Skip to content

Rhenium-188-HEDP vs. Radium-223-chloride in Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer Refractory to Hormonal Therapy

Repeated Rhenium-188-HEDP Versus Radium-223-chloride in Patients With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: The RaRe Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03458559
Acronym
RaRe
Enrollment
402
Registered
2018-03-08
Start date
2018-05-16
Completion date
2024-05-16
Last updated
2020-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer Metastatic to Bone

Keywords

Bone metastases, Rhenium-188-HEDP, Radium 223-chloride, Survival, Prostate cancer

Brief summary

Radium-223 chloride is an alpha-emitting radiopharmaceutical with proven survival benefit in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer metastatic to bone. Beta-emitting radiopharmaceuticals have proven efficacy for palliating malignant bone pain. Nowadays, rhenium-188-HEDP is used in clinical practice for pain relief and palliative care. Several studies suggest that also rhenium-188-HEDP has the potential to improve overall survival. The purpose of this study is to investigate if treatment with rhenium-188-HEDP results in improvement of overall survival compared to treatment with radium-223-chloride.

Detailed description

The main objective of this trial is to compare rhenium-188-HEDP (a beta-emitting radiopharmaceutical) with radium-223-chloride (an alfa-emitting radiopharmaceutical), in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer metastatic to bone, with overall survival as primary endpoint. For radium-223-chloride, an overall survival benefit has been proven in a large randomized phase III trial. Although such a trial has never been performed for rhenium-188-HEDP, some trials in literature suggest a survival benefit for rhenium as well. Rhenium has some advantages compared to radium. Firstly, it is easily available as it can be produced in the hospital. Secondly, the costs of rhenium are significantly lower compared to radium. Lastly, rhenium seems to have a favorable pain response. However, no randomized trials have been performed to confirm this.

Interventions

DRUGRadium-223 chloride

Intravenously 50 kBq/kg every 4 weeks. Total: 6 administrations

Intravenously 40 MBq/kg every 8 weeks. Total: 3 administrations

Sponsors

Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Patients will be randomized between * radium-223-chloride intravenously, for a total of 6 administrations (every 4weeks) * rhenium-188-HEDP intravenously for a total of 3 administratrions (every 8 weeks)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male, 18 years or older * Histologically confirmed prostate cancer * Bone metastases (≥ 6 lesions) showing pathological uptake at bone scintigraphy. * WHO performance status of ≤2 * Life expectancy of at least 6 months * Castration-resistant disease: serum testosterone level of ≤ 1.7 nmol per liter (≤50 ng per deciliter) after bilateral orchiectomy or during maintenance treatment consisting of androgen-ablation therapy with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist. During study treatment the maintenance androgen-deprivation therapy must be continued. * Baseline PSA ≥5 ng/ml with evidence of progressively increasing PSA values * Symptomatic disease with either regular use of analgesic medication or treatment with external-beam radiotherapy for cancer-related bone pain within the previous 12 weeks. * Progression on or after treatment with docetaxel, or inability to receive docetaxel. * Adequate renal function (serum creatinine level ≤1.5 x ULN) * Adequate hematological function defined as absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1.5x10\^9/L and platelet count ≥100x 10\^9/L) * Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Treatment with chemotherapy within the previous 4 weeks * Continuation of treatment with abiraterone or enzalutamide * Previous hemibody external radiotherapy * Systemic radiotherapy with radioisotopes within the previous 24 weeks * Malignant lymphadenopathy ≥3cm in the short-axis diameter * Presence of visceral metastases * Imminent of established spinal cord compression * Active uncontrolled bacterial, viral or fungal infection * History of another malignancy within the last five years except adequately treated basal cell carcinoma of the skin * Organ allografts requiring immunosuppressive therapy. * Any serious uncontrolled concommitant disease * Any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule: those conditions should be discussed with the patient before registration in the trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall survivalTime from randomization until death due to any cause, an average of 18 monthsTime from randomization until death due to any cause,

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of lifeAssessed through study completion, an average of 1 yearMeasured by the EORTC quality of Life Questionnaire C30
Effect on painAssessed through study completion, an average of 1 yearMeasured with a visual analogue scale
Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (IVER)Assessed through study completion, an average of 1 yearRatio between the difference in costs and the difference in benefits (quality of life of treatment with rhenium-188-HEDP of radium-223-chloride)
Time to first SRETime from randomization to the date of first skeletal related events, an average of 12 monthsTime from randomization to the date of first skeletal related events
Time to total-ALP progressionTime from randomization to the date of earliest objective evidence of ALP progression, an average of 8 months (ALP measure at baseline and every 4 weeks)Time from randomization to the date of earliest objective evidence of ALP progression.
Clinical progressionTime from randomization to the date of first clinical progression, an average of 12 monthsTime from randomization to the date of first clinical progression.
Time to PSA progressionTime from randomization to the date of a minimum of rising PSA levels, an average of 8 months (PSA measured at baseline and every 4 weeks).Time from randomization to the date of a minimum of rising PSA levels with an interval of \>1week between each determination

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026