Behavioral Symptoms, Depression, Depression, Postpartum, Depressive Disorder, Mental Disorder, Mood Disorders, Postpartum Blues, Postpartum Disorder, PPD, Pregnancy Complications
Conditions
Keywords
Postpartum Care, Postpartum Depression
Brief summary
A clinical study to evaluate safety, tolerability and efficacy of oral administration of ganaxolone in women with postpartum depression
Interventions
Oral
Oral
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Experiencing a major depressive episode, which started between the start of the third trimester and 4 weeks following delivery. The major depressive episode must be diagnosed according to Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) 7.0 interview * Given birth in the last 6 months * HAMD17 score of ≥ 20 at screening but \< 26 * Must agree to stop breastfeeding from start of study treatment or must agree to temporarily cease giving breast milk to her infant(s)
Exclusion criteria
* Current history of any psychotic illness, including major depressive episode with psychotic features * History of suicide attempt within the past 3 years * History of bipolar I disorder * History of seizure discorder
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version (HAMD17) Through Treatment | Baseline (Day 1) and through Day 10 for 2 week treatment group and Day 29 for 4 week treatment groups | The HAMD17 was a 17-item clinician-rated instrument used to assess the range of symptoms that were most frequently observed in participants with major depression. All items were scored on an ordinal scale between 0 and 4 (8 items) or 0 and 2 (9 items) of increasing severity. Each of 17 items was rated by clinician with rating of 0: absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe. A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding scores of all 17 items, where 0 indicated no depression and 52 indicated severe depression. Higher score represented more severe condition. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 assessment before study drug infusion. Change from Baseline is defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Response to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 Item (HAMD17) | Day 2 (all treatment groups), Day 7 (TID & QHS), Day 8/10 (all treatment groups), Day 15/17 (all treatment groups), Day 22 and 29 (QHS, 1125mg), Day 36/38 (all treatment groups), Day 57/59 (QHS, 1125mg), Day 71 (1125mg), Day 89 (QHS), Day 119 (QHS) | HAMD17 Response was defined as ≥50% reduction from Baseline in total score. The HAMD-17 is a 17-item assessment used to assess the severity of depression and its improvement during the course of therapy. Each item was evaluated and scored using either a 5-point scale of 0 (not present/absent) to 4 (very severe) or a 3-point scale of 0 (not present/absent) to 2 (marked). Items rated on the 3-point scale include: insomnia early, middle, late; somatic symptoms gastrointestinal and general; genital symptoms; loss of weight; insight. Items rated on 5-point scale include: depressed mood; feelings of guilt; suicide; work and activities; retardation; agitation; anxiety psychic and somatic; hypochondriasis. The total score was the sum of the scores from HAMD-17 Items 1 through 17 and ranged from 0 (not at all depressed) to 52 (severely depressed). Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. Number of participants with response to HAMD-17 has been presented. |
| Number of Participants With Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Remission | Day 8/10 (all treatment arms), Day 15/17 (all treatment arms), Day 22 and 29 (QHS & 1125mg), Day 36/38 (all treatment arms), Day 57/59 (QHS & 1125mg), Day 71 (1125mg), Day 89 & 119 (QHS) | Remission was defined as an observed total score of 0 to 7. The HAMD-17 is a 17-item assessment used to assess the severity of depression and its improvement during the course of therapy. Each item was evaluated and scored using either a 5-point scale of 0 (not present/absent) to 4 (very severe) or a 3-point scale of 0 (not present/absent) to 2 (marked). Items rated on the 3-point scale include: insomnia early, middle, late; somatic symptoms gastrointestinal and general; genital symptoms; loss of weight; insight. Items rated on 5-point scale include: depressed mood; feelings of guilt; suicide; work and activities; retardation; agitation; anxiety psychic and somatic; hypochondriasis. The total score was the sum of the scores from HAMD-17 Items 1 through 17 and ranged from 0 (not at all depressed) to 52 (severely depressed). Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. Number of participants with HAMD-17 remission has been presented. |
| Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version Post Treatment | Baseline (Day 1) and Through Day 38 for 2 week treatment group and Day 71 and 119 for 4 week treatment groups | The HAMD17 was a 17-item clinician-rated instrument used to assess the range of symptoms that were most frequently observed in participants with major depression. All items were scored on an ordinal scale between 0 and 4 (8 items) or 0 and 2 (9 items) of increasing severity. Each of 17 items was rated by clinician with rating of 0: absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe. A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding scores of all 17 items, where 0 indicated no depression and 52 indicated severe depression. Higher score represented more severe condition. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 assessment before study drug infusion. Change from Baseline is defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value. |
| Change From Baseline in Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, 6-item Version | Baseline (Day 1) through Day 119 | The Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory was a 6-item questionnaire designed and validated. It is a reliable and sensitive measure of anxiety. The 6-item version has been shown to have acceptable reliability, producing similar scores as the full 20-item inventory for those with normal and raised levels of anxiety. Participants are prompted to respond to indicate how \[the participant\] feel right now, at this moment, followed by a list of common experiences like I feel calm, I am tense, I feel upset, I am relaxed I feel content and I am worried. Responses range from Not at all (1) to Very much (4), with overall scores ranging from 20-80, where higher scores reflected higher states of anxiety. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 assessment before study drug infusion. Change from Baseline is defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value. |
| Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Baseline through Day 119 | The CGI-I scale is a clinician-rated 7-point scale used to assess how much the participant's illness had improved or worsened relative to a Baseline state at the beginning of the intervention. It was rated as: 1. very much improved 2. much improved 3. minimally improved 4. no change 5. minimally worse 6. much worse 7. very much worse. Higher scores indicated worse condition. Only those participants with CGI- improvement have been presented. |
| Change From Baseline in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Total Score | Baseline (Day 1) through Day 119 | The EPDS is a validated 10-question depression assessment for postpartum women, which includes anxiety symptoms and excludes constitutional symptoms associated with depression common in the postpartum period, such as changes in sleeping patterns. It consists of 10 multiple choice questions with scores for each question ranging from 0-3. Questions 1, 2, & 4 are scored 0, 1, 2 or 3 with top box scored as 0 and the bottom box scored as 3. Questions 3 and 5 to 10 are reverse scored, with the top box scored as a 3 and the bottom box scored as 0. Scores are then summed for a total score, which ranges from 0: no depression to 30: severe depression. Higher score indicates severe depression. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 assessment before study drug infusion. Change from Baseline is defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| TID (2-week) Oral ganaxolone doses were titrated to a daily dose of 900 mg/day Oral ganaxolone doses were titrated to a daily dose of 675 mg/day QHS over 4 days, which was maintained until Day 10, followed by a taper over 4 days | 2 |
| QHS (2-week) Oral ganaxolone doses were titrated to a daily dose of 675 mg/day QHS over 4 days, which was maintained until Day 10, followed by a taper over 4 days | 14 |
| QHS (4-week) Oral ganaxolone was dosed at a daily dose of 675 mg/day QHS for 28 days, followed by a taper over 4 days | 25 |
| 1125 mg (4-week) Oral ganaxolone was dosed as 675 mg at approximately 7 PM or with supper (Q7PM) and QHS (for a total of 1,350 mg/day on the first 2 days), followed by a daily dose of 1,125 mg/day at Q7PM for 26 days and a taper over 4 days | 43 |
| Total | 84 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Pregnancy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 4 | 7 | 3 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | QHS (2-week) | QHS (4-week) | TID (2-week) | 1125 mg (4-week) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 27.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.84 | 27.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.27 | 27.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.27 | 23.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.78 | 28.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.72 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 27 Participants | 3 Participants | 11 Participants | 1 Participants | 12 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 57 Participants | 11 Participants | 14 Participants | 1 Participants | 31 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 4 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 31 Participants | 4 Participants | 10 Participants | 1 Participants | 16 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 46 Participants | 7 Participants | 13 Participants | 1 Participants | 25 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 84 Participants | 14 Participants | 25 Participants | 2 Participants | 43 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 2 | 0 / 14 | 0 / 25 | 0 / 43 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 2 / 2 | 5 / 14 | 16 / 25 | 32 / 43 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 2 | 0 / 14 | 0 / 25 | 1 / 43 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version (HAMD17) Through Treatment
The HAMD17 was a 17-item clinician-rated instrument used to assess the range of symptoms that were most frequently observed in participants with major depression. All items were scored on an ordinal scale between 0 and 4 (8 items) or 0 and 2 (9 items) of increasing severity. Each of 17 items was rated by clinician with rating of 0: absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe. A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding scores of all 17 items, where 0 indicated no depression and 52 indicated severe depression. Higher score represented more severe condition. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 assessment before study drug infusion. Change from Baseline is defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and through Day 10 for 2 week treatment group and Day 29 for 4 week treatment groups
Population: Safety Set was defined as all participants who were dispensed study drug. Only those participants with HAMD17 response through treatment have been presented.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TID (2-week) | Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version (HAMD17) Through Treatment | Day 2/4 | -8.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.9 |
| TID (2-week) | Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version (HAMD17) Through Treatment | Day 15/17 | -9.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.19 |
| TID (2-week) | Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version (HAMD17) Through Treatment | Day 7 | -15.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.73 |
| TID (2-week) | Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version (HAMD17) Through Treatment | Day 8/10 | -3.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| QHS (2-week) | Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version (HAMD17) Through Treatment | Day 2/4 | -5.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.87 |
| QHS (2-week) | Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version (HAMD17) Through Treatment | Day 7 | -6.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.93 |
| QHS (2-week) | Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version (HAMD17) Through Treatment | Day 8/10 | -10.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.21 |
| QHS (2-week) | Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version (HAMD17) Through Treatment | Day 15/17 | -8.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.12 |
| QHS (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version (HAMD17) Through Treatment | Day 8/10 | -6.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.25 |
| QHS (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version (HAMD17) Through Treatment | Day 2/4 | -0.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.19 |
