Skip to content

Most Effective Stimulation Site in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Gait Recovery After Stoke

Most Effective Stimulation Site in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Gait Recovery After Stoke

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03460886
Enrollment
24
Registered
2018-03-09
Start date
2018-02-01
Completion date
2018-05-30
Last updated
2019-09-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gait Disorders, Neurologic, Stroke

Keywords

transcranial direct current stimulation

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to investigate the most effective stimulation site in transcranial direct current stimulation for gait recovery after stroke. All subjects will go through four conditions of transcranial direct current stimulation with for 30 minutes. Four conditions are 1) bihemispheric stimulation - anodal stimulation on both ipsilesional and contralesional leg area of primary motor cortex and supplementary motor area. 2) ipsilesional stimulation - anodal stimulation on ipsilesional leg area of primary motor cortex and supplementary motor area. 3) contralesional stimulation - anodal stimulation on contralesional leg area of primary motor cortex and supplementary motor area. 4) sham stimulation. Subjects will walk on treadmill for 10 minutes during transcranial direct current stimulation. Motor evoked potential and functional evaluations will be done before and after stimulation to measure the changes.

Interventions

anodal stimulation on Ipsilesional leg area of primary motor cortex and supplementary motor area for 30 minutes

anodal stimulation on contralesional leg area of primary motor cortex and supplementary motor area for 30 minutes

walking on treadmill for 10 minutes

Sponsors

Samsung Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Chronic stroke patients with 6 months after onset. * Functional ambulation category ≥ 3

Exclusion criteria

* patients who needs assist in surface level walking * patients with mini mental status exam score under 9 * patients with implantable electronic device * metal device inside skull * history of epilepsy * pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in motor evoked potentialbefore and after intervention (approximately 30 minutes)measure the motor threshold and amplitude of motor evoked potential in tibialis anterior muscle.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Fugl Meyer Assessmentbefore and after intervention (approximately 30 minutes)Fugl Meyer Assessment is a measurement of motor function.
Changes in 10 meter walking testbefore and after intervention (approximately 30 minutes)measures gait speed
Changes in motricity indexbefore and after intervention (approximately 30 minutes)measures motor function
Functional ambulatory categorybefore and after intervention (approximately 30 minutes)measure gait ability. 0 is impossible to gait and 6 is normal.
Modified ashworth scalebefore and after intervention (approximately 30 minutes)measures spasticity with scale from 0 to 3. 0 is no increase in muscle tone. 3 is considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult.
Timed up and go testbefore and after intervention (approximately 30 minutes)measures gait capacity and balance

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026