils \>1.5\*10\^9/liter (L), platelets \>100\*10\^9/L, Hgb \>11 g/dL and ALC \<4000/mcL, normocellular bone marrow with \<30% lymphocytes and no B lymphoid nodules; CRi- CR with incomplete recovery of bone marrow; nPR- participants meet criteria for CR, but bone marrow biopsy shows B-lymphoid nodules (reflecting residual disease); PR-2 of following when abnormal at baseline: \>=50% decrease in ALC, \>=50% decrease in sum of products of multiple nodes, \>=50% decrease in enlargement of spleen or liver; and 1 of following: neutrophils \>1.5\*10\^9/L, Platelets \>100\*10\^9/L and Hgb\>11 g/dL or \>=50% improvement over baseline in any of these; 50% reduction in bone marrow infiltrates or B lymphoid nodules; no new enlarged nodes or new hepatosplenomegaly.

Time frame: Up to 2 years 10 months

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who were analyzed according to assigned treatment group, regardless of the actual treatment received. Participants with missing post-randomization data were considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Overall Response Rate (ORR)86.8 Percentage of participants
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Overall Response Rate (ORR)84.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death from any cause.

Time frame: Up to 4 years 10 months

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who were analyzed according to assigned treatment group, regardless of the actual treatment received. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Overall Survival (OS)NA Months
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Overall Survival (OS)NA Months
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Hemoglobin Improvement

Sustained hemoglobin improvement is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved an increase in hemoglobin levels from baseline by \>= 2 grams per deciliter (g/dL) and lasts for at least 56 days without blood transfusion or growth factors.

Time frame: Up to 2 years 10 months

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who were analyzed according to assigned treatment group, regardless of the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Percentage of Participants With Sustained Hemoglobin Improvement44.3 Percentage of Participants
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Percentage of Participants With Sustained Hemoglobin Improvement50.5 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Platelet Improvement

Sustained platelet improvement is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved an increase in platelet levels from baseline by \>= 50% and lasts for at least 56 days without blood transfusion or growth factors.

Time frame: Up to 2 years 10 months

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who were analyzed according to assigned treatment group, regardless of the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Percentage of Participants With Sustained Platelet Improvement24.5 Percentage of Participants
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Percentage of Participants With Sustained Platelet Improvement29.5 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Plasma Concentration of Ibrutinib and Venetoclax

Plasma concentrations of ibrutinib and venetoclax were determined by validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Time frame: Ibrutinib: Pre-dose-Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 5 and 6 (each cycle is defined as 28 days), Venetoclax: Pre-dose-Day 1 of Cycles 5 and 6

Population: The pharmacokinetics (PK) analysis set is defined as all randomized participants in Treatment Arm A who received at least one dose of ibrutinib and/or venetoclax and had at least one valid blood sample drawn for PK analysis. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this endpoint. Here, n (number analyzed) is defined as number of participants analyzed for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Plasma Concentration of Ibrutinib and VenetoclaxIbrutinib: Pre-dose Day 1 Cycle 2 (Ibrutinib Alone)5.70 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 5.58
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Plasma Concentration of Ibrutinib and VenetoclaxIbrutinib: Pre-dose Day 1 Cycle 3 (Ibrutinib Alone)6.20 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 7.78
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Plasma Concentration of Ibrutinib and VenetoclaxIbrutinib: Pre-dose Day 1 Cycle 5 (Ibrutinib and Venetoclax)6.37 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 6.71
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Plasma Concentration of Ibrutinib and VenetoclaxIbrutinib: Pre-dose Day 1 Cycle 6 (Ibrutinib and Venetoclax)5.90 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 6.74
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Plasma Concentration of Ibrutinib and VenetoclaxVenetoclax: Pre-dose Day 1 Cycle 5 (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)1139 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 959
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Plasma Concentration of Ibrutinib and VenetoclaxVenetoclax: Pre-dose Day 1 Cycle 6 (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)1765 Nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 1573
Secondary

Time-to-Next Treatment

Time-to-next treatment was measured from the date of randomization to the start date of any subsequent anti-leukemic therapy.