| QHS (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version (HAMD17) Through Treatment | Day 22 | -10.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.94 |
| QHS (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version (HAMD17) Through Treatment | Day 29 | -12.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.4 |
| QHS (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version (HAMD17) Through Treatment | Day 15/17 | -9.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.36 |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version (HAMD17) Through Treatment | Day 29 | -14.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.64 |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version (HAMD17) Through Treatment | Day 2/4 | -2.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.46 |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version (HAMD17) Through Treatment | Day 8/10 | -10.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.44 |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version (HAMD17) Through Treatment | Day 15/17 | -9.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.94 |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version (HAMD17) Through Treatment | Day 22 | -12.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.98 |
Change From Baseline in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Total Score
The EPDS is a validated 10-question depression assessment for postpartum women, which includes anxiety symptoms and excludes constitutional symptoms associated with depression common in the postpartum period, such as changes in sleeping patterns. It consists of 10 multiple choice questions with scores for each question ranging from 0-3. Questions 1, 2, & 4 are scored 0, 1, 2 or 3 with top box scored as 0 and the bottom box scored as 3. Questions 3 and 5 to 10 are reverse scored, with the top box scored as a 3 and the bottom box scored as 0. Scores are then summed for a total score, which ranges from 0: no depression to 30: severe depression. Higher score indicates severe depression. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 assessment before study drug infusion. Change from Baseline is defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) through Day 119
Population: Safety Set. Only those participants with data available at specified timepoints has been presented.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TID (2-week) | Change From Baseline in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Total Score | Day 2/4 | -0.5 Score on a scale | Standard Error 2.12 |
| TID (2-week) | Change From Baseline in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Total Score | Day 36/38 | -2.0 Score on a scale | Standard Error 2.83 |
| TID (2-week) | Change From Baseline in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Total Score | Day 15/17 | -5.0 Score on a scale | Standard Error 0 |
| TID (2-week) | Change From Baseline in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Total Score | Day 7 | -2.0 Score on a scale | Standard Error 2.83 |
| TID (2-week) | Change From Baseline in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Total Score | Day 8/10 | -3.0 Score on a scale | — |
| QHS (2-week) | Change From Baseline in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Total Score | Day 7 | -2.3 Score on a scale | Standard Error 2.06 |
| QHS (2-week) | Change From Baseline in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Total Score | Day 36/38 | -2.6 Score on a scale | Standard Error 1.85 |
| QHS (2-week) | Change From Baseline in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Total Score | Day 15/17 | -2.6 Score on a scale | Standard Error 1.63 |
| QHS (2-week) | Change From Baseline in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Total Score | Day 2/4 | -1.4 Score on a scale | Standard Error 2.19 |
| QHS (2-week) | Change From Baseline in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Total Score | Day 8/10 | -1.3 Score on a scale | Standard Error 1.57 |
| QHS (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Total Score | Day 119 | -3.3 Score on a scale | Standard Error 3.2 |
| QHS (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Total Score | Day 8/10 | -1.5 Score on a scale | Standard Error 1.74 |
| QHS (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Total Score | Day 15/17 | -1.8 Score on a scale | Standard Error 2.17 |
| QHS (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Total Score | Day 22 | -2.7 Score on a scale | Standard Error 2.18 |
| QHS (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Total Score | Day 29 | -2.9 Score on a scale | Standard Error 2.79 |
| QHS (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Total Score | Day 36/38 | -3.1 Score on a scale | Standard Error 2.77 |
| QHS (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Total Score | Day 57/59 | -2.5 Score on a scale | Standard Error 2.46 |
| QHS (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Total Score | Day 89 | -2.6 Score on a scale | Standard Error 2.41 |
| QHS (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Total Score | Day 2/4 | -0.8 Score on a scale | Standard Error 1.18 |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Total Score | Day 36/38 | -3.7 Score on a scale | Standard Error 2.64 |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Total Score | Day 8/10 | -2.3 Score on a scale | Standard Error 2.01 |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Total Score | Day 2/4 | -0.6 Score on a scale | Standard Error 1.64 |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Total Score | Day 71 | -3.3 Score on a scale | Standard Error 2.31 |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Total Score | Day 57/59 | -3.4 Score on a scale | Standard Error 2.68 |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Total Score | Day 15/17 | -2.2 Score on a scale | Standard Error 2.38 |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Total Score | Day 29 | -3.1 Score on a scale | Standard Error 2.77 |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Total Score | Day 22 | -3.0 Score on a scale | Standard Error 2.62 |
Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version Post Treatment
