Skip to content

Network-Level Mechanisms for Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease Development

Network-Level Mechanisms for Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease Development

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03461861
Enrollment
26
Registered
2018-03-12
Start date
2019-04-11
Completion date
2021-03-31
Last updated
2023-07-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

APOE 4

Keywords

Healthy, Adult, Normal Memory, APOE 4, Brain, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, MRI, Alzheimer's disease, Hippocampus, Genetic testing, Dementia, AGB101

Brief summary

The purpose of this project is to test the hypothesis that AGB101 low dose levetiracetam extended release formulation can reduce abnormal hyperfunctional activity in the hippocampus in normal, healthy adults. The investigators will compare the functional connectivity results after taking AGB101 or placebo.

Detailed description

In this study the investigators want to find out whether the use of a perturbation, such as AGB101 low dose of levetiracetam extended release formulation, in healthy adults can reduce abnormal hippocampal network activity. The investigators also want to study whether this low dose of LEV can improve memory function. Generic levetiracetam is a type of drug called an anti-epileptic or anti-seizure medication. It is FDA approved worldwide for adults and children as young as one month with seizures. It is a generic drug used in long-term epilepsy treatment. It is relatively safe and has an acceptable side-effect profile. AGB101 has been developed as a novel extended release formulation of low dose levetiracetam (below clinically marketed doses for epilepsy) for slowing the progression of amnestic mild cognitive impairment. It is known that age and the APOE 4 gene are important risk factors for late-onset Alzheimer's disease. Further studies have shown that cognitively normal, older adults have more hyperfunctional brain network activity, increased alpha beta accumulation, decreased memory function, and decreased brain volume, which is consistent with Alzheimer's disease patterns.

Interventions

DRUGAGB101 220 mg

AGB101 oral dose of 220 mg/day capsule, given as once-daily dosing.

OTHERPlacebo

Placebo, oral capsule given once-daily.

Sponsors

National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH
Medical College of Wisconsin
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study in which a low dose of AGB101 (220mg QD) or placebo will be administered to 50 healthy 55-75-year-old subjects, with the order of treatments counterbalanced in a within-subject crossover design.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Fluent in English * At least eight (8) years of education * Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) (62) score \< 6 * Hachinski Ischemic Score ≤ 4 * Normal general cognitive function as well as 1) normal memory function, documented by MOCA score of 23 or greater, and a RBANS Delayed Memory Index score of 85 or greater.

Exclusion criteria

* Neurological disease, such as Parkinson's disease, multi-infarct dementia, Huntington's disease, normal pressure hydrocephalus, brain tumor, progressive supranuclear palsy, seizure disorder, subdural hematoma, multiple sclerosis, or a history of significant head trauma or known structural brain abnormalities * Major psychiatric disease or chronic unstable medical conditions * History of drug abuse * History of alcohol abuse (4 or greater drinks per day on average) * Unable to complete MRI scans (no Pacemaker/Defibrillator) * Known clinically significant abnormalities in B12 or thyroid function tests * End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) * Hemodialysis (HD)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional Connectivity Strengths of Neural Networks2 weeks after treatment between AGB101 and PlaceboThe seed-based functional connectivity strengths of the hippocampus network and the default mode network will be employed to measure the changes between AGB101 and Placebo perturbation. The functional connectivity strengths will be measured with the median of the Pearson cross-correlation coefficients over entire brain regions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT), Delayed Recall Scaled Integer. The Higher is the BetterPlacebo vs AGB101 2 weeks after treatment paired t-testRey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT), delayed recall Scaled integer will be employed to measure the episodic memory changes before and after AGB101 treatment. The AVLT score will be recorded as a standard score. The theoretical range: min 50, max 155, the higher the better. The higher the number is, the better the memory. It is an integer number.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
AGB101 220 mg, Then Placebo
AGB101 220 mg/day capsule, once daily dosing for 2 weeks. After a 4 week washout, to be followed by Placebo, given as a capsule, once daily dosing for 2 weeks. AGB101 220 mg: AGB101 oral dose of 220 mg/day capsule, given as once-daily dosing. Placebo: Placebo, oral capsule given once-daily.
13
Placebo, Then AGB101 220 mg
Placebo, given as a capsule, once daily for 2 weeks. After a 4 week washout, to be followed by AGB101 220 mg/day capsule, once daily dosing for 2 weeks. AGB101 220 mg: AGB101 oral dose of 220 mg/day capsule, given as once-daily dosing. Placebo: Placebo, oral capsule given once-daily.
12
Total25

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAGB101 220 mg, Then PlaceboTotalPlacebo, Then AGB101 220 mg
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
8 Participants16 Participants8 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
5 Participants9 Participants4 Participants
Age, Continuous66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
66.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5
67 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
Apolipoprotein E (APOE) Status
APOE e4 Carrier
3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Apolipoprotein E (APOE) Status
APOE e4 Non-Carrier
10 Participants20 Participants10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
13 Participants25 Participants12 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
13 Participants25 Participants12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
13 participants26 participants12 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants15 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants10 Participants6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 260 / 26
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 263 / 26
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 260 / 26

Outcome results

Primary

Functional Connectivity Strengths of Neural Networks

The seed-based functional connectivity strengths of the hippocampus network and the default mode network will be employed to measure the changes between AGB101 and Placebo perturbation. The functional connectivity strengths will be measured with the median of the Pearson cross-correlation coefficients over entire brain regions.

Time frame: 2 weeks after treatment between AGB101 and Placebo

Population: A total of 25 subjects who were treated with AGB 101 and Placebo (order-balanced), then conducted a paired t-test to detect the treatment effect vs placebo.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
AGB101 220 mgFunctional Connectivity Strengths of Neural Networks0.233 Pearson coefficientStandard Deviation 0.132
PlaceboFunctional Connectivity Strengths of Neural Networks0.318 Pearson coefficientStandard Deviation 0.127
Comparison: The null hypothesis (H0) of this superiority trials asserts that there is no true difference in functional connectivity between the interventions of placebo and AGB101, and the alternative hypothesis (H1) states that there is a difference between the interventions of placebo and AGB101. A type I error is the error of rejecting H0 when it is actually true.p-value: 0.00756795% CI: [-0.0886, -0.0774]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT), Delayed Recall Scaled Integer. The Higher is the Better

Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT), delayed recall Scaled integer will be employed to measure the episodic memory changes before and after AGB101 treatment. The AVLT score will be recorded as a standard score. The theoretical range: min 50, max 155, the higher the better. The higher the number is, the better the memory. It is an integer number.

Time frame: Placebo vs AGB101 2 weeks after treatment paired t-test

Population: Measure RAVLT Delayed recall standard score memory test

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AGB101 220 mgRey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT), Delayed Recall Scaled Integer. The Higher is the Better108 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
PlaceboRey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT), Delayed Recall Scaled Integer. The Higher is the Better105 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16
Comparison: The null hypothesis (H0) of this trial asserts that there is no true difference in AVLT between the interventions of placebo and AGB101, and the alternative hypothesis (H1) states that there is a difference between the interventions of placebo and AGB101. A type I error is the error of rejecting H0 when it is actually true.p-value: 0.90059395% CI: [1.72, 4.52]t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026