Time frame: Up to 2 years 10 months

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who were analyzed according to assigned treatment group, regardless of the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Time-to-Next TreatmentNA Months
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Time-to-Next TreatmentNA Months
Secondary

Time to Worsening and Time to Improvement as Measured by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Total Score

Responses to the 13-item FACIT Fatigue Scale are reported on a 5-point categorical response scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worst score) to 52 (best score). Time to Worsening is defined as time interval (months) from randomization to first observation of deterioration. Worsening is defined as a decrease \>= 3 points (on a 0-52 scale). Time to improvement is defined as the time interval (months) from randomization to the first observation of improvement. Improvement is defined as an increase \>=3 points (on a 0-52 scale).

Time frame: Up to 2 years 10 months

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who were analyzed according to assigned treatment group, regardless of the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Time to Worsening and Time to Improvement as Measured by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Total ScoreTime to Worsening8.15 Months
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Time to Worsening and Time to Improvement as Measured by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Total ScoreTime to Improvement5.59 Months
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Time to Worsening and Time to Improvement as Measured by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Total ScoreTime to Worsening14.03 Months
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Time to Worsening and Time to Improvement as Measured by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Total ScoreTime to Improvement3.75 Months
Secondary

Time to Worsening as Measured by Using EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)

Time to worsening= time interval (months) from randomization to first observation of deterioration. EQ-5D-5L consists of a 5-item descriptive system and the EuroQol visual analog scale (EQ-5D VAS). EQ-5D-VAS self-rating records respondent's own assessment of his/her overall health status at time of completion, on scale of 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine). Worsening is defined as a decrease of \>= 7 points (on a 0-100 scale). EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self -care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) to describe participant's current health state. Responses for 5 dimensions are combined into a 5-digit number describing respondents health state that can be converted into a single index value or utility score (using the United Kingdom weights), ranging from -1 to 1, where lower scores indicate a worse health status. Worsening is defined as a decrease of \>=0.08 points (on a 0-1 scale).

Time frame: Up to 2 years 10 months

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who were analyzed according to assigned treatment group, regardless of the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Time to Worsening as Measured by Using EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)EQ-5D-5L: Visual Analogue Score8.34 Months
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Time to Worsening as Measured by Using EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)EQ-5D-5L: Utility Score14.29 Months
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Time to Worsening as Measured by Using EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)EQ-5D-5L: Visual Analogue Score24.18 Months
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Time to Worsening as Measured by Using EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)EQ-5D-5L: Utility Score24.11 Months
Secondary

Time to Worsening Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30)

Time to worsening= time interval from randomization to first observation of deterioration. EORTC QLQ-C30 includes 30 separate items: 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social Functioning), 1 global health status (GHS) and QoL scale, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Each item, except GHS, is answered on 4-point scale (1=not at all to 4=very much) and GHS is measured on 1-7 scale: 1=very poor and 7=excellent. Scores derived using validated scoring algorithms as per EORTC QLQ-C30 Manual and linearly transformed in a range from 0-100. For functional and global QoL scales, higher scores=better level of functioning/QoL. For symptom-oriented scales, higher score=more severe symptoms. Worsening in functional and global health scores=decrease of \>=10 points (on 0-100 scale) and in symptom scores=increase of \>=10 points (on 0-100 scale).

Time frame: Up to 2 years 10 months

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who were analyzed according to assigned treatment group, regardless of the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Time to Worsening Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30)Cognitive Functioning11.07 Months
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Time to Worsening Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30)Social Functioning11.10 Months
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Time to Worsening Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30)Physical FunctioningNA Months
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Time to Worsening Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30)Fatigue (Symptom Scale)8.38 Months
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Time to Worsening Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30)Emotional FunctioningNA Months
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Time to Worsening Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30)Nausea/Vomiting (Symptom Scale)11.07 Months
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Time to Worsening Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30)Role Functioning11.10 Months
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Time to Worsening Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30)Pain (Symptom Scale)8.31 Months
Treatment Arm A (Ibrutinib + Venetoclax)Time to Worsening Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30)Global Health Status14.95 Months
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Time to Worsening Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30)Pain (Symptom Scale)11.01 Months
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Time to Worsening Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30)Global Health Status24.18 Months
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Time to Worsening Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30)Cognitive Functioning14.03 Months
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Time to Worsening Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30)Emotional Functioning25.00 Months
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Time to Worsening Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30)Physical FunctioningNA Months
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Time to Worsening Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30)Role Functioning8.48 Months
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Time to Worsening Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30)Social Functioning17.87 Months
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Time to Worsening Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30)Fatigue (Symptom Scale)17.87 Months
Treatment Arm B (Chlorambucil + Obinutuzumab)Time to Worsening Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30)Nausea/Vomiting (Symptom Scale)NA Months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 1, 2026