The HAMD17 was a 17-item clinician-rated instrument used to assess the range of symptoms that were most frequently observed in participants with major depression. All items were scored on an ordinal scale between 0 and 4 (8 items) or 0 and 2 (9 items) of increasing severity. Each of 17 items was rated by clinician with rating of 0: absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe. A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding scores of all 17 items, where 0 indicated no depression and 52 indicated severe depression. Higher score represented more severe condition. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 assessment before study drug infusion. Change from Baseline is defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Through Day 38 for 2 week treatment group and Day 71 and 119 for 4 week treatment groups
Population: Safety Set. Only those participants with HAMD17 response post treatment have been presented.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TID (2-week) | Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version Post Treatment | Day 36/38 | -19.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.07 |
| QHS (2-week) | Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version Post Treatment | Day 36/38 | -7.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.44 |
| QHS (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version Post Treatment | Day 57/59 | -13.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.2 |
| QHS (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version Post Treatment | Day 119 | -20.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.59 |
| QHS (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version Post Treatment | Day 36/38 | -14.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.63 |
| QHS (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version Post Treatment | Day 89 | -14.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.98 |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version Post Treatment | Day 71 | -12.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.45 |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version Post Treatment | Day 36/38 | -12.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.82 |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version Post Treatment | Day 57/59 | -12.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.11 |
Change From Baseline in Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, 6-item Version
The Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory was a 6-item questionnaire designed and validated. It is a reliable and sensitive measure of anxiety. The 6-item version has been shown to have acceptable reliability, producing similar scores as the full 20-item inventory for those with normal and raised levels of anxiety. Participants are prompted to respond to indicate how \[the participant\] feel right now, at this moment, followed by a list of common experiences like I feel calm, I am tense, I feel upset, I am relaxed I feel content and I am worried. Responses range from Not at all (1) to Very much (4), with overall scores ranging from 20-80, where higher scores reflected higher states of anxiety. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 assessment before study drug infusion. Change from Baseline is defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) through Day 119
Population: Safety Set. Only those participants with data available at specified timepoints has been analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TID (2-week) | Change From Baseline in Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, 6-item Version | Day 7 | -11.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 7 |
| TID (2-week) | Change From Baseline in Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, 6-item Version | Day 8/10 | -20.0 Scores on a scale | — |
| TID (2-week) | Change From Baseline in Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, 6-item Version | Day 36/38 | -31.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 2.33 |
| TID (2-week) | Change From Baseline in Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, 6-item Version | Day 2/4 | -11.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 11.81 |
| TID (2-week) | Change From Baseline in Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, 6-item Version | Day 15/17 | -33.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 9.48 |
| QHS (2-week) | Change From Baseline in Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, 6-item Version | Day 7 | -9.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 11.86 |
| QHS (2-week) | Change From Baseline in Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, 6-item Version | Day 2/4 | -6.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 11.77 |
| QHS (2-week) | Change From Baseline in Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, 6-item Version | Day 8/10 | -5.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 11 |
| QHS (2-week) | Change From Baseline in Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, 6-item Version | Day 15/17 | -14.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 13.45 |
| QHS (2-week) | Change From Baseline in Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, 6-item Version | Day 36/38 | -11.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 5.31 |
| QHS (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, 6-item Version | Day 89 | -14.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 18.52 |
| QHS (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, 6-item Version | Day 119 | -16.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 17.45 |
| QHS (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, 6-item Version | Day 2/4 | -1.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 11.45 |
| QHS (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, 6-item Version | Day 8/10 | -11.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 12.4 |
| QHS (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, 6-item Version | Day 15/17 | -14.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 17.58 |
| QHS (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, 6-item Version | Day 29 | -17.13 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 17.94 |
| QHS (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, 6-item Version | Day 36/38 | -20.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 17.62 |
| QHS (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, 6-item Version | Day 57/59 | -16.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 15.52 |
| QHS (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, 6-item Version | Day 22 | -13.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 17.48 |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, 6-item Version | Day 22 | -21.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 19.81 |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, 6-item Version | Day 71 | -19.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 18.75 |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, 6-item Version | Day 29 | -21.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 20.34 |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, 6-item Version | Day 8/10 | -16.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 17.53 |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, 6-item Version | Day 2/4 | -9.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 14.84 |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, 6-item Version | Day 36/38 | -23.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 18.96 |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, 6-item Version | Day 57/59 | -22.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 19.72 |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Change From Baseline in Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, 6-item Version | Day 15/17 | -15.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 19.97 |
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement
The CGI-I scale is a clinician-rated 7-point scale used to assess how much the participant's illness had improved or worsened relative to a Baseline state at the beginning of the intervention. It was rated as: 1. very much improved 2. much improved 3. minimally improved 4. no change 5. minimally worse 6. much worse 7. very much worse. Higher scores indicated worse condition. Only those participants with CGI- improvement have been presented.
Time frame: Baseline through Day 119
Population: Safety Set. Only those participants with data available at specified timepoints has been presented.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| TID (2-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 8/10 - Minimally Improved | 0 Participants |
| TID (2-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 15/17 - Very much Improved | 0 Participants |
| TID (2-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 15/17 - Minimally Improved | 0 Participants |
| TID (2-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 36/38 - Minimally Improved | 0 Participants |
| TID (2-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 2/4 - Much Improved | 0 Participants |
| TID (2-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 2/4 - Minimally Improved | 1 Participants |
| TID (2-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 36/38 - Much Improved | 2 Participants |
| TID (2-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 7 - Very much Improved | 0 Participants |
| TID (2-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 7 - Much Improved | 1 Participants |
| TID (2-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 7 - Minimally Improved | 1 Participants |
| TID (2-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 8/10 - Very much Improved | 0 Participants |
| TID (2-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 8/10 - Much Improved | 1 Participants |
| TID (2-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 15/17 - Much Improved | 2 Participants |
| TID (2-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 36/38 - Very much Improved | 0 Participants |
| QHS (2-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 36/38 - Minimally Improved | 1 Participants |
| QHS (2-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 8/10 - Minimally Improved | 2 Participants |
| QHS (2-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 15/17 - Much Improved | 5 Participants |
| QHS (2-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 15/17 - Minimally Improved | 3 Participants |
| QHS (2-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 7 - Minimally Improved | 2 Participants |
| QHS (2-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 15/17 - Very much Improved | 2 Participants |
| QHS (2-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 8/10 - Much Improved | 5 Participants |
| QHS (2-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 8/10 - Very much Improved | 2 Participants |
| QHS (2-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 7 - Much Improved | 5 Participants |
| QHS (2-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 2/4 - Much Improved | 1 Participants |
| QHS (2-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 7 - Very much Improved | 1 Participants |
| QHS (2-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 36/38 - Much Improved | 3 Participants |
| QHS (2-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 36/38 - Very much Improved | 1 Participants |
| QHS (2-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 2/4 - Minimally Improved | 6 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 119 - Minimally Improved | 3 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 15/17 - Very much Improved | 1 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 2/4 - Much Improved | 1 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 2/4 - Minimally Improved | 4 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 8/10 - Much Improved | 7 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 8/10 - Minimally Improved | 8 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 15/17 - Much Improved | 9 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 15/17 - Minimally Improved | 5 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 22 - Very much Improved | 1 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 22 - Much Improved | 9 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 22 - Minimally Improved | 6 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 29 - Very much Improved | 4 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 29 - Much Improved | 7 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 29 - Minimally Improved | 8 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 36/38 - Very much Improved | 8 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 36/38 - Much Improved | 4 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 36/38 - Minimally Improved | 7 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 57/59 - Very Much Improved | 4 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 57/59 - Much Improved | 9 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 57/59 - Minimally Improved | 2 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 89 - Very much Improved | 6 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 89 - Much Improved | 4 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 89 - Minimally Improved | 6 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 119 - Very Much Improved | 5 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 119 - Much Improved | 3 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 36/38 - Very much Improved | 12 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 2/4 - Minimally Improved | 15 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 2/4 - Much Improved | 4 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 57/59 - Minimally Improved | 7 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 36/38 - Much Improved | 10 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 15/17 - Minimally Improved | 9 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 15/17 - Much Improved | 15 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 8/10 - Minimally Improved | 11 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 15/17 - Very much Improved | 6 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 71 - Very Much Improved | 8 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 22 - Very much Improved | 7 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 36/38 - Minimally Improved | 10 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 22 - Much Improved | 16 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 71 - Much Improved | 14 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 22 - Minimally Improved | 6 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 57/59 - Very Much Improved | 9 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 29 - Very much Improved | 11 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 71 - Minimally Improved | 6 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 29 - Much Improved | 16 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 57/59 - Much Improved | 14 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 29 - Minimally Improved | 5 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 8/10 - Much Improved | 14 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 8/10 - Very much Improved | 3 Participants |
| Unknown | Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement | Day 2/4 - Very much Improved | — Participants |
Number of Participants With Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Remission
Remission was defined as an observed total score of 0 to 7. The HAMD-17 is a 17-item assessment used to assess the severity of depression and its improvement during the course of therapy. Each item was evaluated and scored using either a 5-point scale of 0 (not present/absent) to 4 (very severe) or a 3-point scale of 0 (not present/absent) to 2 (marked). Items rated on the 3-point scale include: insomnia early, middle, late; somatic symptoms gastrointestinal and general; genital symptoms; loss of weight; insight. Items rated on 5-point scale include: depressed mood; feelings of guilt; suicide; work and activities; retardation; agitation; anxiety psychic and somatic; hypochondriasis. The total score was the sum of the scores from HAMD-17 Items 1 through 17 and ranged from 0 (not at all depressed) to 52 (severely depressed). Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. Number of participants with HAMD-17 remission has been presented.
Time frame: Day 8/10 (all treatment arms), Day 15/17 (all treatment arms), Day 22 and 29 (QHS & 1125mg), Day 36/38 (all treatment arms), Day 57/59 (QHS & 1125mg), Day 71 (1125mg), Day 89 & 119 (QHS)
Population: Safety Set. Only those participants with data available at specified timepoints have been presented.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| TID (2-week) | Number of Participants With Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Remission | Day 36/38 - Remission | 1 Participants |
| TID (2-week) | Number of Participants With Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Remission | Day 8/10 - Remission | 0 Participants |
| TID (2-week) | Number of Participants With Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Remission | Day 15/17 - Remission | 0 Participants |
| QHS (2-week) | Number of Participants With Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Remission | Day 8/10 - Remission | 1 Participants |
| QHS (2-week) | Number of Participants With Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Remission | Day 15/17 - Remission | 2 Participants |
| QHS (2-week) | Number of Participants With Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Remission | Day 36/38 - Remission | 1 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Remission | Day 119 - Remission | 8 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Remission | Day 22 - Remission | 3 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Remission | Day 29 - Remission | 7 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Remission | Day 36/38 - Remission | 9 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Remission | Day 15/17 - Remission | 4 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Remission | Day 57/59 - Remission | 5 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Remission | Day 89 - Remission | 7 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Remission | Day 8/10 - Remission | 1 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Remission | Day 57/59 - Remission | 12 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Remission | Day 22 - Remission | 10 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Remission | Day 36/38 - Remission | 11 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Remission | Day 8/10 - Remission | 8 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Remission | Day 71 - Remission | 9 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Remission | Day 15/17 - Remission | 8 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Remission | Day 29 - Remission | 14 Participants |
Number of Participants With Response to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 Item (HAMD17)
HAMD17 Response was defined as ≥50% reduction from Baseline in total score. The HAMD-17 is a 17-item assessment used to assess the severity of depression and its improvement during the course of therapy. Each item was evaluated and scored using either a 5-point scale of 0 (not present/absent) to 4 (very severe) or a 3-point scale of 0 (not present/absent) to 2 (marked). Items rated on the 3-point scale include: insomnia early, middle, late; somatic symptoms gastrointestinal and general; genital symptoms; loss of weight; insight. Items rated on 5-point scale include: depressed mood; feelings of guilt; suicide; work and activities; retardation; agitation; anxiety psychic and somatic; hypochondriasis. The total score was the sum of the scores from HAMD-17 Items 1 through 17 and ranged from 0 (not at all depressed) to 52 (severely depressed). Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. Number of participants with response to HAMD-17 has been presented.
Time frame: Day 2 (all treatment groups), Day 7 (TID & QHS), Day 8/10 (all treatment groups), Day 15/17 (all treatment groups), Day 22 and 29 (QHS, 1125mg), Day 36/38 (all treatment groups), Day 57/59 (QHS, 1125mg), Day 71 (1125mg), Day 89 (QHS), Day 119 (QHS)
Population: Safety Set. Only those participants with data available at specified timepoints have been presented.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| TID (2-week) | Number of Participants With Response to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 Item (HAMD17) | Day 7 - Response | 1 Participants |
| TID (2-week) | Number of Participants With Response to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 Item (HAMD17) | Day 2/4 - Response | 0 Participants |
| TID (2-week) | Number of Participants With Response to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 Item (HAMD17) | Day 8/10 - Response | 0 Participants |
| TID (2-week) | Number of Participants With Response to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 Item (HAMD17) | Day 36/38 - Response | 2 Participants |
| TID (2-week) | Number of Participants With Response to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 Item (HAMD17) | Day 15/17 - Response | 1 Participants |
| QHS (2-week) | Number of Participants With Response to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 Item (HAMD17) | Day 2/4 - Response | 2 Participants |
| QHS (2-week) | Number of Participants With Response to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 Item (HAMD17) | Day 15/17 - Response | 4 Participants |
| QHS (2-week) | Number of Participants With Response to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 Item (HAMD17) | Day 7 - Response | 4 Participants |
| QHS (2-week) | Number of Participants With Response to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 Item (HAMD17) | Day 8/10 - Response | 4 Participants |
| QHS (2-week) | Number of Participants With Response to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 Item (HAMD17) | Day 36/38 - Response | 3 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Response to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 Item (HAMD17) | Day 119 - Response | 10 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Response to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 Item (HAMD17) | Day 2/4 - Response | 0 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Response to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 Item (HAMD17) | Day 8/10 - Response | 7 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Response to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 Item (HAMD17) | Day 15/17 - Response | 7 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Response to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 Item (HAMD17) | Day 22 - Response | 8 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Response to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 Item (HAMD17) | Day 29 - Response | 10 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Response to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 Item (HAMD17) | Day 36/38 - Response | 12 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Response to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 Item (HAMD17) | Day 57/59 - Response | 8 Participants |
| QHS (4-week) | Number of Participants With Response to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 Item (HAMD17) | Day 89 - Response | 9 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Response to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 Item (HAMD17) | Day 8/10 - Response | 12 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Response to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 Item (HAMD17) | Day 71 - Response | 13 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Response to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 Item (HAMD17) | Day 36/38 - Response | 17 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Response to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 Item (HAMD17) | Day 2/4 - Response | 3 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Response to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 Item (HAMD17) | Day 22 - Response | 20 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Response to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 Item (HAMD17) | Day 57/59 - Response | 18 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Response to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 Item (HAMD17) | Day 29 - Response | 22 Participants |
| 1125 mg (4-week) | Number of Participants With Response to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 Item (HAMD17) | Day 15/17 - Response | 16 Participants |